Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan
Probiotics are actively used for treatment of diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and prevention of infectious gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of probiotics is due to strain-specific features and the number of viable cells; however, several reports of deviations from the label in the actual c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of food microbiology 2016-11, Vol.237, p.92-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | International journal of food microbiology |
container_volume | 237 |
creator | Patrone, Vania Molinari, Paola Morelli, Lorenzo |
description | Probiotics are actively used for treatment of diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and prevention of infectious gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of probiotics is due to strain-specific features and the number of viable cells; however, several reports of deviations from the label in the actual content of strains in probiotic products are a matter of concern. Most of the available data on quality focuses on probiotic products containing lactobacilli and/or bifidobacteria, while very few data are available on spore-forming probiotics. The present study evaluates the label claims for spore count and species identification in five commercial probiotic products marketed in India and Pakistan that claim to contain Bacillus clausii: Tufpro, Ecogro, Enterogermina, Entromax, and Ospor. Bacterial enumeration from three batches was done by microbiological plating methods by two independent operators. Species identification was done using PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, and determination of the total amount of species present in the products was done using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis followed by DNA sequencing of the excised bands. Plate count methods demonstrated poor correlations between quantitative label indications and bacteria recovered from plates for Tufpro, Ecogro, and Ospor. The 16S rRNA analysis performed on bacteria isolated from plate counts showed that only Enterogermina and Ospor contained homogenous B. clausii. PCR-DGGE analysis revealed that only Enterogermina had a homogenous B. clausii population while other products had mixed bacterial populations. In conclusion, the current analysis clearly demonstrates that of the five analysed commercial probiotics, only Enterogermina followed the label claims.
•Few data are available on quality and reliability of spore-forming probiotics.•Most B. clausii probiotics from India and Pakistan do not comply with label claims.•Bacteria contained in some products are not univocally ascribed to B. clausii.•Some bacteria found have not received Qualified Presumption of Safety status.•Surveillance of food and therapeutic probiotics is needed to ensure safety/efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835376359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168160516304159</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835376359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-cd7191609341bf34f1410d6249bfa9342466e4d068194b1083423af54e0973543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctuFDEQtFAQWQK_gJxbLjPYY8_rmKwCRAqCA5ytHj9CLx472DORkh_gt_FmA8qRk6VydVVXFyGnnNWc8e79rsadi9HMqFOsmwLVbKgZb16QDR_6sRKyY0dkUz6GinesPSavc94xxloh2Cty3PStFAMfN-T3573GhNHHG9TgKQRD5-itXj0kqn9AAr3YhA-wYAw0OqrjPNukEby_p3AH6GHylt4-yiyoc2GEBTBguKEXoNH7tWAe1oxIXYozvQoG4dHqK_zEvEB4Q1468Nm-fXpPyPcPl9-2n6rrLx-vtufXlRZ9v1Ta9HwsiUYh-eSEdFxyZrpGjpODAjay66w0rCvh5MTZUCABrpWWjb0ooU_I2UG3rPtrtXlRM2ZtvYdg45oVH0Qr-k60Y6GOB2o5UM7JOnWbcIZ0rzhT-x7UTj3rQe17UGxQpYcy--7JZp1ma_5N_j18IWwPBFvC3qFNKmu0QVuDyepFmYj_YfMHdCuhjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835376359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Patrone, Vania ; Molinari, Paola ; Morelli, Lorenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Patrone, Vania ; Molinari, Paola ; Morelli, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><description>Probiotics are actively used for treatment of diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and prevention of infectious gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of probiotics is due to strain-specific features and the number of viable cells; however, several reports of deviations from the label in the actual content of strains in probiotic products are a matter of concern. Most of the available data on quality focuses on probiotic products containing lactobacilli and/or bifidobacteria, while very few data are available on spore-forming probiotics. The present study evaluates the label claims for spore count and species identification in five commercial probiotic products marketed in India and Pakistan that claim to contain Bacillus clausii: Tufpro, Ecogro, Enterogermina, Entromax, and Ospor. Bacterial enumeration from three batches was done by microbiological plating methods by two independent operators. Species identification was done using PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, and determination of the total amount of species present in the products was done using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis followed by DNA sequencing of the excised bands. Plate count methods demonstrated poor correlations between quantitative label indications and bacteria recovered from plates for Tufpro, Ecogro, and Ospor. The 16S rRNA analysis performed on bacteria isolated from plate counts showed that only Enterogermina and Ospor contained homogenous B. clausii. PCR-DGGE analysis revealed that only Enterogermina had a homogenous B. clausii population while other products had mixed bacterial populations. In conclusion, the current analysis clearly demonstrates that of the five analysed commercial probiotics, only Enterogermina followed the label claims.
