Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees

Summary Within the same forest stand, temperate deciduous trees generally exhibit a distinct pattern in leaf‐out timing, with some species flushing earlier than other species. This study aimed to explain the timing of leaf‐out of various temperate tree species in relation to the risk of freezing dam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2016-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1480-1490
Hauptverfasser: Lenz, Armando, Hoch, Günter, Körner, Christian, Vitasse, Yann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1490
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1480
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 30
creator Lenz, Armando
Hoch, Günter
Körner, Christian
Vitasse, Yann
description Summary Within the same forest stand, temperate deciduous trees generally exhibit a distinct pattern in leaf‐out timing, with some species flushing earlier than other species. This study aimed to explain the timing of leaf‐out of various temperate tree species in relation to the risk of freezing damage to leaves. We combined long‐term series of leaf‐out date (14–32 years) of five temperate tree species located in both low and high elevations in Switzerland, daily minimum temperatures recorded at the same sites and species‐specific freezing resistance (LT50) of emerging leaves. We calculated temperature safety margins (the temperature difference between absolute minimum temperature during leaf‐out and species‐specific LT50 values), and date safety margins (time lag between the last day when temperature falls below species‐specific LT50 values and the date of leaf‐out). Leaf‐out occurred when the probability to encounter freezing damage approaches zero, irrespective of climatic conditions (low vs. high elevation) and species (early‐ and late‐flushing species). In other words, trees leaf out precisely at the beginning of the probabilistically safe period. Interestingly, the temperature safety margins did not differ significantly between low and high elevation. Yet, the date safety margin was smaller at high elevation, presumably due to a faster increase in temperature during the leaf‐out period at high elevation. When species‐specific freezing resistance is taken into account, the time of leaf‐out converges among species towards a marginal risk of freezing damage. Thus, leaf‐out time has likely evolved in a way that the risk of freezing damage is minimized over a large spectrum of climatic conditions. Species with a small safety margin against freezing temperature, like Fagus sylvatica, appear to employ photoperiod co‐control of spring phenology, whereas species with a large safety margin depend largely on temperature for the right timing of leaf‐out. Our results offer a new avenue to explain the differences in leaf‐out timing among co‐occurring tree species. They further suggest that in a warming climate, tree species can expand their distribution range to the extent their phenology matches the stochasticity of freezing temperatures in spring. Lay Summary
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.12623
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582245</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5053-be4acc6a87adc1a8f36ac6883b25128c4e02329eff7734c31164e0a39236a00c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQQIMoWKtnT0LAi5dt87HJZo9SWhUKgug5pOls2bq7qcmupf56s1Z78KBzGZh5bxhmELqkZERjjCmXImEpFyPKJONHaHCoHKMBYTJPVCr5KToLYU0IyQVjA_Q0cc07-BU0FrArcAWmSFzX4tZtjV8GXJdNWXc19mV47YHCA3yUzQovTW1WgMsGt1BvwJsWcBub4RydFKYKcPGdh-hlNn2e3Cfzx7uHye08sYIIniwgNdZKozKztNSogktjpVJ8wQRlyqZAGGc5FEWW8dRySmUsGZ6zCBJi-RDd7OduvHvrILS6LoOFqjINuC5oqliWEymViOj1L3TtOt_E7TSjWUYjlfG_KKqoFJLKLI3UeE9Z70LwUOiNL2vjd5oS3X9C93fX_d311yeiIfbGtqxg9x-uZ9PJj3e199ahdf7gpUooxlLBPwFGUpH_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1816561674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Lenz, Armando ; Hoch, Günter ; Körner, Christian ; Vitasse, Yann</creator><contributor>Russo, Sabrina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Armando ; Hoch, Günter ; Körner, Christian ; Vitasse, Yann ; Russo, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Within the same forest stand, temperate deciduous trees generally exhibit a distinct pattern in leaf‐out timing, with some species flushing earlier than other species. This study aimed to explain the timing of leaf‐out of various temperate tree species in relation to the risk of freezing damage to leaves. We combined long‐term series of leaf‐out date (14–32 years) of five temperate tree species located in both low and high elevations in Switzerland, daily minimum temperatures recorded at the same sites and species‐specific freezing resistance (LT50) of emerging leaves. We calculated temperature safety margins (the temperature difference between absolute minimum temperature during leaf‐out and species‐specific LT50 values), and date safety margins (time lag between the last day when temperature falls below species‐specific LT50 values and the date of leaf‐out). Leaf‐out occurred when the probability to encounter freezing damage approaches zero, irrespective of climatic conditions (low vs. high elevation) and species (early‐ and late‐flushing species). In other words, trees leaf out precisely at the beginning of the probabilistically safe period. Interestingly, the temperature safety margins did not differ significantly between low and high elevation. Yet, the date safety margin was smaller at high elevation, presumably due to a faster increase in temperature during the leaf‐out period at high elevation. When