Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View
A common view is that bailouts of firms by governments are needed to cure inefficiencies in private markets. We propose an alternative view: even when private markets are efficient, costly bankruptcies will occur and benevolent governments without commitment will bail out firms to avoid bankruptcy c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American economic review 2016-09, Vol.106 (9), p.2458-2493 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2493 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2458 |
container_title | The American economic review |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Chari, V. V. Kehoe, Patrick J. |
description | A common view is that bailouts of firms by governments are needed to cure inefficiencies in private markets. We propose an alternative view: even when private markets are efficient, costly bankruptcies will occur and benevolent governments without commitment will bail out firms to avoid bankruptcy costs. Bailouts then introduce inefficiencies where none had existed. Although granting the government orderly resolution powers which allow it to rewrite private contracts improves on bailout outcomes, regulating leverage and taxing size is needed to achieve the relevant constrained efficient outcome, the sustainably efficient outcome. This outcome respects governments' incentives to intervene when they lack commitment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1257/aer.20150157 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835025960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43956922</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43956922</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-512ed04d9ad1dc51de28594544d8413a2e452b7ac0e32bd1cabcc543ee5b20cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pm69CwRcf1plck7XxTYc_JpOBTF9Lmtwko21m0iL7782Y-iAcHAcfjrsvIeeMjhmI_FqhHwNlIlZ-QAZMcp7msmCHZEAphbSAAo7JSQhruptZPiDPd8rWru_CKFnaBpNZq10bbOiw1dtRolqTLDadbVSdvOJHX6vOuvYmuU1elPYOI3aN1cm7xa9TcrRSdcCznz4kbw_3y-lTOl88zqa381RzoF0qGKCh3EhlmNGCGYRCSC44NwVnmQLkAqpcaYoZVIZpVWkteIYoKqC6yobkar93491nj6ErGxs01rVq0fWhZEUmKAg5oZFe_qNr1_s2XhcV4zLnwHdqtFfxoxA8rsqNjx_7bclouQu2jMGWv8FGfrHn69A5_2d5JsVEAmTfQnpz5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1814974240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Access via American Economic Association</source><creator>Chari, V. V. ; Kehoe, Patrick J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chari, V. V. ; Kehoe, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><description>A common view is that bailouts of firms by governments are needed to cure inefficiencies in private markets. We propose an alternative view: even when private markets are efficient, costly bankruptcies will occur and benevolent governments without commitment will bail out firms to avoid bankruptcy costs. Bailouts then introduce inefficiencies where none had existed. Although granting the government orderly resolution powers which allow it to rewrite private contracts improves on bailout outcomes, regulating leverage and taxing size is needed to achieve the relevant constrained efficient outcome, the sustainably efficient outcome. This outcome respects governments' incentives to intervene when they lack commitment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1257/aer.20150157</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AENRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nashville: American Economic Association</publisher><subject>Bailouts ; Bankruptcy ; Central banks ; Costs ; Efficiency ; Equilibrium ; Externality ; Government ; Incentives ; Macroeconomics ; Private sector ; Regulation ; Studies ; Subsidies ; Sustainability ; Taxes ; Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act 2010-US</subject><ispartof>The American economic review, 2016-09, Vol.106 (9), p.2458-2493</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2016 American Economic Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Economic Association Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-512ed04d9ad1dc51de28594544d8413a2e452b7ac0e32bd1cabcc543ee5b20cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-512ed04d9ad1dc51de28594544d8413a2e452b7ac0e32bd1cabcc543ee5b20cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43956922$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43956922$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3748,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chari, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehoe, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View</title><title>The American economic review</title><description>A common view is that bailouts of firms by governments are needed to cure inefficiencies in private markets. We propose an alternative view: even when private markets are efficient, costly bankruptcies will occur and benevolent governments without commitment will bail out firms to avoid bankruptcy costs. Bailouts then introduce inefficiencies where none had existed. Although granting the government orderly resolution powers which allow it to rewrite private contracts improves on bailout outcomes, regulating leverage and taxing size is needed to achieve the relevant constrained efficient outcome, the sustainably efficient outcome. This outcome respects governments' incentives to intervene when they lack commitment.</description><subject>Bailouts</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act 2010-US</subject><issn>0002-8282</issn><issn>1944-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0N9LwzAQB_AgCs7pm69CwRcf1plck7XxTYc_JpOBTF9Lmtwko21m0iL7782Y-iAcHAcfjrsvIeeMjhmI_FqhHwNlIlZ-QAZMcp7msmCHZEAphbSAAo7JSQhruptZPiDPd8rWru_CKFnaBpNZq10bbOiw1dtRolqTLDadbVSdvOJHX6vOuvYmuU1elPYOI3aN1cm7xa9TcrRSdcCznz4kbw_3y-lTOl88zqa381RzoF0qGKCh3EhlmNGCGYRCSC44NwVnmQLkAqpcaYoZVIZpVWkteIYoKqC6yobkar93491nj6ErGxs01rVq0fWhZEUmKAg5oZFe_qNr1_s2XhcV4zLnwHdqtFfxoxA8rsqNjx_7bclouQu2jMGWv8FGfrHn69A5_2d5JsVEAmTfQnpz5Q</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Chari, V. V.</creator><creator>Kehoe, Patrick J.</creator><general>American Economic Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View</title><author>Chari, V. V. ; Kehoe, Patrick J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-512ed04d9ad1dc51de28594544d8413a2e452b7ac0e32bd1cabcc543ee5b20cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bailouts</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act 2010-US</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chari, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehoe, Patrick J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chari, V. V.</au><au>Kehoe, Patrick J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View</atitle><jtitle>The American economic review</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2458</spage><epage>2493</epage><pages>2458-2493</pages><issn>0002-8282</issn><eissn>1944-7981</eissn><coden>AENRAA</coden><abstract>A common view is that bailouts of firms by governments are needed to cure inefficiencies in private markets. We propose an alternative view: even when private markets are efficient, costly bankruptcies will occur and benevolent governments without commitment will bail out firms to avoid bankruptcy costs. Bailouts then introduce inefficiencies where none had existed. Although granting the government orderly resolution powers which allow it to rewrite private contracts improves on bailout outcomes, regulating leverage and taxing size is needed to achieve the relevant constrained efficient outcome, the sustainably efficient outcome. This outcome respects governments' incentives to intervene when they lack commitment.</abstract><cop>Nashville</cop><pub>American Economic Association</pub><doi>10.1257/aer.20150157</doi><tpages>36</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8282 |
ispartof | The American economic review, 2016-09, Vol.106 (9), p.2458-2493 |
issn | 0002-8282 1944-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835025960 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy; Access via American Economic Association |
subjects | Bailouts Bankruptcy Central banks Costs Efficiency Equilibrium Externality Government Incentives Macroeconomics Private sector Regulation Studies Subsidies Sustainability Taxes Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act 2010-US |
title | Bailouts, Time Inconsistency, and Optimal Regulation: A Macroeconomic View |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bailouts,%20Time%20Inconsistency,%20and%20Optimal%20Regulation:%20A%20Macroeconomic%20View&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20economic%20review&rft.au=Chari,%20V.%20V.&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2458&rft.epage=2493&rft.pages=2458-2493&rft.issn=0002-8282&rft.eissn=1944-7981&rft.coden=AENRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1257/aer.20150157&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E43956922%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1814974240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43956922&rfr_iscdi=true |