A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA

Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2016-09, Vol.26 (6), p.1645-1659
Hauptverfasser: Shelton, Andrew Olaf, O'Donnell, James Lawrence, Samhouri, Jameal F., Lowell, Natalie, Williams, Gregory D., Kelly, Ryan P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1659
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1645
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 26
creator Shelton, Andrew Olaf
O'Donnell, James Lawrence
Samhouri, Jameal F.
Lowell, Natalie
Williams, Gregory D.
Kelly, Ryan P.
description Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management, because it offers the prospect of quantitatively reconstructing whole ecological communities from easily obtained samples. However, like all sampling methods, eDNA sequencing is subject to methodological limitations that can generate biased descriptions of ecological communities. Here, we demonstrate parallels between eDNA sampling and traditional sampling techniques, and use these parallels to offer a statistical structure for framing the challenges faced by eDNA and for illuminating the gaps in our current knowledge. Although the current state of knowledge on some of these steps precludes a full estimate of biomass for each taxon in a sampled eDNA community, we provide a map that illustrates potential methods for bridging these gaps. Additionally, we use an original data set to estimate the relative abundances of taxon-specific template DNA prior to PCR, given the abundance of DNA sequences recovered post-PCR-and-sequencing, a critical step in the chain of eDNA inference. While we focus on the use of eDNA samples to determine the relative abundance of taxa within a community, our approach also applies to single-taxon applications (including applications using qPCR), studies of diversity, and studies focused on occurrence. By grounding inferences about eDNA community composition in a rigorous statistical framework, and by making these inferences explicit, we hope to improve the inferential potential for the emerging field of community-level eDNA analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/15-1733.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835446133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24818203</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24818203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4456-db5bf5111cf6bf73409b8f2a562f6b3d10b32cd69391ffad16789f2182f24c393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EolAY-AGgjDCk-OzYScaolIJUAQPMVj7syiWJi51Q9d_jKgUmJLyc5Xvu0flF6ALwBJIU3wILIaZ0AgfoBFKahowl5NDfMYMQxxxG6NS5FfaHEHKMRiSOGeNpcoLmWaBs3siNse-BMjbQrZLW6nYZFNrUZqnLvA5K0zR9qzstncdNE8j2U1vTNrLtfPvuKTtDRyqvnTzf1zF6u5-9Th_CxfP8cZotwjKKGA-rghWKAUCpeKFiGuG0SBTJGSf-gVaAC0rKivtPgFJ5BTxOUkUgIYpEJU3pGF0P3rU1H710nWi0K2Vd5600vROQUBZFHCj9B0q8nAPGHr0Z0NIa56xUYm11k9utACx2EQtgYhexAM9e7bV90cjqh_zO1AOTAdjoWm7_NolZ9uL35H7gchhYuc7YX2GU-BUxpV9oeoxO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827896100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Shelton, Andrew Olaf ; O'Donnell, James Lawrence ; Samhouri, Jameal F. ; Lowell, Natalie ; Williams, Gregory D. ; Kelly, Ryan P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Andrew Olaf ; O'Donnell, James Lawrence ; Samhouri, Jameal F. ; Lowell, Natalie ; Williams, Gregory D. ; Kelly, Ryan P.</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management, because it offers the prospect of quantitatively reconstructing whole ecological communities from easily obtained samples. However, like all sampling methods, eDNA sequencing is subject to methodological limitations that can generate biased descriptions of ecological communities. Here, we demonstrate parallels between eDNA sampling and traditional sampling techniques, and use these parallels to offer a statistical structure for framing the challenges faced by eDNA and for illuminating the gaps in our current knowledge. Although the current state of knowledge on some of these steps precludes a full estimate of biomass for each taxon in a sampled eDNA community, we provide a map that illustrates potential methods for bridging these gaps. Additionally, we use an original data set to estimate the relative abundances of taxon-specific template DNA prior to PCR, given the abundance of DNA sequences recovered post-PCR-and-sequencing, a critical step in the chain of eDNA inference. While we focus on the use of eDNA samples to determine the relative abundance of taxa within a community, our approach also applies to single-taxon applications (including applications using qPCR), studies of diversity, and studies focused on occurrence. By grounding inferences about eDNA community composition in a rigorous statistical framework, and by making these inferences explicit, we hope to improve the inferential potential for the emerging field of community-level eDNA analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/15-1733.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27755698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bayesian statistics ; Biomass ; community surveys ; DNA - genetics ; ecosystem assessment ; environmental DNA ; Fishes ; Invertebrates ; Metagenomics ; Models, Biological ; multinomial‐Poisson transformation ; quantitative PCR ; Seawater</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2016-09, Vol.26 (6), p.1645-1659</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4456-db5bf5111cf6bf73409b8f2a562f6b3d10b32cd69391ffad16789f2182f24c393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4456-db5bf5111cf6bf73409b8f2a562f6b3d10b32cd69391ffad16789f2182f24c393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24818203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24818203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755698$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Andrew Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, James Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samhouri, Jameal F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowell, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ryan P.