Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study
Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 478 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 472 |
container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD Dayno, Megan, BS Strohl, Anna E., MD Graves, Stephen, MS Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD Shahabi, Shohreh, MD |
description | Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835504319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0090825816314950</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835504319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCJ0BCPnLJMhPHiY0EUlnKH6mCQ-GGZHntSeUlmyx2siLfHqdbOHDhNHqj92Y0v2HsGcIaAeuXu_V8O_fDuswid9aA6gFbIWhZ1Erqh2wFoKFQpVRn7DylHQAIwPIxOyubpoYGmhX7fjPFYzjajtt2pMgP1B2D4_SL-iztGIaet0PkU1ahJ763Xbjtbe_mV_ySf74z5PAmd3L6nR0tf2sT8TROfn7CHrW2S_T0vl6wb--vvm4-FtdfPnzaXF4XrsJqLGSpWpIkZOmrpiKttmBVs9XaEzqFUFbeE-SCrdTaYa1aKVsvpRQCt74RF-zFae4hDj8nSqPZh-So62xPw5QMKiElVAJ1toqT1cUhpUitOcSwt3E2CGbBanbmDqtZsC7NjDWnnt8vmLZ78n8zfzhmw-uTgfKZx0DRJBcoM_EhkhuNH8J_Frz5J--60Adnux80U9oNU8yY8yUmlQbMzfLZ5bFYC6y0BPEbSJSerw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835504319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27760707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery ; Carcinosarcoma - mortality ; Carcinosarcoma - pathology ; Carcinosarcoma - surgery ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Databases, Factual ; Exenteration ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pelvic Exenteration ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Protective Factors ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Risk Factors ; Sarcoma - mortality ; Sarcoma - pathology ; Sarcoma - surgery ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Tumor Burden ; Uterine neoplasms ; Uterine Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5851-3958 ; 0000-0003-2723-0650 ; 0000-0003-1566-7345 ; 0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayno, Megan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Stephen, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Exenteration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Margins of Excision</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Protective Factors</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Sarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Uterine neoplasms</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCJ0BCPnLJMhPHiY0EUlnKH6mCQ-GGZHntSeUlmyx2siLfHqdbOHDhNHqj92Y0v2HsGcIaAeuXu_V8O_fDuswid9aA6gFbIWhZ1Erqh2wFoKFQpVRn7DylHQAIwPIxOyubpoYGmhX7fjPFYzjajtt2pMgP1B2D4_SL-iztGIaet0PkU1ahJ763Xbjtbe_mV_ySf74z5PAmd3L6nR0tf2sT8TROfn7CHrW2S_T0vl6wb--vvm4-FtdfPnzaXF4XrsJqLGSpWpIkZOmrpiKttmBVs9XaEzqFUFbeE-SCrdTaYa1aKVsvpRQCt74RF-zFae4hDj8nSqPZh-So62xPw5QMKiElVAJ1toqT1cUhpUitOcSwt3E2CGbBanbmDqtZsC7NjDWnnt8vmLZ78n8zfzhmw-uTgfKZx0DRJBcoM_EhkhuNH8J_Frz5J--60Adnux80U9oNU8yY8yUmlQbMzfLZ5bFYC6y0BPEbSJSerw</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creator><creator>Dayno, Megan, BS</creator><creator>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creator><creator>Graves, Stephen, MS</creator><creator>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creator><creator>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1566-7345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><author>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Exenteration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Margins of Excision</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Protective Factors</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Sarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Uterine neoplasms</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayno, Megan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Stephen, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</au><au>Dayno, Megan, BS</au><au>Strohl, Anna E., MD</au><au>Graves, Stephen, MS</au><au>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</au><au>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>472-478</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27760707</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1566-7345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478 |
issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835504319 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - surgery Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery Aged Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery Carcinosarcoma - mortality Carcinosarcoma - pathology Carcinosarcoma - surgery Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Databases, Factual Exenteration Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data Kaplan-Meier Estimate Lymph Nodes - pathology Margins of Excision Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Neoplasm Staging Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology Pelvic Exenteration Prognosis Proportional Hazards Models Protective Factors Radiotherapy, Adjuvant Risk Factors Sarcoma - mortality Sarcoma - pathology Sarcoma - surgery Survival Survival Rate Tumor Burden Uterine neoplasms Uterine Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A41%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20after%20pelvic%20exenteration%20for%20uterine%20malignancy:%20A%20National%20Cancer%20Data%20Base%20study&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Seagle,%20Brandon-Luke%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=472-478&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835504319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835504319&rft_id=info:pmid/27760707&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0090825816314950&rfr_iscdi=true |