Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization

Abstract Study objective Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-11, Vol.34, p.105-112
Hauptverfasser: Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC, Bhadoria, Poonam, MD, Wadhawan, Sonia, MD, Prasad, Sudha, MS, Kohli, Amit, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112
container_issue
container_start_page 105
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 34
creator Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC
Bhadoria, Poonam, MD
Wadhawan, Sonia, MD
Prasad, Sudha, MS
Kohli, Amit, MD
description Abstract Study objective Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia. Design Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting Operating theater and postoperative recovery area. Patients One hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring). Intervention None. Measurements Total propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A). Main results Patients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol ( P = .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl ( P = .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table ( P = .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group ( P = .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted. Conclusion Entropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827920735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S095281801630023X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1827920735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6908686c809a057eba661d16ef93df55827df562a9376b2661bbfceb704238b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsFu1DAUtBCILoVfqCxx4ZLFdhLHuSBQ1QJSJQ6AxM1ynJfikLUX24m0fAjfy0u320MvSFYs582M37wxIRecbTnj8u24He3kvPGwFXjeMoGrfUI2XDVlUdWifUo2rK1FobhiZ-RFSiNjDAv8OTkTjURYXW_I3yufY9gf6JJoysb3JvZ0VXbWTHQXvMshOn9L57R-c8j42yHHLODDnCh2kPJPSM7Qfr5DYs2nxdxidxMNwR4y0Ag5OljuuHRvsgOfEx1CXM-LwxboADG7yf3BYvAvybPBTAle3e_n5Pv11bfLT8XNl4-fLz_cFLZSVS5ky5RU0irWGlY30Bkpec8lDG3ZD3WtRIObFKYtG9kJLHbdYKFrWCVK1TXlOXlz1N3H8HtGJ3rnkoVpQlvoTnNUaAXDWSH09SPoGOaIHpMWTFRMNaIRiJJHlI0hpQiD3ke3M_GgOdNrcnrUp-T0mpxmAleLxIt7-bnbQf9AO0WFgPdHAOA8FgdRJ4tjtNC7CDbrPrj_3_HukcQp6V9wgPTgh-uEBP11fT_r8-GyZEyUP8p_acbGGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2024087272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC ; Bhadoria, Poonam, MD ; Wadhawan, Sonia, MD ; Prasad, Sudha, MS ; Kohli, Amit, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC ; Bhadoria, Poonam, MD ; Wadhawan, Sonia, MD ; Prasad, Sudha, MS ; Kohli, Amit, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study objective Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia. Design Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting Operating theater and postoperative recovery area. Patients One hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring). Intervention None. Measurements Total propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A). Main results Patients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol ( P = .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl ( P = .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table ( P = .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group ( P = .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted. Conclusion Entropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27687355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Anesthesia, General - methods ; Anesthesia, Intravenous - methods ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage ; Drug dosages ; Entropy ; Female ; Fentanyl - administration & dosage ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects ; In vitro fertilization ; Intraoperative awareness ; Intraoperative Awareness - prevention & control ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects ; Oocyte Retrieval - methods ; Pain - prevention & control ; Pain Medicine ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Propofol - administration & dosage ; Propofol - adverse effects ; Prospective Studies ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Transvaginal oocyte retrieval]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-11, Vol.34, p.105-112</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6908686c809a057eba661d16ef93df55827df562a9376b2661bbfceb704238b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6908686c809a057eba661d16ef93df55827df562a9376b2661bbfceb704238b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2024087272?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadoria, Poonam, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadhawan, Sonia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Sudha, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohli, Amit, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Study objective Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia. Design Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting Operating theater and postoperative recovery area. Patients One hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring). Intervention None. Measurements Total propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A). Main results Patients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol ( P = .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl ( P = .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table ( P = .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group ( P = .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted. Conclusion Entropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Intravenous - methods</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Intraoperative awareness</subject><subject>Intraoperative Awareness - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</subject><subject>Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsFu1DAUtBCILoVfqCxx4ZLFdhLHuSBQ1QJSJQ6AxM1ynJfikLUX24m0fAjfy0u320MvSFYs582M37wxIRecbTnj8u24He3kvPGwFXjeMoGrfUI2XDVlUdWifUo2rK1FobhiZ-RFSiNjDAv8OTkTjURYXW_I3yufY9gf6JJoysb3JvZ0VXbWTHQXvMshOn9L57R-c8j42yHHLODDnCh2kPJPSM7Qfr5DYs2nxdxidxMNwR4y0Ag5OljuuHRvsgOfEx1CXM-LwxboADG7yf3BYvAvybPBTAle3e_n5Pv11bfLT8XNl4-fLz_cFLZSVS5ky5RU0irWGlY30Bkpec8lDG3ZD3WtRIObFKYtG9kJLHbdYKFrWCVK1TXlOXlz1N3H8HtGJ3rnkoVpQlvoTnNUaAXDWSH09SPoGOaIHpMWTFRMNaIRiJJHlI0hpQiD3ke3M_GgOdNrcnrUp-T0mpxmAleLxIt7-bnbQf9AO0WFgPdHAOA8FgdRJ4tjtNC7CDbrPrj_3_HukcQp6V9wgPTgh-uEBP11fT_r8-GyZEyUP8p_acbGGg</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC</creator><creator>Bhadoria, Poonam, MD</creator><creator>Wadhawan, Sonia, MD</creator><creator>Prasad, Sudha, MS</creator><creator>Kohli, Amit, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization</title><author>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC ; Bhadoria, Poonam, MD ; Wadhawan, Sonia, MD ; Prasad, Sudha, MS ; Kohli, Amit, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6908686c809a057eba661d16ef93df55827df562a9376b2661bbfceb704238b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia &amp; Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Intravenous - methods</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Intraoperative awareness</topic><topic>Intraoperative Awareness - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval - methods</topic><topic>Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Propofol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhadoria, Poonam, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadhawan, Sonia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Sudha, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohli, Amit, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tewari, Saipriya, MD, PDCC</au><au>Bhadoria, Poonam, MD</au><au>Wadhawan, Sonia, MD</au><au>Prasad, Sudha, MS</au><au>Kohli, Amit, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>112</epage><pages>105-112</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study objective Day care surgery is an important arena for monitors of anesthetic depth where minimizing drug use is essential for rapid turnover. Underdosage, on the other hand, carries the risks of intraoperative awareness and pain. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), often performed under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl in Indian patients, is a procedure of special interest because, in addition to the above concerns, toxic effects of propofol on oocytes have been described. We have studied the role of entropy monitor, a depth of anesthesia monitor, in optomising drug titration and facilitating distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of anesthesia. Design Prospective randomized controlled study. Setting Operating theater and postoperative recovery area. Patients One hundred twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II female patients coming to the IVF centre for TVOR under total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and fentanyl. They were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group EM (drugs titrated as per entropy values: state entropy and response entropy) and group CM (drugs titrated as per standard clinical monitoring). Intervention None. Measurements Total propofol consumption (TP), total fentanyl consumption (TF), on-table recovery time (T1), time to discharge (T2), intraoperative awareness (A). Main results Patients in group EM demonstrated 6.7% lesser consumption of propofol ( P = .01), 10.9% more consumption of fentanyl ( P = .007) and 1 minute faster recovery on-table ( P = .009) as compared to group CM. In the PACU, only 10% patients of group EM required supplemental analgesia as opposed to 28.3% in CM group ( P = .01). Time to discharge was similar in both groups and no intraoperative awareness was noted. Conclusion Entropy monitor is a useful tool allowing distinction between analgesic and hypnotic components of general anesthesia in patients undergoing TVOR and facilitating drug titration accordingly. Its impact on intraoperative awareness needs to be further evaluated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27687355</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.029</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-11, Vol.34, p.105-112
issn 0952-8180
1873-4529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827920735
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central
subjects Adult
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Anesthesia, General - methods
Anesthesia, Intravenous - methods
Anesthetics, Intravenous - administration & dosage
Drug dosages
Entropy
Female
Fentanyl - administration & dosage
Fertilization in Vitro
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Hypnotics and Sedatives - adverse effects
In vitro fertilization
Intraoperative awareness
Intraoperative Awareness - prevention & control
Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Oocyte Retrieval - adverse effects
Oocyte Retrieval - methods
Pain - prevention & control
Pain Medicine
Patients
Pediatrics
Propofol - administration & dosage
Propofol - adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Surgery
Time Factors
Transvaginal oocyte retrieval
title Entropy vs standard clinical monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia during transvaginal oocyte retrieval in patients for in vitro fertilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Entropy%20vs%20standard%20clinical%20monitoring%20using%20total%20intravenous%20anesthesia%20during%20transvaginal%20oocyte%20retrieval%20in%20patients%20for%20in%20vitro%20fertilization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Tewari,%20Saipriya,%20MD,%20PDCC&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=34&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=112&rft.pages=105-112&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827920735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2024087272&rft_id=info:pmid/27687355&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S095281801630023X&rfr_iscdi=true