Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves

Background: A high rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves has been reported in dental students and staff members. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in glove use from high-protein/powdered to low-protein/powder-free latex g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2002-01, Vol.109 (1), p.131-135
Hauptverfasser: Saary, M.Joan, Kanani, Amin, Alghadeer, Hend, Holness, D.Linn, Tarlo, Susan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
container_volume 109
creator Saary, M.Joan
Kanani, Amin
Alghadeer, Hend
Holness, D.Linn
Tarlo, Susan M.
description Background: A high rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves has been reported in dental students and staff members. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in glove use from high-protein/powdered to low-protein/powder-free latex gloves at a previously surveyed dental school reduced the prevalence of NRL sensitivity among students and staff members. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed through use of a questionnaire and skin prick testing to low ammoniated NRL extract; the method was similar to that used in a study conducted in 1995. Analyses were performed on the entire groups as well as on a subset of senior students. Results: A total of 97 subjects (61 students and 36 staff members) completed the questionnaire and underwent skin prick testing; this compared with 131 subjects in 1995. Percentages of subjects reporting asthma symptoms, rhinitis or conjunctivitis, urticaria, or pruritis within minutes of NRL exposure were 4%, 7%, 6%, and 8%, respectively; the corresponding percentages in the 1995 survey were 7% (P = not significant), 13% (P = not significant), 20% (P = .004), and 22% (P = .005). Results were similar for the subset of senior students, but in addition there were also significantly fewer complaints of rhinoconjunctivitis in 2000 than in 1995 (0% and 12%, respectively; P = .007). Of 97 subjects who underwent skin prick testing, 3 (3%) had positive skin prick test responses of 2+ or greater to NRL; this compared with 13 (10%) of 131 subjects in 1995 (P = .03). There were 3 positive skin test responses among staff members in 2000; there were none among students. Conclusions: Our results suggest a preventive effect on NRL allergy in dental students from the change to low-protein/powder-free NRL gloves in the dental school. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:131-5.)
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mai.2002.120557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18355455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091674902343148</els_id><sourcerecordid>3239553291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4e50e95d60a9ce99014ac558475a1232fe034d5dd83652abc99b5f170ef1a57f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpaLZJz70VQWlv3ki2x7KOZekXBHpJzkKWRxsFW0oleUmO_c-rxQsLhZ5G8_jNm0GPkPecbTnrxM2s3bZmrN7ymgGIV2TDmRRV19fwmmwYk7zqRCsvyduUHlnpm16-IZecCykbITfkz-5B-z0m6jyNOpdHsNTrvEQ90bgMA0Y6Ff2ZJvTJZXdw-YXqOfg9HdHnQiXzEEIpeTkKiWo_lkZbS2ecy3xRbC425rxpddxP4YDpmlxYPSV8d6pX5P7b17vdj-r21_efuy-3lWlFk6sWgaGEsWNaGpSS8VYbgL4VoHnd1BZZ044wjn3TQa0HI-UAlguGlmsQtrkin1ffpxh-L5iyml0yOE3aY1iS4n0D0AIU8OM_4GNYoi-3KQ6sLf4SeKFuVsrEkFJEq56im3V8UZypYzaqZKOO2ag1mzLx4eS7DDOOZ_4URgE-nQCdjJ5s1N64dOaatpM99IWTK4fluw4Oo0rGoTc4uogmqzG4_x7xF4cIq58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504836951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Saary, M.Joan ; Kanani, Amin ; Alghadeer, Hend ; Holness, D.Linn ; Tarlo, Susan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saary, M.Joan ; Kanani, Amin ; Alghadeer, Hend ; Holness, D.Linn ; Tarlo, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: A high rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves has been reported in dental students and staff members. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in glove use from high-protein/powdered to low-protein/powder-free latex gloves at a previously surveyed dental school reduced the prevalence of NRL sensitivity among students and staff members. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed through use of a questionnaire and skin prick testing to low ammoniated NRL extract; the method was similar to that used in a study conducted in 1995. Analyses were performed on the entire groups as well as on a subset of senior students. Results: A total of 97 subjects (61 students and 36 staff members) completed the questionnaire and underwent skin prick testing; this compared with 131 subjects in 1995. Percentages of subjects reporting asthma symptoms, rhinitis or conjunctivitis, urticaria, or pruritis within minutes of NRL exposure were 4%, 7%, 6%, and 8%, respectively; the corresponding percentages in the 1995 survey were 7% (P = not significant), 13% (P = not significant), 20% (P = .004), and 22% (P = .005). Results were similar for the subset of senior students, but in addition there were also significantly fewer complaints of rhinoconjunctivitis in 2000 than in 1995 (0% and 12%, respectively; P = .007). Of 97 subjects who underwent skin prick testing, 3 (3%) had positive skin prick test responses of 2+ or greater to NRL; this compared with 13 (10%) of 131 subjects in 1995 (P = .03). There were 3 positive skin test responses among staff members in 2000; there were none among students. Conclusions: Our results suggest a preventive effect on NRL allergy in dental students from the change to low-protein/powder-free NRL gloves in the dental school. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:131-5.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mai.2002.120557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11799379</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACIBY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergic diseases ; Allergies ; Asthma ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dental Staff ; Dentistry ; Eczema ; Female ; Gloves ; Hay fever ; Humans ; Immunopathology ; Latex allergy ; Latex Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; occupational rhinitis ; Other localizations ; Proteins ; Questionnaires ; Skin Tests ; Students ; Students, Dental ; urticaria</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002-01, Vol.109 (1), p.131-135</ispartof><rights>2002 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4e50e95d60a9ce99014ac558475a1232fe034d5dd83652abc99b5f170ef1a57f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4e50e95d60a9ce99014ac558475a1232fe034d5dd83652abc99b5f170ef1a57f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.120557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,4010,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13469858$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11799379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saary, M.Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanani, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alghadeer, Hend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holness, D.Linn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlo, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>Background: A high rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves has been reported in dental students and staff members. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in glove use from high-protein/powdered to low-protein/powder-free latex gloves at a previously surveyed dental school reduced the prevalence of NRL sensitivity among students and staff members. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed through use of a questionnaire and skin prick testing to low ammoniated NRL extract; the method was similar to that used in a study conducted in 1995. Analyses were performed on the entire groups as well as on a subset of senior students. Results: A total of 97 subjects (61 students and 36 staff members) completed the questionnaire and underwent skin prick testing; this compared with 131 subjects in 1995. Percentages of subjects reporting asthma symptoms, rhinitis or conjunctivitis, urticaria, or pruritis within minutes of NRL exposure were 4%, 7%, 6%, and 8%, respectively; the corresponding percentages in the 1995 survey were 7% (P = not significant), 13% (P = not significant), 20% (P = .004), and 22% (P = .005). Results were similar for the subset of senior students, but in addition there were also significantly fewer complaints of rhinoconjunctivitis in 2000 than in 1995 (0% and 12%, respectively; P = .007). Of 97 subjects who underwent skin prick testing, 3 (3%) had positive skin prick test responses of 2+ or greater to NRL; this compared with 13 (10%) of 131 subjects in 1995 (P = .03). There were 3 positive skin test responses among staff members in 2000; there were none among students. Conclusions: Our results suggest a preventive effect on NRL allergy in dental students from the change to low-protein/powder-free NRL gloves in the dental school. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:131-5.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergic diseases</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dental Staff</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gloves</subject><subject>Hay fever</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunopathology</subject><subject>Latex allergy</subject><subject>Latex Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>occupational rhinitis</subject><subject>Other localizations</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Skin Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Dental</subject><subject>urticaria</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxUVpaLZJz70VQWlv3ki2x7KOZekXBHpJzkKWRxsFW0oleUmO_c-rxQsLhZ5G8_jNm0GPkPecbTnrxM2s3bZmrN7ymgGIV2TDmRRV19fwmmwYk7zqRCsvyduUHlnpm16-IZecCykbITfkz-5B-z0m6jyNOpdHsNTrvEQ90bgMA0Y6Ff2ZJvTJZXdw-YXqOfg9HdHnQiXzEEIpeTkKiWo_lkZbS2ecy3xRbC425rxpddxP4YDpmlxYPSV8d6pX5P7b17vdj-r21_efuy-3lWlFk6sWgaGEsWNaGpSS8VYbgL4VoHnd1BZZ044wjn3TQa0HI-UAlguGlmsQtrkin1ffpxh-L5iyml0yOE3aY1iS4n0D0AIU8OM_4GNYoi-3KQ6sLf4SeKFuVsrEkFJEq56im3V8UZypYzaqZKOO2ag1mzLx4eS7DDOOZ_4URgE-nQCdjJ5s1N64dOaatpM99IWTK4fluw4Oo0rGoTc4uogmqzG4_x7xF4cIq58</recordid><startdate>200201</startdate><enddate>200201</enddate><creator>Saary, M.Joan</creator><creator>Kanani, Amin</creator><creator>Alghadeer, Hend</creator><creator>Holness, D.Linn</creator><creator>Tarlo, Susan