A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction
personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of ‘satisfaction’ makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective tech...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Midwifery 2016-10, Vol.41, p.68-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Midwifery |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Macpherson, Ignacio Roqué-Sánchez, María V. Legget, BN, Finola O. Fuertes, Ferran Segarra, Ignacio |
description | personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of ‘satisfaction’ makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective technique to obtain in depth quantitative evidence of the importance of this factor and its interaction with the other factors involved. This technique allows us to estimate the importance of overall satisfaction in its context and suggest actions for healthcare services.
systematic review of studies that quantitatively measure the personal relationship between women and healthcare professionals (gynecologists, obstetricians, nurse, midwifes, etc.) regarding maternity care satisfaction. The literature search focused on studies carried out between 1970 and 2014 that used multivariate analyses and included the woman-caregiver relationship as a factor of their analysis.
twenty-four studies which applied various multivariate analysis tools to different periods of maternity care (antenatal, perinatal, post partum) were selected. The studies included discrete scale scores and questionnaires from women with low-risk pregnancies. The “personal relationship” factor appeared under various names: care received, personalised treatment, professional support, amongst others. The most common multivariate techniques used to assess the percentage of variance explained and the odds ratio of each factor were principal component analysis and logistic regression.
the data, variables and factor analysis suggest that continuous, personalised care provided by the usual midwife and delivered within a family or a specialised setting, generates the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, these factors foster the woman's psychological and physiological recovery, often surpassing clinical action (e.g. medicalization and hospital organization) and/or physiological determinants (e.g. pain, pathologies, etc.).
•Care, consideration and support are identified more relevant than clinical outcomes.•Sensitivity, fulfilment and support perception configure childbirth satisfaction.•The personalised and continuous care by the habitual midwife maximizes satisfaction.•A familiar or an specialized setting further enhance maternal satisfaction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835397214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266613816301371</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835397214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d0a6caedce972091dacfa63790cfce46daa295f5b5b50920aa7ffefdd68c71e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0BVxIwI2b1pP2Nm3BzTD4Dwbc6DrkJic0l7a5JumU-xTzyp56RxcuJJDkhN_3nUM-xl4LKAUI-f5YTt6uZUX3EroSoH7CdqKpq6KGvn_KdlBJWUhRd1fsRUpHAOj30D5nV1XbNKJr5I493PB0Thknnb3hEe89rjw4ngekaqTXMKfBn7jTJofID5hXxJmvYaJdz5YPqMc88FMMDlMiXI-Jrz4Pfv7tMi1j9vc6ej1nEujxnHzaWlBLjFTzRF3S5k_il-yZIwN89Xhesx-fPn6__VLcffv89fbmrjB1t8-FBS2NRmuwbyvohdXGaVm3PRhncC-t1lXfuOZAC_oKtG6dQ2et7EwrUNbX7N3Fl-b-uWDKavLJ4DjqGcOSlOjqpiZvsSf07T_oMSzb4ETRfxLSiZao6kKZGFKK6NQp-knHsxKgtrjUUW1xqS0uBZ2iuEj05tF6OUxo_0r-5EPAhwuA9BeUTVTJeJwNWh_RZGWD_5__L-Kpqz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1940214817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Macpherson, Ignacio ; Roqué-Sánchez, María V. ; Legget, BN, Finola O. ; Fuertes, Ferran ; Segarra, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Ignacio ; Roqué-Sánchez, María V. ; Legget, BN, Finola O. ; Fuertes, Ferran ; Segarra, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of ‘satisfaction’ makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective technique to obtain in depth quantitative evidence of the importance of this factor and its interaction with the other factors involved. This technique allows us to estimate the importance of overall satisfaction in its context and suggest actions for healthcare services.
systematic review of studies that quantitatively measure the personal relationship between women and healthcare professionals (gynecologists, obstetricians, nurse, midwifes, etc.) regarding maternity care satisfaction. The literature search focused on studies carried out between 1970 and 2014 that used multivariate analyses and included the woman-caregiver relationship as a factor of their analysis.
twenty-four studies which applied various multivariate analysis tools to different periods of maternity care (antenatal, perinatal, post partum) were selected. The studies included discrete scale scores and questionnaires from women with low-risk pregnancies. The “personal relationship” factor appeared under various names: care received, personalised treatment, professional support, amongst others. The most common multivariate techniques used to assess the percentage of variance explained and the odds ratio of each factor were principal component analysis and logistic regression.
the data, variables and factor analysis suggest that continuous, personalised care provided by the usual midwife and delivered within a family or a specialised setting, generates the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, these factors foster the woman's psychological and physiological recovery, often surpassing clinical action (e.g. medicalization and hospital organization) and/or physiological determinants (e.g. pain, pathologies, etc.).
•Care, consideration and support are identified more relevant than clinical outcomes.•Sensitivity, fulfilment and support perception configure childbirth satisfaction.•The personalised and continuous care by the habitual midwife maximizes satisfaction.•A familiar or an specialized setting further enhance maternal satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27551856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Caregivers ; Childbirth ; Childbirth & labor ; Evidence-based medicine ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; Maternity care ; Medical personnel ; Medicalization ; Midwives ; Mothers - psychology ; Multivariate analysis ; Nursing ; Obstetricians ; Pain ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patient-Centered Care - methods ; Patient-Centered Care - standards ; Perinatal care ; Postpartum period ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Principal components analysis ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Questionnaires ; Recovery ; Relationship ; Satisfaction ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2016-10, Vol.41, p.68-78</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d0a6caedce972091dacfa63790cfce46daa295f5b5b50920aa7ffefdd68c71e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d0a6caedce972091dacfa63790cfce46daa295f5b5b50920aa7ffefdd68c71e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roqué-Sánchez, María V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legget, BN, Finola O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuertes, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segarra, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of ‘satisfaction’ makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective technique to obtain in depth quantitative evidence of the importance of this factor and its interaction with the other factors involved. This technique allows us to estimate the importance of overall satisfaction in its context and suggest actions for healthcare services.
systematic review of studies that quantitatively measure the personal relationship between women and healthcare professionals (gynecologists, obstetricians, nurse, midwifes, etc.) regarding maternity care satisfaction. The literature search focused on studies carried out between 1970 and 2014 that used multivariate analyses and included the woman-caregiver relationship as a factor of their analysis.
twenty-four studies which applied various multivariate analysis tools to different periods of maternity care (antenatal, perinatal, post partum) were selected. The studies included discrete scale scores and questionnaires from women with low-risk pregnancies. The “personal relationship” factor appeared under various names: care received, personalised treatment, professional support, amongst others. The most common multivariate techniques used to assess the percentage of variance explained and the odds ratio of each factor were principal component analysis and logistic regression.
the data, variables and factor analysis suggest that continuous, personalised care provided by the usual midwife and delivered within a family or a specialised setting, generates the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, these factors foster the woman's psychological and physiological recovery, often surpassing clinical action (e.g. medicalization and hospital organization) and/or physiological determinants (e.g. pain, pathologies, etc.).
•Care, consideration and support are identified more relevant than clinical outcomes.•Sensitivity, fulfilment and support perception configure childbirth satisfaction.•The personalised and continuous care by the habitual midwife maximizes satisfaction.•A familiar or an specialized setting further enhance maternal satisfaction.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Maternity care</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicalization</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetricians</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - methods</subject><subject>Patient-Centered Care - standards</subject><subject>Perinatal care</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Relationship</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-K1TAUxoMoznX0BVxIwI2b1pP2Nm3BzTD4Dwbc6DrkJic0l7a5JumU-xTzyp56RxcuJJDkhN_3nUM-xl4LKAUI-f5YTt6uZUX3EroSoH7CdqKpq6KGvn_KdlBJWUhRd1fsRUpHAOj30D5nV1XbNKJr5I493PB0Thknnb3hEe89rjw4ngekaqTXMKfBn7jTJofID5hXxJmvYaJdz5YPqMc88FMMDlMiXI-Jrz4Pfv7tMi1j9vc6ej1nEujxnHzaWlBLjFTzRF3S5k_il-yZIwN89Xhesx-fPn6__VLcffv89fbmrjB1t8-FBS2NRmuwbyvohdXGaVm3PRhncC-t1lXfuOZAC_oKtG6dQ2et7EwrUNbX7N3Fl-b-uWDKavLJ4DjqGcOSlOjqpiZvsSf07T_oMSzb4ETRfxLSiZao6kKZGFKK6NQp-knHsxKgtrjUUW1xqS0uBZ2iuEj05tF6OUxo_0r-5EPAhwuA9BeUTVTJeJwNWh_RZGWD_5__L-Kpqz8</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Macpherson, Ignacio</creator><creator>Roqué-Sánchez, María V.</creator><creator>Legget, BN, Finola O.