The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen
The Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Phase (Maritime Delimitation) of the Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration follows the trend towards producing a single all-purpose delimitation line constructed on the basis of equidistance, the course of which is chiefly dictated by mainland coastal geography....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leiden journal of international law 2001-03, Vol.14 (1), p.141-170 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Leiden journal of international law |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Evans, Malcolm D. |
description | The Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Phase (Maritime Delimitation) of the Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration follows the trend towards producing a single all-purpose delimitation line constructed on the basis of equidistance, the course of which is chiefly dictated by mainland coastal geography. Islands are accorded little impact upon the course of the final line, save to the extent necessary to permit them a full territorial sea. The potential relevance of other factors, including fishing and navigational interests is acknowledged but, given the methodology adopted, they did not influence the construction of the line. As in other cases, proportionality is demonstrated by comparison of areas with the relevant coastal lengths, although the usefulness of this is dubious. Although entirely separate exercises, it may be that the methodology pursued owes something to the outcomes of the first phase of the Arbitration, concerning sovereignty over the islands, and this may have a bearing upon the impact of the Award for maritime boundary delimitation more generally. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0922156501000073 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18302838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0922156501000073</cupid><sourcerecordid>1401077071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c63fb4e4390c25f46c58ab0ec79395334820a2be8dcef8930326cbc67e81eb983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hFHLgF_Igd-wilLYhWgCgSnCzH3YBLHsVOBfx7ErUCCcRe9jDf7I4GoUOCTwgm6ek9VpQSLjgmuJ2UbaEeSVIZK6HkNup1ctzpu2gvhEWLKIllD7HZC0RT413jSoguoHCla0zj6io6h-YdoIqGrejBRKaaR09QQrWPdnJTBDjY7D56GA1ng8t4cjO-GpxNYsswbmIrWJ4lkDCFLeV5IiyXJsNgU8UUZyyRFBuagZxbyKVimFFhMytSkAQyJVkfHa_vLn39toLQ6NIFC0VhKqhXQRPJMJWsA49-gYt65as2m6ZEcUEVEy1E1pD1dQgecr30rjT-UxOsuw71nw5bT7z2uNDAx7fB-FctUpZyLcZ3mt-OJJ9Nr_Vjy7PND1Nm3s2f4SfJ_1--AGIyf_4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219562936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Evans, Malcolm D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Malcolm D.</creatorcontrib><description>The Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Phase (Maritime Delimitation) of the Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration follows the trend towards producing a single all-purpose delimitation line constructed on the basis of equidistance, the course of which is chiefly dictated by mainland coastal geography. Islands are accorded little impact upon the course of the final line, save to the extent necessary to permit them a full territorial sea. The potential relevance of other factors, including fishing and navigational interests is acknowledged but, given the methodology adopted, they did not influence the construction of the line. As in other cases, proportionality is demonstrated by comparison of areas with the relevant coastal lengths, although the usefulness of this is dubious. Although entirely separate exercises, it may be that the methodology pursued owes something to the outcomes of the first phase of the Arbitration, concerning sovereignty over the islands, and this may have a bearing upon the impact of the Award for maritime boundary delimitation more generally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-1565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0922156501000073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Arbitration ; Coasts ; Court hearings & proceedings ; delimitation ; Eritrea ; Exclusive economic zone ; HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS ; International law ; Islands ; Jurisdiction ; Law of the Sea Convention ; Marine ; Maritime law ; Sovereignty ; Territorial waters ; Yemen</subject><ispartof>Leiden journal of international law, 2001-03, Vol.14 (1), p.141-170</ispartof><rights>2001 Kluwer Law International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c63fb4e4390c25f46c58ab0ec79395334820a2be8dcef8930326cbc67e81eb983</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0922156501000073/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Malcolm D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen</title><title>Leiden journal of international law</title><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><description>The Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Phase (Maritime Delimitation) of the Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration follows the trend towards producing a single all-purpose delimitation line constructed on the basis of equidistance, the course of which is chiefly dictated by mainland coastal geography. Islands are accorded little impact upon the course of the final line, save to the extent necessary to permit them a full territorial sea. The potential relevance of other factors, including fishing and navigational interests is acknowledged but, given the methodology adopted, they did not influence the construction of the line. As in other cases, proportionality is demonstrated by comparison of areas with the relevant coastal lengths, although the usefulness of this is dubious. Although entirely separate exercises, it may be that the methodology pursued owes something to the outcomes of the first phase of the Arbitration, concerning sovereignty over the islands, and this may have a bearing upon the impact of the Award for maritime boundary delimitation more generally.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>delimitation</subject><subject>Eritrea</subject><subject>Exclusive economic zone</subject><subject>HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law of the Sea Convention</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Maritime law</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Territorial waters</subject><subject>Yemen</subject><issn>0922-1565</issn><issn>1478-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hFHLgF_Igd-wilLYhWgCgSnCzH3YBLHsVOBfx7ErUCCcRe9jDf7I4GoUOCTwgm6ek9VpQSLjgmuJ2UbaEeSVIZK6HkNup1ctzpu2gvhEWLKIllD7HZC0RT413jSoguoHCla0zj6io6h-YdoIqGrejBRKaaR09QQrWPdnJTBDjY7D56GA1ng8t4cjO-GpxNYsswbmIrWJ4lkDCFLeV5IiyXJsNgU8UUZyyRFBuagZxbyKVimFFhMytSkAQyJVkfHa_vLn39toLQ6NIFC0VhKqhXQRPJMJWsA49-gYt65as2m6ZEcUEVEy1E1pD1dQgecr30rjT-UxOsuw71nw5bT7z2uNDAx7fB-FctUpZyLcZ3mt-OJJ9Nr_Vjy7PND1Nm3s2f4SfJ_1--AGIyf_4</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Evans, Malcolm D.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen</title><author>Evans, Malcolm D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-c63fb4e4390c25f46c58ab0ec79395334820a2be8dcef8930326cbc67e81eb983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>delimitation</topic><topic>Eritrea</topic><topic>Exclusive economic zone</topic><topic>HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law of the Sea Convention</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Maritime law</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Territorial waters</topic><topic>Yemen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Malcolm D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Malcolm D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen</atitle><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle><addtitle>Leiden Journal of International Law</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>141-170</pages><issn>0922-1565</issn><eissn>1478-9698</eissn><abstract>The Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Phase (Maritime Delimitation) of the Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration follows the trend towards producing a single all-purpose delimitation line constructed on the basis of equidistance, the course of which is chiefly dictated by mainland coastal geography. Islands are accorded little impact upon the course of the final line, save to the extent necessary to permit them a full territorial sea. The potential relevance of other factors, including fishing and navigational interests is acknowledged but, given the methodology adopted, they did not influence the construction of the line. As in other cases, proportionality is demonstrated by comparison of areas with the relevant coastal lengths, although the usefulness of this is dubious. Although entirely separate exercises, it may be that the methodology pursued owes something to the outcomes of the first phase of the Arbitration, concerning sovereignty over the islands, and this may have a bearing upon the impact of the Award for maritime boundary delimitation more generally.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0922156501000073</doi><tpages>30</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-1565 |
ispartof | Leiden journal of international law, 2001-03, Vol.14 (1), p.141-170 |
issn | 0922-1565 1478-9698 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18302838 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Agreements Arbitration Coasts Court hearings & proceedings delimitation Eritrea Exclusive economic zone HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS International law Islands Jurisdiction Law of the Sea Convention Marine Maritime law Sovereignty Territorial waters Yemen |
title | The Maritime Delimitation Between Eritrea and Yemen |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Maritime%20Delimitation%20Between%20Eritrea%20and%20Yemen&rft.jtitle=Leiden%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Evans,%20Malcolm%20D.&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=141-170&rft.issn=0922-1565&rft.eissn=1478-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0922156501000073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1401077071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219562936&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0922156501000073&rfr_iscdi=true |