Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis

ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to memb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ding, Xiaoli, Liu, Zhiguang, Hua, Mingming, Kang, Te, Li, Xu, Zhang, Yuzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 39
container_start_page np
container_title Journal of applied polymer science
container_volume 133
creator Ding, Xiaoli
Liu, Zhiguang
Hua, Mingming
Kang, Te
Li, Xu
Zhang, Yuzhong
description ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/app.43941
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835555729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835555729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhq2qSN1CD_0HkXqBQ8COP2IfEW13kVbLHqiWm4mdSRtw4tTOCvLvMaT0gMRIo5nRPO9o9CL0leBTgnFxVg3DKaOKkQ9oQbAqcyYK-REt0o7kUin-CX2O8Q5jQjgWC3S79W46hvHP5KCH7LebrHcnmQ0-Rtf291Bnce8a31djaocEzyNk1neDj-0IWQedCVUPMWt8eM6HKtSZj11axyN00FQuwpd_9RD9-vnj-mKVr6-Wlxfn69yykpDcSFUzTo2C0pS1slwKAlQV1hhZCFpTAZRJYWsuCiqMpYZwMIyrhlZMKkYP0fF8dwj-7x7iqLs2WnAuPeb3URNJeYqyUAn99ga98_vQp-8ShZkkTJQiUScz9eJFgEYPoe2qMGmC9bPXOnmtX7xO7NnMPrQOpvdBfb7dviryWdHGER7_K6pwr0VJS653m6Xe4c3y-2q30Tf0CcItkKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1804814676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.43941</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPNAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>coatings ; Contact angle ; Crosslinking ; Glycols ; Hydrophilicity ; Materials science ; Membranes ; Osmosis ; Polymers ; Polysulfone resins ; Rejection</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.43941$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.43941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Polym. Sci</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</description><subject>coatings</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Crosslinking</subject><subject>Glycols</subject><subject>Hydrophilicity</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Osmosis</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polysulfone resins</subject><subject>Rejection</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhq2qSN1CD_0HkXqBQ8COP2IfEW13kVbLHqiWm4mdSRtw4tTOCvLvMaT0gMRIo5nRPO9o9CL0leBTgnFxVg3DKaOKkQ9oQbAqcyYK-REt0o7kUin-CX2O8Q5jQjgWC3S79W46hvHP5KCH7LebrHcnmQ0-Rtf291Bnce8a31djaocEzyNk1neDj-0IWQedCVUPMWt8eM6HKtSZj11axyN00FQuwpd_9RD9-vnj-mKVr6-Wlxfn69yykpDcSFUzTo2C0pS1slwKAlQV1hhZCFpTAZRJYWsuCiqMpYZwMIyrhlZMKkYP0fF8dwj-7x7iqLs2WnAuPeb3URNJeYqyUAn99ga98_vQp-8ShZkkTJQiUScz9eJFgEYPoe2qMGmC9bPXOnmtX7xO7NnMPrQOpvdBfb7dviryWdHGER7_K6pwr0VJS653m6Xe4c3y-2q30Tf0CcItkKc</recordid><startdate>20161015</startdate><enddate>20161015</enddate><creator>Ding, Xiaoli</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiguang</creator><creator>Hua, Mingming</creator><creator>Kang, Te</creator><creator>Li, Xu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuzhong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161015</creationdate><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><author>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>coatings</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Crosslinking</topic><topic>Glycols</topic><topic>Hydrophilicity</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Osmosis</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polysulfone resins</topic><topic>Rejection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Xiaoli</au><au>Liu, Zhiguang</au><au>Hua, Mingming</au><au>Kang, Te</au><au>Li, Xu</au><au>Zhang, Yuzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Appl. Polym. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-10-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><coden>JAPNAB</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/app.43941</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8995
ispartof Journal of applied polymer science, 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a
issn 0021-8995
1097-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835555729
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects coatings
Contact angle
Crosslinking
Glycols
Hydrophilicity
Materials science
Membranes
Osmosis
Polymers
Polysulfone resins
Rejection
title Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A23%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poly(ethylene%20glycol)%20crosslinked%20sulfonated%20polysulfone%20composite%20membranes%20for%20forward%20osmosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Ding,%20Xiaoli&rft.date=2016-10-15&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft.coden=JAPNAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.43941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835555729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1804814676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true