Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Arguably, an abundance of single-arm phase 2 and 3 studies have been testing novel single or combination systemic drugs (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, pemetrexed, and molecular-targeted treatments); however, these studies often had small sample sizes, catered to patients with trea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Lancet (British edition) 2016-10, Vol.388 (10054), p.1853-1854
Hauptverfasser: Chua, Melvin L K, Chan, Anthony T C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1854
container_issue 10054
container_start_page 1853
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 388
creator Chua, Melvin L K
Chan, Anthony T C
description Arguably, an abundance of single-arm phase 2 and 3 studies have been testing novel single or combination systemic drugs (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, pemetrexed, and molecular-targeted treatments); however, these studies often had small sample sizes, catered to patients with treatment-refractory disease, and showed only slight gains in disease control and survival.2 This and other reasons relating to the paucity of robust preclinical models for high throughput drug screens3 led to a dormancy of the chemotherapeutic landscape and a resistance to replace fluorouracil plus cisplatin as the first-line systemic treatment in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The potency of gemcitabine, either as a monotherapy or in combination, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was subsequently documented in several single-arm phase 2 trials.6-8 However, in 2015, a randomised controlled, phase 3 trial of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma did not show a benefit with additional gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.9 With this new evidence from Zhang and colleagues,4 we await the results of two ongoing randomised controlled phase 3 trials of induction or adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in individuals with high-risk non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01872962 and NCT00370890).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31394-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834995288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673616313940</els_id><sourcerecordid>4225156871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-d9cb2733eb6cbcfee58cfed24593d29ccdbe7e05f3fc2722a97fea0d210846ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EapfSnwCK1Es5BMbfSQ-tUAUFqVIPBYmb5UwmrUvibO1dpP57vLulSL1w8cijZx57XsbecvjAgZuP18AV1MZKc8zNe8llq2p4wRZcWVVrZX--ZIsnZJ-9zvkOAJQBvcf2hdXGigYWzF7QhGHluxDppPLVjZ-owlsfbyhVIVbR53l569NDafixQp8wxHnyb9irwY-ZDh_rAfvx5fP386_15dXFt_NPlzVq3qzqvsVOWCmpM9jhQKSbcvZC6Vb2okXsO7IEepADCiuEb-1AHnrBoVEGSR6w4513meb7NeWVm0JGGkcfaV5nxxup2laLpino0TP0bl6nWH63obgE2yhbKL2jMM05JxrcMoWpLOg4uE2ybpus28Tmym2brIMy9-7Rvu4m6p-m_kZZgLMdQCWO34GSyxgoIvUhEa5cP4f_PnH6zIBjiAH9-IseKP_bxmXhYCfZOLjZGkD-AbwanEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1831307847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Chua, Melvin L K ; Chan, Anthony T C</creator><creatorcontrib>Chua, Melvin L K ; Chan, Anthony T C</creatorcontrib><description>Arguably, an abundance of single-arm phase 2 and 3 studies have been testing novel single or combination systemic drugs (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, pemetrexed, and molecular-targeted treatments); however, these studies often had small sample sizes, catered to patients with treatment-refractory disease, and showed only slight gains in disease control and survival.2 This and other reasons relating to the paucity of robust preclinical models for high throughput drug screens3 led to a dormancy of the chemotherapeutic landscape and a resistance to replace fluorouracil plus cisplatin as the first-line systemic treatment in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The potency of gemcitabine, either as a monotherapy or in combination, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was subsequently documented in several single-arm phase 2 trials.6-8 However, in 2015, a randomised controlled, phase 3 trial of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma did not show a benefit with additional gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.9 With this new evidence from Zhang and colleagues,4 we await the results of two ongoing randomised controlled phase 3 trials of induction or adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in individuals with high-risk non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01872962 and NCT00370890).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31394-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27567280</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemotherapy ; Clinical outcomes ; Disease control ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Metastasis ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; Studies ; Throat cancer</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2016-10, Vol.388 (10054), p.1853-1854</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 15, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-d9cb2733eb6cbcfee58cfed24593d29ccdbe7e05f3fc2722a97fea0d210846ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-d9cb2733eb6cbcfee58cfed24593d29ccdbe7e05f3fc2722a97fea0d210846ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673616313940$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27567280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chua, Melvin L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Anthony T C</creatorcontrib><title>Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Arguably, an abundance of single-arm phase 2 and 3 studies have been testing novel single or combination systemic drugs (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, pemetrexed, and molecular-targeted treatments); however, these studies often had small sample sizes, catered to patients with treatment-refractory disease, and showed only slight gains in disease control and survival.2 This and other reasons relating to the paucity of robust preclinical models for high throughput drug screens3 led to a dormancy of the chemotherapeutic landscape and a resistance to replace fluorouracil plus cisplatin as the first-line systemic treatment in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The potency of gemcitabine, either as a monotherapy or in combination, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was subsequently documented in several single-arm phase 2 trials.6-8 However, in 2015, a randomised controlled, phase 3 trial of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma did not show a benefit with additional gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.9 With this new evidence from Zhang and colleagues,4 we await the results of two ongoing randomised controlled phase 3 trials of induction or adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in individuals with high-risk non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01872962 and NCT00370890).</description><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Throat cancer</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EapfSnwCK1Es5BMbfSQ-tUAUFqVIPBYmb5UwmrUvibO1dpP57vLulSL1w8cijZx57XsbecvjAgZuP18AV1MZKc8zNe8llq2p4wRZcWVVrZX--ZIsnZJ-9zvkOAJQBvcf2hdXGigYWzF7QhGHluxDppPLVjZ-owlsfbyhVIVbR53l569NDafixQp8wxHnyb9irwY-ZDh_rAfvx5fP386_15dXFt_NPlzVq3qzqvsVOWCmpM9jhQKSbcvZC6Vb2okXsO7IEepADCiuEb-1AHnrBoVEGSR6w4513meb7NeWVm0JGGkcfaV5nxxup2laLpino0TP0bl6nWH63obgE2yhbKL2jMM05JxrcMoWpLOg4uE2ybpus28Tmym2brIMy9-7Rvu4m6p-m_kZZgLMdQCWO34GSyxgoIvUhEa5cP4f_PnH6zIBjiAH9-IseKP_bxmXhYCfZOLjZGkD-AbwanEc</recordid><startdate>20161015</startdate><enddate>20161015</enddate><creator>Chua, Melvin L K</creator><creator>Chan, Anthony T C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161015</creationdate><title>Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</title><author>Chua, Melvin L K ; Chan, Anthony T C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-d9cb2733eb6cbcfee58cfed24593d29ccdbe7e05f3fc2722a97fea0d210846ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Throat cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chua, Melvin L K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Anthony T C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chua, Melvin L K</au><au>Chan, Anthony T C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2016-10-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>388</volume><issue>10054</issue><spage>1853</spage><epage>1854</epage><pages>1853-1854</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Arguably, an abundance of single-arm phase 2 and 3 studies have been testing novel single or combination systemic drugs (gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, pemetrexed, and molecular-targeted treatments); however, these studies often had small sample sizes, catered to patients with treatment-refractory disease, and showed only slight gains in disease control and survival.2 This and other reasons relating to the paucity of robust preclinical models for high throughput drug screens3 led to a dormancy of the chemotherapeutic landscape and a resistance to replace fluorouracil plus cisplatin as the first-line systemic treatment in metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The potency of gemcitabine, either as a monotherapy or in combination, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma was subsequently documented in several single-arm phase 2 trials.6-8 However, in 2015, a randomised controlled, phase 3 trial of chemoradiotherapy with or without induction gemcitabine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma did not show a benefit with additional gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.9 With this new evidence from Zhang and colleagues,4 we await the results of two ongoing randomised controlled phase 3 trials of induction or adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in individuals with high-risk non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01872962 and NCT00370890).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27567280</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31394-0</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2016-10, Vol.388 (10054), p.1853-1854
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1834995288
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Chemotherapy
Clinical outcomes
Disease control
Humans
Internal Medicine
Metastasis
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms
Studies
Throat cancer
title Gemcitabine: a game changer in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T14%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gemcitabine:%20a%20game%20changer%20in%20nasopharyngeal%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Chua,%20Melvin%20L%20K&rft.date=2016-10-15&rft.volume=388&rft.issue=10054&rft.spage=1853&rft.epage=1854&rft.pages=1853-1854&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31394-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4225156871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1831307847&rft_id=info:pmid/27567280&rft_els_id=S0140673616313940&rfr_iscdi=true