Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context

The present study attempts to give an account of how students represent writing task in an EAP course. Further, the study is intended to discover if learners’ mental representation of writing would contribute to their written performance. During a 16-week term, students were instructed to practice w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psycholinguistic research 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.567-581
Hauptverfasser: Zarei, Gholam Reza, Pourghasemian, Hossein, Jalali, Hassan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 581
container_issue 3
container_start_page 567
container_title Journal of psycholinguistic research
container_volume 46
creator Zarei, Gholam Reza
Pourghasemian, Hossein
Jalali, Hassan
description The present study attempts to give an account of how students represent writing task in an EAP course. Further, the study is intended to discover if learners’ mental representation of writing would contribute to their written performance. During a 16-week term, students were instructed to practice writing as a problem solving activity. At almost the end of the term, they were prompted to write on what they thought writing task was like and also an essay on an argumentative topic. The results revealed that students could conceptualize the instructed recursive model of writing as a process-based, multi-dimensional and integrated activity inducing self-direction and organization while holding in low regard the product view of writing. The findings also demonstrated that task representation was related to the students’ writing performance, with process oriented students significantly outperforming the product-oriented ones. Also, it was found that task representation components (ideational, linguistic, textual, interpersonal) had a significant relationship with the written performance ( β = 0.59 ; Sig.: 0.006). The study can have both theoretical and practical implications with regard to the factors involving the students’ writing internal processes and their effects on written performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835438449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1141108</ericid><sourcerecordid>1899694832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-622162e2b5a939f240de2b56a1335eceec372f96d7ef58e6d220a5d082ea92bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qFEEQxxtRzBp9AA-GhlxymaT6c6aPsmxiZCBBIh6b3pmadZLdnrW7B8wtr-Hr5UnsYWIQwVNR9f_VB_Un5D2DUwZQnkUGRugCmC6MVLyAF2TBVCkKrZR6SRYABgptQB2QNzHeQs6rir0mB7wspdSsXJDvtfOb0W2Q1uiCxxAfH37Rb6FPvd_QGxfv6BfcB4zok0v94KnzLb1Mka66DptEc2WiE3p6jaEbws75Bmk_gXR1XtPl4BP-TG_Jq85tI757iofk6_nqZvmpqK8uLpcf66IRRqZCc840R75WzgjTcQntlGjHhFDYIDai5J3RbYmdqlC3nINTLVQcneHrtTgkJ_PcfRh-jBiT3fWxwe3WeRzGaFkllBSVlCajx_-gt8MYfL4uU8ZoIyvBM8VmqglDjAE7uw_9zoV7y8BONtjZBpttsJMNFnLP0dPkcb3D9rnjz98z8GEGMPTNs7z6zJhkDKqs81mPWfMbDH-d9t-tvwGhLJwG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899694832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zarei, Gholam Reza ; Pourghasemian, Hossein ; Jalali, Hassan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Gholam Reza ; Pourghasemian, Hossein ; Jalali, Hassan</creatorcontrib><description>The present study attempts to give an account of how students represent writing task in an EAP course. Further, the study is intended to discover if learners’ mental representation of writing would contribute to their written performance. During a 16-week term, students were instructed to practice writing as a problem solving activity. At almost the end of the term, they were prompted to write on what they thought writing task was like and also an essay on an argumentative topic. The results revealed that students could conceptualize the instructed recursive model of writing as a process-based, multi-dimensional and integrated activity inducing self-direction and organization while holding in low regard the product view of writing. The findings also demonstrated that task representation was related to the students’ writing performance, with process oriented students significantly outperforming the product-oriented ones. Also, it was found that task representation components (ideational, linguistic, textual, interpersonal) had a significant relationship with the written performance ( β = 0.59 ; Sig.: 0.006). The study can have both theoretical and practical implications with regard to the factors involving the students’ writing internal processes and their effects on written performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-6905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27744617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; English (Second Language) ; English for Academic Purposes ; Essays ; Female ; Humans ; Integrated Activities ; Language ; Learning - physiology ; Male ; Mental representation ; Multilingualism ; Persuasive Discourse ; Problem Solving ; Problem Solving - physiology ; Process Approach (Writing) ; Psycholinguistics ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language writing ; Student writing ; Task Analysis ; Teaching Methods ; Writing ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Processes ; Writing Skills ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.567-581</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Psycholinguistic Research is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-622162e2b5a939f240de2b56a1335eceec372f96d7ef58e6d220a5d082ea92bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-622162e2b5a939f240de2b56a1335eceec372f96d7ef58e6d220a5d082ea92bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1141108$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27744617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Gholam Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourghasemian, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalali, Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context</title><title>Journal of psycholinguistic research</title><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><description>The present study attempts to give an account of how students represent writing task in an EAP course. Further, the study is intended to discover if learners’ mental representation of writing would contribute to their written performance. During a 16-week term, students were instructed to practice writing as a problem solving activity. At almost the end of the term, they were prompted to write on what they thought writing task was like and also an essay on an argumentative topic. The results revealed that students could conceptualize the instructed recursive model of writing as a process-based, multi-dimensional and integrated activity inducing self-direction and organization while holding in low regard the product view of writing. The findings also demonstrated that task representation was related to the students’ writing performance, with process oriented students significantly outperforming the product-oriented ones. Also, it was found that task representation components (ideational, linguistic, textual, interpersonal) had a significant relationship with the written performance ( β = 0.59 ; Sig.: 0.006). The study can have both theoretical and practical implications with regard to the factors involving the students’ writing internal processes and their effects on written performance.