The Outlook: Scattered Showers
This is a philosophical article that discusses turbulence, chaos, and limited predictability as they affect professional meteorologists. Particular consideration is given to the problem of the limits of predictability in meteorology. It is a science whose behavior is not regular; it is subject to th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 1988-04, Vol.69 (4), p.368-372 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 372 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 368 |
container_title | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Tennekes, Hendrik |
description | This is a philosophical article that discusses turbulence, chaos, and limited predictability as they affect professional meteorologists. Particular consideration is given to the problem of the limits of predictability in meteorology. It is a science whose behavior is not regular; it is subject to the theory of chaotic dynamics of nonlinear systems as pointed out by Lorenz. Automation and computerization can be perfected and used to forecast weather routinely for 3-5 days with minimum human intervention. However, the forecaster will not be eliminated-not because human beings are necessary to make forecasts, but because there is a limit to that which can be predicted. The theory developed by Lorenz, Leith, and others gives climatological values for the useful prediction range based on an assumed shape of the energy spectrum of atmospheric motion. On the average, prediction cannot be extended beyond 14 days, even with perfect observation technology and arbitrarily large computers. For reliable guidance on predictability, a simplified subjective version of the lagged-averages forecasting proposed by Koffmann and Kalnoy is suggested. The concept of ambiguity expressed by the phrase Fourier-transform ambiguity is proposed to substitute for the negative connotation that goes with uncertainty, insecurity, indeterminability, and unpredictability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0368:TOSS>2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18282441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26225945</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26225945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-f3aaf548cd3ccc34cc6c5bf26304151d0102c96b7ec4fa275c2d154c206a9303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gtKT6CF1dnY3H1UECfUDCjkk92U72dDW1NTdFPHfm6XSywzDvDzwPoxFHKacJ-qBK4QIZJLc8SxN7yHOnkDE6awqyvIZpzDNi0c8YaNj7pSNAEBEw0jO2YX3m3CKlI_YTbWyk2Lft133OZuUZPreOltPylX3Y52_ZGeNab29-t9jVr3Oq_w9WhRvH_nLIiKMRR81wphGyZRqQURCEsWkls3wA8kVr4EDUhYvE0uyMZgowporSQixyQSIMbs9YHeu-95b3-vt2pNtW_Nlu73XPMUUpeRDcH4Ikuu8d7bRO7feGverOeggR4fSOpTWQY4e5OggRwc5GjXovNA4cK4PnI3vO3eEYIyoMqnEHw_MYrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18282441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Outlook: Scattered Showers</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tennekes, Hendrik</creator><creatorcontrib>Tennekes, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><description>This is a philosophical article that discusses turbulence, chaos, and limited predictability as they affect professional meteorologists. Particular consideration is given to the problem of the limits of predictability in meteorology. It is a science whose behavior is not regular; it is subject to the theory of chaotic dynamics of nonlinear systems as pointed out by Lorenz. Automation and computerization can be perfected and used to forecast weather routinely for 3-5 days with minimum human intervention. However, the forecaster will not be eliminated-not because human beings are necessary to make forecasts, but because there is a limit to that which can be predicted. The theory developed by Lorenz, Leith, and others gives climatological values for the useful prediction range based on an assumed shape of the energy spectrum of atmospheric motion. On the average, prediction cannot be extended beyond 14 days, even with perfect observation technology and arbitrarily large computers. For reliable guidance on predictability, a simplified subjective version of the lagged-averages forecasting proposed by Koffmann and Kalnoy is suggested. The concept of ambiguity expressed by the phrase Fourier-transform ambiguity is proposed to substitute for the negative connotation that goes with uncertainty, insecurity, indeterminability, and unpredictability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0368:TOSS>2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Biomedical technology ; Chaos theory ; Computer technology ; Meteorology ; Predictability ; Technology forecasting ; Turbulence ; Weather ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1988-04, Vol.69 (4), p.368-372</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1988, American Meteorological Society (AMS)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26225945$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26225945$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3667,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tennekes, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><title>The Outlook: Scattered Showers</title><title>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</title><description>This is a philosophical article that discusses turbulence, chaos, and limited predictability as they affect professional meteorologists. Particular consideration is given to the problem of the