•Few data are available on quality and reliability of spore-forming probiotics.•Most B. clausii probiotics from India and Pakistan do not comply with label claims.•Bacteria contained in some products are not univocally ascribed to B. clausii.•Some bacteria found have not received Qualified Presumption of Safety status.•Surveillance of food and therapeutic probiotics is needed to ensure safety/efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27543819</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>16S rRNA ; Bacillus clausii ; Bacillus clausii - genetics ; Bacillus clausii - isolation & purification ; Bifidobacterium - genetics ; Bifidobacterium - isolation & purification ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; India ; Lactobacillus - genetics ; Lactobacillus - isolation & purification ; Pakistan ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Probiotics ; Probiotics - chemistry ; Probiotics - economics ; Repetitive sequence-based PCR ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><ispartof>International journal of food microbiology, 2016-11, Vol.237, p.92-97</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-cd7191609341bf34f1410d6249bfa9342466e4d068194b1083423af54e0973543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-cd7191609341bf34f1410d6249bfa9342466e4d068194b1083423af54e0973543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160516304159$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27543819$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patrone, Vania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molinari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan</title><title>International journal of food microbiology</title><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>Probiotics are actively used for treatment of diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and prevention of infectious gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of probiotics is due to strain-specific features and the number of viable cells; however, several reports of deviations from the label in the actual content of strains in probiotic products are a matter of concern. Most of the available data on quality focuses on probiotic products containing lactobacilli and/or bifidobacteria, while very few data are available on spore-forming probiotics. The present study evaluates the label claims for spore count and species identification in five commercial probiotic products marketed in India and Pakistan that claim to contain Bacillus clausii: Tufpro, Ecogro, Enterogermina, Entromax, and Ospor. Bacterial enumeration from three batches was done by microbiological plating methods by two independent operators. Species identification was done using PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, and determination of the total amount of species present in the products was done using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis followed by DNA sequencing of the excised bands. Plate count methods demonstrated poor correlations between quantitative label indications and bacteria recovered from plates for Tufpro, Ecogro, and Ospor. The 16S rRNA analysis performed on bacteria isolated from plate counts showed that only Enterogermina and Ospor contained homogenous B. clausii. PCR-DGGE analysis revealed that only Enterogermina had a homogenous B. clausii population while other products had mixed bacterial populations. In conclusion, the current analysis clearly demonstrates that of the five analysed commercial probiotics, only Enterogermina followed the label claims.
•Few data are available on quality and reliability of spore-forming probiotics.•Most B. clausii probiotics from India and Pakistan do not comply with label claims.•Bacteria contained in some products are not univocally ascribed to B. clausii.•Some bacteria found have not received Qualified Presumption of Safety status.•Surveillance of food and therapeutic probiotics is needed to ensure safety/efficacy.</description><subject>16S rRNA</subject><subject>Bacillus clausii</subject><subject>Bacillus clausii - genetics</subject><subject>Bacillus clausii - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium - genetics</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - genetics</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Pakistan</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Probiotics - chemistry</subject><subject>Probiotics - economics</subject><subject>Repetitive sequence-based PCR</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><issn>0168-1605</issn><issn>1879-3460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUctuFDEQtFAQWQK_gJxbLjPYY8_rmKwCRAqCA5ytHj9CLx472DORkh_gt_FmA8qRk6VydVVXFyGnnNWc8e79rsadi9HMqFOsmwLVbKgZb16QDR_6sRKyY0dkUz6GinesPSavc94xxloh2Cty3PStFAMfN-T3573GhNHHG9TgKQRD5-itXj0kqn9AAr3YhA-wYAw0OqrjPNukEby_p3AH6GHylt4-yiyoc2GEBTBguKEXoNH7tWAe1oxIXYozvQoG4dHqK_zEvEB4Q1468Nm-fXpPyPcPl9-2n6rrLx-vtufXlRZ9v1Ta9HwsiUYh-eSEdFxyZrpGjpODAjay66w0rCvh5MTZUCABrpWWjb0ooU_I2UG3rPtrtXlRM2ZtvYdg45oVH0Qr-k60Y6GOB2o5UM7JOnWbcIZ0rzhT-x7UTj3rQe17UGxQpYcy--7JZp1ma_5N_j18IWwPBFvC3qFNKmu0QVuDyepFmYj_YfMHdCuhjg</recordid><startdate>20161121</startdate><enddate>20161121</enddate><creator>Patrone, Vania</creator><creator>Molinari, Paola</creator><creator>Morelli, Lorenzo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161121</creationdate><title>Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan</title><author>Patrone, Vania ; Molinari, Paola ; Morelli, Lorenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-cd7191609341bf34f1410d6249bfa9342466e4d068194b1083423af54e0973543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>16S rRNA</topic><topic>Bacillus clausii</topic><topic>Bacillus clausii - genetics</topic><topic>Bacillus clausii - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium - genetics</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - genetics</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Pakistan</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Probiotics - chemistry</topic><topic>Probiotics - economics</topic><topic>Repetitive sequence-based PCR</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patrone, Vania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molinari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morelli, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patrone, Vania</au><au>Molinari, Paola</au><au>Morelli, Lorenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan</atitle><jtitle>International journal of food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2016-11-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>92-97</pages><issn>0168-1605</issn><eissn>1879-3460</eissn><abstract>Probiotics are actively used for treatment of diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and prevention of infectious gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of probiotics is due to strain-specific features and the number of viable cells; however, several reports of deviations from the label in the actual content of strains in probiotic products are a matter of concern. Most of the available data on quality focuses on probiotic products containing lactobacilli and/or bifidobacteria, while very few data are available on spore-forming probiotics. The present study evaluates the label claims for spore count and species identification in five commercial probiotic products marketed in India and Pakistan that claim to contain Bacillus clausii: Tufpro, Ecogro, Enterogermina, Entromax, and Ospor. Bacterial enumeration from three batches was done by microbiological plating methods by two independent operators. Species identification was done using PCR amplification and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, and determination of the total amount of species present in the products was done using PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis followed by DNA sequencing of the excised bands. Plate count methods demonstrated poor correlations between quantitative label indications and bacteria recovered from plates for Tufpro, Ecogro, and Ospor. The 16S rRNA analysis performed on bacteria isolated from plate counts showed that only Enterogermina and Ospor contained homogenous B. clausii. PCR-DGGE analysis revealed that only Enterogermina had a homogenous B. clausii population while other products had mixed bacterial populations. In conclusion, the current analysis clearly demonstrates that of the five analysed commercial probiotics, only Enterogermina followed the label claims.
•Few data are available on quality and reliability of spore-forming probiotics.•Most B. clausii probiotics from India and Pakistan do not comply with label claims.•Bacteria contained in some products are not univocally ascribed to B. clausii.•Some bacteria found have not received Qualified Presumption of Safety status.•Surveillance of food and therapeutic probiotics is needed to ensure safety/efficacy.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27543819</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.012</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1605 |
ispartof | International journal of food microbiology, 2016-11, Vol.237, p.92-97 |
issn | 0168-1605 1879-3460 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835376359 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | 16S rRNA Bacillus clausii Bacillus clausii - genetics Bacillus clausii - isolation & purification Bifidobacterium - genetics Bifidobacterium - isolation & purification Colony Count, Microbial Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis DNA, Bacterial - genetics India Lactobacillus - genetics Lactobacillus - isolation & purification Pakistan Polymerase Chain Reaction Probiotics Probiotics - chemistry Probiotics - economics Repetitive sequence-based PCR RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics |
title | Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiological%20and%20molecular%20characterization%20of%20commercially%20available%20probiotics%20containing%20Bacillus%20clausii%20from%20India%20and%20Pakistan&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20food%20microbiology&rft.au=Patrone,%20Vania&rft.date=2016-11-21&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=92-97&rft.issn=0168-1605&rft.eissn=1879-3460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835376359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835376359&rft_id=info:pmid/27543819&rft_els_id=S0168160516304159&rfr_iscdi=true |