Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest

Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 2016-11, Vol.81 (5), p.849-854
Hauptverfasser: Bradley, Matthew J, Bonds, Brandon W, Chang, Luke, Yang, Shiming, Hu, Peter, Li, Hsiao-Chi, Brenner, Megan L, Scalea, Thomas M, Stein, Deborah M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 854
container_issue 5
container_start_page 849
container_title The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
container_volume 81
creator Bradley, Matthew J
Bonds, Brandon W
Chang, Luke
Yang, Shiming
Hu, Peter
Li, Hsiao-Chi
Brenner, Megan L
Scalea, Thomas M
Stein, Deborah M
description Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), the criterion standard for determining the effectiveness of chest compressions and detection of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as the surrogate for cardiac output and marker for adequacy of resuscitation. This prospective observational study enrolled patients over a 9-month period directly presenting to a level 1 trauma center after TCA. Continuous high-resolution ETCO2 measurements were collected every 6 seconds for periods of CCC and OCCM, respectively. Patients receiving CCC only were compared with patients receiving CCC followed by OCCM. Student's t tests were used to compare ETCO2 within and between groups. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (16 OCCM, 17 CCC-only). Mean time of CCC before OCCM was 66 seconds. Within the OCCM group, final, peak, mean, and median ETCO2 levels significantly increased when comparing the initial CCC period to the OCCM interval. Using a time-matched comparison, significant increases were observed in the final and peak but not mean and median values when comparing the first minute of CCC to the remaining time in the CCC-only group. However, when periods of OCCM were compared with equivalent periods of CCC-only, there were no differences in the initial, final, peak, mean, or median ETCO2 values. Correspondingly, no difference in rates of ROSC was observed between groups (OCCM 23.5% vs. CCC 38.9%; p = 0.53). Although we could not control for confounders, we found no significant improvement in ETCO2 or ROSC with OCCM. With newer endovascular techniques for aortic occlusion, thoracotomy solely for performing OCCM provides no benefit over CCC. Therapeutic study, level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/TA.0000000000001227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835518666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835518666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-bfb46b65e55c883b24d625ec5d07d8205f76316ce91527e6ce3905267fd7de143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMlqwzAQFaWlCWm-oFB07MWplkhyjiF0g0Au6dnI0rhRsS1Xklv693XIQulc5jG8hXkI3VIyo2ShHrbLGfkzlDF1gcaMSp4RJfnlGQsxQtMYP_YsIRdciGs0YkpwJYgao37TQYvNDmLCRgfrtMGNjlG_A_ZVBSHi1uMSWqhcwv4LAja1j2BPGt90AWJ0vo3YtbjTyUGbIv52aYdT0H0zXMzZW4eBnW7QVaXrCNPjnqC3p8ft6iVbb55fV8t1ZjgRKSurci5LKUAIk-e8ZHMrmQAjLFE2Z0RUw6tUGlhQwRQMgC-IYFJVVlmgcz5B9wffLvjPfgguGhcN1LVuwfexoPnQB82llAOVH6gm-BgDVEUXXKPDT0FJsa-82C6L_5UPqrtjQF82YM-aU8H8F7CQfPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835518666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bradley, Matthew J ; Bonds, Brandon W ; Chang, Luke ; Yang, Shiming ; Hu, Peter ; Li, Hsiao-Chi ; Brenner, Megan L ; Scalea, Thomas M ; Stein, Deborah M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Matthew J ; Bonds, Brandon W ; Chang, Luke ; Yang, Shiming ; Hu, Peter ; Li, Hsiao-Chi ; Brenner, Megan L ; Scalea, Thomas M ; Stein, Deborah M</creatorcontrib><description>Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), the criterion standard for determining the effectiveness of chest compressions and detection of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as the surrogate for cardiac output and marker for adequacy of resuscitation. This prospective observational study enrolled patients over a 9-month period directly presenting to a level 1 trauma center after TCA. Continuous high-resolution ETCO2 measurements were collected every 6 seconds for periods of CCC and OCCM, respectively. Patients receiving CCC only were compared with patients receiving CCC followed by OCCM. Student's t tests were used to compare ETCO2 within and between groups. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (16 OCCM, 17 CCC-only). Mean time of CCC before OCCM was 66 seconds. Within the OCCM group, final, peak, mean, and median ETCO2 levels significantly increased when comparing the initial CCC period to the OCCM interval. Using a time-matched comparison, significant increases were observed in the final and peak but not mean and median values when comparing the first minute of CCC to the remaining time in the CCC-only group. However, when periods of OCCM were compared with equivalent periods of CCC-only, there were no differences in the initial, final, peak, mean, or median ETCO2 values. Correspondingly, no difference in rates of ROSC was observed between groups (OCCM 23.5% vs. CCC 38.9%; p = 0.53). Although we could not control for confounders, we found no significant improvement in ETCO2 or ROSC with OCCM. With newer endovascular techniques for aortic occlusion, thoracotomy solely for performing OCCM provides no benefit over CCC. Therapeutic study, level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-0755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001227</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27537507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; Female ; Heart Arrest - etiology ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Heart Massage - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Wounds and Injuries - complications</subject><ispartof>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2016-11, Vol.81 (5), p.849-854</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-bfb46b65e55c883b24d625ec5d07d8205f76316ce91527e6ce3905267fd7de143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-bfb46b65e55c883b24d625ec5d07d8205f76316ce91527e6ce3905267fd7de143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27537507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonds, Brandon W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hsiao-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Megan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalea, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Deborah M</creatorcontrib><title>Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest</title><title>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</title><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><description>Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), the criterion standard for determining the effectiveness of chest compressions and detection of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as the surrogate for cardiac output and marker for adequacy of resuscitation. This prospective observational study enrolled patients over a 9-month period directly presenting to a level 1 trauma center after TCA. Continuous high-resolution ETCO2 measurements were collected every 6 seconds for periods of CCC and OCCM, respectively. Patients receiving CCC only were compared with patients receiving CCC followed by OCCM. Student's t tests were used to compare ETCO2 within and between groups. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (16 OCCM, 17 CCC-only). Mean time of CCC before OCCM was 66 seconds. Within the OCCM group, final, peak, mean, and median ETCO2 levels significantly increased when comparing the initial CCC period to the OCCM interval. Using a time-matched comparison, significant increases were observed in the final and peak but not mean and median values when comparing the first minute of CCC to the remaining time in the CCC-only group. However, when periods of OCCM were compared with equivalent periods of CCC-only, there were no differences in the initial, final, peak, mean, or median ETCO2 values. Correspondingly, no difference in rates of ROSC was observed between groups (OCCM 23.5% vs. CCC 38.9%; p = 0.53). Although we could not control for confounders, we found no significant improvement in ETCO2 or ROSC with OCCM. With newer endovascular techniques for aortic occlusion, thoracotomy solely for performing OCCM provides no benefit over CCC. Therapeutic study, level III.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Heart Massage - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Trauma Centers</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - complications</subject><issn>2163-0755</issn><issn>2163-0763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUMlqwzAQFaWlCWm-oFB07MWplkhyjiF0g0Au6dnI0rhRsS1Xklv693XIQulc5jG8hXkI3VIyo2ShHrbLGfkzlDF1gcaMSp4RJfnlGQsxQtMYP_YsIRdciGs0YkpwJYgao37TQYvNDmLCRgfrtMGNjlG_A_ZVBSHi1uMSWqhcwv4LAja1j2BPGt90AWJ0vo3YtbjTyUGbIv52aYdT0H0zXMzZW4eBnW7QVaXrCNPjnqC3p8ft6iVbb55fV8t1ZjgRKSurci5LKUAIk-e8ZHMrmQAjLFE2Z0RUw6tUGlhQwRQMgC-IYFJVVlmgcz5B9wffLvjPfgguGhcN1LVuwfexoPnQB82llAOVH6gm-BgDVEUXXKPDT0FJsa-82C6L_5UPqrtjQF82YM-aU8H8F7CQfPU</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Bradley, Matthew J</creator><creator>Bonds, Brandon W</creator><creator>Chang, Luke</creator><creator>Yang, Shiming</creator><creator>Hu, Peter</creator><creator>Li, Hsiao-Chi</creator><creator>Brenner, Megan L</creator><creator>Scalea, Thomas M</creator><creator>Stein, Deborah M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest</title><author>Bradley, Matthew J ; Bonds, Brandon W ; Chang, Luke ; Yang, Shiming ; Hu, Peter ; Li, Hsiao-Chi ; Brenner, Megan L ; Scalea, Thomas M ; Stein, Deborah M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-bfb46b65e55c883b24d625ec5d07d8205f76316ce91527e6ce3905267fd7de143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Heart Massage - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Trauma Centers</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonds, Brandon W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Shiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hsiao-Chi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brenner, Megan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scalea, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Deborah M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Matthew J</au><au>Bonds, Brandon W</au><au>Chang, Luke</au><au>Yang, Shiming</au><au>Hu, Peter</au><au>Li, Hsiao-Chi</au><au>Brenner, Megan L</au><au>Scalea, Thomas M</au><au>Stein, Deborah M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest</atitle><jtitle>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma Acute Care Surg</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>849</spage><epage>854</epage><pages>849-854</pages><issn>2163-0755</issn><eissn>2163-0763</eissn><abstract>Open chest cardiac massage (OCCM) is a commonly performed procedure after traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA). OCCM has been reported to be superior to closed chest compressions (CCC) in animal models and in non-TCA. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare OCCM versus CCC in TCA using end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), the criterion standard for determining the effectiveness of chest compressions and detection of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as the surrogate for cardiac output and marker for adequacy of resuscitation. This prospective observational study enrolled patients over a 9-month period directly presenting to a level 1 trauma center after TCA. Continuous high-resolution ETCO2 measurements were collected every 6 seconds for periods of CCC and OCCM, respectively. Patients receiving CCC only were compared with patients receiving CCC followed by OCCM. Student's t tests were used to compare ETCO2 within and between groups. Thirty-three patients were enrolled (16 OCCM, 17 CCC-only). Mean time of CCC before OCCM was 66 seconds. Within the OCCM group, final, peak, mean, and median ETCO2 levels significantly increased when comparing the initial CCC period to the OCCM interval. Using a time-matched comparison, significant increases were observed in the final and peak but not mean and median values when comparing the first minute of CCC to the remaining time in the CCC-only group. However, when periods of OCCM were compared with equivalent periods of CCC-only, there were no differences in the initial, final, peak, mean, or median ETCO2 values. Correspondingly, no difference in rates of ROSC was observed between groups (OCCM 23.5% vs. CCC 38.9%; p = 0.53). Although we could not control for confounders, we found no significant improvement in ETCO2 or ROSC with OCCM. With newer endovascular techniques for aortic occlusion, thoracotomy solely for performing OCCM provides no benefit over CCC. Therapeutic study, level III.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27537507</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0000000000001227</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2163-0755
ispartof The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2016-11, Vol.81 (5), p.849-854
issn 2163-0755
2163-0763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835518666
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods
Female
Heart Arrest - etiology
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart Arrest - therapy
Heart Massage - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries - complications
title Open chest cardiac massage offers no benefit over closed chest compressions in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T11%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20chest%20cardiac%20massage%20offers%20no%20benefit%20over%20closed%20chest%20compressions%20in%20patients%20with%20traumatic%20cardiac%20arrest&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20acute%20care%20surgery&rft.au=Bradley,%20Matthew%20J&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=849&rft.epage=854&rft.pages=849-854&rft.issn=2163-0755&rft.eissn=2163-0763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0000000000001227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835518666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835518666&rft_id=info:pmid/27537507&rfr_iscdi=true