M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200201</creationdate><title>Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves</title><author>Saary, M.Joan ; Kanani, Amin ; Alghadeer, Hend ; Holness, D.Linn ; Tarlo, Susan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-4e50e95d60a9ce99014ac558475a1232fe034d5dd83652abc99b5f170ef1a57f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergic diseases</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dental Staff</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gloves</topic><topic>Hay fever</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunopathology</topic><topic>Latex allergy</topic><topic>Latex Hypersensitivity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>occupational rhinitis</topic><topic>Other localizations</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Skin Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Dental</topic><topic>urticaria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saary, M.Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanani, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alghadeer, Hend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holness, D.Linn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarlo, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saary, M.Joan</au><au>Kanani, Amin</au><au>Alghadeer, Hend</au><au>Holness, D.Linn</au><au>Tarlo, Susan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2002-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>131-135</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><coden>JACIBY</coden><abstract>Background: A high rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves has been reported in dental students and staff members. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in glove use from high-protein/powdered to low-protein/powder-free latex gloves at a previously surveyed dental school reduced the prevalence of NRL sensitivity among students and staff members. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed through use of a questionnaire and skin prick testing to low ammoniated NRL extract; the method was similar to that used in a study conducted in 1995. Analyses were performed on the entire groups as well as on a subset of senior students. Results: A total of 97 subjects (61 students and 36 staff members) completed the questionnaire and underwent skin prick testing; this compared with 131 subjects in 1995. Percentages of subjects reporting asthma symptoms, rhinitis or conjunctivitis, urticaria, or pruritis within minutes of NRL exposure were 4%, 7%, 6%, and 8%, respectively; the corresponding percentages in the 1995 survey were 7% (P = not significant), 13% (P = not significant), 20% (P = .004), and 22% (P = .005). Results were similar for the subset of senior students, but in addition there were also significantly fewer complaints of rhinoconjunctivitis in 2000 than in 1995 (0% and 12%, respectively; P = .007). Of 97 subjects who underwent skin prick testing, 3 (3%) had positive skin prick test responses of 2+ or greater to NRL; this compared with 13 (10%) of 131 subjects in 1995 (P = .03). There were 3 positive skin test responses among staff members in 2000; there were none among students. Conclusions: Our results suggest a preventive effect on NRL allergy in dental students from the change to low-protein/powder-free NRL gloves in the dental school. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:131-5.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>11799379</pmid><doi>10.1067/mai.2002.120557</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6749
ispartof Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2002-01, Vol.109 (1), p.131-135
issn 0091-6749
1097-6825
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18355455
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Allergic diseases
Allergies
Asthma
Biological and medical sciences
Colleges & universities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dental Staff
Dentistry
Eczema
Female
Gloves
Hay fever
Humans
Immunopathology
Latex allergy
Latex Hypersensitivity - prevention & control
Male
Medical sciences
Occupational Diseases - prevention & control
occupational rhinitis
Other localizations
Proteins
Questionnaires
Skin Tests
Students
Students, Dental
urticaria
title Changes in rates of natural rubber latex sensitivity among dental school students and staff members after changes in latex gloves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A19%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20in%20rates%20of%20natural%20rubber%20latex%20sensitivity%20among%20dental%20school%20students%20and%20staff%20members%20after%20changes%20in%20latex%20gloves&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=Saary,%20M.Joan&rft.date=2002-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=131-135&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft.coden=JACIBY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mai.2002.120557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3239553291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504836951&rft_id=info:pmid/11799379&rft_els_id=S0091674902343148&rfr_iscdi=true