Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To provide a systematic review of recently published reports and carry out a meta-analysis on the use of radiolabeled choline PET/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatments. Bibliograph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear medicine communications 2016-12, Vol.37 (12), p.1223-1231
Hauptverfasser: Evangelista, Laura, Zattoni, Fabio, Karnes, Robert J, Novara, Giacomo, Lowe, Val
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1231
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1223
container_title Nuclear medicine communications
container_volume 37
creator Evangelista, Laura
Zattoni, Fabio
Karnes, Robert J
Novara, Giacomo
Lowe, Val
description To provide a systematic review of recently published reports and carry out a meta-analysis on the use of radiolabeled choline PET/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatments. Bibliographic database searches, from 2005 to May 2015, including Pubmed, Web of Science, and TripDatabase, were performed to find studies that included only patients who underwent sLND after radiolabeled choline PET/CT alone or in combination with other imaging modalities. For the qualitative assessment, all studies including the selected population were considered. Conversely, for the quantitative assessment, articles were included only if absolute numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative test results were available or derivable from the text for lymph node metastases. Reviews, clinical reports, and editorial articles were excluded from analyses. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were assessed qualitatively. A total of 750 patients underwent radiolabeled choline (such as C-choline or F-choline) PET/CT before sLND. A quantitative evaluation was performed in nine studies. A patient-based, a lesion-based, and a site-based analysis was carried out in nine, four, and five studies, respectively. The pooled sensitivities were 85.3% [95% confidence interval (CI)78.5–90.3%], 56.2% (95% CI41.6–69.7%), 75.3% (95% CI56.6–87.7%), and 63.7% (95% CI41–81.6%), respectively, for patient-based, lesion-based, pelvic site-based, and retroperitoneal site-based analysis. The pooled positive predictive values (PPVs) were 75% (95% CI68–80.9%), 85.8% (95% CI66.8–94.8%), 81.2% (95% CI70.1–88.9%), and 75.2% (95% CI58.7–86.7%), respectively, in the same analyses. High heterogeneities among the studies were found for sensitivities and PPVs ranging between 61.7–93.3% and 60.6–94.5%, respectively. Radiolabeled choline PET/CT has only a moderate sensitivity for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients who are candidates for sLND, although the pooled PPVs ranged between 75 and 85.8% for all type of subanalyses. The presence of high heterogeneity among the studies should be considered carefully.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000582
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835529209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835529209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-ab7cd0ae87307f9c56b9429653950a5e6485bece0741eee6a6cfe02bf50cea963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbFiWMnYYeq8pDKQ6iso4kzoQYnLnZClb8nVQEhFsxmZnHujOYQchKySciy5Pzu_m7CfpdIox0yDuOEB0JG6S4ZszDmAZdcjsiB968Dk3KZ7JNRlAgRplyMiXmCUlsDBRosqVpaoxukj7PF-XRBC6ysQ-rBfMALUtPXqyWU2KBqbd3TUns_jNo2FxSo732LNbRaUYcfGtcUmpLW2EIADZjea39E9iowHo-_-iF5vpotpjfB_OH6dno5DxRnIgqgSFTJANOEs6TKlJBFFkeZFDwTDATKOBUFKmRJHCKiBKkqZFFRCaYQMskPydl278rZ9w59m9faKzQGGrSdzzeviyiLWDag8RZVznrvsMpXTtfg-jxk-cZzPnjO_3oeYqdfF7qixvIn9C12ANItsLamReffTLdGly8RTLv8f_cn1WqLGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835529209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Evangelista, Laura ; Zattoni, Fabio ; Karnes, Robert J ; Novara, Giacomo ; Lowe, Val</creator><creatorcontrib>Evangelista, Laura ; Zattoni, Fabio ; Karnes, Robert J ; Novara, Giacomo ; Lowe, Val</creatorcontrib><description>To provide a systematic review of recently published reports and carry out a meta-analysis on the use of radiolabeled choline PET/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatments. Bibliographic database searches, from 2005 to May 2015, including Pubmed, Web of Science, and TripDatabase, were performed to find studies that included only patients who underwent sLND after radiolabeled choline PET/CT alone or in combination with other imaging modalities. For the qualitative assessment, all studies including the selected population were considered. Conversely, for the quantitative assessment, articles were included only if absolute numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative test results were available or derivable from the text for lymph node metastases. Reviews, clinical reports, and editorial articles were excluded from analyses. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were assessed qualitatively. A total of 750 patients underwent radiolabeled choline (such as C-choline or F-choline) PET/CT before sLND. A quantitative evaluation was performed in nine studies. A patient-based, a lesion-based, and a site-based analysis was carried out in nine, four, and five studies, respectively. The pooled sensitivities were 85.3% [95% confidence interval (CI)78.5–90.3%], 56.2% (95% CI41.6–69.7%), 75.3% (95% CI56.6–87.7%), and 63.7% (95% CI41–81.6%), respectively, for patient-based, lesion-based, pelvic site-based, and retroperitoneal site-based analysis. The pooled positive predictive values (PPVs) were 75% (95% CI68–80.9%), 85.8% (95% CI66.8–94.8%), 81.2% (95% CI70.1–88.9%), and 75.2% (95% CI58.7–86.7%), respectively, in the same analyses. High heterogeneities among the studies were found for sensitivities and PPVs ranging between 61.7–93.3% and 60.6–94.5%, respectively. Radiolabeled choline PET/CT has only a moderate sensitivity for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients who are candidates for sLND, although the pooled PPVs ranged between 75 and 85.8% for all type of subanalyses. The presence of high heterogeneity among the studies should be considered carefully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-3636</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27551835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Choline ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Salvage Therapy ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Nuclear medicine communications, 2016-12, Vol.37 (12), p.1223-1231</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-ab7cd0ae87307f9c56b9429653950a5e6485bece0741eee6a6cfe02bf50cea963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551835$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evangelista, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zattoni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Val</creatorcontrib><title>Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Nuclear medicine communications</title><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><description>To provide a systematic review of recently published reports and carry out a meta-analysis on the use of radiolabeled choline PET/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatments. Bibliographic database searches, from 2005 to May 2015, including Pubmed, Web of Science, and TripDatabase, were performed to find studies that included only patients who underwent sLND after radiolabeled choline PET/CT alone or in combination with other imaging modalities. For the qualitative assessment, all studies including the selected population were considered. Conversely, for the quantitative assessment, articles were included only if absolute numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative test results were available or derivable from the text for lymph node metastases. Reviews, clinical reports, and editorial articles were excluded from analyses. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were assessed qualitatively. A total of 750 patients underwent radiolabeled choline (such as C-choline or F-choline) PET/CT before sLND. A quantitative evaluation was performed in nine studies. A patient-based, a lesion-based, and a site-based analysis was carried out in nine, four, and five studies, respectively. The pooled sensitivities were 85.3% [95% confidence interval (CI)78.5–90.3%], 56.2% (95% CI41.6–69.7%), 75.3% (95% CI56.6–87.7%), and 63.7% (95% CI41–81.6%), respectively, for patient-based, lesion-based, pelvic site-based, and retroperitoneal site-based analysis. The pooled positive predictive values (PPVs) were 75% (95% CI68–80.9%), 85.8% (95% CI66.8–94.8%), 81.2% (95% CI70.1–88.9%), and 75.2% (95% CI58.7–86.7%), respectively, in the same analyses. High heterogeneities among the studies were found for sensitivities and PPVs ranging between 61.7–93.3% and 60.6–94.5%, respectively. Radiolabeled choline PET/CT has only a moderate sensitivity for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients who are candidates for sLND, although the pooled PPVs ranged between 75 and 85.8% for all type of subanalyses. The presence of high heterogeneity among the studies should be considered carefully.</description><subject>Choline</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Salvage Therapy</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0143-3636</issn><issn>1473-5628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwh5ySbFiWMnYYeq8pDKQ6iso4kzoQYnLnZClb8nVQEhFsxmZnHujOYQchKySciy5Pzu_m7CfpdIox0yDuOEB0JG6S4ZszDmAZdcjsiB968Dk3KZ7JNRlAgRplyMiXmCUlsDBRosqVpaoxukj7PF-XRBC6ysQ-rBfMALUtPXqyWU2KBqbd3TUns_jNo2FxSo732LNbRaUYcfGtcUmpLW2EIADZjea39E9iowHo-_-iF5vpotpjfB_OH6dno5DxRnIgqgSFTJANOEs6TKlJBFFkeZFDwTDATKOBUFKmRJHCKiBKkqZFFRCaYQMskPydl278rZ9w59m9faKzQGGrSdzzeviyiLWDag8RZVznrvsMpXTtfg-jxk-cZzPnjO_3oeYqdfF7qixvIn9C12ANItsLamReffTLdGly8RTLv8f_cn1WqLGw</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Evangelista, Laura</creator><creator>Zattoni, Fabio</creator><creator>Karnes, Robert J</creator><creator>Novara, Giacomo</creator><creator>Lowe, Val</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Evangelista, Laura ; Zattoni, Fabio ; Karnes, Robert J ; Novara, Giacomo ; Lowe, Val</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3052-ab7cd0ae87307f9c56b9429653950a5e6485bece0741eee6a6cfe02bf50cea963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Choline</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Salvage Therapy</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evangelista, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zattoni, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karnes, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novara, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Val</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evangelista, Laura</au><au>Zattoni, Fabio</au><au>Karnes, Robert J</au><au>Novara, Giacomo</au><au>Lowe, Val</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear medicine communications</jtitle><addtitle>Nucl Med Commun</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1223</spage><epage>1231</epage><pages>1223-1231</pages><issn>0143-3636</issn><eissn>1473-5628</eissn><abstract>To provide a systematic review of recently published reports and carry out a meta-analysis on the use of radiolabeled choline PET/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary treatments. Bibliographic database searches, from 2005 to May 2015, including Pubmed, Web of Science, and TripDatabase, were performed to find studies that included only patients who underwent sLND after radiolabeled choline PET/CT alone or in combination with other imaging modalities. For the qualitative assessment, all studies including the selected population were considered. Conversely, for the quantitative assessment, articles were included only if absolute numbers of true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative test results were available or derivable from the text for lymph node metastases. Reviews, clinical reports, and editorial articles were excluded from analyses. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were assessed qualitatively. A total of 750 patients underwent radiolabeled choline (such as C-choline or F-choline) PET/CT before sLND. A quantitative evaluation was performed in nine studies. A patient-based, a lesion-based, and a site-based analysis was carried out in nine, four, and five studies, respectively. The pooled sensitivities were 85.3% [95% confidence interval (CI)78.5–90.3%], 56.2% (95% CI41.6–69.7%), 75.3% (95% CI56.6–87.7%), and 63.7% (95% CI41–81.6%), respectively, for patient-based, lesion-based, pelvic site-based, and retroperitoneal site-based analysis. The pooled positive predictive values (PPVs) were 75% (95% CI68–80.9%), 85.8% (95% CI66.8–94.8%), 81.2% (95% CI70.1–88.9%), and 75.2% (95% CI58.7–86.7%), respectively, in the same analyses. High heterogeneities among the studies were found for sensitivities and PPVs ranging between 61.7–93.3% and 60.6–94.5%, respectively. Radiolabeled choline PET/CT has only a moderate sensitivity for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients who are candidates for sLND, although the pooled PPVs ranged between 75 and 85.8% for all type of subanalyses. The presence of high heterogeneity among the studies should be considered carefully.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>27551835</pmid><doi>10.1097/MNM.0000000000000582</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-3636
ispartof Nuclear medicine communications, 2016-12, Vol.37 (12), p.1223-1231
issn 0143-3636
1473-5628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835529209
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Choline
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging
Male
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - surgery
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - statistics & numerical data
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Radiopharmaceuticals
Salvage Therapy
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Radiolabeled choline PET/CT before salvage lymphadenectomy dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A53%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiolabeled%20choline%20PET/CT%20before%20salvage%20lymphadenectomy%20dissection:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20medicine%20communications&rft.au=Evangelista,%20Laura&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1223&rft.epage=1231&rft.pages=1223-1231&rft.issn=0143-3636&rft.eissn=1473-5628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835529209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835529209&rft_id=info:pmid/27551835&rfr_iscdi=true