Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor
Olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major olive pest in the Mediterranean basin where increasing insecticide resistance has enhanced damage and necessitates more reliance on other control strategies, such as biological control. Provision of floral resources has been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.473-483 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 483 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 473 |
container_title | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Furtado, C. Belo, A. F. Nunes, F. M. Ganhão, E. Müller, C. T. Torres, L. Rei, F. T. |
description | Olive fruit fly
Bactrocera oleae
(Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major olive pest in the Mediterranean basin where increasing insecticide resistance has enhanced damage and necessitates more reliance on other control strategies, such as biological control. Provision of floral resources has been reported to improve the effectiveness of natural enemies. Here, we tested the effect of six plant nectars and two honeydew sources on the survival of
Psyttalia concolor
(Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid wasp used in the biological control of olive fruit fly. Our results showed a positive effect on survival associated with nectars of
Anchusa azurea
Mill.,
Rosmarinus officinalis
L.,
Lavatera cretica
L. and
Calamintha nepeta
(L.) Savi, while honeydew proved to be a valuable alternative food source. When offering flowers directly to insects,
Anchusa azurea
,
Lavatera cretica
, and
Foeniculum vulgare
L. were found to be the most beneficial species, indicating also that
P. concolor
feeds predominantly on shallow corollas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827931904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4180653791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2206cfb28361509c49df132f1a663d1e465a005fe7124fd268835e50af7883bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AjZtoHpNMZimlPqCgC12HNJO0U9JJTTKF_ntTpgsRXN1z4TuHew8AtwQ_EIzrx0QwpwJhIlBTM4r4GZgQXjMkaSXPi2ZSIEEqcgmuUtrg4uFcToCd77UfdO76FdyFbPvcaQ-D7_YWhmjWOrYwDSsdoQuhyDBEY1NZIsxrewKdP8Cdjjp1OXQt_EiHnLXvNDShN8GHeA0unPbJ3pzmFHw9zz9nr2jx_vI2e1ogwxqaEaVYGLekkgnCcWOqpnWEUUe0EKwlthJcY8ydrQmtXEuFlIxbjrWri1q2bArux9xdDN-DTVltu2Ss97q3YUiKSFo3jDS4KujdH3RTfuvLdYUqRI2lwIUiI2ViSClap3ax2-p4UASrY_FqLF6V4tWxeMWLh46eVNh-ZeOv5H9NP6B4hgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819070860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Furtado, C. ; Belo, A. F. ; Nunes, F. M. ; Ganhão, E. ; Müller, C. T. ; Torres, L. ; Rei, F. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Furtado, C. ; Belo, A. F. ; Nunes, F. M. ; Ganhão, E. ; Müller, C. T. ; Torres, L. ; Rei, F. T.</creatorcontrib><description>Olive fruit fly
Bactrocera oleae
(Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major olive pest in the Mediterranean basin where increasing insecticide resistance has enhanced damage and necessitates more reliance on other control strategies, such as biological control. Provision of floral resources has been reported to improve the effectiveness of natural enemies. Here, we tested the effect of six plant nectars and two honeydew sources on the survival of
Psyttalia concolor
(Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid wasp used in the biological control of olive fruit fly. Our results showed a positive effect on survival associated with nectars of
Anchusa azurea
Mill.,
Rosmarinus officinalis
L.,
Lavatera cretica
L. and
Calamintha nepeta
(L.) Savi, while honeydew proved to be a valuable alternative food source. When offering flowers directly to insects,
Anchusa azurea
,
Lavatera cretica
, and
Foeniculum vulgare
L. were found to be the most beneficial species, indicating also that
P. concolor
feeds predominantly on shallow corollas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Anchusa azurea ; Animal Biochemistry ; Animal Ecology ; Bactrocera oleae ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biological control ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Braconidae ; Diptera ; Entomology ; Flowers & plants ; Foeniculum vulgare ; Food ; Food sources ; Foraging behavior ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Honeydew ; Hymenoptera ; Insecticide resistance ; Insecticides ; Insects ; Lavatera cretica ; Life Sciences ; Natural enemies ; Nepeta ; Olea ; Orchards ; Pest control ; Pesticide resistance ; Pesticides ; Plant nectar ; Plant Pathology ; Psyttalia concolor ; Rosmarinus officinalis ; Sugar ; Survival ; Tephritidae</subject><ispartof>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.473-483</ispartof><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2016</rights><rights>International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2206cfb28361509c49df132f1a663d1e465a005fe7124fd268835e50af7883bd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2206cfb28361509c49df132f1a663d1e465a005fe7124fd268835e50af7883bd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Furtado, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belo, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganhão, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rei, F. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor</title><title>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>BioControl</addtitle><description>Olive fruit fly
Bactrocera oleae
(Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major olive pest in the Mediterranean basin where increasing insecticide resistance has enhanced damage and necessitates more reliance on other control strategies, such as biological control. Provision of floral resources has been reported to improve the effectiveness of natural enemies. Here, we tested the effect of six plant nectars and two honeydew sources on the survival of
Psyttalia concolor
(Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid wasp used in the biological control of olive fruit fly. Our results showed a positive effect on survival associated with nectars of
Anchusa azurea
Mill.,
Rosmarinus officinalis
L.,
Lavatera cretica
L. and
Calamintha nepeta
(L.) Savi, while honeydew proved to be a valuable alternative food source. When offering flowers directly to insects,
