The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics
Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicology letters 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 44 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Toxicology letters |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Pugh, D.Michael |
description | Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18307402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378427401005318</els_id><sourcerecordid>18307402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotlYfQZmNoovRnEkml4WIlHqBggvbdUgzZzAynanJtNC3d3rBLl0dOHz_uXyEXAK9Bwri4ZMyqVKeSX5L4Y7SnEGqjkgflNQpA6GPSf8P6ZGzGL8ppYKL_JT0AJTQCvI-eZx8YTKaJouAzi5b39Q2rJOZrWPSlImt_dxWSYlYJLYofOtX2DVbP_NN6108JyelrSJe7OuATF9Gk-FbOv54fR8-j1PHJW9Tqx0DrhXLUDuXZY4LDsBEdx5kFJWUpRZcSsu0KliZYUdqCU5bpZjMMzYgN7u5i9D8LDG2Zu6jw6qyNTbLaEAxKjndgPkOdKGJMWBpFqF7IawNULPxZrbezEaKoWC23ozqclf7BcvZHItDai-qA673gI3OVmWwtfPxwLGcS6E23NOOw07HymMw0XmsHRa-M9yaovH_nPILjzqHAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18307402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pugh, D.Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11869815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TOLED5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - standards ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antibiotic feed additives ; antibiotics ; Banning ; Biological and medical sciences ; European Union ; Food Additives ; General aspects. Methods ; Legislation, Food ; Medical sciences ; Safety assurance ; Socio-economic factors ; Swine ; The precautionary principle ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Toxicology letters, 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427401005318$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13547685$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><title>Toxicology letters</title><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><description>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</description><subject>Animal Feed - standards</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Antibiotic feed additives</subject><subject>antibiotics</subject><subject>Banning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Food Additives</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Legislation, Food</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Safety assurance</subject><subject>Socio-economic factors</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>The precautionary principle</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0378-4274</issn><issn>1879-3169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotlYfQZmNoovRnEkml4WIlHqBggvbdUgzZzAynanJtNC3d3rBLl0dOHz_uXyEXAK9Bwri4ZMyqVKeSX5L4Y7SnEGqjkgflNQpA6GPSf8P6ZGzGL8ppYKL_JT0AJTQCvI-eZx8YTKaJouAzi5b39Q2rJOZrWPSlImt_dxWSYlYJLYofOtX2DVbP_NN6108JyelrSJe7OuATF9Gk-FbOv54fR8-j1PHJW9Tqx0DrhXLUDuXZY4LDsBEdx5kFJWUpRZcSsu0KliZYUdqCU5bpZjMMzYgN7u5i9D8LDG2Zu6jw6qyNTbLaEAxKjndgPkOdKGJMWBpFqF7IawNULPxZrbezEaKoWC23ozqclf7BcvZHItDai-qA673gI3OVmWwtfPxwLGcS6E23NOOw07HymMw0XmsHRa-M9yaovH_nPILjzqHAA</recordid><startdate>20020310</startdate><enddate>20020310</enddate><creator>Pugh, D.Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020310</creationdate><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><author>Pugh, D.Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - standards</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Antibiotic feed additives</topic><topic>antibiotics</topic><topic>Banning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Food Additives</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Legislation, Food</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Safety assurance</topic><topic>Socio-economic factors</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>The precautionary principle</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pugh, D.Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><date>2002-03-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>35-44</pages><issn>0378-4274</issn><eissn>1879-3169</eissn><coden>TOLED5</coden><abstract>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>11869815</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-4274 |
ispartof | Toxicology letters, 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44 |
issn | 0378-4274 1879-3169 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18307402 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animal Feed - standards Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents Antibiotic feed additives antibiotics Banning Biological and medical sciences European Union Food Additives General aspects. Methods Legislation, Food Medical sciences Safety assurance Socio-economic factors Swine The precautionary principle Toxicology |
title | The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20EU%20precautionary%20bans%20of%20animal%20feed%20additive%20antibiotics&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20letters&rft.au=Pugh,%20D.Michael&rft.date=2002-03-10&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=35-44&rft.issn=0378-4274&rft.eissn=1879-3169&rft.coden=TOLED5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18307402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18307402&rft_id=info:pmid/11869815&rft_els_id=S0378427401005318&rfr_iscdi=true |