The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)

Background Oculomotor deficits in smooth pursuit, saccades, vestibular–ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and fixation are common problems seen after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). No scale currently exists to rate all of these together. The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PM & R 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.477-482
Hauptverfasser: Politzer, Thomas, Berryman, Amy, Rasavage, Karen, Snell, Lawrence, Weintraub, Allan, Gerber, Donald J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 482
container_issue 5
container_start_page 477
container_title PM & R
container_volume 9
creator Politzer, Thomas
Berryman, Amy
Rasavage, Karen
Snell, Lawrence
Weintraub, Allan
Gerber, Donald J.
description Background Oculomotor deficits in smooth pursuit, saccades, vestibular–ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and fixation are common problems seen after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). No scale currently exists to rate all of these together. The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS) was designed to systematically quantify frequency and severity of eye movement deficits in TBI. Objective To assess the intra‐ and interrater reliability of a new rating scale for detecting the presence and degree of 5 oculomotor abnormalities after TBI. Design A reliability study. Setting This was an institution‐based study at Craig Rehabilitation Hospital. Participants English‐speaking patients between ages 18 and 65 years with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe mechanical TBI and who were not blind in either eye were eligible. Methods Between October 2013 and March 2014, a total of 11 TBI patients and 9 non‐TBI controls were enrolled in the study. The median age was 30 years (range, 18‐74 years) for subjects and 52 years (range, 28‐63 years) for controls. All patients were male, and 8 of 9 controls were female. Eye movements (fixation, smooth pursuit, saccade, convergence, and vestibular–ocular reflex) were recorded for each on digital video. They were rated on 2 separate occasions by each of the 2 raters. Main Outcome Measurements Inter‐ and intrarater reliability tests. Results Median elapsed time between the first and second ratings was 7 days (range, 5‐44 days). Intrarater agreement was very strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.900) for pursuit, saccades, and VOR for both raters, and strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.710) for vergence and fixation. The interrater agreement for detecting presence of any oculomotor abnormality was substantial (unweighted κ = 0.63). The interrater concordance on the full range of scale scoring was strongest on the VOR test (weighted κ = 0.98), was substantial for vergence, pursuit, saccades, and total score (weighted κ > 0.60), and was moderate for fixation. For TBI patients, every eye movement rated was found to be more abnormal than compared to those in the controls. Conclusions CHEERS is a reliable scale for assessing and quantifying oculomotor deficits commonly observed in moderate to severe TBI. Further studies to validate the scale's utility in outcome prediction, and its applicability to broader brain injury populations, are warranted. Level of Evidence IV
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835433633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835433633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3517-8f0d5bee43d0556ba46b1950acea109cc8899d8b6c04ea659275a380c8a9a0713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwkAYRSdGI4i-gAvTJS5av-n8dmmaIhqMBnA9mU4HbNPS2qEa3t4SwLWrexfn3sVB6BZDgAHzhyJoqrYIwr4HIAMg4Rka4ohQHzNOzk-dynCArpwrADjFkl-iQSg4pxToEInlp_XiVudrb1q7Jt_q0kt21ku-ddnpbV5vvHkfm7W3MLq03jieJsl8cX-NLla6dPbmmCP0MUmW8dSfvT09x48z3xCGhS9XkLHUWkoyYIynmvIURwy0sRpDZIyUUZTJlBugVnMWhYJpIsFIHWkQmIzQ-PDbtPVXZ91WVbkztiz1xtadU1gSRgnhhPRoeEBNWzvX2pVq2rzS7U5hUHthqlB7YWovTIFUvbB-dHf879LKZn-Tk6EeEAfgJy_t7h-X6v11_kKFIL_MjHZj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835433633</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Politzer, Thomas ; Berryman, Amy ; Rasavage, Karen ; Snell, Lawrence ; Weintraub, Allan ; Gerber, Donald J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Politzer, Thomas ; Berryman, Amy ; Rasavage, Karen ; Snell, Lawrence ; Weintraub, Allan ; Gerber, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Oculomotor deficits in smooth pursuit, saccades, vestibular–ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and fixation are common problems seen after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). No scale currently exists to rate all of these together. The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS) was designed to systematically quantify frequency and severity of eye movement deficits in TBI. Objective To assess the intra‐ and interrater reliability of a new rating scale for detecting the presence and degree of 5 oculomotor abnormalities after TBI. Design A reliability study. Setting This was an institution‐based study at Craig Rehabilitation Hospital. Participants English‐speaking patients between ages 18 and 65 years with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe mechanical TBI and who were not blind in either eye were eligible. Methods Between October 2013 and March 2014, a total of 11 TBI patients and 9 non‐TBI controls were enrolled in the study. The median age was 30 years (range, 18‐74 years) for subjects and 52 years (range, 28‐63 years) for controls. All patients were male, and 8 