“Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors

Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by variable age of onset, with no treatment proven to alter its natural history. Siblings of individuals with FRDA have a 25 % risk of developing the condition, raising issues around genetic testing of asympt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of genetic counseling 2015-10, Vol.24 (5), p.732-743
Hauptverfasser: Lowe, Georgia C., Corben, Louise A., Duncan, Rony E., Yoon, Grace, Delatycki, Martin B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 743
container_issue 5
container_start_page 732
container_title Journal of genetic counseling
container_volume 24
creator Lowe, Georgia C.
Corben, Louise A.
Duncan, Rony E.
Yoon, Grace
Delatycki, Martin B.
description Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by variable age of onset, with no treatment proven to alter its natural history. Siblings of individuals with FRDA have a 25 % risk of developing the condition, raising issues around genetic testing of asymptomatic minors. There is a lack of professional consensus and limited empirical evidence to support provision or refusal of testing. This study aimed to ascertain the opinions of individuals with and parents of individuals with FRDA regarding pre-symptomatic testing of minors. A qualitative research approach using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was employed. Interviews with ten individuals with FRDA, and ten parents of individuals with FRDA were conducted, recorded, transcribed and analyzed. Four findings emerged. First, a number of arguments for and against testing minors were identified. Second, strong support existed from parents about the parental right to test their at-risk immature children, but individuals with FRDA were of mixed opinions. Third, participants felt it was not the clinician’s role to make a final decision about whether testing occurs. Finally, a specific issue of concern regarding testing was what and when to tell at-risk children about the test result. The findings highlight a dilemma of how to manage the desires of some individuals and families affected by FRDA to access testing, when there is a lack of professional consensus due to differing opinions regarding autonomy, confidentiality and risk of harm. Research regarding the impact of testing and the views of at-risk individuals and clinicians is required so an appropriate framework for dealing with this contentious issue is developed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1832242693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3801954711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5662-474cd422e4da241559ab12a2caee8d88dff6e854e743b3f22ffaf3bd2b4ca4b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAGyQJTZdEPBf4phdGbWlqIgKBlhaTnwzcZWfwU4YZtcHoVKfrU-CQwpCCNSVrXu_c3SuDkKPKXlOCZEvAiW5kgmhIlE5oYm6g3ZpKnnCU6Xuxj9JVSIlITvoQQjnhBCVp_Q-2mFpqhgVfBddXV98f9UPNf7gLATcV3ioAX-uAZqyNs5fX1y-xMs4-uRg83N_0ln31dnRNAFv3FA_w6az-Mx46IZ_AvjIO7AeXFnjg8F8cwa_h5Xx1nUrfOYhCdt2PfStGVyJlxCGaR593rqu9-EhuldFJ3h08-6hj0eHy8Xr5PTd8cni4DQp0yxjiZCitIIxENYwQeN9pqDMsNIA5DbPbVVlkKcCpOAFrxirKlPxwrJClEYUGd9D-7Pv2vdfxphCty6U0DSmg34MmuacMcEyxW9HJaWp4IqIiD79Cz3vR9_FQyaKZJRwPlF0pkrfh-Ch0mvvWuO3mhI9Na3npnVsWk9NaxU1T26cx6IF-1vxq9oIyBnYuAa2tzvqN8cLQSRnUclmZYiibgX-j9D_zfMD-ITG6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1710610334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lowe, Georgia C. ; Corben, Louise A. ; Duncan, Rony E. ; Yoon, Grace ; Delatycki, Martin B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Georgia C. ; Corben, Louise A. ; Duncan, Rony E. ; Yoon, Grace ; Delatycki, Martin B.</creatorcontrib><description>Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by variable age of onset, with no treatment proven to alter its natural history. Siblings of individuals with FRDA have a 25 % risk of developing the condition, raising issues around genetic testing of asymptomatic minors. There is a lack of professional consensus and limited empirical evidence to support provision or refusal of testing. This study aimed to ascertain the opinions of individuals with and parents of individuals with FRDA regarding pre-symptomatic testing of minors. A qualitative research approach using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was employed. Interviews with ten individuals with FRDA, and ten parents of individuals with FRDA were conducted, recorded, transcribed and analyzed. Four findings emerged. First, a number of arguments for and against testing minors were identified. Second, strong support existed from parents about the parental right to test their at-risk immature children, but individuals with FRDA were of mixed opinions. Third, participants felt it was not the clinician’s role to make a final decision about whether testing occurs. Finally, a specific issue of concern regarding testing was what and when to tell at-risk children about the test result. The findings highlight a dilemma of how to manage the desires of some individuals and families affected by FRDA to access testing, when there is a lack of professional consensus due to differing opinions regarding autonomy, confidentiality and risk of harm. Research regarding the impact of testing and the views of at-risk individuals and clinicians is required so an appropriate framework for dealing with this contentious issue is developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25592143</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Attitude to Health ; Bioethics ; Biomedicine ; Child ; Children with disabilities ; Clinical Psychology ; Confidentiality ; Ethics ; Female ; Friedreich ataxia ; Friedreich Ataxia - diagnosis ; Friedreich Ataxia - psychology ; Genetic counseling ; Genetic predisposition testing ; Genetic testing ; Genetic Testing - methods ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minors ; Neurological disorders ; Original Research ; Parent-Child Relations ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Parents - psychology ; Public Health ; Qualitative research ; Siblings - psychology</subject><ispartof>Journal of genetic counseling, 2015-10, Vol.24 (5), p.732-743</ispartof><rights>National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc. 2015</rights><rights>2015 National Society of Genetic Counselors, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5662-474cd422e4da241559ab12a2caee8d88dff6e854e743b3f22ffaf3bd2b4ca4b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5662-474cd422e4da241559ab12a2caee8d88dff6e854e743b3f22ffaf3bd2b4ca4b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12826,27903,27904,30978,41467,42536,45553,45554,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592143$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Georgia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corben, Louise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Rony E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatycki, Martin B.</creatorcontrib><title>“Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors</title><title>Journal of genetic counseling</title><addtitle>J Genet Counsel</addtitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><description>Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by variable age of onset, with no treatment proven to alter its natural history. Siblings of individuals with FRDA have a 25 % risk of developing the condition, raising issues around genetic testing of asymptomatic minors. There is a lack of professional consensus and limited empirical evidence to support provision or refusal of testing. This study aimed to ascertain the opinions of individuals with and parents of individuals with FRDA regarding pre-symptomatic testing of minors. A qualitative research approach using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was employed. Interviews with ten individuals with FRDA, and ten parents of individuals with FRDA were conducted, recorded, transcribed and analyzed. Four findings emerged. First, a number of arguments for and against testing minors were identified. Second, strong support existed from parents about the parental right to test their at-risk immature children, but individuals with FRDA were of mixed opinions. Third, participants felt it was not the clinician’s role to make a final decision about whether testing occurs. Finally, a specific issue of concern regarding testing was what and when to tell at-risk children about the test result. The findings highlight a dilemma of how to manage the desires of some individuals and families affected by FRDA to access testing, when there is a lack of professional consensus due to differing opinions regarding autonomy, confidentiality and risk of harm. Research regarding the impact of testing and the views of at-risk individuals and clinicians is required so an appropriate framework for dealing with this contentious issue is developed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children with disabilities</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Confidentiality</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Friedreich ataxia</subject><subject>Friedreich Ataxia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Friedreich Ataxia - psychology</subject><subject>Genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic predisposition testing</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetic Testing - methods</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minors</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Siblings - psychology</subject><issn>1059-7700</issn><issn>1573-3599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAGyQJTZdEPBf4phdGbWlqIgKBlhaTnwzcZWfwU4YZtcHoVKfrU-CQwpCCNSVrXu_c3SuDkKPKXlOCZEvAiW5kgmhIlE5oYm6g3ZpKnnCU6Xuxj9JVSIlITvoQQjnhBCVp_Q-2mFpqhgVfBddXV98f9UPNf7gLATcV3ioAX-uAZqyNs5fX1y-xMs4-uRg83N_0ln31dnRNAFv3FA_w6az-Mx46IZ_AvjIO7AeXFnjg8F8cwa_h5Xx1nUrfOYhCdt2PfStGVyJlxCGaR593rqu9-EhuldFJ3h08-6hj0eHy8Xr5PTd8cni4DQp0yxjiZCitIIxENYwQeN9pqDMsNIA5DbPbVVlkKcCpOAFrxirKlPxwrJClEYUGd9D-7Pv2vdfxphCty6U0DSmg34MmuacMcEyxW9HJaWp4IqIiD79Cz3vR9_FQyaKZJRwPlF0pkrfh-Ch0mvvWuO3mhI9Na3npnVsWk9NaxU1T26cx6IF-1vxq9oIyBnYuAa2tzvqN8cLQSRnUclmZYiibgX-j9D_zfMD-ITG6Q</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Lowe, Georgia C.</creator><creator>Corben, Louise A.</creator><creator>Duncan, Rony E.</creator><creator>Yoon, Grace</creator><creator>Delatycki, Martin B.