Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law
Purpose: To examine locations of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, 7 years after a statewide smoke-free policy. Design: Data collected via statewide, random digit dial telephone survey. Response rates were 64.7% for landline and 73.5% for cell phone. Setting: Minnesota, 2014. Partici...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of health promotion 2018-01, Vol.32 (1), p.131-134 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 134 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | American journal of health promotion |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | St. Claire, Ann W. Amato, Michael S. Boyle, Raymond G. Rode, Peter Kinney, Ann M. |
| description | Purpose:
To examine locations of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, 7 years after a statewide smoke-free policy.
Design:
Data collected via statewide, random digit dial telephone survey. Response rates were 64.7% for landline and 73.5% for cell phone.
Setting:
Minnesota, 2014.
Participants:
Representative sample of 7887 nonsmoking adults.
Measures:
Self-reported locations of SHS exposure and opinions on smoke-free restrictions.
Analysis:
Descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 35.5% of nonsmokers reported SHS exposure in the past 7 days. The greatest proportion of exposure occurred in community settings (31.7%) followed by cars (6.9%) and in the home (3.2%). Young adults were more likely to be exposed in a home or car than older adults. Nonsmokers living with a smoker were 39.6 (20.6-75.8) times more likely to be exposed to SHS in their home and 5.3 (4.1-6.8) times more likely to be exposed in a car, compared to those who did not live with a smoker.
Conclusion:
SHS exposure continues after comprehensive smoke-free policies restricted it from public places. Disparities in exposure rates exist for those who live with a smoker, are young, and have low incomes. Findings suggest the need for additional policies that will have the greatest public health benefit. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0890117116671390 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835360925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0890117116671390</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1835360925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-97fee54753b8676cd9310135020872ad9070f020692b7c1ce1a2221dcd2310543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlbvnmTBi5fVSdIkm5ultFooeKgePC1pMqut3U1Nuqj_3i1bFQqeZob3zZvhEXJO4ZpSpW4g09A0lEqpKNdwQLqMyiyVEtgh6W7ldKt3yEmMSwAmKMAx6TClgIPUXXI7Q-sr92oql8xK_4bJ6HPtYx0wUckzmhCTQbHBkJgqmVTO-9Bi6TggJlPzcUqOCrOKeLarPfI0Hj0O79Ppw91kOJimlkuxSbUqEEVfCT7PpJLWaU6BcgEMMsWM06CgaAap2VxZapEaxhh11rEGFH3eI1et7zr49xrjJi8X0eJqZSr0dcxpxgWXoJlo0Ms9dOnrUDXf5Qz6HDTPMt5Q0FI2-BgDFvk6LEoTvnIK-TbdfD_dZuViZ1zPS3S_Cz9xNkDaAtG84N_Vfw2_ATIifMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2043093883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>St. Claire, Ann W. ; Amato, Michael S. ; Boyle, Raymond G. ; Rode, Peter ; Kinney, Ann M.</creator><creatorcontrib>St. Claire, Ann W. ; Amato, Michael S. ; Boyle, Raymond G. ; Rode, Peter ; Kinney, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To examine locations of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, 7 years after a statewide smoke-free policy.
Design:
Data collected via statewide, random digit dial telephone survey. Response rates were 64.7% for landline and 73.5% for cell phone.
Setting:
Minnesota, 2014.
Participants:
Representative sample of 7887 nonsmoking adults.
Measures:
Self-reported locations of SHS exposure and opinions on smoke-free restrictions.
Analysis:
Descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 35.5% of nonsmokers reported SHS exposure in the past 7 days. The greatest proportion of exposure occurred in community settings (31.7%) followed by cars (6.9%) and in the home (3.2%). Young adults were more likely to be exposed in a home or car than older adults. Nonsmokers living with a smoker were 39.6 (20.6-75.8) times more likely to be exposed to SHS in their home and 5.3 (4.1-6.8) times more likely to be exposed in a car, compared to those who did not live with a smoker.
Conclusion:
SHS exposure continues after comprehensive smoke-free policies restricted it from public places. Disparities in exposure rates exist for those who live with a smoker, are young, and have low incomes. Findings suggest the need for additional policies that will have the greatest public health benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-1171</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0890117116671390</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27703069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Air Pollution, Indoor - legislation & jurisprudence ; Air Pollution, Indoor - statistics & numerical data ; Bans ; Female ; Health disparities ; Health promotion ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Indoor air quality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minnesota ; Mobile phones ; Nonsmokers ; Older people ; Passive smoking ; Public health ; Public spaces ; Smoke-Free Policy ; Smoking ; Telephone surveys ; Tobacco smoke ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence ; Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>American journal of health promotion, 2018-01, Vol.32 (1), p.131-134</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-97fee54753b8676cd9310135020872ad9070f020692b7c1ce1a2221dcd2310543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-97fee54753b8676cd9310135020872ad9070f020692b7c1ce1a2221dcd2310543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0890117116671390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0890117116671390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27703069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>St. Claire, Ann W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amato, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Raymond G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rode, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><title>Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law</title><title>American journal of health promotion</title><addtitle>Am J Health Promot</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To examine locations of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, 7 years after a statewide smoke-free policy.
Design:
Data collected via statewide, random digit dial telephone survey. Response rates were 64.7% for landline and 73.5% for cell phone.
Setting:
Minnesota, 2014.
Participants:
Representative sample of 7887 nonsmoking adults.