of 9 controls were female. Eye movements (fixation, smooth pursuit, saccade, convergence, and vestibular–ocular reflex) were recorded for each on digital video. They were rated on 2 separate occasions by each of the 2 raters. Main Outcome Measurements Inter‐ and intrarater reliability tests. Results Median elapsed time between the first and second ratings was 7 days (range, 5‐44 days). Intrarater agreement was very strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.900) for pursuit, saccades, and VOR for both raters, and strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.710) for vergence and fixation. The interrater agreement for detecting presence of any oculomotor abnormality was substantial (unweighted κ = 0.63). The interrater concordance on the full range of scale scoring was strongest on the VOR test (weighted κ = 0.98), was substantial for vergence, pursuit, saccades, and total score (weighted κ &gt; 0.60), and was moderate for fixation. For TBI patients, every eye movement rated was found to be more abnormal than compared to those in the controls. Conclusions CHEERS is a reliable scale for assessing and quantifying oculomotor deficits commonly observed in moderate to severe TBI. Further studies to validate the scale's utility in outcome prediction, and its applicability to broader brain injury populations, are warranted. Level of Evidence IV</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27664404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis ; Case-Control Studies ; Eye Movement Measurements - classification ; Eye Movements ; Female ; Hospitals, Special ; Humans ; Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - diagnosis ; Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - etiology ; Reference Values ; Rehabilitation Centers ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PM &amp; R, 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.477-482</ispartof><rights>2017 by the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3517-8f0d5bee43d0556ba46b1950acea109cc8899d8b6c04ea659275a380c8a9a0713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3517-8f0d5bee43d0556ba46b1950acea109cc8899d8b6c04ea659275a380c8a9a0713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2Fj.pmrj.2016.08.032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2Fj.pmrj.2016.08.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Politzer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasavage, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snell, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)</title><title>PM &amp; R</title><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><description>Background Oculomotor deficits in smooth pursuit, saccades, vestibular–ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and fixation are common problems seen after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). No scale currently exists to rate all of these together. The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS) was designed to systematically quantify frequency and severity of eye movement deficits in TBI. Objective To assess the intra‐ and interrater reliability of a new rating scale for detecting the presence and degree of 5 oculomotor abnormalities after TBI. Design A reliability study. Setting This was an institution‐based study at Craig Rehabilitation Hospital. Participants English‐speaking patients between ages 18 and 65 years with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe mechanical TBI and who were not blind in either eye were eligible. Methods Between October 2013 and March 2014, a total of 11 TBI patients and 9 non‐TBI controls were enrolled in the study. The median age was 30 years (range, 18‐74 years) for subjects and 52 years (range, 28‐63 years) for controls. All patients were male, and 8 of 9 controls were female. Eye movements (fixation, smooth pursuit, saccade, convergence, and vestibular–ocular reflex) were recorded for each on digital video. They were rated on 2 separate occasions by each of the 2 raters. Main Outcome Measurements Inter‐ and intrarater reliability tests. Results Median elapsed time between the first and second ratings was 7 days (range, 5‐44 days). Intrarater agreement was very strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.900) for pursuit, saccades, and VOR for both raters, and strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.710) for vergence and fixation. The interrater agreement for detecting presence of any oculomotor abnormality was substantial (unweighted κ = 0.63). The interrater concordance on the full range of scale scoring was strongest on the VOR test (weighted κ = 0.98), was substantial for vergence, pursuit, saccades, and total score (weighted κ &gt; 0.60), and was moderate for fixation. For TBI patients, every eye movement rated was found to be more abnormal than compared to those in the controls. Conclusions CHEERS is a reliable scale for assessing and quantifying oculomotor deficits commonly observed in moderate to severe TBI. Further studies to validate the scale's utility in outcome prediction, and its applicability to broader brain injury populations, are warranted. Level of Evidence IV</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Eye Movement Measurements - classification</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Special</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1934-1482</issn><issn>1934-1563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1OwkAYRSdGI4i-gAvTJS5av-n8dmmaIhqMBnA9mU4HbNPS2qEa3t4SwLWrexfn3sVB6BZDgAHzhyJoqrYIwr4HIAMg4Rka4ohQHzNOzk-dynCArpwrADjFkl-iQSg4pxToEInlp_XiVudrb1q7Jt_q0kt21ku-ddnpbV5vvHkfm7W3MLq03jieJsl8cX-NLla6dPbmmCP0MUmW8dSfvT09x48z3xCGhS9XkLHUWkoyYIynmvIURwy0sRpDZIyUUZTJlBugVnMWhYJpIsFIHWkQmIzQ-PDbtPVXZ91WVbkztiz1xtadU1gSRgnhhPRoeEBNWzvX2pVq2rzS7U5hUHthqlB7YWovTIFUvbB-dHf879LKZn-Tk6EeEAfgJy_t7h-X6v11_kKFIL_MjHZj</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Politzer, Thomas</creator><creator>Berryman, Amy</creator><creator>Rasavage, Karen</creator><creator>Snell, Lawrence</creator><creator>Weintraub, Allan</creator><creator>Gerber, Donald J.