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English for Academic Purposes</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Integrated Activities</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental representation</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Problem Solving - physiology</subject><subject>Process Approach (Writing)</subject><subject>Psycholinguistics</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-6905</issn><issn>1573-6555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qFEEQxxtRzBp9AA-GhlxymaT6c6aPsmxiZCBBIh6b3pmadZLdnrW7B8wtr-Hr5UnsYWIQwVNR9f_VB_Un5D2DUwZQnkUGRugCmC6MVLyAF2TBVCkKrZR6SRYABgptQB2QNzHeQs6rir0mB7wspdSsXJDvtfOb0W2Q1uiCxxAfH37Rb6FPvd_QGxfv6BfcB4zok0v94KnzLb1Mka66DptEc2WiE3p6jaEbws75Bmk_gXR1XtPl4BP-TG_Jq85tI757iofk6_nqZvmpqK8uLpcf66IRRqZCc840R75WzgjTcQntlGjHhFDYIDai5J3RbYmdqlC3nINTLVQcneHrtTgkJ_PcfRh-jBiT3fWxwe3WeRzGaFkllBSVlCajx_-gt8MYfL4uU8ZoIyvBM8VmqglDjAE7uw_9zoV7y8BONtjZBpttsJMNFnLP0dPkcb3D9rnjz98z8GEGMPTNs7z6zJhkDKqs81mPWfMbDH-d9t-tvwGhLJwG</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Zarei, Gholam Reza</creator><creator>Pourghasemian, Hossein</creator><creator>Jalali, Hassan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context</title><author>Zarei, Gholam Reza ; Pourghasemian, Hossein ; Jalali, Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-622162e2b5a939f240de2b56a1335eceec372f96d7ef58e6d220a5d082ea92bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English for Academic Purposes</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Integrated Activities</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental representation</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Problem Solving - physiology</topic><topic>Process Approach (Writing)</topic><topic>Psycholinguistics</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zarei, Gholam Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourghasemian, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalali, Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology &amp; Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zarei, Gholam Reza</au><au>Pourghasemian, Hossein</au><au>Jalali, Hassan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1141108</ericid><atitle>Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psycholinguistic research</jtitle><stitle>J Psycholinguist Res</stitle><addtitle>J Psycholinguist Res</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>581</epage><pages>567-581</pages><issn>0090-6905</issn><eissn>1573-6555</eissn><abstract>The present study attempts to give an account of how students represent writing task in an EAP course. Further, the study is intended to discover if learners’ mental representation of writing would contribute to their written performance. During a 16-week term, students were instructed to practice writing as a problem solving activity. At almost the end of the term, they were prompted to write on what they thought writing task was like and also an essay on an argumentative topic. The results revealed that students could conceptualize the instructed recursive model of writing as a process-based, multi-dimensional and integrated activity inducing self-direction and organization while holding in low regard the product view of writing. The findings also demonstrated that task representation was related to the students’ writing performance, with process oriented students significantly outperforming the product-oriented ones. Also, it was found that task representation components (ideational, linguistic, textual, interpersonal) had a significant relationship with the written performance ( β = 0.59 ; Sig.: 0.006). The study can have both theoretical and practical implications with regard to the factors involving the students’ writing internal processes and their effects on written performance.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27744617</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-6905
ispartof Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2017-06, Vol.46 (3), p.567-581
issn 0090-6905
1573-6555
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835438449
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adolescent
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
English (Second Language)
English for Academic Purposes
Essays
Female
Humans
Integrated Activities
Language
Learning - physiology
Male
Mental representation
Multilingualism
Persuasive Discourse
Problem Solving
Problem Solving - physiology
Process Approach (Writing)
Psycholinguistics
Psychological aspects
Psychology
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Second language writing
Student writing
Task Analysis
Teaching Methods
Writing
Writing Instruction
Writing Processes
Writing Skills
Young Adult
title Language Learners’ Writing Task Representation and Its Effect on Written Performance in an EFL Context
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T21%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Language%20Learners%E2%80%99%20Writing%20Task%20Representation%20and%20Its%20Effect%20on%20Written%20Performance%20in%20an%20EFL%20Context&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psycholinguistic%20research&rft.au=Zarei,%20Gholam%20Reza&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=581&rft.pages=567-581&rft.issn=0090-6905&rft.eissn=1573-6555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10936-016-9452-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1899694832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899694832&rft_id=info:pmid/27744617&rft_ericid=EJ1141108&rfr_iscdi=true