Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure

Background Bacterial cells in the human body account for 1–3% of total body weight and are at least equal in number to human cells. Recent research has focused on understanding how the different bacterial communities in the body (eg, gut, respiratory, skin, and vaginal microbiomes) predispose to hea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2016-12, Vol.215 (6), p.684-703
Hauptverfasser: Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD, Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD, Vilella, Felipe, PhD, Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD, Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD, Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD, Alonso, Roberto, Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD, Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD, Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD, Ramon, Daniel, PhD, Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 703
container_issue 6
container_start_page 684
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 215
creator Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD
Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD
Vilella, Felipe, PhD
Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD
Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD
Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD
Alonso, Roberto
Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD
Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD
Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD
Ramon, Daniel, PhD
Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD
description Background Bacterial cells in the human body account for 1–3% of total body weight and are at least equal in number to human cells. Recent research has focused on understanding how the different bacterial communities in the body (eg, gut, respiratory, skin, and vaginal microbiomes) predispose to health and disease. The microbiota of the reproductive tract has been inferred from the vaginal bacterial communities, and the uterus has been classically considered a sterile cavity. However, while the vaginal microbiota has been investigated in depth, there is a paucity of consistent data regarding the existence of an endometrial microbiota and its possible impact in reproductive function. Objective This study sought to test the existence of an endometrial microbiota that differs from that in the vagina, assess its hormonal regulation, and analyze the impact of the endometrial microbial community on reproductive outcome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Study Design To identify the existence of an endometrial microbiota, paired samples of endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirates were obtained simultaneously from 13 fertile women in prereceptive and receptive phases within the same menstrual cycle (total samples analyzed n = 52). To investigate the hormonal regulation of the endometrial microbiota during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, endometrial fluid was collected at prereceptive and receptive phases within the same cycle from 22 fertile women (n = 44). Finally, the reproductive impact of an altered endometrial microbiota in endometrial fluid was assessed by implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates in 35 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (total samples n = 41) with a receptive endometrium diagnosed using the endometrial receptivity array. Genomic DNA was obtained either from endometrial fluid or vaginal aspirate and sequenced by 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene; the resulting sequences were taxonomically assigned using QIIME. Data analysis was performed using R packages. The χ2 test, Student t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results When bacterial communities from paired endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirate samples within the same subjects were interrogated, different bacterial communities were detected between the uterine cavity and the vagina of some subjects. Based on its composition, the microbiota in the endometr
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835378674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937816307827</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835378674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5c1c3bab952b16715f1b30f35e58ff059529d8108a53cad487df28474db621a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAXrJJ8E8cOxJCQlVLK1ViASxYWY49pg5JfLGdSn17HN3CggUb2zM658jzDUKvKWkpof27qTVT_NGy-m7J0BIpnqADJYNsetWrp-hACGHNwKU6Qy9ynvaSDew5OmNSUik5O6Dvl_fBwWoBlztT6gEYVhcXKCmYGS_BpjiGWAy-MxmbFYP3YAuOKw7LcTZrMSXUIm_WQs44JuxNmLcEL9Ezb-YMrx7vc_Tt6vLrxXVz-_nTzcXH28Z2QpRGWGr5aMZBsJH2kgpPR048FyCU90TU_uAUJcoIbo3rlHSeqU52buwZrc1z9PaUe0zx1wa56CVkC3P9G8Qta6q4qAh62VUpO0nrUDkn8PqYwmLSg6ZE70j1pHekekeqyaAr0mp685i_jQu4v5Y_DKvg_UkAdcr7AElnG3akLqSKSrsY_p__4R-7ncMarJl_wgPkKW5prfw01Zlpor_sW9x3SntOpGKS_wZhDJyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835378674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD ; Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD ; Vilella, Felipe, PhD ; Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD ; Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD ; Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD ; Alonso, Roberto ; Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD ; Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD ; Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD ; Ramon, Daniel, PhD ; Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD ; Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD ; Vilella, Felipe, PhD ; Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD ; Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD ; Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD ; Alonso, Roberto ; Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD ; Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD ; Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD ; Ramon, Daniel, PhD ; Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Bacterial cells in the human body account for 1–3% of total body weight and are at least equal in number to human cells. Recent research has focused on understanding how the different bacterial communities in the body (eg, gut, respiratory, skin, and vaginal microbiomes) predispose to health and disease. The microbiota of the reproductive tract has been inferred from the vaginal bacterial communities, and the uterus has been classically considered a sterile cavity. However, while the vaginal microbiota has been investigated in depth, there is a paucity of consistent data regarding the existence of an endometrial microbiota and its possible impact in reproductive function. Objective This study sought to test the existence of an endometrial microbiota that differs from that in the vagina, assess its hormonal regulation, and analyze the impact of the endometrial microbial community on reproductive outcome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Study Design To identify the existence of an endometrial microbiota, paired samples of endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirates were obtained simultaneously from 13 fertile women in prereceptive and receptive phases within the same menstrual cycle (total samples analyzed n = 52). To investigate the hormonal regulation of the endometrial microbiota during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, endometrial fluid was collected at prereceptive and receptive phases within the same cycle from 22 fertile women (n = 44). Finally, the reproductive impact of an altered endometrial microbiota in endometrial fluid was assessed by implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates in 35 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (total samples n = 41) with a receptive endometrium diagnosed using the endometrial receptivity array. Genomic DNA was obtained either from endometrial fluid or vaginal aspirate and sequenced by 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene; the resulting sequences were taxonomically assigned using QIIME. Data analysis was performed using R packages. The χ2 test, Student t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results When bacterial communities from paired endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirate samples within the same subjects were interrogated, different bacterial communities were detected between the uterine cavity and the vagina of some subjects. Based on its composition, the microbiota in the endometrial fluid, comprising up to 191 operational taxonomic units, was defined as a Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&gt;90% Lactobacillus spp.) or a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&lt;90% Lactobacillus spp. with &gt;10% of other bacteria). Although the endometrial microbiota was not hormonally regulated during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, the presence of a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota in a receptive endometrium was associated with significant decreases in implantation [60.7% vs 23.1% ( P  = .02)], pregnancy [70.6% vs 33.3% ( P  = .03)], ongoing pregnancy [58.8% vs 13.3% ( P  = .02)], and live birth [58.8% vs 6.7% ( P  = .002)] rates. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the existence of an endometrial microbiota that is highly stable during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity. However, pathological modification of its profile is associated with poor reproductive outcomes for in vitro fertilization patients. This finding adds a novel microbiological dimension to the reproductive process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27717732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>assisted reproductive techniques ; bacterial pathogens ; Bacterial Typing Techniques ; Case-Control Studies ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; endometrial microbiota ; endometrial receptivity array ; Endometrium - microbiology ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gardnerella vaginalis - genetics ; Genome, Bacterial ; Humans ; Infertility - therapy ; Lactobacillus - genetics ; Live Birth - epidemiology ; Logistic Models ; Luteinizing Hormone ; Menstrual Cycle ; Microbiota - genetics ; Multivariate Analysis ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pilot Projects ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Prevotella - genetics ; Principal Component Analysis ; Prospective Studies ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, RNA ; Spain - epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina - microbiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016-12, Vol.215 (6), p.684-703</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5c1c3bab952b16715f1b30f35e58ff059529d8108a53cad487df28474db621a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5c1c3bab952b16715f1b30f35e58ff059529d8108a53cad487df28474db621a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9340-6207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937816307827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27717732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilella, Felipe, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramon, Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Background Bacterial cells in the human body account for 1–3% of total body weight and are at least equal in number to human cells. Recent research has focused on understanding how the different bacterial communities in the body (eg, gut, respiratory, skin, and vaginal microbiomes) predispose to health and disease. The microbiota of the reproductive tract has been inferred from the vaginal bacterial communities, and the uterus has been classically considered a sterile cavity. However, while the vaginal microbiota has been investigated in depth, there is a paucity of consistent data regarding the existence of an endometrial microbiota and its possible impact in reproductive function. Objective This study sought to test the existence of an endometrial microbiota that differs from that in the vagina, assess its hormonal regulation, and analyze the impact of the endometrial microbial community on reproductive