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)</title><author>Politzer, Thomas ; Berryman, Amy ; Rasavage, Karen ; Snell, Lawrence ; Weintraub, Allan ; Gerber, Donald J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3517-8f0d5bee43d0556ba46b1950acea109cc8899d8b6c04ea659275a380c8a9a0713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Eye Movement Measurements - classification</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Special</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Politzer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berryman, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasavage, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snell, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>PM &amp; R</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Politzer, Thomas</au><au>Berryman, Amy</au><au>Rasavage, Karen</au><au>Snell, Lawrence</au><au>Weintraub, Allan</au><au>Gerber, Donald J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)</atitle><jtitle>PM &amp; R</jtitle><addtitle>PM R</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>482</epage><pages>477-482</pages><issn>1934-1482</issn><eissn>1934-1563</eissn><abstract>Background Oculomotor deficits in smooth pursuit, saccades, vestibular–ocular reflex (VOR), vergence, and fixation are common problems seen after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). No scale currently exists to rate all of these together. The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS) was designed to systematically quantify frequency and severity of eye movement deficits in TBI. Objective To assess the intra‐ and interrater reliability of a new rating scale for detecting the presence and degree of 5 oculomotor abnormalities after TBI. Design A reliability study. Setting This was an institution‐based study at Craig Rehabilitation Hospital. Participants English‐speaking patients between ages 18 and 65 years with a primary diagnosis of moderate to severe mechanical TBI and who were not blind in either eye were eligible. Methods Between October 2013 and March 2014, a total of 11 TBI patients and 9 non‐TBI controls were enrolled in the study. The median age was 30 years (range, 18‐74 years) for subjects and 52 years (range, 28‐63 years) for controls. All patients were male, and 8 of 9 controls were female. Eye movements (fixation, smooth pursuit, saccade, convergence, and vestibular–ocular reflex) were recorded for each on digital video. They were rated on 2 separate occasions by each of the 2 raters. Main Outcome Measurements Inter‐ and intrarater reliability tests. Results Median elapsed time between the first and second ratings was 7 days (range, 5‐44 days). Intrarater agreement was very strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.900) for pursuit, saccades, and VOR for both raters, and strong (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.710) for vergence and fixation. The interrater agreement for detecting presence of any oculomotor abnormality was substantial (unweighted κ = 0.63). The interrater concordance on the full range of scale scoring was strongest on the VOR test (weighted κ = 0.98), was substantial for vergence, pursuit, saccades, and total score (weighted κ &gt; 0.60), and was moderate for fixation. For TBI patients, every eye movement rated was found to be more abnormal than compared to those in the controls. Conclusions CHEERS is a reliable scale for assessing and quantifying oculomotor deficits commonly observed in moderate to severe TBI. Further studies to validate the scale's utility in outcome prediction, and its applicability to broader brain injury populations, are warranted. Level of Evidence IV</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27664404</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.032</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-1482
ispartof PM & R, 2017-05, Vol.9 (5), p.477-482
issn 1934-1482
1934-1563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835433633
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Brain Injuries, Traumatic - complications
Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis
Case-Control Studies
Eye Movement Measurements - classification
Eye Movements
Female
Hospitals, Special
Humans
Inpatients - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - diagnosis
Oculomotor Nerve Diseases - etiology
Reference Values
Rehabilitation Centers
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
United States
Young Adult
title The Craig Hospital Eye Evaluation Rating Scale (CHEERS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T14%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Craig%20Hospital%20Eye%20Evaluation%20Rating%20Scale%20(CHEERS)&rft.jtitle=PM%20&%20R&rft.au=Politzer,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=482&rft.pages=477-482&rft.issn=1934-1482&rft.eissn=1934-1563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.08.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835433633%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835433633&rft_id=info:pmid/27664404&rfr_iscdi=true