</creator><creator>Fuertes, Ferran</creator><creator>Segarra, Ignacio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction</title><author>Macpherson, Ignacio ; Roqué-Sánchez, María V. ; Legget, BN, Finola O. ; Fuertes, Ferran ; Segarra, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d0a6caedce972091dacfa63790cfce46daa295f5b5b50920aa7ffefdd68c71e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Maternity care</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicalization</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetricians</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - methods</topic><topic>Patient-Centered Care - standards</topic><topic>Perinatal care</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Relationship</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macpherson, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roqué-Sánchez, María V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legget, BN, Finola O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuertes, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segarra, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macpherson, Ignacio</au><au>Roqué-Sánchez, María V.</au><au>Legget, BN, Finola O.</au><au>Fuertes, Ferran</au><au>Segarra, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>68</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>68-78</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>personalised support provided to women by health professionals is one of the prime factors attaining women's satisfaction during pregnancy and childbirth. However the multifactorial nature of ‘satisfaction’ makes difficult to assess it. Statistical multivariate analysis may be an effective technique to obtain in depth quantitative evidence of the importance of this factor and its interaction with the other factors involved. This technique allows us to estimate the importance of overall satisfaction in its context and suggest actions for healthcare services.
systematic review of studies that quantitatively measure the personal relationship between women and healthcare professionals (gynecologists, obstetricians, nurse, midwifes, etc.) regarding maternity care satisfaction. The literature search focused on studies carried out between 1970 and 2014 that used multivariate analyses and included the woman-caregiver relationship as a factor of their analysis.
twenty-four studies which applied various multivariate analysis tools to different periods of maternity care (antenatal, perinatal, post partum) were selected. The studies included discrete scale scores and questionnaires from women with low-risk pregnancies. The “personal relationship” factor appeared under various names: care received, personalised treatment, professional support, amongst others. The most common multivariate techniques used to assess the percentage of variance explained and the odds ratio of each factor were principal component analysis and logistic regression.
the data, variables and factor analysis suggest that continuous, personalised care provided by the usual midwife and delivered within a family or a specialised setting, generates the highest level of satisfaction. In addition, these factors foster the woman's psychological and physiological recovery, often surpassing clinical action (e.g. medicalization and hospital organization) and/or physiological determinants (e.g. pain, pathologies, etc.).
•Care, consideration and support are identified more relevant than clinical outcomes.•Sensitivity, fulfilment and support perception configure childbirth satisfaction.•The personalised and continuous care by the habitual midwife maximizes satisfaction.•A familiar or an specialized setting further enhance maternal satisfaction.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27551856</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-6138 |
ispartof | Midwifery, 2016-10, Vol.41, p.68-78 |
issn | 0266-6138 1532-3099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835397214 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Analysis Caregivers Childbirth Childbirth & labor Evidence-based medicine Factor analysis Female Humans Maternal Health Services - standards Maternity care Medical personnel Medicalization Midwives Mothers - psychology Multivariate analysis Nursing Obstetricians Pain Patient Satisfaction Patient-Centered Care - methods Patient-Centered Care - standards Perinatal care Postpartum period Pregnancy Prenatal care Principal components analysis Professional-Patient Relations Questionnaires Recovery Relationship Satisfaction Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Women Womens health |
title | A systematic review of the relationship factor between women and health professionals within the multivariant analysis of maternal satisfaction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A57%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20relationship%20factor%20between%20women%20and%20health%20professionals%20within%20the%20multivariant%20analysis%20of%20maternal%20satisfaction&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Macpherson,%20Ignacio&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=68-78&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2016.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835397214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1940214817&rft_id=info:pmid/27551856&rft_els_id=S0266613816301371&rfr_iscdi=true |