Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation
Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessme...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cardiology 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | International journal of cardiology |
container_volume | 225 |
creator | Aleksandric, Srdjan Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana Beleslin, Branko Parapid, Biljana Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana Stepanovic, Jelena Simic, Dragan Nedeljkovic, Ivana Petrovic, Milan Dobric, Milan Tomasevic, Miloje Banovic, Marko Nedeljkovic, Milan Ostojic, Miodrag |
description | Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835401947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527316325517</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835401947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUs1u1DAQthCIbgtvgJCPXLLY-bFjDkiopYBUwQE4W15nsjtLYgfb2Sqvw5PiaAsHLpwsz3w_mvmGkBecbTnj4vVxi0drQrct82_L1Fp9RDa8lXXBZVM_JpvckEVTyuqCXMZ4ZIzVSrVPyUUpJWctYxvy67N36E4m4gmoiRFiHMEl6ns6Ln7VRzPQXcBuj25Pdwu1PnhnwkL7wd_TEwzeYlpogAgha9xjOtAUjIvp4IOxaOmNn6YBAgV7OCv6fTDTYXlDs6_vcDDJB3qKW4rOp-CnzIkJxzk30Ltn5ElvhgjPH94r8v32_bfrj8Xdlw-frt_dFbbmMhVix4RhUIqeS7nrKiGrpm-BK171QlV9A72SjZIKuo6DkU1ZipKLFqTiggtbXZFXZ90p-J8zxKRHjBaGwTjwc9S8rZqacVXLDK3PUBt8jAF6PQUc81I0Z3pNRx_1OR29pqOZWquZ9vLBYd6N0P0l_YkjA96eAZDnPCEEHS2Cs9BhAJt05_F_Dv8K2AEdWjP8gAXi0c_B5R1qrmOpmf66Xsh6IFxUZdNwWf0G_qS8Cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835401947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</creator><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27710800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenosine - administration & dosage ; Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Aged ; Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage ; Cardiovascular ; Coronary Circulation - drug effects ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; Coronary flow velocity reserve ; Dobutamine ; Dobutamine - administration & dosage ; Echocardiography, Doppler - methods ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial bridging ; Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy ; Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology ; Myocardial ischemia ; Prospective Studies ; Stress-echocardiography ; Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography ; Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27710800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beleslin, Branko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parapid, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobric, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasevic, Miloje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</description><subject>Adenosine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Coronary flow velocity reserve</subject><subject>Dobutamine</subject><subject>Dobutamine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial bridging</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial ischemia</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stress-echocardiography</subject><subject>Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography</subject><subject>Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUs1u1DAQthCIbgtvgJCPXLLY-bFjDkiopYBUwQE4W15nsjtLYgfb2Sqvw5PiaAsHLpwsz3w_mvmGkBecbTnj4vVxi0drQrct82_L1Fp9RDa8lXXBZVM_JpvckEVTyuqCXMZ4ZIzVSrVPyUUpJWctYxvy67N36E4m4gmoiRFiHMEl6ns6Ln7VRzPQXcBuj25Pdwu1PnhnwkL7wd_TEwzeYlpogAgha9xjOtAUjIvp4IOxaOmNn6YBAgV7OCv6fTDTYXlDs6_vcDDJB3qKW4rOp-CnzIkJxzk30Ltn5ElvhgjPH94r8v32_bfrj8Xdlw-frt_dFbbmMhVix4RhUIqeS7nrKiGrpm-BK171QlV9A72SjZIKuo6DkU1ZipKLFqTiggtbXZFXZ90p-J8zxKRHjBaGwTjwc9S8rZqacVXLDK3PUBt8jAF6PQUc81I0Z3pNRx_1OR29pqOZWquZ9vLBYd6N0P0l_YkjA96eAZDnPCEEHS2Cs9BhAJt05_F_Dv8K2AEdWjP8gAXi0c_B5R1qrmOpmf66Xsh6IFxUZdNwWf0G_qS8Cg</recordid><startdate>20161215</startdate><enddate>20161215</enddate><creator>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creator><creator>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creator><creator>Beleslin, Branko</creator><creator>Parapid, Biljana</creator><creator>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creator><creator>Stepanovic, Jelena</creator><creator>Simic, Dragan</creator><creator>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creator><creator>Petrovic, Milan</creator><creator>Dobric, Milan</creator><creator>Tomasevic, Miloje</creator><creator>Banovic, Marko</creator><creator>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creator><creator>Ostojic, Miodrag</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161215</creationdate><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><author>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenosine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Coronary flow velocity reserve</topic><topic>Dobutamine</topic><topic>Dobutamine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial bridging</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial ischemia</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stress-echocardiography</topic><topic>Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography</topic><topic>Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beleslin, Branko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parapid, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobric, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasevic, Miloje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aleksandric, Srdjan</au><au>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</au><au>Beleslin, Branko</au><au>Parapid, Biljana</au><au>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</au><au>Stepanovic, Jelena</au><au>Simic, Dragan</au><au>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</au><au>Petrovic, Milan</au><au>Dobric, Milan</au><au>Tomasevic, Miloje</au><au>Banovic, Marko</au><au>Nedeljkovic, Milan</au><au>Ostojic, Miodrag</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-12-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>225</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27710800</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-5273 |
ispartof | International journal of cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45 |
issn | 0167-5273 1874-1754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835401947 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adenosine - administration & dosage Administration, Intravenous Adult Aged Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage Cardiovascular Coronary Circulation - drug effects Coronary Circulation - physiology Coronary flow velocity reserve Dobutamine Dobutamine - administration & dosage Echocardiography, Doppler - methods Exercise Test - methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Myocardial bridging Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology Myocardial ischemia Prospective Studies Stress-echocardiography Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage |
title | Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noninvasive%20assessment%20of%20myocardial%20bridging%20by%20coronary%20flow%20velocity%20reserve%20with%20transthoracic%20Doppler%20echocardiography:%20vasodilator%20vs.%20inotropic%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Aleksandric,%20Srdjan&rft.date=2016-12-15&rft.volume=225&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835401947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835401947&rft_id=info:pmid/27710800&rft_els_id=S0167527316325517&rfr_iscdi=true |