Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis
ABSTRACT Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to memb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied polymer science 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 39 |
container_start_page | np |
container_title | Journal of applied polymer science |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Ding, Xiaoli Liu, Zhiguang Hua, Mingming Kang, Te Li, Xu Zhang, Yuzhong |
description | ABSTRACT
Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/app.43941 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835555729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835555729</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhq2qSN1CD_0HkXqBQ8COP2IfEW13kVbLHqiWm4mdSRtw4tTOCvLvMaT0gMRIo5nRPO9o9CL0leBTgnFxVg3DKaOKkQ9oQbAqcyYK-REt0o7kUin-CX2O8Q5jQjgWC3S79W46hvHP5KCH7LebrHcnmQ0-Rtf291Bnce8a31djaocEzyNk1neDj-0IWQedCVUPMWt8eM6HKtSZj11axyN00FQuwpd_9RD9-vnj-mKVr6-Wlxfn69yykpDcSFUzTo2C0pS1slwKAlQV1hhZCFpTAZRJYWsuCiqMpYZwMIyrhlZMKkYP0fF8dwj-7x7iqLs2WnAuPeb3URNJeYqyUAn99ga98_vQp-8ShZkkTJQiUScz9eJFgEYPoe2qMGmC9bPXOnmtX7xO7NnMPrQOpvdBfb7dviryWdHGER7_K6pwr0VJS653m6Xe4c3y-2q30Tf0CcItkKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1804814676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.43941</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPNAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>coatings ; Contact angle ; Crosslinking ; Glycols ; Hydrophilicity ; Materials science ; Membranes ; Osmosis ; Polymers ; Polysulfone resins ; Rejection</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.43941$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.43941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Polym. Sci</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</description><subject>coatings</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Crosslinking</subject><subject>Glycols</subject><subject>Hydrophilicity</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Osmosis</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polysulfone resins</subject><subject>Rejection</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1P3DAQhq2qSN1CD_0HkXqBQ8COP2IfEW13kVbLHqiWm4mdSRtw4tTOCvLvMaT0gMRIo5nRPO9o9CL0leBTgnFxVg3DKaOKkQ9oQbAqcyYK-REt0o7kUin-CX2O8Q5jQjgWC3S79W46hvHP5KCH7LebrHcnmQ0-Rtf291Bnce8a31djaocEzyNk1neDj-0IWQedCVUPMWt8eM6HKtSZj11axyN00FQuwpd_9RD9-vnj-mKVr6-Wlxfn69yykpDcSFUzTo2C0pS1slwKAlQV1hhZCFpTAZRJYWsuCiqMpYZwMIyrhlZMKkYP0fF8dwj-7x7iqLs2WnAuPeb3URNJeYqyUAn99ga98_vQp-8ShZkkTJQiUScz9eJFgEYPoe2qMGmC9bPXOnmtX7xO7NnMPrQOpvdBfb7dviryWdHGER7_K6pwr0VJS653m6Xe4c3y-2q30Tf0CcItkKc</recordid><startdate>20161015</startdate><enddate>20161015</enddate><creator>Ding, Xiaoli</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiguang</creator><creator>Hua, Mingming</creator><creator>Kang, Te</creator><creator>Li, Xu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuzhong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161015</creationdate><title>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</title><author>Ding, Xiaoli ; Liu, Zhiguang ; Hua, Mingming ; Kang, Te ; Li, Xu ; Zhang, Yuzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-b89d453b9e7b7d9c5861e392cbb8263d36e3486cd56236bc3b15eb459f3a48943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>coatings</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Crosslinking</topic><topic>Glycols</topic><topic>Hydrophilicity</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Osmosis</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polysulfone resins</topic><topic>Rejection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Xiaoli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Mingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Xiaoli</au><au>Liu, Zhiguang</au><au>Hua, Mingming</au><au>Kang, Te</au><au>Li, Xu</au><au>Zhang, Yuzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Appl. Polym. Sci</addtitle><date>2016-10-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><coden>JAPNAB</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Forward osmosis (FO) membranes were prepared by a coating method with poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) as a selective layer. The poly(ether sulfone)/SPSf substrate was prepared by phase inversion. The composite membranes were characterized with respect to membrane chemistry (by attenuated total reflectance/Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy), hydrophilicity (by static contact angle measurement), and surface morphology (by scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy). The FO performance was also characterized. The effects of the crosslinker concentration on the hydrophilicity and FO performance were investigated. The crosslinked membrane exhibited a high hydrophilicity with a lowest contact angle of 15.5°. Under FO tests, the membranes achieved a higher water flux of 15.2 L m−2 h−1 when used against deionized water as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl) solution as the the draw solution. The membranes achieved a magnesium sulfate rejection of 96% and an NaCl rejection of 55% when used against a 1 g/L inorganic salt solution as the feed solution and a 2 mol/L glucose solution as the draw solution. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43941.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/app.43941</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8995 |
ispartof | Journal of applied polymer science, 2016-10, Vol.133 (39), p.np-n/a |
issn | 0021-8995 1097-4628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835555729 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | coatings Contact angle Crosslinking Glycols Hydrophilicity Materials science Membranes Osmosis Polymers Polysulfone resins Rejection |
title | Poly(ethylene glycol) crosslinked sulfonated polysulfone composite membranes for forward osmosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A23%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poly(ethylene%20glycol)%20crosslinked%20sulfonated%20polysulfone%20composite%20membranes%20for%20forward%20osmosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Ding,%20Xiaoli&rft.date=2016-10-15&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft.coden=JAPNAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.43941&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835555729%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1804814676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |