Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study

Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478
Hauptverfasser: Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD, Dayno, Megan, BS, Strohl, Anna E., MD, Graves, Stephen, MS, Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD, Shahabi, Shohreh, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 478
container_issue 3
container_start_page 472
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 143
creator Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD
Dayno, Megan, BS
Strohl, Anna E., MD
Graves, Stephen, MS
Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD
Shahabi, Shohreh, MD
description Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835504319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0090825816314950</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835504319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCJ0BCPnLJMhPHiY0EUlnKH6mCQ-GGZHntSeUlmyx2siLfHqdbOHDhNHqj92Y0v2HsGcIaAeuXu_V8O_fDuswid9aA6gFbIWhZ1Erqh2wFoKFQpVRn7DylHQAIwPIxOyubpoYGmhX7fjPFYzjajtt2pMgP1B2D4_SL-iztGIaet0PkU1ahJ763Xbjtbe_mV_ySf74z5PAmd3L6nR0tf2sT8TROfn7CHrW2S_T0vl6wb--vvm4-FtdfPnzaXF4XrsJqLGSpWpIkZOmrpiKttmBVs9XaEzqFUFbeE-SCrdTaYa1aKVsvpRQCt74RF-zFae4hDj8nSqPZh-So62xPw5QMKiElVAJ1toqT1cUhpUitOcSwt3E2CGbBanbmDqtZsC7NjDWnnt8vmLZ78n8zfzhmw-uTgfKZx0DRJBcoM_EhkhuNH8J_Frz5J--60Adnux80U9oNU8yY8yUmlQbMzfLZ5bFYC6y0BPEbSJSerw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835504319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27760707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery ; Aged ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery ; Carcinosarcoma - mortality ; Carcinosarcoma - pathology ; Carcinosarcoma - surgery ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Databases, Factual ; Exenteration ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Margins of Excision ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology ; Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pelvic Exenteration ; Prognosis ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Protective Factors ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Risk Factors ; Sarcoma - mortality ; Sarcoma - pathology ; Sarcoma - surgery ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Tumor Burden ; Uterine neoplasms ; Uterine Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5851-3958 ; 0000-0003-2723-0650 ; 0000-0003-1566-7345 ; 0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayno, Megan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Stephen, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinosarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Exenteration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Margins of Excision</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pelvic Exenteration</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Protective Factors</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sarcoma - mortality</subject><subject>Sarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>Sarcoma - surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Uterine neoplasms</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCJ0BCPnLJMhPHiY0EUlnKH6mCQ-GGZHntSeUlmyx2siLfHqdbOHDhNHqj92Y0v2HsGcIaAeuXu_V8O_fDuswid9aA6gFbIWhZ1Erqh2wFoKFQpVRn7DylHQAIwPIxOyubpoYGmhX7fjPFYzjajtt2pMgP1B2D4_SL-iztGIaet0PkU1ahJ763Xbjtbe_mV_ySf74z5PAmd3L6nR0tf2sT8TROfn7CHrW2S_T0vl6wb--vvm4-FtdfPnzaXF4XrsJqLGSpWpIkZOmrpiKttmBVs9XaEzqFUFbeE-SCrdTaYa1aKVsvpRQCt74RF-zFae4hDj8nSqPZh-So62xPw5QMKiElVAJ1toqT1cUhpUitOcSwt3E2CGbBanbmDqtZsC7NjDWnnt8vmLZ78n8zfzhmw-uTgfKZx0DRJBcoM_EhkhuNH8J_Frz5J--60Adnux80U9oNU8yY8yUmlQbMzfLZ5bFYC6y0BPEbSJSerw</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creator><creator>Dayno, Megan, BS</creator><creator>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creator><creator>Graves, Stephen, MS</creator><creator>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creator><creator>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1566-7345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</title><author>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD ; Dayno, Megan, BS ; Strohl, Anna E., MD ; Graves, Stephen, MS ; Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD ; Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-528fe5e352d474e98b0a87b99de1c81024dde00241f599c168f55fd555331bd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinosarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Exenteration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Margins of Excision</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pelvic Exenteration</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Protective Factors</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sarcoma - mortality</topic><topic>Sarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>Sarcoma - surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Uterine neoplasms</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayno, Megan, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strohl, Anna E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, Stephen, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seagle, Brandon-Luke L., MD</au><au>Dayno, Megan, BS</au><au>Strohl, Anna E., MD</au><au>Graves, Stephen, MS</au><au>Nieves-Neira, Wilberto, MD</au><au>Shahabi, Shohreh, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>472-478</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To determine overall survival (OS) and factors associated with OS after pelvic exenteration for uterine cancer. Methods Women with uterine cancer who underwent exenteration (n = 1160) were identified from the 1998–2011 National Cancer Data Base. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards survival analyses were performed to test for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, comorbidity score, insurance status, income, distance from home to treatment center, stage, distant and nodal metastasis, tumor size, surgical margin status, exenteration type, and treatment with radiation and/or chemotherapy. Results Among women with follow-up data (n = 652), median (IQR) OS was 63.1 (42.2–107.2) and 17.6 (14.7–23.9) months for women with node-negative versus node-positive disease, respectively. Histology (p = 1.5 × 10 − 4 ), grade (p = 7.9 × 10 − 14 ), race (p = 0.0002), lymph node status (p = 1.0 × 10 − 14 ), surgical node evaluation (p = 2.8 × 10 − 8 ), surgery for distant metastasis (p = 0.004), distant metastasis at diagnosis (p = 1.3 × 10 − 10 ), positive surgical margins (p = 1.6 × 10 − 9 ), radiotherapy (p = 0.004), and insurance status (p = 6.5 × 10 − 6 ) were significantly associated with differential, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier OS estimates. Exenteration type was not associated with OS (p = 0.357). By multivariate regression, increased age, positive surgical margins, nodal metastasis or unknown nodal status, higher histologic grade, and black race were associated with increased hazards for death. Conclusion Exenteration may be curative for well-selected women with uterine cancer, particularly among women with pathologically negative lymph nodes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27760707</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-0650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1566-7345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-4205</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2016-12, Vol.143 (3), p.472-478
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835504319
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - mortality
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - pathology
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell - surgery
Aged
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery
Carcinosarcoma - mortality
Carcinosarcoma - pathology
Carcinosarcoma - surgery
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Databases, Factual
Exenteration
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Insurance, Health - statistics & numerical data
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Margins of Excision
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - mortality
Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - pathology
Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous - surgery
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pelvic Exenteration
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
Protective Factors
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Risk Factors
Sarcoma - mortality
Sarcoma - pathology
Sarcoma - surgery
Survival
Survival Rate
Tumor Burden
Uterine neoplasms
Uterine Neoplasms - mortality
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
title Survival after pelvic exenteration for uterine malignancy: A National Cancer Data Base study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T08%3A41%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20after%20pelvic%20exenteration%20for%20uterine%20malignancy:%20A%20National%20Cancer%20Data%20Base%20study&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Seagle,%20Brandon-Luke%20L.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=472-478&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835504319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835504319&rft_id=info:pmid/27760707&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0090825816314950&rfr_iscdi=true