Measures:
Self-reported locations of SHS exposure and opinions on smoke-free restrictions.
Analysis:
Descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 35.5% of nonsmokers reported SHS exposure in the past 7 days. The greatest proportion of exposure occurred in community settings (31.7%) followed by cars (6.9%) and in the home (3.2%). Young adults were more likely to be exposed in a home or car than older adults. Nonsmokers living with a smoker were 39.6 (20.6-75.8) times more likely to be exposed to SHS in their home and 5.3 (4.1-6.8) times more likely to be exposed in a car, compared to those who did not live with a smoker.
Conclusion:
SHS exposure continues after comprehensive smoke-free policies restricted it from public places. Disparities in exposure rates exist for those who live with a smoker, are young, and have low incomes. Findings suggest the need for additional policies that will have the greatest public health benefit.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Bans</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Mobile phones</subject><subject>Nonsmokers</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Passive smoking</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Smoke-Free Policy</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Telephone surveys</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0890-1171</issn><issn>2168-6602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMotlbvnmTBi5fVSdIkm5ultFooeKgePC1pMqut3U1Nuqj_3i1bFQqeZob3zZvhEXJO4ZpSpW4g09A0lEqpKNdwQLqMyiyVEtgh6W7ldKt3yEmMSwAmKMAx6TClgIPUXXI7Q-sr92oql8xK_4bJ6HPtYx0wUckzmhCTQbHBkJgqmVTO-9Bi6TggJlPzcUqOCrOKeLarPfI0Hj0O79Ppw91kOJimlkuxSbUqEEVfCT7PpJLWaU6BcgEMMsWM06CgaAap2VxZapEaxhh11rEGFH3eI1et7zr49xrjJi8X0eJqZSr0dcxpxgWXoJlo0Ms9dOnrUDXf5Qz6HDTPMt5Q0FI2-BgDFvk6LEoTvnIK-TbdfD_dZuViZ1zPS3S_Cz9xNkDaAtG84N_Vfw2_ATIifMY</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>St. Claire, Ann W.</creator><creator>Amato, Michael S.</creator><creator>Boyle, Raymond G.</creator><creator>Rode, Peter</creator><creator>Kinney, Ann M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Journal of Health Promotion</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law</title><author>St. Claire, Ann W. ; Amato, Michael S. ; Boyle, Raymond G. ; Rode, Peter ; Kinney, Ann M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-97fee54753b8676cd9310135020872ad9070f020692b7c1ce1a2221dcd2310543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Bans</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Mobile phones</topic><topic>Nonsmokers</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Passive smoking</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Smoke-Free Policy</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Telephone surveys</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>St. Claire, Ann W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amato, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Raymond G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rode, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of health promotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>St. Claire, Ann W.</au><au>Amato, Michael S.</au><au>Boyle, Raymond G.</au><au>Rode, Peter</au><au>Kinney, Ann M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law</atitle><jtitle>American journal of health promotion</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Health Promot</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>131-134</pages><issn>0890-1171</issn><eissn>2168-6602</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
To examine locations of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, 7 years after a statewide smoke-free policy.
Design:
Data collected via statewide, random digit dial telephone survey. Response rates were 64.7% for landline and 73.5% for cell phone.
Setting:
Minnesota, 2014.
Participants:
Representative sample of 7887 nonsmoking adults.
Measures:
Self-reported locations of SHS exposure and opinions on smoke-free restrictions.
Analysis:
Descriptive statistics and logistic regression.
Results:
A total of 35.5% of nonsmokers reported SHS exposure in the past 7 days. The greatest proportion of exposure occurred in community settings (31.7%) followed by cars (6.9%) and in the home (3.2%). Young adults were more likely to be exposed in a home or car than older adults. Nonsmokers living with a smoker were 39.6 (20.6-75.8) times more likely to be exposed to SHS in their home and 5.3 (4.1-6.8) times more likely to be exposed in a car, compared to those who did not live with a smoker.
Conclusion:
SHS exposure continues after comprehensive smoke-free policies restricted it from public places. Disparities in exposure rates exist for those who live with a smoker, are young, and have low incomes. Findings suggest the need for additional policies that will have the greatest public health benefit.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27703069</pmid><doi>10.1177/0890117116671390</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-1171 |
| ispartof | American journal of health promotion, 2018-01, Vol.32 (1), p.131-134 |
| issn | 0890-1171 2168-6602 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835360925 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Air Pollution, Indoor - legislation & jurisprudence Air Pollution, Indoor - statistics & numerical data Bans Female Health disparities Health promotion Health technology assessment Humans Indoor air quality Male Middle Aged Minnesota Mobile phones Nonsmokers Older people Passive smoking Public health Public spaces Smoke-Free Policy Smoking Telephone surveys Tobacco smoke Tobacco Smoke Pollution - legislation & jurisprudence Tobacco Smoke Pollution - statistics & numerical data Young Adult Young adults |
| title | Secondhand Smoke Exposure 7 Years After an Indoor Smoke-Free Law |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A11%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondhand%20Smoke%20Exposure%207%20Years%20After%20an%20Indoor%20Smoke-Free%20Law&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20health%20promotion&rft.au=St.%20Claire,%20Ann%20W.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=131-134&rft.issn=0890-1171&rft.eissn=2168-6602&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0890117116671390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835360925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2043093883&rft_id=info:pmid/27703069&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0890117116671390&rfr_iscdi=true |