Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients
Abstract Objective A prospective observational clinical study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of preoperative Axillary Ultrasound (AUS) plus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as well as and its clinical utility, that is the capacity of the information supplied by the test to guide the cli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Breast (Edinburgh) 2016-12, Vol.30, p.146-150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 150 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 146 |
container_title | Breast (Edinburgh) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Gipponi, Marco Fregatti, Piero Garlaschi, Alessandro Murelli, Federica Margarino, Cecilia Depaoli, Francesca Baccini, Paola Gallo, Maurizio Friedman, Daniele |
description | Abstract Objective A prospective observational clinical study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of preoperative Axillary Ultrasound (AUS) plus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as well as and its clinical utility, that is the capacity of the information supplied by the test to guide the clinical decision-making. Materials and methods from January 2013 to August 2015, 400 female patients with pT1-3 cN0 operable breast cancer underwent AUS with FNAC at the Breast Unit of the “ IRCCS San Martino-IST ” in Genoa (Italy). Results 127 out of 400 patients (31.7%) had axillary lymph node metastases; in 69 out of 127 node-positive patients (54.3%) AUS detected at least one abnormal lymph node, and in 56 out of 127 patients (44.1%) the abnormal sonographic pattern of the lymph node was coupled with a positive FNAC finding. No false-positive finding by both AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC was observed. AUS-alone had sensitivity of 54.3% (69/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (69/69), NPV of 82.5% (273/331), and accuracy of 85.5% (342/400). Combined AUS/FNAC had sensitivity of 44.1% (56/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (56/56), NPV of 79.4% (273/344), and accuracy of 82.2% (329/400). Conclusions AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC had a high accuracy rate coupled with a more than satisfactory efficiency due to their low costs and easy access for the preoperative staging of the axilla. Notably, AUS-alone might be suggested for the preoperative staging of patients with early stage breast cancer because FNAC did not increased the specificity but reduced the sensitivity of the technique. Patients with negative findings might undergo either SLNB or close observation while waiting for the definitive results of ongoing SOUND randomized clinical trial. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835403377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960977616301709</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835403377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c641cffbc576c36b43816f44e2eadfccc166ff718a06d7d86f6950017d65e433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsGOFCEUJEbjzo7-gTEcvXQLTTd0X0wmE1c32ehBPRMGHiNjD7RAb5xP8K-l07sevHgghFBVr169h9ArSmpKKH97qg8RVMp1U141GWpChidoQzvWVIz05CnakIGTahCCX6HrlE6kIBjvn6OrRoim77tug37vfrlxVPGC5zFHlcLsDVbl3DgP1ScAMwLepclFlV3weH_JYQzHC3Ye5--ApwhhguXzHnDK6uj8EQeL1aOsDwbwGXJxqpJLC2_1jbXyGiKeChd8Ti_QM6vGBC8f7i36dvP-6_5jdff5w-1-d1fplopcdZq3VFt70J3gmvFDy3rKbdtCA8pYrTXl3FpBe0W4Eabnlg8dIVQY3kHL2Ba9WXWnGH7OkLI8u6ShuPUQ5iRpz7qWMCZEgbYrVMeQUgQrp-jOpStJiVyGIE9ybUYuQ5BkkEvEW_T6ocJ8OIP5S3pMvQDerQAofd47iDLpkoEG4yLoLE1w_6vwr4AenXdajT_gAukU5uhLhpLK1EgivyyLsOwB5awEUQT-ACXcsmY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835403377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gipponi, Marco ; Fregatti, Piero ; Garlaschi, Alessandro ; Murelli, Federica ; Margarino, Cecilia ; Depaoli, Francesca ; Baccini, Paola ; Gallo, Maurizio ; Friedman, Daniele</creator><creatorcontrib>Gipponi, Marco ; Fregatti, Piero ; Garlaschi, Alessandro ; Murelli, Federica ; Margarino, Cecilia ; Depaoli, Francesca ; Baccini, Paola ; Gallo, Maurizio ; Friedman, Daniele</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective A prospective observational clinical study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of preoperative Axillary Ultrasound (AUS) plus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as well as and its clinical utility, that is the capacity of the information supplied by the test to guide the clinical decision-making. Materials and methods from January 2013 to August 2015, 400 female patients with pT1-3 cN0 operable breast cancer underwent AUS with FNAC at the Breast Unit of the “ IRCCS San Martino-IST ” in Genoa (Italy). Results 127 out of 400 patients (31.7%) had axillary lymph node metastases; in 69 out of 127 node-positive patients (54.3%) AUS detected at least one abnormal lymph node, and in 56 out of 127 patients (44.1%) the abnormal sonographic pattern of the lymph node was coupled with a positive FNAC finding. No false-positive finding by both AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC was observed. AUS-alone had sensitivity of 54.3% (69/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (69/69), NPV of 82.5% (273/331), and accuracy of 85.5% (342/400). Combined AUS/FNAC had sensitivity of 44.1% (56/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (56/56), NPV of 79.4% (273/344), and accuracy of 82.2% (329/400). Conclusions AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC had a high accuracy rate coupled with a more than satisfactory efficiency due to their low costs and easy access for the preoperative staging of the axilla. Notably, AUS-alone might be suggested for the preoperative staging of patients with early stage breast cancer because FNAC did not increased the specificity but reduced the sensitivity of the technique. Patients with negative findings might undergo either SLNB or close observation while waiting for the definitive results of ongoing SOUND randomized clinical trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27728855</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla - diagnostic imaging ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery ; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy ; Italy ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel lymph node ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Staging ; Tumor Burden ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2016-12, Vol.30, p.146-150</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c641cffbc576c36b43816f44e2eadfccc166ff718a06d7d86f6950017d65e433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c641cffbc576c36b43816f44e2eadfccc166ff718a06d7d86f6950017d65e433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977616301709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27728855$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gipponi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregatti, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garlaschi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murelli, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margarino, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaoli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baccini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Daniele</creatorcontrib><title>Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective A prospective observational clinical study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of preoperative Axillary Ultrasound (AUS) plus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as well as and its clinical utility, that is the capacity of the information supplied by the test to guide the clinical decision-making. Materials and methods from January 2013 to August 2015, 400 female patients with pT1-3 cN0 operable breast cancer underwent AUS with FNAC at the Breast Unit of the “ IRCCS San Martino-IST ” in Genoa (Italy). Results 127 out of 400 patients (31.7%) had axillary lymph node metastases; in 69 out of 127 node-positive patients (54.3%) AUS detected at least one abnormal lymph node, and in 56 out of 127 patients (44.1%) the abnormal sonographic pattern of the lymph node was coupled with a positive FNAC finding. No false-positive finding by both AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC was observed. AUS-alone had sensitivity of 54.3% (69/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (69/69), NPV of 82.5% (273/331), and accuracy of 85.5% (342/400). Combined AUS/FNAC had sensitivity of 44.1% (56/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (56/56), NPV of 79.4% (273/344), and accuracy of 82.2% (329/400). Conclusions AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC had a high accuracy rate coupled with a more than satisfactory efficiency due to their low costs and easy access for the preoperative staging of the axilla. Notably, AUS-alone might be suggested for the preoperative staging of patients with early stage breast cancer because FNAC did not increased the specificity but reduced the sensitivity of the technique. Patients with negative findings might undergo either SLNB or close observation while waiting for the definitive results of ongoing SOUND randomized clinical trial.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Staging</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsGOFCEUJEbjzo7-gTEcvXQLTTd0X0wmE1c32ehBPRMGHiNjD7RAb5xP8K-l07sevHgghFBVr169h9ArSmpKKH97qg8RVMp1U141GWpChidoQzvWVIz05CnakIGTahCCX6HrlE6kIBjvn6OrRoim77tug37vfrlxVPGC5zFHlcLsDVbl3DgP1ScAMwLepclFlV3weH_JYQzHC3Ye5--ApwhhguXzHnDK6uj8EQeL1aOsDwbwGXJxqpJLC2_1jbXyGiKeChd8Ti_QM6vGBC8f7i36dvP-6_5jdff5w-1-d1fplopcdZq3VFt70J3gmvFDy3rKbdtCA8pYrTXl3FpBe0W4Eabnlg8dIVQY3kHL2Ba9WXWnGH7OkLI8u6ShuPUQ5iRpz7qWMCZEgbYrVMeQUgQrp-jOpStJiVyGIE9ybUYuQ5BkkEvEW_T6ocJ8OIP5S3pMvQDerQAofd47iDLpkoEG4yLoLE1w_6vwr4AenXdajT_gAukU5uhLhpLK1EgivyyLsOwB5awEUQT-ACXcsmY</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Gipponi, Marco</creator><creator>Fregatti, Piero</creator><creator>Garlaschi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Murelli, Federica</creator><creator>Margarino, Cecilia</creator><creator>Depaoli, Francesca</creator><creator>Baccini, Paola</creator><creator>Gallo, Maurizio</creator><creator>Friedman, Daniele</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients</title><author>Gipponi, Marco ; Fregatti, Piero ; Garlaschi, Alessandro ; Murelli, Federica ; Margarino, Cecilia ; Depaoli, Francesca ; Baccini, Paola ; Gallo, Maurizio ; Friedman, Daniele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-5c641cffbc576c36b43816f44e2eadfccc166ff718a06d7d86f6950017d65e433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Biopsy, Fine-Needle</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Staging</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gipponi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fregatti, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garlaschi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murelli, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margarino, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depaoli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baccini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Daniele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gipponi, Marco</au><au>Fregatti, Piero</au><au>Garlaschi, Alessandro</au><au>Murelli, Federica</au><au>Margarino, Cecilia</au><au>Depaoli, Francesca</au><au>Baccini, Paola</au><au>Gallo, Maurizio</au><au>Friedman, Daniele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>146</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>146-150</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective A prospective observational clinical study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of preoperative Axillary Ultrasound (AUS) plus Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as well as and its clinical utility, that is the capacity of the information supplied by the test to guide the clinical decision-making. Materials and methods from January 2013 to August 2015, 400 female patients with pT1-3 cN0 operable breast cancer underwent AUS with FNAC at the Breast Unit of the “ IRCCS San Martino-IST ” in Genoa (Italy). Results 127 out of 400 patients (31.7%) had axillary lymph node metastases; in 69 out of 127 node-positive patients (54.3%) AUS detected at least one abnormal lymph node, and in 56 out of 127 patients (44.1%) the abnormal sonographic pattern of the lymph node was coupled with a positive FNAC finding. No false-positive finding by both AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC was observed. AUS-alone had sensitivity of 54.3% (69/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (69/69), NPV of 82.5% (273/331), and accuracy of 85.5% (342/400). Combined AUS/FNAC had sensitivity of 44.1% (56/127), specificity of 100% (273/273), PPV of 100% (56/56), NPV of 79.4% (273/344), and accuracy of 82.2% (329/400). Conclusions AUS-alone or combined AUS/FNAC had a high accuracy rate coupled with a more than satisfactory efficiency due to their low costs and easy access for the preoperative staging of the axilla. Notably, AUS-alone might be suggested for the preoperative staging of patients with early stage breast cancer because FNAC did not increased the specificity but reduced the sensitivity of the technique. Patients with negative findings might undergo either SLNB or close observation while waiting for the definitive results of ongoing SOUND randomized clinical trial.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27728855</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-9776 |
ispartof | Breast (Edinburgh), 2016-12, Vol.30, p.146-150 |
issn | 0960-9776 1532-3080 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835403377 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Axilla - diagnostic imaging Biopsy, Fine-Needle Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology Carcinoma, Lobular - surgery Clinical Decision-Making Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Image-Guided Biopsy Italy Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymph Nodes - pathology Mastectomy Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Predictive Value of Tests Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Sentinel lymph node Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Staging Tumor Burden Ultrasonography |
title | Axillary ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the preoperative staging of axillary node metastasis in breast cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A47%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Axillary%20ultrasound%20and%20Fine-Needle%20Aspiration%20Cytology%20in%20the%20preoperative%20staging%20of%20axillary%20node%20metastasis%20in%20breast%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Gipponi,%20Marco&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=146-150&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835403377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835403377&rft_id=info:pmid/27728855&rft_els_id=S0960977616301709&rfr_iscdi=true |