Anchusa azurea
,
Lavatera cretica
, and
Foeniculum vulgare
L. were found to be the most beneficial species, indicating also that
P. concolor
feeds predominantly on shallow corollas.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Anchusa azurea</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Bactrocera oleae</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Braconidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Foeniculum vulgare</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Honeydew</subject><subject>Hymenoptera</subject><subject>Insecticide resistance</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Lavatera cretica</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Nepeta</subject><subject>Olea</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticide resistance</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant nectar</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Psyttalia concolor</subject><subject>Rosmarinus officinalis</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tephritidae</subject><issn>1386-6141</issn><issn>1573-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AjZtoHpNMZimlPqCgC12HNJO0U9JJTTKF_ntTpgsRXN1z4TuHew8AtwQ_EIzrx0QwpwJhIlBTM4r4GZgQXjMkaSXPi2ZSIEEqcgmuUtrg4uFcToCd77UfdO76FdyFbPvcaQ-D7_YWhmjWOrYwDSsdoQuhyDBEY1NZIsxrewKdP8Cdjjp1OXQt_EiHnLXvNDShN8GHeA0unPbJ3pzmFHw9zz9nr2jx_vI2e1ogwxqaEaVYGLekkgnCcWOqpnWEUUe0EKwlthJcY8ydrQmtXEuFlIxbjrWri1q2bArux9xdDN-DTVltu2Ss97q3YUiKSFo3jDS4KujdH3RTfuvLdYUqRI2lwIUiI2ViSClap3ax2-p4UASrY_FqLF6V4tWxeMWLh46eVNh-ZeOv5H9NP6B4hgc</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Furtado, C.</creator><creator>Belo, A. F.</creator><creator>Nunes, F. M.</creator><creator>Ganhão, E.</creator><creator>Müller, C. T.</creator><creator>Torres, L.</creator><creator>Rei, F. T.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor</title><author>Furtado, C. ; Belo, A. F. ; Nunes, F. M. ; Ganhão, E. ; Müller, C. T. ; Torres, L. ; Rei, F. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-2206cfb28361509c49df132f1a663d1e465a005fe7124fd268835e50af7883bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Anchusa azurea</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Bactrocera oleae</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Braconidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Foeniculum vulgare</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Honeydew</topic><topic>Hymenoptera</topic><topic>Insecticide resistance</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Lavatera cretica</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Nepeta</topic><topic>Olea</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticide resistance</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant nectar</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Psyttalia concolor</topic><topic>Rosmarinus officinalis</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tephritidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Furtado, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belo, A. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, F. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganhão, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rei, F. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Furtado, C.</au><au>Belo, A. F.</au><au>Nunes, F. M.</au><au>Ganhão, E.</au><au>Müller, C. T.</au><au>Torres, L.</au><au>Rei, F. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor</atitle><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>BioControl</stitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>473-483</pages><issn>1386-6141</issn><eissn>1573-8248</eissn><abstract>Olive fruit fly
Bactrocera oleae
(Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a major olive pest in the Mediterranean basin where increasing insecticide resistance has enhanced damage and necessitates more reliance on other control strategies, such as biological control. Provision of floral resources has been reported to improve the effectiveness of natural enemies. Here, we tested the effect of six plant nectars and two honeydew sources on the survival of
Psyttalia concolor
(Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid wasp used in the biological control of olive fruit fly. Our results showed a positive effect on survival associated with nectars of
Anchusa azurea
Mill.,
Rosmarinus officinalis
L.,
Lavatera cretica
L. and
Calamintha nepeta
(L.) Savi, while honeydew proved to be a valuable alternative food source. When offering flowers directly to insects,
Anchusa azurea
,
Lavatera cretica
, and
Foeniculum vulgare
L. were found to be the most beneficial species, indicating also that
P. concolor
feeds predominantly on shallow corollas.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-6141 |
ispartof | BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2016-10, Vol.61 (5), p.473-483 |
issn | 1386-6141 1573-8248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827931904 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Anchusa azurea Animal Biochemistry Animal Ecology Bactrocera oleae Behavioral Sciences Biological control Biomedical and Life Sciences Braconidae Diptera Entomology Flowers & plants Foeniculum vulgare Food Food sources Foraging behavior Fruit flies Fruits Honeydew Hymenoptera Insecticide resistance Insecticides Insects Lavatera cretica Life Sciences Natural enemies Nepeta Olea Orchards Pest control Pesticide resistance Pesticides Plant nectar Plant Pathology Psyttalia concolor Rosmarinus officinalis Sugar Survival Tephritidae |
title | Evaluating potential olive orchard sugar food sources for the olive fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A14%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20potential%20olive%20orchard%20sugar%20food%20sources%20for%20the%20olive%20fly%20parasitoid%20Psyttalia%20concolor&rft.jtitle=BioControl%20(Dordrecht,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Furtado,%20C.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=473-483&rft.issn=1386-6141&rft.eissn=1573-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10526-016-9732-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4180653791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819070860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |