The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics

Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology letters 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44
1. Verfasser: Pugh, D.Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 44
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Toxicology letters
container_volume 128
creator Pugh, D.Michael
description Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18307402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378427401005318</els_id><sourcerecordid>18307402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotlYfQZmNoovRnEkml4WIlHqBggvbdUgzZzAynanJtNC3d3rBLl0dOHz_uXyEXAK9Bwri4ZMyqVKeSX5L4Y7SnEGqjkgflNQpA6GPSf8P6ZGzGL8ppYKL_JT0AJTQCvI-eZx8YTKaJouAzi5b39Q2rJOZrWPSlImt_dxWSYlYJLYofOtX2DVbP_NN6108JyelrSJe7OuATF9Gk-FbOv54fR8-j1PHJW9Tqx0DrhXLUDuXZY4LDsBEdx5kFJWUpRZcSsu0KliZYUdqCU5bpZjMMzYgN7u5i9D8LDG2Zu6jw6qyNTbLaEAxKjndgPkOdKGJMWBpFqF7IawNULPxZrbezEaKoWC23ozqclf7BcvZHItDai-qA673gI3OVmWwtfPxwLGcS6E23NOOw07HymMw0XmsHRa-M9yaovH_nPILjzqHAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18307402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pugh, D.Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4274</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11869815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TOLED5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - standards ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents ; Antibiotic feed additives ; antibiotics ; Banning ; Biological and medical sciences ; European Union ; Food Additives ; General aspects. Methods ; Legislation, Food ; Medical sciences ; Safety assurance ; Socio-economic factors ; Swine ; The precautionary principle ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Toxicology letters, 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378427401005318$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13547685$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><title>Toxicology letters</title><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><description>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</description><subject>Animal Feed - standards</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents</subject><subject>Antibiotic feed additives</subject><subject>antibiotics</subject><subject>Banning</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Food Additives</subject><subject>General aspects. Methods</subject><subject>Legislation, Food</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Safety assurance</subject><subject>Socio-economic factors</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>The precautionary principle</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0378-4274</issn><issn>1879-3169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMotlYfQZmNoovRnEkml4WIlHqBggvbdUgzZzAynanJtNC3d3rBLl0dOHz_uXyEXAK9Bwri4ZMyqVKeSX5L4Y7SnEGqjkgflNQpA6GPSf8P6ZGzGL8ppYKL_JT0AJTQCvI-eZx8YTKaJouAzi5b39Q2rJOZrWPSlImt_dxWSYlYJLYofOtX2DVbP_NN6108JyelrSJe7OuATF9Gk-FbOv54fR8-j1PHJW9Tqx0DrhXLUDuXZY4LDsBEdx5kFJWUpRZcSsu0KliZYUdqCU5bpZjMMzYgN7u5i9D8LDG2Zu6jw6qyNTbLaEAxKjndgPkOdKGJMWBpFqF7IawNULPxZrbezEaKoWC23ozqclf7BcvZHItDai-qA673gI3OVmWwtfPxwLGcS6E23NOOw07HymMw0XmsHRa-M9yaovH_nPILjzqHAA</recordid><startdate>20020310</startdate><enddate>20020310</enddate><creator>Pugh, D.Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020310</creationdate><title>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</title><author>Pugh, D.Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a9c3149832e9cc22c4641136378120e877f96477a398d3f2e832971c9a8837523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - standards</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents</topic><topic>Antibiotic feed additives</topic><topic>antibiotics</topic><topic>Banning</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Food Additives</topic><topic>General aspects. Methods</topic><topic>Legislation, Food</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Safety assurance</topic><topic>Socio-economic factors</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>The precautionary principle</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pugh, D.Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pugh, D.Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology letters</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Lett</addtitle><date>2002-03-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>35-44</pages><issn>0378-4274</issn><eissn>1879-3169</eissn><coden>TOLED5</coden><abstract>Toxicologists, with good reason, will feel that the biological safety of chemical products across the market sectors rests largely on their efforts. However, one sector has received much adverse attention from the media, consumers, politicians, legislators and advisory groups in recent years. It is food animal production in intensive systems and, within those, various types of chemical additives included in the compound diets fed. No additive class received more adverse comment than those antibiotics used for the purpose of enhancing the efficiency of animal production. This paper considers the safety of the antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) against the background of the regulatory measures in place, defines their role and describes the relevant concerns. It closes with comment on the microbiologically-based health risk which underpinned the AFA bans and sounds a warning over the precedent created by the use of the precautionary principle in the recent banning of six of their number.</abstract><cop>Shannon</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>11869815</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4274
ispartof Toxicology letters, 2002-03, Vol.128 (1), p.35-44
issn 0378-4274
1879-3169
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18307402
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animal Feed - standards
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antibiotic feed additives
antibiotics
Banning
Biological and medical sciences
European Union
Food Additives
General aspects. Methods
Legislation, Food
Medical sciences
Safety assurance
Socio-economic factors
Swine
The precautionary principle
Toxicology
title The EU precautionary bans of animal feed additive antibiotics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A54%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20EU%20precautionary%20bans%20of%20animal%20feed%20additive%20antibiotics&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20letters&rft.au=Pugh,%20D.Michael&rft.date=2002-03-10&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=35-44&rft.issn=0378-4274&rft.eissn=1879-3169&rft.coden=TOLED5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-4274(01)00531-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18307402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18307402&rft_id=info:pmid/11869815&rft_els_id=S0378427401005318&rfr_iscdi=true