species‐specific freezing resistance is taken into account, the time of leaf‐out converges among species towards a marginal risk of freezing damage. Thus, leaf‐out time has likely evolved in a way that the risk of freezing damage is minimized over a large spectrum of climatic conditions. Species with a small safety margin against freezing temperature, like Fagus sylvatica, appear to employ photoperiod co‐control of spring phenology, whereas species with a large safety margin depend largely on temperature for the right timing of leaf‐out. Our results offer a new avenue to explain the differences in leaf‐out timing among co‐occurring tree species. They further suggest that in a warming climate, tree species can expand their distribution range to the extent their phenology matches the stochasticity of freezing temperatures in spring. Lay Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12623</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley</publisher><subject>bud break ; Climate change ; Climatic conditions ; cold hardiness ; Convergence ; Damage ; Deciduous forests ; Deciduous trees ; Elevation ; evolution ; Fagus sylvatica ; Flushing ; Freezing ; frost ; Global warming ; Herbivores ; Leaves ; LT 50 ; Phenology ; Plant physiological ecology ; Plant species ; Risk ; Safety ; safety margin ; Safety margins ; Species ; Stochasticity ; temperate deciduous forest ; Temperature effects ; Temperature gradients ; Time lag ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2016-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1480-1490</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. Functional Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5053-be4acc6a87adc1a8f36ac6883b25128c4e02329eff7734c31164e0a39236a00c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5053-be4acc6a87adc1a8f36ac6883b25128c4e02329eff7734c31164e0a39236a00c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5888-0846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Russo, Sabrina</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoch, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitasse, Yann</creatorcontrib><title>Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees</title><title>Functional ecology</title><description>Summary Within the same forest stand, temperate deciduous trees generally exhibit a distinct pattern in leaf‐out timing, with some species flushing earlier than other species. This study aimed to explain the timing of leaf‐out of various temperate tree species in relation to the risk of freezing damage to leaves. We combined long‐term series of leaf‐out date (14–32 years) of five temperate tree species located in both low and high elevations in Switzerland, daily minimum temperatures recorded at the same sites and species‐specific freezing resistance (LT50) of emerging leaves. We calculated temperature safety margins (the temperature difference between absolute minimum temperature during leaf‐out and species‐specific LT50 values), and date safety margins (time lag between the last day when temperature falls below species‐specific LT50 values and the date of leaf‐out). Leaf‐out occurred when the probability to encounter freezing damage approaches zero, irrespective of climatic conditions (low vs. high elevation) and species (early‐ and late‐flushing species). In other words, trees leaf out precisely at the beginning of the probabilistically safe period. Interestingly, the temperature safety margins did not differ significantly between low and high elevation. Yet, the date safety margin was smaller at high elevation, presumably due to a faster increase in temperature during the leaf‐out period at high elevation. When species‐specific freezing resistance is taken into account, the time of leaf‐out converges among species towards a marginal risk of freezing damage. Thus, leaf‐out time has likely evolved in a way that the risk of freezing damage is minimized over a large spectrum of climatic conditions. Species with a small safety margin against freezing temperature, like Fagus sylvatica, appear to employ photoperiod co‐control of spring phenology, whereas species with a large safety margin depend largely on temperature for the right timing of leaf‐out. Our results offer a new avenue to explain the differences in leaf‐out timing among co‐occurring tree species. They further suggest that in a warming climate, tree species can expand their distribution range to the extent their phenology matches the stochasticity of freezing temperatures in spring. Lay Summary</description><subject>bud break</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>cold hardiness</subject><subject>Convergence</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deciduous forests</subject><subject>Deciduous trees</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>Flushing</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>frost</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>LT 50</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Plant physiological ecology</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>safety margin</subject><subject>Safety margins</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>temperate deciduous forest</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature gradients</subject><subject>Time lag</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQQIMoWKtnT0LAi5dt87HJZo9SWhUKgug5pOls2bq7qcmupf56s1Z78KBzGZh5bxhmELqkZERjjCmXImEpFyPKJONHaHCoHKMBYTJPVCr5KToLYU0IyQVjA_Q0cc07-BU0FrArcAWmSFzX4tZtjV8GXJdNWXc19mV47YHCA3yUzQovTW1WgMsGt1BvwJsWcBub4RydFKYKcPGdh-hlNn2e3Cfzx7uHye08sYIIniwgNdZKozKztNSogktjpVJ8wQRlyqZAGGc5FEWW8dRySmUsGZ6zCBJi-RDd7OduvHvrILS6LoOFqjINuC5oqliWEymViOj1L3TtOt_E7TSjWUYjlfG_KKqoFJLKLI3UeE9Z70LwUOiNL2vjd5oS3X9C93fX_d311yeiIfbGtqxg9x-uZ9PJj3e199ahdf7gpUooxlLBPwFGUpH_</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Lenz, Armando</creator><creator>Hoch, Günter</creator><creator>Körner, Christian</creator><creator>Vitasse, Yann</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-0846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees</title><author>Lenz, Armando ; Hoch, Günter ; Körner, Christian ; Vitasse, Yann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5053-be4acc6a87adc1a8f36ac6883b25128c4e02329eff7734c31164e0a39236a00c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>bud break</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>cold hardiness</topic><topic>Convergence</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deciduous forests</topic><topic>Deciduous trees</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>Flushing</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>frost</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>LT 50</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Plant physiological ecology</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>safety margin</topic><topic>Safety margins</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>temperate deciduous forest</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature gradients</topic><topic>Time lag</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoch, Günter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Körner, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitasse, Yann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenz, Armando</au><au>Hoch, Günter</au><au>Körner, Christian</au><au>Vitasse, Yann</au><au>Russo, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1480</spage><epage>1490</epage><pages>1480-1490</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>Summary Within the same forest stand, temperate deciduous trees generally exhibit a distinct pattern in leaf‐out timing, with some species flushing earlier than other species. This study aimed to explain the timing of leaf‐out of various temperate tree species in relation to the risk of freezing damage to leaves. We combined long‐term series of leaf‐out date (14–32 years) of five temperate tree species located in both low and high elevations in Switzerland, daily minimum temperatures recorded at the same sites and species‐specific freezing resistance (LT50) of emerging leaves. We calculated temperature safety margins (the temperature difference between absolute minimum temperature during leaf‐out and species‐specific LT50 values), and date safety margins (time lag between the last day when temperature falls below species‐specific LT50 values and the date of leaf‐out). Leaf‐out occurred when the probability to encounter freezing damage approaches zero, irrespective of climatic conditions (low vs. high elevation) and species (early‐ and late‐flushing species). In other words, trees leaf out precisely at the beginning of the probabilistically safe period. Interestingly, the temperature safety margins did not differ significantly between low and high elevation. Yet, the date safety margin was smaller at high elevation, presumably due to a faster increase in temperature during the leaf‐out period at high elevation. When species‐specific freezing resistance is taken into account, the time of leaf‐out converges among species towards a marginal risk of freezing damage. Thus, leaf‐out time has likely evolved in a way that the risk of freezing damage is minimized over a large spectrum of climatic conditions. Species with a small safety margin against freezing temperature, like Fagus sylvatica, appear to employ photoperiod co‐control of spring phenology, whereas species with a large safety margin depend largely on temperature for the right timing of leaf‐out. Our results offer a new avenue to explain the differences in leaf‐out timing among co‐occurring tree species. They further suggest that in a warming climate, tree species can expand their distribution range to the extent their phenology matches the stochasticity of freezing temperatures in spring. Lay Summary</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12623</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-0846</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2016-09, Vol.30 (9), p.1480-1490
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906685
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Free Content
subjects bud break
Climate change
Climatic conditions
cold hardiness
Convergence
Damage
Deciduous forests
Deciduous trees
Elevation
evolution
Fagus sylvatica
Flushing
Freezing
frost
Global warming
Herbivores
Leaves
LT 50
Phenology
Plant physiological ecology
Plant species
Risk
Safety
safety margin
Safety margins
Species
Stochasticity
temperate deciduous forest
Temperature effects
Temperature gradients
Time lag
Trees
title Convergence of leaf-out towards minimum risk of freezing damage in temperate trees
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Convergence%20of%20leaf-out%20towards%20minimum%20risk%20of%20freezing%20damage%20in%20temperate%20trees&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Lenz,%20Armando&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1480&rft.epage=1490&rft.pages=1480-1490&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12623&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48582245%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1816561674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48582245&rfr_iscdi=true