Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?
This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2016-10, Vol.27 (7), p.1879-1883 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1883 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1879 |
| container_title | The Journal of craniofacial surgery |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin Alan, Hilal Özgür, Cem Vardi, Nigar Asutay, Fatih Güler, Çiğdem |
| description | This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835506173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835506173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a9e1d5ee013e88ad890c21507a48487fa19dfdafea11370a336ea524066b3e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKUjiZukOaFRxhga4rDdq6x1UVHbjKSdxNtT6EAIX-xf-mxLHyGXjE4Z1epmnayn9E9xDfyIjJkAGYICftzPNNIh50qMyJn3bz3DGJenZMSVkqCVHpOnpQ-ercMgsa4tM1MFd7bB4B6zIbelbYJ5UWDWlnsM-rDoyhzzAZt1rzU27Td1e05OClN5vDj0Cdk8zDfJY7h6WSyT2SrMgKo2NBpZLhApA4xjk8eaZpwJqkwUR7EqDNN5kZsCDWOgqAGQaASPqJRbQAUTcj2c3Tn73qFv07r0GVaVadB2PmUxCEElU9Cj0YBmznrvsEh3rqyN-0gZTb8kpr3E9L_Efu3q8KHb1pj_Lv1Yg0_qE2u0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835506173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin ; Alan, Hilal ; Özgür, Cem ; Vardi, Nigar ; Asutay, Fatih ; Güler, Çiğdem</creator><creatorcontrib>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin ; Alan, Hilal ; Özgür, Cem ; Vardi, Nigar ; Asutay, Fatih ; Güler, Çiğdem</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27763979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone Regeneration ; Calcium Phosphates ; Cortical Bone - surgery ; Dentistry ; Disease Models, Animal ; Implants, Experimental ; Osteogenesis - physiology ; Rabbits ; Skull - surgery ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2016-10, Vol.27 (7), p.1879-1883</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a9e1d5ee013e88ad890c21507a48487fa19dfdafea11370a336ea524066b3e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a9e1d5ee013e88ad890c21507a48487fa19dfdafea11370a336ea524066b3e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27763979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alan, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özgür, Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardi, Nigar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asutay, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güler, Çiğdem</creatorcontrib><title>Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates</subject><subject>Cortical Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Implants, Experimental</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Skull - surgery</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFOwzAMhiMEYmPwBgj1yKUjiZukOaFRxhga4rDdq6x1UVHbjKSdxNtT6EAIX-xf-mxLHyGXjE4Z1epmnayn9E9xDfyIjJkAGYICftzPNNIh50qMyJn3bz3DGJenZMSVkqCVHpOnpQ-ercMgsa4tM1MFd7bB4B6zIbelbYJ5UWDWlnsM-rDoyhzzAZt1rzU27Td1e05OClN5vDj0Cdk8zDfJY7h6WSyT2SrMgKo2NBpZLhApA4xjk8eaZpwJqkwUR7EqDNN5kZsCDWOgqAGQaASPqJRbQAUTcj2c3Tn73qFv07r0GVaVadB2PmUxCEElU9Cj0YBmznrvsEh3rqyN-0gZTb8kpr3E9L_Efu3q8KHb1pj_Lv1Yg0_qE2u0</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin</creator><creator>Alan, Hilal</creator><creator>Özgür, Cem</creator><creator>Vardi, Nigar</creator><creator>Asutay, Fatih</creator><creator>Güler, Çiğdem</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?</title><author>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin ; Alan, Hilal ; Özgür, Cem ; Vardi, Nigar ; Asutay, Fatih ; Güler, Çiğdem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-a9e1d5ee013e88ad890c21507a48487fa19dfdafea11370a336ea524066b3e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates</topic><topic>Cortical Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Implants, Experimental</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Skull - surgery</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alan, Hilal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özgür, Cem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardi, Nigar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asutay, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güler, Çiğdem</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acar, Ahmet Hüseyin</au><au>Alan, Hilal</au><au>Özgür, Cem</au><au>Vardi, Nigar</au><au>Asutay, Fatih</au><au>Güler, Çiğdem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1879</spage><epage>1883</epage><pages>1879-1883</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>This study aims to evaluate the possible effect of more cortical bone decortication (CBD) on guided bone augmentation. A total of 16 New Zealand rabbits and 32 titanium domes were used. No cortical bone decortication was applied to the control group and in the study groups, the cortical bones were decorticated with a round burr (Group A: 1 hole with bleeding, Group B: 5 holes with bleeding, Group C: a thin layer of compact bone was completely removed with no bleeding). Then 2 titanium domes were placed on the calvarium of each rabbit with hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate. After 3 months, the animals were sacrificed and specimens were sent for histological and histomorphometric analysis. Histological and histomorphometric analysis showed that bone decortication with burr significantly increased new bone regeneration in all the experimental groups compared with the control group (P <0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between the study groups. In conclusion, CBD, which has no negative impact on surgery, has a positive effect on guided bone augmentation. However, a greater amount of CBD does not have a greater effect.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27763979</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-2275 |
| ispartof | The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2016-10, Vol.27 (7), p.1879-1883 |
| issn | 1049-2275 1536-3732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835506173 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Animals Bone Regeneration Calcium Phosphates Cortical Bone - surgery Dentistry Disease Models, Animal Implants, Experimental Osteogenesis - physiology Rabbits Skull - surgery Titanium |
| title | Is More Cortical Bone Decortication Effective on Guided Bone Augmentation? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A52%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20More%20Cortical%20Bone%20Decortication%20Effective%20on%20Guided%20Bone%20Augmentation?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Acar,%20Ahmet%20H%C3%BCseyin&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1879&rft.epage=1883&rft.pages=1879-1883&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835506173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835506173&rft_id=info:pmid/27763979&rfr_iscdi=true |