Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract Study objectives To evaluate whether intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative pain scores compared with low-dose remifentanil infusion. Design Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-08, Vol.32, p.153-158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 158 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Journal of clinical anesthesia |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Yamashita, Soichiro, MD Yokouchi, Takako, MD Tanaka, Makoto, MD |
description | Abstract Study objectives To evaluate whether intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative pain scores compared with low-dose remifentanil infusion. Design Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting Operating room, university hospital. Patients Thirty female patients scheduled for elective gynecological abdominal surgery. Interventions After epidural catheter placement and induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to 2 anesthetic regimens. In the first group (high-dose remifentanil group), sevoflurane concentration was held constant at 1.2%, and the remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. In the second group (low-dose remifentanil group), the remifentanil infusion rate was held constant at 0.1 μ g/(kg min), and the sevoflurane concentration was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. As abdominal wall closure began, 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was administrated via epidural catheter; a patient-controlled analgesia device was set to deliver 4 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with 3 μ g/mL of fentanyl, with 2-mL incremental doses and a 15-minute lockout time. Measurements Local anesthetic consumption via postoperative epidural catheter and pain intensity with the Prince Henry pain scale were assessed for 48 hours after surgery. Main results The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.23 μ g/(kg min) in the high-dose remifentanil group, 2.3 times the rate used in the low-dose remifentanil group. The cumulative amount of local anesthetic used within 48 hours of surgery was significant greater in the high-dose remifentanil group than in the low-dose remifentanil group (212 ± 25 mL vs. 181 ± 35 mL, respectively; P < .05), but postoperative pain scores were similar in each group. Conclusions Intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia relative to low-dose remifentanil. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827923585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0952818016300058</els_id><sourcerecordid>1827923585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-a77011bee3b864f807c3515388f2016be69c30cfada3c2b6af9710ca4d5854e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAQxyMEotvCK1SWuHDJ4o_EcTggqqoFpEocgLPlOOPUwYmDnSxanocHxel2qdRLpZH8Mb8Ze-Y_WXZO8JZgwt_12147O6oRtjSdt5gmK55lGyIqlhclrZ9nG1yXNBdE4JPsNMYeY5wc5GV2Qita45rzTfb3yhjQc0TeIDvOQfkJgprtDtCt7W7z1kdAu4ic_33YBxisgXFWo3XI-IAmH-eHIJhsuwTlkBqV6yBahZSZIaBuP4L2zndWr96m9UP6vkNxCR2E_XukUFDjevsHWrTWdgfOwSr3KnthlIvw-n49y35cX32__JzffP305fLiJteFKOZcVRUmpAFgjeCFEbjSrCQlE8KsPWqA15phbVSrmKYNV6auCNaqaEtRFsDZWfb2kHcK_tcCcZaDjRqcS232S5RE0KqmLNFPo1VqrxAM1wl98wjt_RJS7XdUVdAC85XiB0oHH2MAI6dgBxX2kmC5Si57eZRcruVITJMVKfD8Pv3SDND-DztqnICPBwBS63YWgozawqihtSFJL1tvn37jw6MUR4F-wh7iQz0ypgD5bR28de4IZ2noSsH-AUBD2Is</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797424069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD ; Yokouchi, Takako, MD ; Tanaka, Makoto, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD ; Yokouchi, Takako, MD ; Tanaka, Makoto, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study objectives To evaluate whether intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative pain scores compared with low-dose remifentanil infusion. Design Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting Operating room, university hospital. Patients Thirty female patients scheduled for elective gynecological abdominal surgery. Interventions After epidural catheter placement and induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to 2 anesthetic regimens. In the first group (high-dose remifentanil group), sevoflurane concentration was held constant at 1.2%, and the remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. In the second group (low-dose remifentanil group), the remifentanil infusion rate was held constant at 0.1 μ g/(kg min), and the sevoflurane concentration was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. As abdominal wall closure began, 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was administrated via epidural catheter; a patient-controlled analgesia device was set to deliver 4 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with 3 μ g/mL of fentanyl, with 2-mL incremental doses and a 15-minute lockout time. Measurements Local anesthetic consumption via postoperative epidural catheter and pain intensity with the Prince Henry pain scale were assessed for 48 hours after surgery. Main results The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.23 μ g/(kg min) in the high-dose remifentanil group, 2.3 times the rate used in the low-dose remifentanil group. The cumulative amount of local anesthetic used within 48 hours of surgery was significant greater in the high-dose remifentanil group than in the low-dose remifentanil group (212 ± 25 mL vs. 181 ± 35 mL, respectively; P < .05), but postoperative pain scores were similar in each group. Conclusions Intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia relative to low-dose remifentanil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27290966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdomen - surgery ; Abdominal surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia, Epidural - methods ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Catheters ; Clinical trials ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Epidural analgesia ; Female ; General anesthesia ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Hyperalgesia ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Medical personnel ; Middle Aged ; Narcotics ; Pain management ; Pain Medicine ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Patients ; Piperidines - therapeutic use ; Postoperative pain ; Prospective Studies ; Remifentanil ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-08, Vol.32, p.153-158</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-a77011bee3b864f807c3515388f2016be69c30cfada3c2b6af9710ca4d5854e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-a77011bee3b864f807c3515388f2016be69c30cfada3c2b6af9710ca4d5854e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1797424069?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27290966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokouchi, Takako, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Makoto, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Study objectives To evaluate whether intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative pain scores compared with low-dose remifentanil infusion. Design Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting Operating room, university hospital. Patients Thirty female patients scheduled for elective gynecological abdominal surgery. Interventions After epidural catheter placement and induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to 2 anesthetic regimens. In the first group (high-dose remifentanil group), sevoflurane concentration was held constant at 1.2%, and the remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. In the second group (low-dose remifentanil group), the remifentanil infusion rate was held constant at 0.1 μ g/(kg min), and the sevoflurane concentration was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. As abdominal wall closure began, 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was administrated via epidural catheter; a patient-controlled analgesia device was set to deliver 4 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with 3 μ g/mL of fentanyl, with 2-mL incremental doses and a 15-minute lockout time. Measurements Local anesthetic consumption via postoperative epidural catheter and pain intensity with the Prince Henry pain scale were assessed for 48 hours after surgery. Main results The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.23 μ g/(kg min) in the high-dose remifentanil group, 2.3 times the rate used in the low-dose remifentanil group. The cumulative amount of local anesthetic used within 48 hours of surgery was significant greater in the high-dose remifentanil group than in the low-dose remifentanil group (212 ± 25 mL vs. 181 ± 35 mL, respectively; P < .05), but postoperative pain scores were similar in each group. Conclusions Intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia relative to low-dose remifentanil.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Epidural analgesia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperalgesia</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Piperidines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Postoperative pain</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Remifentanil</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAQxyMEotvCK1SWuHDJ4o_EcTggqqoFpEocgLPlOOPUwYmDnSxanocHxel2qdRLpZH8Mb8Ze-Y_WXZO8JZgwt_12147O6oRtjSdt5gmK55lGyIqlhclrZ9nG1yXNBdE4JPsNMYeY5wc5GV2Qita45rzTfb3yhjQc0TeIDvOQfkJgprtDtCt7W7z1kdAu4ic_33YBxisgXFWo3XI-IAmH-eHIJhsuwTlkBqV6yBahZSZIaBuP4L2zndWr96m9UP6vkNxCR2E_XukUFDjevsHWrTWdgfOwSr3KnthlIvw-n49y35cX32__JzffP305fLiJteFKOZcVRUmpAFgjeCFEbjSrCQlE8KsPWqA15phbVSrmKYNV6auCNaqaEtRFsDZWfb2kHcK_tcCcZaDjRqcS232S5RE0KqmLNFPo1VqrxAM1wl98wjt_RJS7XdUVdAC85XiB0oHH2MAI6dgBxX2kmC5Si57eZRcruVITJMVKfD8Pv3SDND-DztqnICPBwBS63YWgozawqihtSFJL1tvn37jw6MUR4F-wh7iQz0ypgD5bR28de4IZ2noSsH-AUBD2Is</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD</creator><creator>Yokouchi, Takako, MD</creator><creator>Tanaka, Makoto, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD ; Yokouchi, Takako, MD ; Tanaka, Makoto, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-a77011bee3b864f807c3515388f2016be69c30cfada3c2b6af9710ca4d5854e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Epidural analgesia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperalgesia</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Piperidines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Postoperative pain</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Remifentanil</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yokouchi, Takako, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Makoto, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yamashita, Soichiro, MD</au><au>Yokouchi, Takako, MD</au><au>Tanaka, Makoto, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><spage>153</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>153-158</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study objectives To evaluate whether intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia and postoperative pain scores compared with low-dose remifentanil infusion. Design Prospective, randomized controlled study. Setting Operating room, university hospital. Patients Thirty female patients scheduled for elective gynecological abdominal surgery. Interventions After epidural catheter placement and induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomly assigned to 2 anesthetic regimens. In the first group (high-dose remifentanil group), sevoflurane concentration was held constant at 1.2%, and the remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. In the second group (low-dose remifentanil group), the remifentanil infusion rate was held constant at 0.1 μ g/(kg min), and the sevoflurane concentration was titrated to maintain systolic blood pressure within 20% of baseline. As abdominal wall closure began, 6 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine was administrated via epidural catheter; a patient-controlled analgesia device was set to deliver 4 mL/h of 0.2% ropivacaine with 3 μ g/mL of fentanyl, with 2-mL incremental doses and a 15-minute lockout time. Measurements Local anesthetic consumption via postoperative epidural catheter and pain intensity with the Prince Henry pain scale were assessed for 48 hours after surgery. Main results The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.23 μ g/(kg min) in the high-dose remifentanil group, 2.3 times the rate used in the low-dose remifentanil group. The cumulative amount of local anesthetic used within 48 hours of surgery was significant greater in the high-dose remifentanil group than in the low-dose remifentanil group (212 ± 25 mL vs. 181 ± 35 mL, respectively; P < .05), but postoperative pain scores were similar in each group. Conclusions Intraoperative high-dose remifentanil infusion increased local anesthetic consumption in postoperative epidural analgesia relative to low-dose remifentanil.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27290966</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-08, Vol.32, p.153-158 |
issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827923585 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Abdomen Abdomen - surgery Abdominal surgery Adult Aged Analgesia, Epidural - methods Analgesics Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Anesthesia Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Catheters Clinical trials Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Epidural analgesia Female General anesthesia Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods Gynecology Humans Hyperalgesia Intraoperative Care - methods Medical personnel Middle Aged Narcotics Pain management Pain Medicine Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Patients Piperidines - therapeutic use Postoperative pain Prospective Studies Remifentanil Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Effects of intraoperative high-dose vs low-dose remifentanil for postoperative epidural analgesia after gynecological abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A57%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20intraoperative%20high-dose%20vs%20low-dose%20remifentanil%20for%20postoperative%20epidural%20analgesia%20after%20gynecological%20abdominal%20surgery:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Yamashita,%20Soichiro,%20MD&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=153-158&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827923585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797424069&rft_id=info:pmid/27290966&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0952818016300058&rfr_iscdi=true |