limits of predictability in meteorology. It is a science whose behavior is not regular; it is subject to the theory of chaotic dynamics of nonlinear systems as pointed out by Lorenz. Automation and computerization can be perfected and used to forecast weather routinely for 3-5 days with minimum human intervention. However, the forecaster will not be eliminated-not because human beings are necessary to make forecasts, but because there is a limit to that which can be predicted. The theory developed by Lorenz, Leith, and others gives climatological values for the useful prediction range based on an assumed shape of the energy spectrum of atmospheric motion. On the average, prediction cannot be extended beyond 14 days, even with perfect observation technology and arbitrarily large computers. For reliable guidance on predictability, a simplified subjective version of the lagged-averages forecasting proposed by Koffmann and Kalnoy is suggested. The concept of ambiguity expressed by the phrase Fourier-transform ambiguity is proposed to substitute for the negative connotation that goes with uncertainty, insecurity, indeterminability, and unpredictability.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Biomedical technology</subject><subject>Chaos theory</subject><subject>Computer technology</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Predictability</subject><subject>Technology forecasting</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0003-0007</issn><issn>1520-0477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gtKT6CF1dnY3H1UECfUDCjkk92U72dDW1NTdFPHfm6XSywzDvDzwPoxFHKacJ-qBK4QIZJLc8SxN7yHOnkDE6awqyvIZpzDNi0c8YaNj7pSNAEBEw0jO2YX3m3CKlI_YTbWyk2Lft133OZuUZPreOltPylX3Y52_ZGeNab29-t9jVr3Oq_w9WhRvH_nLIiKMRR81wphGyZRqQURCEsWkls3wA8kVr4EDUhYvE0uyMZgowporSQixyQSIMbs9YHeu-95b3-vt2pNtW_Nlu73XPMUUpeRDcH4Ikuu8d7bRO7feGverOeggR4fSOpTWQY4e5OggRwc5GjXovNA4cK4PnI3vO3eEYIyoMqnEHw_MYrw</recordid><startdate>19880401</startdate><enddate>19880401</enddate><creator>Tennekes, Hendrik</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19880401</creationdate><title>The Outlook: Scattered Showers</title><author>Tennekes, Hendrik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-f3aaf548cd3ccc34cc6c5bf26304151d0102c96b7ec4fa275c2d154c206a9303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Biomedical technology</topic><topic>Chaos theory</topic><topic>Computer technology</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Predictability</topic><topic>Technology forecasting</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tennekes, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tennekes, Hendrik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Outlook: Scattered Showers</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>1988-04-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>368-372</pages><issn>0003-0007</issn><eissn>1520-0477</eissn><abstract>This is a philosophical article that discusses turbulence, chaos, and limited predictability as they affect professional meteorologists. Particular consideration is given to the problem of the limits of predictability in meteorology. It is a science whose behavior is not regular; it is subject to the theory of chaotic dynamics of nonlinear systems as pointed out by Lorenz. Automation and computerization can be perfected and used to forecast weather routinely for 3-5 days with minimum human intervention. However, the forecaster will not be eliminated-not because human beings are necessary to make forecasts, but because there is a limit to that which can be predicted. The theory developed by Lorenz, Leith, and others gives climatological values for the useful prediction range based on an assumed shape of the energy spectrum of atmospheric motion. On the average, prediction cannot be extended beyond 14 days, even with perfect observation technology and arbitrarily large computers. For reliable guidance on predictability, a simplified subjective version of the lagged-averages forecasting proposed by Koffmann and Kalnoy is suggested. The concept of ambiguity expressed by the phrase Fourier-transform ambiguity is proposed to substitute for the negative connotation that goes with uncertainty, insecurity, indeterminability, and unpredictability.</abstract><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0368:TOSS>2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0007 |
ispartof | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1988-04, Vol.69 (4), p.368-372 |
issn | 0003-0007 1520-0477 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18282441 |
source | American Meteorological Society; Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ambiguity Biomedical technology Chaos theory Computer technology Meteorology Predictability Technology forecasting Turbulence Weather Weather forecasting |
title | The Outlook: Scattered Showers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Outlook:%20Scattered%20Showers&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20American%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Tennekes,%20Hendrik&rft.date=1988-04-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=368-372&rft.issn=0003-0007&rft.eissn=1520-0477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069%3C0368:TOSS%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26225945%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18282441&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26225945&rfr_iscdi=true |