Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery

Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) upon the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery, comparing moderate NMB and deep NMB. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Setting Operating room. Patients Seve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-11, Vol.34, p.197-203
Hauptverfasser: Barrio, Javier, MD, Errando, Carlos L., PhD, San Miguel, Guillermo, MD, Salas, Boris I., MD, Raga, Juan, MD, Carrión, José L., MD, García-Ramón, Jaime, MD, Gallego, Juan, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue
container_start_page 197
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 34
creator Barrio, Javier, MD
Errando, Carlos L., PhD
San Miguel, Guillermo, MD
Salas, Boris I., MD
Raga, Juan, MD
Carrión, José L., MD
García-Ramón, Jaime, MD
Gallego, Juan, PhD
description Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) upon the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery, comparing moderate NMB and deep NMB. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Setting Operating room. Patients Seventy-six American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 to 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery. Interventions Two independent evaluations were performed at the establishment of pneumoperitoneum for a preset intraabdominal pressures (IAPs) of 8 and 12 mm Hg, both during moderate NMB (train-of-four count, 1-3) and deep NMB (posttetanic count, < 5). Rocuronium was used to induce NMB, and sugammadex was used for reversal. Measurements We evaluated (i) the volume of CO2 introduced in 41 patients and (ii) the skin-sacral promontory distance in 35 patients, at pneumoperitoneum establishment. Results Compared to moderate NMB, deep NMB increased, in a significant manner, both the intraabdominal volume of CO2 insufflated (mean [SD], 2.24 [1.10] vs 2.81 [1.13] L at 8 mm Hg IAP, P < .001, and 3.52 [1.31] vs 4.09 [1.31] L at 12 mm Hg IAP, P < .001) and the skin-sacral promontory distance (11.78 [1.52] vs 12.16 [1.51] cm at 8 mm Hg IAP, P = .002, and 13.34 [1.87] vs 13.80 [1.81] cm at 12 mm Hg IAP, P < .001). Increase in intraabdominal volume after inducing deep NMB was observed in 88% and 81.7% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a volume increase of mean of 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8-50.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.7-36.4), respectively ( P = .003). Increase in distance was observed in 61% and 82% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a mean distance increase of 3.3% (95% CI, 1.3-5.4) and 3.6% (95% CI, 1.9-5.2), respectively ( P = .840). Conclusions Deep NMB, in comparison to moderate NMB, increased in a significant manner the abdominal space at pneumoperitoneum establishment. However, the effective increase in the abdominal cavity dimensions could be low, the increase showed a great interindividual variability, and it was not observed in every patient. Clinical significance of this increase on surgical conditions is yet to be demonstrated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827925977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0952818016301283</els_id><sourcerecordid>1827925977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c95dded3501f31efdc1be6a58fe396ee4fab60819825d2ee468288de71c149103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstu1TAQhi0EoofCK1SW2LBJsJ2bs0GgqtBKlVgAa8uxJz1OnTjYSaWz4dmZ6LQgddOuPJa_uf2_CTnjLOeM1x-HfDDeTXqCXOA9Z2XOePOC7LhsiqysRPuS7FhbiUxyyU7Im5QGxhg-8NfkRDQ1Yk2xI38u-h7MQkNPLczLfgsmWGMY12RWryPtfDC32gINE132QHVnw4idPU2zNkDtGt10Q2fMGsMM0S1hCymkRXfepf0I00LdRL2edQzJhNkZmtZ4A_HwlrzqtU_w7v48Jb--Xvw8v8yuv3-7Ov9ynZlSlktm2spasEXFeF9w6K3hHdS6kj0UbQ1Q9rqrmeStFJUVeK-lkNJCww0vW86KU_LhWHeO4feKo6nRJQPeo4BhTYpL0bSiapvmOWglUHOxoe8foUNYI0pzpOqmxZmQqo-Uwe1ThF7N0Y06HhRnajNTDerBTLWZqVip0ExMPLsvv3Yj2H9pD-4h8PkIAEp35yCqZBxMBqyLaKqywT3d49OjEhvljPa3cID0fx-VhGLqx_alth_F6wIlkEXxFwjoyrE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825679081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Barrio, Javier, MD ; Errando, Carlos L., PhD ; San Miguel, Guillermo, MD ; Salas, Boris I., MD ; Raga, Juan, MD ; Carrión, José L., MD ; García-Ramón, Jaime, MD ; Gallego, Juan, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrio, Javier, MD ; Errando, Carlos L., PhD ; San Miguel, Guillermo, MD ; Salas, Boris I., MD ; Raga, Juan, MD ; Carrión, José L., MD ; García-Ramón, Jaime, MD ; Gallego, Juan, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) upon the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery, comparing moderate NMB and deep NMB. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Setting Operating room. Patients Seventy-six American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 to 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery. Interventions Two independent evaluations were performed at the establishment of pneumoperitoneum for a preset intraabdominal pressures (IAPs) of 8 and 12 mm Hg, both during moderate NMB (train-of-four count, 1-3) and deep NMB (posttetanic count, &lt; 5). Rocuronium was used to induce NMB, and sugammadex was used for reversal. Measurements We evaluated (i) the volume of CO2 introduced in 41 patients and (ii) the skin-sacral promontory distance in 35 patients, at pneumoperitoneum establishment. Results Compared to moderate NMB, deep NMB increased, in a significant manner, both the intraabdominal volume of CO2 insufflated (mean [SD], 2.24 [1.10] vs 2.81 [1.13] L at 8 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001, and 3.52 [1.31] vs 4.09 [1.31] L at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001) and the skin-sacral promontory distance (11.78 [1.52] vs 12.16 [1.51] cm at 8 mm Hg IAP, P = .002, and 13.34 [1.87] vs 13.80 [1.81] cm at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001). Increase in intraabdominal volume after inducing deep NMB was observed in 88% and 81.7% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a volume increase of mean of 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8-50.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.7-36.4), respectively ( P = .003). Increase in distance was observed in 61% and 82% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a mean distance increase of 3.3% (95% CI, 1.3-5.4) and 3.6% (95% CI, 1.9-5.2), respectively ( P = .840). Conclusions Deep NMB, in comparison to moderate NMB, increased in a significant manner the abdominal space at pneumoperitoneum establishment. However, the effective increase in the abdominal cavity dimensions could be low, the increase showed a great interindividual variability, and it was not observed in every patient. Clinical significance of this increase on surgical conditions is yet to be demonstrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27687373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal Cavity ; Abdominal surgery ; Adult ; Androstanols - administration &amp; dosage ; Androstanols - adverse effects ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care ; Body mass index ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Clinical trials ; Cross-Over Studies ; Elective Surgical Procedures ; Female ; gamma-Cyclodextrins - administration &amp; dosage ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Injections, Intraperitoneal ; Insufflation ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuromuscular blockade ; Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects ; Neuromuscular Blockade - methods ; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - adverse effects ; Pain Medicine ; Patients ; Pneumoperitoneum ; Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Rocuronium ; Skin</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-11, Vol.34, p.197-203</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c95dded3501f31efdc1be6a58fe396ee4fab60819825d2ee468288de71c149103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c95dded3501f31efdc1be6a58fe396ee4fab60819825d2ee468288de71c149103</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8882-081X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818016301283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrio, Javier, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errando, Carlos L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, Guillermo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Boris I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raga, Juan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrión, José L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Ramón, Jaime, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego, Juan, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) upon the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery, comparing moderate NMB and deep NMB. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Setting Operating room. Patients Seventy-six American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 to 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery. Interventions Two independent evaluations were performed at the establishment of pneumoperitoneum for a preset intraabdominal pressures (IAPs) of 8 and 12 mm Hg, both during moderate NMB (train-of-four count, 1-3) and deep NMB (posttetanic count, &lt; 5). Rocuronium was used to induce NMB, and sugammadex was used for reversal. Measurements We evaluated (i) the volume of CO2 introduced in 41 patients and (ii) the skin-sacral promontory distance in 35 patients, at pneumoperitoneum establishment. Results Compared to moderate NMB, deep NMB increased, in a significant manner, both the intraabdominal volume of CO2 insufflated (mean [SD], 2.24 [1.10] vs 2.81 [1.13] L at 8 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001, and 3.52 [1.31] vs 4.09 [1.31] L at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001) and the skin-sacral promontory distance (11.78 [1.52] vs 12.16 [1.51] cm at 8 mm Hg IAP, P = .002, and 13.34 [1.87] vs 13.80 [1.81] cm at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001). Increase in intraabdominal volume after inducing deep NMB was observed in 88% and 81.7% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a volume increase of mean of 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8-50.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.7-36.4), respectively ( P = .003). Increase in distance was observed in 61% and 82% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a mean distance increase of 3.3% (95% CI, 1.3-5.4) and 3.6% (95% CI, 1.9-5.2), respectively ( P = .840). Conclusions Deep NMB, in comparison to moderate NMB, increased in a significant manner the abdominal space at pneumoperitoneum establishment. However, the effective increase in the abdominal cavity dimensions could be low, the increase showed a great interindividual variability, and it was not observed in every patient. Clinical significance of this increase on surgical conditions is yet to be demonstrated.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Cavity</subject><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Androstanols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Androstanols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gamma-Cyclodextrins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal</subject><subject>Insufflation</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuromuscular blockade</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Blockade - methods</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumoperitoneum</subject><subject>Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rocuronium</subject><subject>Skin</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstu1TAQhi0EoofCK1SW2LBJsJ2bs0GgqtBKlVgAa8uxJz1OnTjYSaWz4dmZ6LQgddOuPJa_uf2_CTnjLOeM1x-HfDDeTXqCXOA9Z2XOePOC7LhsiqysRPuS7FhbiUxyyU7Im5QGxhg-8NfkRDQ1Yk2xI38u-h7MQkNPLczLfgsmWGMY12RWryPtfDC32gINE132QHVnw4idPU2zNkDtGt10Q2fMGsMM0S1hCymkRXfepf0I00LdRL2edQzJhNkZmtZ4A_HwlrzqtU_w7v48Jb--Xvw8v8yuv3-7Ov9ynZlSlktm2spasEXFeF9w6K3hHdS6kj0UbQ1Q9rqrmeStFJUVeK-lkNJCww0vW86KU_LhWHeO4feKo6nRJQPeo4BhTYpL0bSiapvmOWglUHOxoe8foUNYI0pzpOqmxZmQqo-Uwe1ThF7N0Y06HhRnajNTDerBTLWZqVip0ExMPLsvv3Yj2H9pD-4h8PkIAEp35yCqZBxMBqyLaKqywT3d49OjEhvljPa3cID0fx-VhGLqx_alth_F6wIlkEXxFwjoyrE</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Barrio, Javier, MD</creator><creator>Errando, Carlos L., PhD</creator><creator>San Miguel, Guillermo, MD</creator><creator>Salas, Boris I., MD</creator><creator>Raga, Juan, MD</creator><creator>Carrión, José L., MD</creator><creator>García-Ramón, Jaime, MD</creator><creator>Gallego, Juan, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-081X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery</title><author>Barrio, Javier, MD ; Errando, Carlos L., PhD ; San Miguel, Guillermo, MD ; Salas, Boris I., MD ; Raga, Juan, MD ; Carrión, José L., MD ; García-Ramón, Jaime, MD ; Gallego, Juan, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-c95dded3501f31efdc1be6a58fe396ee4fab60819825d2ee468288de71c149103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Cavity</topic><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Androstanols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Androstanols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gamma-Cyclodextrins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal</topic><topic>Insufflation</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuromuscular blockade</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Blockade - methods</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumoperitoneum</topic><topic>Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rocuronium</topic><topic>Skin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrio, Javier, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Errando, Carlos L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, Guillermo, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Boris I., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raga, Juan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrión, José L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Ramón, Jaime, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallego, Juan, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrio, Javier, MD</au><au>Errando, Carlos L., PhD</au><au>San Miguel, Guillermo, MD</au><au>Salas, Boris I., MD</au><au>Raga, Juan, MD</au><au>Carrión, José L., MD</au><au>García-Ramón, Jaime, MD</au><au>Gallego, Juan, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><spage>197</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>197-203</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study Objective To evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) upon the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery, comparing moderate NMB and deep NMB. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Setting Operating room. Patients Seventy-six American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 to 2 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery. Interventions Two independent evaluations were performed at the establishment of pneumoperitoneum for a preset intraabdominal pressures (IAPs) of 8 and 12 mm Hg, both during moderate NMB (train-of-four count, 1-3) and deep NMB (posttetanic count, &lt; 5). Rocuronium was used to induce NMB, and sugammadex was used for reversal. Measurements We evaluated (i) the volume of CO2 introduced in 41 patients and (ii) the skin-sacral promontory distance in 35 patients, at pneumoperitoneum establishment. Results Compared to moderate NMB, deep NMB increased, in a significant manner, both the intraabdominal volume of CO2 insufflated (mean [SD], 2.24 [1.10] vs 2.81 [1.13] L at 8 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001, and 3.52 [1.31] vs 4.09 [1.31] L at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001) and the skin-sacral promontory distance (11.78 [1.52] vs 12.16 [1.51] cm at 8 mm Hg IAP, P = .002, and 13.34 [1.87] vs 13.80 [1.81] cm at 12 mm Hg IAP, P &lt; .001). Increase in intraabdominal volume after inducing deep NMB was observed in 88% and 81.7% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a volume increase of mean of 36.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8-50.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.7-36.4), respectively ( P = .003). Increase in distance was observed in 61% and 82% of patients at 8 and 12 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum, with a mean distance increase of 3.3% (95% CI, 1.3-5.4) and 3.6% (95% CI, 1.9-5.2), respectively ( P = .840). Conclusions Deep NMB, in comparison to moderate NMB, increased in a significant manner the abdominal space at pneumoperitoneum establishment. However, the effective increase in the abdominal cavity dimensions could be low, the increase showed a great interindividual variability, and it was not observed in every patient. Clinical significance of this increase on surgical conditions is yet to be demonstrated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27687373</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.017</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8882-081X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-11, Vol.34, p.197-203
issn 0952-8180
1873-4529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827925977
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal Cavity
Abdominal surgery
Adult
Androstanols - administration & dosage
Androstanols - adverse effects
Anesthesia
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Body mass index
Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Clinical trials
Cross-Over Studies
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
gamma-Cyclodextrins - administration & dosage
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Gynecology
Humans
Injections, Intraperitoneal
Insufflation
Laparoscopy
Male
Middle Aged
Neuromuscular blockade
Neuromuscular Blockade - adverse effects
Neuromuscular Blockade - methods
Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - administration & dosage
Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents - adverse effects
Pain Medicine
Patients
Pneumoperitoneum
Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Rocuronium
Skin
title Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A11%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20depth%20of%20neuromuscular%20blockade%20on%20the%20abdominal%20space%20during%20pneumoperitoneum%20establishment%20in%20laparoscopic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Barrio,%20Javier,%20MD&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=197-203&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827925977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825679081&rft_id=info:pmid/27687373&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0952818016301283&rfr_iscdi=true