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>“Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors</title><author>Lowe, Georgia C. ; Corben, Louise A. ; Duncan, Rony E. ; Yoon, Grace ; Delatycki, Martin B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5662-474cd422e4da241559ab12a2caee8d88dff6e854e743b3f22ffaf3bd2b4ca4b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children with disabilities</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Confidentiality</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Friedreich ataxia</topic><topic>Friedreich Ataxia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Friedreich Ataxia - psychology</topic><topic>Genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic predisposition testing</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetic Testing - methods</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minors</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Siblings - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Georgia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corben, Louise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Rony E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatycki, Martin B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowe, Georgia C.</au><au>Corben, Louise A.</au><au>Duncan, Rony E.</au><au>Yoon, Grace</au><au>Delatycki, Martin B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of genetic counseling</jtitle><stitle>J Genet Counsel</stitle><addtitle>J Genet Couns</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>743</epage><pages>732-743</pages><issn>1059-7700</issn><eissn>1573-3599</eissn><abstract>Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by variable age of onset, with no treatment proven to alter its natural history. Siblings of individuals with FRDA have a 25 % risk of developing the condition, raising issues around genetic testing of asymptomatic minors. There is a lack of professional consensus and limited empirical evidence to support provision or refusal of testing. This study aimed to ascertain the opinions of individuals with and parents of individuals with FRDA regarding pre-symptomatic testing of minors. A qualitative research approach using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis was employed. Interviews with ten individuals with FRDA, and ten parents of individuals with FRDA were conducted, recorded, transcribed and analyzed. Four findings emerged. First, a number of arguments for and against testing minors were identified. Second, strong support existed from parents about the parental right to test their at-risk immature children, but individuals with FRDA were of mixed opinions. Third, participants felt it was not the clinician’s role to make a final decision about whether testing occurs. Finally, a specific issue of concern regarding testing was what and when to tell at-risk children about the test result. The findings highlight a dilemma of how to manage the desires of some individuals and families affected by FRDA to access testing, when there is a lack of professional consensus due to differing opinions regarding autonomy, confidentiality and risk of harm. Research regarding the impact of testing and the views of at-risk individuals and clinicians is required so an appropriate framework for dealing with this contentious issue is developed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25592143</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7700
ispartof Journal of genetic counseling, 2015-10, Vol.24 (5), p.732-743
issn 1059-7700
1573-3599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1832242693
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Attitude to Health
Bioethics
Biomedicine
Child
Children with disabilities
Clinical Psychology
Confidentiality
Ethics
Female
Friedreich ataxia
Friedreich Ataxia - diagnosis
Friedreich Ataxia - psychology
Genetic counseling
Genetic predisposition testing
Genetic testing
Genetic Testing - methods
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minors
Neurological disorders
Original Research
Parent-Child Relations
Parents
Parents & parenting
Parents - psychology
Public Health
Qualitative research
Siblings - psychology
title “Both Sides of the Wheelchair”: The Views of Individuals with, and Parents of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Regarding Pre-symptomatic Testing of Minors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A00%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CBoth%20Sides%20of%20the%20Wheelchair%E2%80%9D:%20The%20Views%20of%20Individuals%20with,%20and%20Parents%20of%20Individuals%20with%20Friedreich%20Ataxia%20Regarding%20Pre-symptomatic%20Testing%20of%20Minors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20genetic%20counseling&rft.au=Lowe,%20Georgia%20C.&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=743&rft.pages=732-743&rft.issn=1059-7700&rft.eissn=1573-3599&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10897-014-9801-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3801954711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1710610334&rft_id=info:pmid/25592143&rfr_iscdi=true