outcome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Study Design To identify the existence of an endometrial microbiota, paired samples of endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirates were obtained simultaneously from 13 fertile women in prereceptive and receptive phases within the same menstrual cycle (total samples analyzed n = 52). To investigate the hormonal regulation of the endometrial microbiota during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, endometrial fluid was collected at prereceptive and receptive phases within the same cycle from 22 fertile women (n = 44). Finally, the reproductive impact of an altered endometrial microbiota in endometrial fluid was assessed by implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates in 35 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (total samples n = 41) with a receptive endometrium diagnosed using the endometrial receptivity array. Genomic DNA was obtained either from endometrial fluid or vaginal aspirate and sequenced by 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene; the resulting sequences were taxonomically assigned using QIIME. Data analysis was performed using R packages. The χ2 test, Student t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results When bacterial communities from paired endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirate samples within the same subjects were interrogated, different bacterial communities were detected between the uterine cavity and the vagina of some subjects. Based on its composition, the microbiota in the endometrial fluid, comprising up to 191 operational taxonomic units, was defined as a Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&gt;90% Lactobacillus spp.) or a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&lt;90% Lactobacillus spp. with &gt;10% of other bacteria). Although the endometrial microbiota was not hormonally regulated during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, the presence of a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota in a receptive endometrium was associated with significant decreases in implantation [60.7% vs 23.1% ( P  = .02)], pregnancy [70.6% vs 33.3% ( P  = .03)], ongoing pregnancy [58.8% vs 13.3% ( P  = .02)], and live birth [58.8% vs 6.7% ( P  = .002)] rates. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the existence of an endometrial microbiota that is highly stable during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity. However, pathological modification of its profile is associated with poor reproductive outcomes for in vitro fertilization patients. This finding adds a novel microbiological dimension to the reproductive process.</description><subject>assisted reproductive techniques</subject><subject>bacterial pathogens</subject><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>endometrial microbiota</subject><subject>endometrial receptivity array</subject><subject>Endometrium - microbiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gardnerella vaginalis - genetics</subject><subject>Genome, Bacterial</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility - therapy</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - genetics</subject><subject>Live Birth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Luteinizing Hormone</subject><subject>Menstrual Cycle</subject><subject>Microbiota - genetics</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Prevotella - genetics</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, RNA</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina - microbiology</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCC7BAXrJJ8E8cOxJCQlVLK1ViASxYWY49pg5JfLGdSn17HN3CggUb2zM658jzDUKvKWkpof27qTVT_NGy-m7J0BIpnqADJYNsetWrp-hACGHNwKU6Qy9ynvaSDew5OmNSUik5O6Dvl_fBwWoBlztT6gEYVhcXKCmYGS_BpjiGWAy-MxmbFYP3YAuOKw7LcTZrMSXUIm_WQs44JuxNmLcEL9Ezb-YMrx7vc_Tt6vLrxXVz-_nTzcXH28Z2QpRGWGr5aMZBsJH2kgpPR048FyCU90TU_uAUJcoIbo3rlHSeqU52buwZrc1z9PaUe0zx1wa56CVkC3P9G8Qta6q4qAh62VUpO0nrUDkn8PqYwmLSg6ZE70j1pHekekeqyaAr0mp685i_jQu4v5Y_DKvg_UkAdcr7AElnG3akLqSKSrsY_p__4R-7ncMarJl_wgPkKW5prfw01Zlpor_sW9x3SntOpGKS_wZhDJyg</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD</creator><creator>Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD</creator><creator>Vilella, Felipe, PhD</creator><creator>Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD</creator><creator>Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD</creator><creator>Alonso, Roberto</creator><creator>Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Ramon, Daniel, PhD</creator><creator>Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-6207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure</title><author>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD ; Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD ; Vilella, Felipe, PhD ; Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD ; Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD ; Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD ; Alonso, Roberto ; Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD ; Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD ; Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD ; Ramon, Daniel, PhD ; Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5c1c3bab952b16715f1b30f35e58ff059529d8108a53cad487df28474db621a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>assisted reproductive techniques</topic><topic>bacterial pathogens</topic><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>endometrial microbiota</topic><topic>endometrial receptivity array</topic><topic>Endometrium - microbiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gardnerella vaginalis - genetics</topic><topic>Genome, Bacterial</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility - therapy</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - genetics</topic><topic>Live Birth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Luteinizing Hormone</topic><topic>Menstrual Cycle</topic><topic>Microbiota - genetics</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Prevotella - genetics</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, RNA</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilella, Felipe, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramon, Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moreno, Inmaculada, PhD</au><au>Codoñer, Francisco M., PhD</au><au>Vilella, Felipe, PhD</au><au>Valbuena, Diana, MD, PhD</au><au>Martinez-Blanch, Juan F., PhD</au><au>Jimenez-Almazán, Jorge, PhD</au><au>Alonso, Roberto</au><au>Alamá, Pilar, MD, PhD</au><au>Remohí, Jose, MD, PhD</au><au>Pellicer, Antonio, MD, PhD</au><au>Ramon, Daniel, PhD</au><au>Simon, Carlos, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>215</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>684</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>684-703</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Background Bacterial cells in the human body account for 1–3% of total body weight and are at least equal in number to human cells. Recent research has focused on understanding how the different bacterial communities in the body (eg, gut, respiratory, skin, and vaginal microbiomes) predispose to health and disease. The microbiota of the reproductive tract has been inferred from the vaginal bacterial communities, and the uterus has been classically considered a sterile cavity. However, while the vaginal microbiota has been investigated in depth, there is a paucity of consistent data regarding the existence of an endometrial microbiota and its possible impact in reproductive function. Objective This study sought to test the existence of an endometrial microbiota that differs from that in the vagina, assess its hormonal regulation, and analyze the impact of the endometrial microbial community on reproductive outcome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Study Design To identify the existence of an endometrial microbiota, paired samples of endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirates were obtained simultaneously from 13 fertile women in prereceptive and receptive phases within the same menstrual cycle (total samples analyzed n = 52). To investigate the hormonal regulation of the endometrial microbiota during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, endometrial fluid was collected at prereceptive and receptive phases within the same cycle from 22 fertile women (n = 44). Finally, the reproductive impact of an altered endometrial microbiota in endometrial fluid was assessed by implantation, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates in 35 infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (total samples n = 41) with a receptive endometrium diagnosed using the endometrial receptivity array. Genomic DNA was obtained either from endometrial fluid or vaginal aspirate and sequenced by 454 pyrosequencing of the V3–V5 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene; the resulting sequences were taxonomically assigned using QIIME. Data analysis was performed using R packages. The χ2 test, Student t test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analyses. Results When bacterial communities from paired endometrial fluid and vaginal aspirate samples within the same subjects were interrogated, different bacterial communities were detected between the uterine cavity and the vagina of some subjects. Based on its composition, the microbiota in the endometrial fluid, comprising up to 191 operational taxonomic units, was defined as a Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&gt;90% Lactobacillus spp.) or a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota (&lt;90% Lactobacillus spp. with &gt;10% of other bacteria). Although the endometrial microbiota was not hormonally regulated during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity, the presence of a non- Lactobacillus -dominated microbiota in a receptive endometrium was associated with significant decreases in implantation [60.7% vs 23.1% ( P  = .02)], pregnancy [70.6% vs 33.3% ( P  = .03)], ongoing pregnancy [58.8% vs 13.3% ( P  = .02)], and live birth [58.8% vs 6.7% ( P  = .002)] rates. Conclusion Our results demonstrate the existence of an endometrial microbiota that is highly stable during the acquisition of endometrial receptivity. However, pathological modification of its profile is associated with poor reproductive outcomes for in vitro fertilization patients. This finding adds a novel microbiological dimension to the reproductive process.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27717732</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-6207</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016-12, Vol.215 (6), p.684-703
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835378674
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects assisted reproductive techniques
bacterial pathogens
Bacterial Typing Techniques
Case-Control Studies
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
endometrial microbiota
endometrial receptivity array
Endometrium - microbiology
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Gardnerella vaginalis - genetics
Genome, Bacterial
Humans
Infertility - therapy
Lactobacillus - genetics
Live Birth - epidemiology
Logistic Models
Luteinizing Hormone
Menstrual Cycle
Microbiota - genetics
Multivariate Analysis
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pilot Projects
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Prevotella - genetics
Principal Component Analysis
Prospective Studies
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
Sequence Analysis, RNA
Spain - epidemiology
Treatment Outcome
Vagina - microbiology
title Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A56%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20that%20the%20endometrial%20microbiota%20has%20an%20effect%20on%20implantation%20success%20or%20failure&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Moreno,%20Inmaculada,%20PhD&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=684&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=684-703&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835378674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835378674&rft_id=info:pmid/27717732&rft_els_id=S0002937816307827&rfr_iscdi=true