Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species
The brittle star Amphipholis squamata is paradoxical in that it lacks an obvious dispersive phase yet has a world-wide distribution. Although individuals from distant populations are morphologically similar, a recent phylogenetic analysis found multiple clades separated by large genetic divergences....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2001-09, Vol.219, p.169-175 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 175 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 219 |
creator | SPONER, Renate DEHEYN, Dimitri ROY, Michael S |
description | The brittle star Amphipholis squamata is paradoxical in that it lacks an obvious dispersive phase yet has a world-wide distribution. Although individuals from distant populations are morphologically similar, a recent phylogenetic analysis found multiple clades separated by large genetic divergences. These clades were not phylogeographically structured and genetic divergences within populations were typically as high as those amongst populations. The recent suggestion that the sympatric colour varieties 'orange', 'dark brown', 'beige', 'black' and 'grey' represent sibling species, led us to test whether colour variety and phylogeny were congruent. Genetic distances among sequences of the mitochondrial gene 16S rRNA from the colour varieties were surprisingly high (up to 13% uncorrected distance) and phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and neighbour joining gave well supported, congruent phylogenies. However, the clades were not consistent with colour variety. When clades were constrained to make colour varieties monophyletic, tree scores were always significantly worse. We conclude from the results of this study that colour varieties do not represent distinct phylogenetic lineages. We discuss the implications of our results in the light of the possibility of clonality or self-fertilization in this species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps219169 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18305805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18185614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-61c9fb17d9ee3dc5de179d0c92458664de8d255868f0fe0bc410893bf4fbfd573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9KHTEUxoNY6NW66RNk02KFaZObSWaCKxFrCxfc1PWQSU7ujcxMYk6m0ufoCzei4Lar84ff-T44HyEfOfsqhGy_zZBwyzVX-ohsuOKq4VLrY7JhvONNrwR7T04QHxjjqu3UhvzdmbwHuocFSrDUBSxmsYD0KZRDWKihKaZ1MiXEhUZPr-Z0COkQp4AUH1czm2Lo-Y2tbHSQn8dLeleZNcfgwHyhLtIlFoprSjEXauMU10x_mxyqYzUyVSiMU1j2FBPYuvpA3nkzIZy91lNy__3m1_WPZnd3-_P6atdYIbvSKG61H3nnNIBwVjrgnXbM6m0re6VaB73bytr2nnlgo20567UYfetH72QnTsnnF92U4-MKWIY5oIVpMgvEFQfeCyZ7Jv8D5L1UvK3gxQtoc0TM4IeUw2zyn4Gz4Tmg4S2gCn96VTVozeRzfXzAt4uWKa3YVvwDd8KUbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18185614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species</title><source>Inter-Research</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SPONER, Renate ; DEHEYN, Dimitri ; ROY, Michael S</creator><creatorcontrib>SPONER, Renate ; DEHEYN, Dimitri ; ROY, Michael S</creatorcontrib><description>The brittle star Amphipholis squamata is paradoxical in that it lacks an obvious dispersive phase yet has a world-wide distribution. Although individuals from distant populations are morphologically similar, a recent phylogenetic analysis found multiple clades separated by large genetic divergences. These clades were not phylogeographically structured and genetic divergences within populations were typically as high as those amongst populations. The recent suggestion that the sympatric colour varieties 'orange', 'dark brown', 'beige', 'black' and 'grey' represent sibling species, led us to test whether colour variety and phylogeny were congruent. Genetic distances among sequences of the mitochondrial gene 16S rRNA from the colour varieties were surprisingly high (up to 13% uncorrected distance) and phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and neighbour joining gave well supported, congruent phylogenies. However, the clades were not consistent with colour variety. When clades were constrained to make colour varieties monophyletic, tree scores were always significantly worse. We conclude from the results of this study that colour varieties do not represent distinct phylogenetic lineages. We discuss the implications of our results in the light of the possibility of clonality or self-fertilization in this species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps219169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oldendorf: Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Amphipholis squamata ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Echinodermata ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Invertebrata ; Marine ; Ophiuroidea ; Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2001-09, Vol.219, p.169-175</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-61c9fb17d9ee3dc5de179d0c92458664de8d255868f0fe0bc410893bf4fbfd573</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3757,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14069602$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPONER, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEHEYN, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROY, Michael S</creatorcontrib><title>Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>The brittle star Amphipholis squamata is paradoxical in that it lacks an obvious dispersive phase yet has a world-wide distribution. Although individuals from distant populations are morphologically similar, a recent phylogenetic analysis found multiple clades separated by large genetic divergences. These clades were not phylogeographically structured and genetic divergences within populations were typically as high as those amongst populations. The recent suggestion that the sympatric colour varieties 'orange', 'dark brown', 'beige', 'black' and 'grey' represent sibling species, led us to test whether colour variety and phylogeny were congruent. Genetic distances among sequences of the mitochondrial gene 16S rRNA from the colour varieties were surprisingly high (up to 13% uncorrected distance) and phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and neighbour joining gave well supported, congruent phylogenies. However, the clades were not consistent with colour variety. When clades were constrained to make colour varieties monophyletic, tree scores were always significantly worse. We conclude from the results of this study that colour varieties do not represent distinct phylogenetic lineages. We discuss the implications of our results in the light of the possibility of clonality or self-fertilization in this species.</description><subject>Amphipholis squamata</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Echinodermata</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Ophiuroidea</subject><subject>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9KHTEUxoNY6NW66RNk02KFaZObSWaCKxFrCxfc1PWQSU7ujcxMYk6m0ufoCzei4Lar84ff-T44HyEfOfsqhGy_zZBwyzVX-ohsuOKq4VLrY7JhvONNrwR7T04QHxjjqu3UhvzdmbwHuocFSrDUBSxmsYD0KZRDWKihKaZ1MiXEhUZPr-Z0COkQp4AUH1czm2Lo-Y2tbHSQn8dLeleZNcfgwHyhLtIlFoprSjEXauMU10x_mxyqYzUyVSiMU1j2FBPYuvpA3nkzIZy91lNy__3m1_WPZnd3-_P6atdYIbvSKG61H3nnNIBwVjrgnXbM6m0re6VaB73bytr2nnlgo20567UYfetH72QnTsnnF92U4-MKWIY5oIVpMgvEFQfeCyZ7Jv8D5L1UvK3gxQtoc0TM4IeUw2zyn4Gz4Tmg4S2gCn96VTVozeRzfXzAt4uWKa3YVvwDd8KUbw</recordid><startdate>20010910</startdate><enddate>20010910</enddate><creator>SPONER, Renate</creator><creator>DEHEYN, Dimitri</creator><creator>ROY, Michael S</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010910</creationdate><title>Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species</title><author>SPONER, Renate ; DEHEYN, Dimitri ; ROY, Michael S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-61c9fb17d9ee3dc5de179d0c92458664de8d255868f0fe0bc410893bf4fbfd573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Amphipholis squamata</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Echinodermata</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Ophiuroidea</topic><topic>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPONER, Renate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEHEYN, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROY, Michael S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPONER, Renate</au><au>DEHEYN, Dimitri</au><au>ROY, Michael S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2001-09-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>219</volume><spage>169</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>169-175</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>The brittle star Amphipholis squamata is paradoxical in that it lacks an obvious dispersive phase yet has a world-wide distribution. Although individuals from distant populations are morphologically similar, a recent phylogenetic analysis found multiple clades separated by large genetic divergences. These clades were not phylogeographically structured and genetic divergences within populations were typically as high as those amongst populations. The recent suggestion that the sympatric colour varieties 'orange', 'dark brown', 'beige', 'black' and 'grey' represent sibling species, led us to test whether colour variety and phylogeny were congruent. Genetic distances among sequences of the mitochondrial gene 16S rRNA from the colour varieties were surprisingly high (up to 13% uncorrected distance) and phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and neighbour joining gave well supported, congruent phylogenies. However, the clades were not consistent with colour variety. When clades were constrained to make colour varieties monophyletic, tree scores were always significantly worse. We conclude from the results of this study that colour varieties do not represent distinct phylogenetic lineages. We discuss the implications of our results in the light of the possibility of clonality or self-fertilization in this species.</abstract><cop>Oldendorf</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps219169</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2001-09, Vol.219, p.169-175 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18305805 |
source | Inter-Research; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Amphipholis squamata Animals Biological and medical sciences Echinodermata Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution Invertebrata Marine Ophiuroidea Population genetics, reproduction patterns |
title | Large genetic distances within a population of Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata; Ophiuroidea) do not support colour varieties as sibling species |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large%20genetic%20distances%20within%20a%20population%20of%20Amphipholis%20squamata%20(Echinodermata;%20Ophiuroidea)%20do%20not%20support%20colour%20varieties%20as%20sibling%20species&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=SPONER,%20Renate&rft.date=2001-09-10&rft.volume=219&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=169-175&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps219169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18185614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18185614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |