Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation

Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45
Hauptverfasser: Aleksandric, Srdjan, Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana, Beleslin, Branko, Parapid, Biljana, Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana, Stepanovic, Jelena, Simic, Dragan, Nedeljkovic, Ivana, Petrovic, Milan, Dobric, Milan, Tomasevic, Miloje, Banovic, Marko, Nedeljkovic, Milan, Ostojic, Miodrag
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue
container_start_page 37
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 225
creator Aleksandric, Srdjan
Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana
Beleslin, Branko
Parapid, Biljana
Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana
Stepanovic, Jelena
Simic, Dragan
Nedeljkovic, Ivana
Petrovic, Milan
Dobric, Milan
Tomasevic, Miloje
Banovic, Marko
Nedeljkovic, Milan
Ostojic, Miodrag
description Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p < 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835401947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527316325517</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835401947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUs1u1DAQthCIbgtvgJCPXLLY-bFjDkiopYBUwQE4W15nsjtLYgfb2Sqvw5PiaAsHLpwsz3w_mvmGkBecbTnj4vVxi0drQrct82_L1Fp9RDa8lXXBZVM_JpvckEVTyuqCXMZ4ZIzVSrVPyUUpJWctYxvy67N36E4m4gmoiRFiHMEl6ns6Ln7VRzPQXcBuj25Pdwu1PnhnwkL7wd_TEwzeYlpogAgha9xjOtAUjIvp4IOxaOmNn6YBAgV7OCv6fTDTYXlDs6_vcDDJB3qKW4rOp-CnzIkJxzk30Ltn5ElvhgjPH94r8v32_bfrj8Xdlw-frt_dFbbmMhVix4RhUIqeS7nrKiGrpm-BK171QlV9A72SjZIKuo6DkU1ZipKLFqTiggtbXZFXZ90p-J8zxKRHjBaGwTjwc9S8rZqacVXLDK3PUBt8jAF6PQUc81I0Z3pNRx_1OR29pqOZWquZ9vLBYd6N0P0l_YkjA96eAZDnPCEEHS2Cs9BhAJt05_F_Dv8K2AEdWjP8gAXi0c_B5R1qrmOpmf66Xsh6IFxUZdNwWf0G_qS8Cg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835401947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</creator><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p &lt; 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27710800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenosine - administration &amp; dosage ; Administration, Intravenous ; Adult ; Aged ; Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Cardiovascular ; Coronary Circulation - drug effects ; Coronary Circulation - physiology ; Coronary flow velocity reserve ; Dobutamine ; Dobutamine - administration &amp; dosage ; Echocardiography, Doppler - methods ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial bridging ; Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging ; Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy ; Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology ; Myocardial ischemia ; Prospective Studies ; Stress-echocardiography ; Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography ; Vasodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27710800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beleslin, Branko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parapid, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobric, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasevic, Miloje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p &lt; 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</description><subject>Adenosine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - physiology</subject><subject>Coronary flow velocity reserve</subject><subject>Dobutamine</subject><subject>Dobutamine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial bridging</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy</subject><subject>Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial ischemia</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stress-echocardiography</subject><subject>Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography</subject><subject>Vasodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUs1u1DAQthCIbgtvgJCPXLLY-bFjDkiopYBUwQE4W15nsjtLYgfb2Sqvw5PiaAsHLpwsz3w_mvmGkBecbTnj4vVxi0drQrct82_L1Fp9RDa8lXXBZVM_JpvckEVTyuqCXMZ4ZIzVSrVPyUUpJWctYxvy67N36E4m4gmoiRFiHMEl6ns6Ln7VRzPQXcBuj25Pdwu1PnhnwkL7wd_TEwzeYlpogAgha9xjOtAUjIvp4IOxaOmNn6YBAgV7OCv6fTDTYXlDs6_vcDDJB3qKW4rOp-CnzIkJxzk30Ltn5ElvhgjPH94r8v32_bfrj8Xdlw-frt_dFbbmMhVix4RhUIqeS7nrKiGrpm-BK171QlV9A72SjZIKuo6DkU1ZipKLFqTiggtbXZFXZ90p-J8zxKRHjBaGwTjwc9S8rZqacVXLDK3PUBt8jAF6PQUc81I0Z3pNRx_1OR29pqOZWquZ9vLBYd6N0P0l_YkjA96eAZDnPCEEHS2Cs9BhAJt05_F_Dv8K2AEdWjP8gAXi0c_B5R1qrmOpmf66Xsh6IFxUZdNwWf0G_qS8Cg</recordid><startdate>20161215</startdate><enddate>20161215</enddate><creator>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creator><creator>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creator><creator>Beleslin, Branko</creator><creator>Parapid, Biljana</creator><creator>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creator><creator>Stepanovic, Jelena</creator><creator>Simic, Dragan</creator><creator>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creator><creator>Petrovic, Milan</creator><creator>Dobric, Milan</creator><creator>Tomasevic, Miloje</creator><creator>Banovic, Marko</creator><creator>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creator><creator>Ostojic, Miodrag</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161215</creationdate><title>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</title><author>Aleksandric, Srdjan ; Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana ; Beleslin, Branko ; Parapid, Biljana ; Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana ; Stepanovic, Jelena ; Simic, Dragan ; Nedeljkovic, Ivana ; Petrovic, Milan ; Dobric, Milan ; Tomasevic, Miloje ; Banovic, Marko ; Nedeljkovic, Milan ; Ostojic, Miodrag</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-6b06a0e26f177bd36735f8e1913f693f5ef975979edd1ea752262168e791616c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenosine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - physiology</topic><topic>Coronary flow velocity reserve</topic><topic>Dobutamine</topic><topic>Dobutamine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial bridging</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy</topic><topic>Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial ischemia</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stress-echocardiography</topic><topic>Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography</topic><topic>Vasodilator Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aleksandric, Srdjan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beleslin, Branko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parapid, Biljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanovic, Jelena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simic, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobric, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomasevic, Miloje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banovic, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nedeljkovic, Milan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostojic, Miodrag</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aleksandric, Srdjan</au><au>Djordjevic-Dikic, Ana</au><au>Beleslin, Branko</au><au>Parapid, Biljana</au><au>Teofilovski-Parapid, Gordana</au><au>Stepanovic, Jelena</au><au>Simic, Dragan</au><au>Nedeljkovic, Ivana</au><au>Petrovic, Milan</au><au>Dobric, Milan</au><au>Tomasevic, Miloje</au><au>Banovic, Marko</au><au>Nedeljkovic, Milan</au><au>Ostojic, Miodrag</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2016-12-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>225</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background To consider hemodynamic assessment of myocardial bridging (MB) adequate, it is believed that inotropic stimulation with dobutamine should be estimated because its dynamic nature depends on the degree of extravascular coronary compression. This study evaluated comparative assessment of hemodynamic relevance of MB using coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurements by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) with vasodilatative and inotropic challenges. Methods This prospective study included forty-four patients with angiographic evidence of isolated MB of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and systolic compression of ≥ 50% diameter stenosis. All patients were evaluated by exercise stress-echocardiography (ExSE) test for signs of myocardial ischemia, and CFVR of the distal segment of LAD during iv.infusion of adenosine (ADO:140 μg/kg/min) and iv.infusion of dobutamine (DOB:10-40 μg/kg/min), separately. Results Exercise-SE was positive for myocardial ischemia in 8/44 (18%) of patients. CFVR during ADO was significantly higher than CFVR during peak DOB (2.85 ± 0.68 vs . 2.44 ± 0.48, p = 0.002). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in SE-positive group in comparison to SE-negative group (2.01 ± 0.16 vs. 2.54 ± 0.47, p &lt; 0.001), but not for ADO (2.47 ± 0.51 vs. 2.89 ± 0.70, p = 0.168), respectively. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that CFVR peak DOB was the most significant predictor of functional significant MB (OR 0.011, 95%CI: 0.001–0.507, p = 0.021). Receiver-operating characteristic curves have shown that TTDE-CFVR obtained by high-dose of dobutamine infusion is better than those by adenosine regarding to functional status of MB (AUC 0.861, p = 0.004; AUC 0.674, p = 0.179, respectively). Conclusions Non-invasive CFVR measurement by TTDE during inotropic stimulation, in comparison to vasodilation, provides more reliable functional evaluation of MB.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27710800</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2016-12, Vol.225, p.37-45
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835401947
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adenosine - administration & dosage
Administration, Intravenous
Adult
Aged
Blood Flow Velocity - drug effects
Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage
Cardiovascular
Coronary Circulation - drug effects
Coronary Circulation - physiology
Coronary flow velocity reserve
Dobutamine
Dobutamine - administration & dosage
Echocardiography, Doppler - methods
Exercise Test - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial bridging
Myocardial Bridging - diagnostic imaging
Myocardial Bridging - drug therapy
Myocardial Bridging - physiopathology
Myocardial ischemia
Prospective Studies
Stress-echocardiography
Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography
Vasodilator Agents - administration & dosage
title Noninvasive assessment of myocardial bridging by coronary flow velocity reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: vasodilator vs. inotropic stimulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Noninvasive%20assessment%20of%20myocardial%20bridging%20by%20coronary%20flow%20velocity%20reserve%20with%20transthoracic%20Doppler%20echocardiography:%20vasodilator%20vs.%20inotropic%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Aleksandric,%20Srdjan&rft.date=2016-12-15&rft.volume=225&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.09.101&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835401947%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835401947&rft_id=info:pmid/27710800&rft_els_id=S0167527316325517&rfr_iscdi=true