</creatorcontrib><title>A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management, because it offers the prospect of quantitatively reconstructing whole ecological communities from easily obtained samples. However, like all sampling methods, eDNA sequencing is subject to methodological limitations that can generate biased descriptions of ecological communities. Here, we demonstrate parallels between eDNA sampling and traditional sampling techniques, and use these parallels to offer a statistical structure for framing the challenges faced by eDNA and for illuminating the gaps in our current knowledge. Although the current state of knowledge on some of these steps precludes a full estimate of biomass for each taxon in a sampled eDNA community, we provide a map that illustrates potential methods for bridging these gaps. Additionally, we use an original data set to estimate the relative abundances of taxon-specific template DNA prior to PCR, given the abundance of DNA sequences recovered post-PCR-and-sequencing, a critical step in the chain of eDNA inference. While we focus on the use of eDNA samples to determine the relative abundance of taxa within a community, our approach also applies to single-taxon applications (including applications using qPCR), studies of diversity, and studies focused on occurrence. By grounding inferences about eDNA community composition in a rigorous statistical framework, and by making these inferences explicit, we hope to improve the inferential potential for the emerging field of community-level eDNA analysis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayesian statistics</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>community surveys</subject><subject>DNA - genetics</subject><subject>ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>environmental DNA</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Metagenomics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>multinomial‐Poisson transformation</subject><subject>quantitative PCR</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EolAY-AGgjDCk-OzYScaolIJUAQPMVj7syiWJi51Q9d_jKgUmJLyc5Xvu0flF6ALwBJIU3wILIaZ0AgfoBFKahowl5NDfMYMQxxxG6NS5FfaHEHKMRiSOGeNpcoLmWaBs3siNse-BMjbQrZLW6nYZFNrUZqnLvA5K0zR9qzstncdNE8j2U1vTNrLtfPvuKTtDRyqvnTzf1zF6u5-9Th_CxfP8cZotwjKKGA-rghWKAUCpeKFiGuG0SBTJGSf-gVaAC0rKivtPgFJ5BTxOUkUgIYpEJU3pGF0P3rU1H710nWi0K2Vd5600vROQUBZFHCj9B0q8nAPGHr0Z0NIa56xUYm11k9utACx2EQtgYhexAM9e7bV90cjqh_zO1AOTAdjoWm7_NolZ9uL35H7gchhYuc7YX2GU-BUxpV9oeoxO</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Shelton, Andrew Olaf</creator><creator>O'Donnell, James Lawrence</creator><creator>Samhouri, Jameal F.</creator><creator>Lowell, Natalie</creator><creator>Williams, Gregory D.</creator><creator>Kelly, Ryan P.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA</title><author>Shelton, Andrew Olaf ; O'Donnell, James Lawrence ; Samhouri, Jameal F. ; Lowell, Natalie ; Williams, Gregory D. ; Kelly, Ryan P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4456-db5bf5111cf6bf73409b8f2a562f6b3d10b32cd69391ffad16789f2182f24c393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayesian statistics</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>community surveys</topic><topic>DNA - genetics</topic><topic>ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>environmental DNA</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Metagenomics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>multinomial‐Poisson transformation</topic><topic>quantitative PCR</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Andrew Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, James Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samhouri, Jameal F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowell, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ryan P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shelton, Andrew Olaf</au><au>O'Donnell, James Lawrence</au><au>Samhouri, Jameal F.</au><au>Lowell, Natalie</au><au>Williams, Gregory D.</au><au>Kelly, Ryan P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1645</spage><epage>1659</epage><pages>1645-1659</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Environmental DNA (eDNA), genetic material recovered from an environmental medium such as soil, water, or feces, reflects the membership of the ecological community present in the sampled environment. As such, eDNA is a potentially rich source of data for basic ecology, conservation, and management, because it offers the prospect of quantitatively reconstructing whole ecological communities from easily obtained samples. However, like all sampling methods, eDNA sequencing is subject to methodological limitations that can generate biased descriptions of ecological communities. Here, we demonstrate parallels between eDNA sampling and traditional sampling techniques, and use these parallels to offer a statistical structure for framing the challenges faced by eDNA and for illuminating the gaps in our current knowledge. Although the current state of knowledge on some of these steps precludes a full estimate of biomass for each taxon in a sampled eDNA community, we provide a map that illustrates potential methods for bridging these gaps. Additionally, we use an original data set to estimate the relative abundances of taxon-specific template DNA prior to PCR, given the abundance of DNA sequences recovered post-PCR-and-sequencing, a critical step in the chain of eDNA inference. While we focus on the use of eDNA samples to determine the relative abundance of taxa within a community, our approach also applies to single-taxon applications (including applications using qPCR), studies of diversity, and studies focused on occurrence. By grounding inferences about eDNA community composition in a rigorous statistical framework, and by making these inferences explicit, we hope to improve the inferential potential for the emerging field of community-level eDNA analysis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>27755698</pmid><doi>10.1890/15-1733.1</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2016-09, Vol.26 (6), p.1645-1659
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835446133
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animals
Bayesian statistics
Biomass
community surveys
DNA - genetics
ecosystem assessment
environmental DNA
Fishes
Invertebrates
Metagenomics
Models, Biological
multinomial‐Poisson transformation
quantitative PCR
Seawater
title A framework for inferring biological communities from environmental DNA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T07%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20framework%20for%20inferring%20biological%20communities%20from%20environmental%20DNA&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Shelton,%20Andrew%20Olaf&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1645&rft.epage=1659&rft.pages=1645-1659&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/15-1733.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24818203%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827896100&rft_id=info:pmid/27755698&rft_jstor_id=24818203&rfr_iscdi=true