Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements
Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2029 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2019 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Mineau, Madeleine M. Wollheim, Wilfred M. Buffam, Ishi Findlay, Stuart E. G. Hall, Robert O. Hotchkiss, Erin R. Koenig, Lauren E. McDowell, William H. Parr, Thomas B. |
description | Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling.
Key Points
Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015JG003204 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4180011901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFw9WZ7PJ7sZbqRotgiC9h-1moqn5U3ealt58BJ_RJ3FLRcRD5zIf8_34GPiC4JTDJQcIr0Lg8SQFECFEB0Ev5DIZ6kTyw18di-NgQDQHP9qfOO8F5qYkaqsV5qx1L6YpLbPGzdqGdYuleUNWNoyWDk1N12zEHK5KXDPT5MwQIVGNzZK1hTeMff36-CRrKmQ1Guocbk06CY4KUxEOfnY_mN7dTsf3w8en9GE8ehzaSERyqIpCWYBZPFORzoGLCDSIGJS2AoTgyGcqsVqAKRC9srn_v9BJHhbcSCv6wfkuduHa9w5pmdUlWawq02DbUcZ1qBKQcRh59OwfOm871_jnMu5DeQRKqb2U5lrJWMaJpy52lHUtkcMiW7iyNm6Tcci2vWR_e_G42OHrssLNXjabpM9pCFJI8Q1owY1u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1818765659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling.
Key Points
Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Assaying ; Bioavailability ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Coupling ; Creeks & streams ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Inland water environment ; Laboratories ; Leachates ; Leaves ; Measurement ; Modelling ; Networks ; Organic compounds ; Removal ; Reviews ; river ; River networks ; Rivers ; Scale (ratio) ; Scaling ; stream ; Streams ; Uptake ; uptake velocity ; Velocity ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JG003204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JG003204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling.
Key Points
Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Creeks & streams</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scale (ratio)</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>stream</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>uptake velocity</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFw9WZ7PJ7sZbqRotgiC9h-1moqn5U3ealt58BJ_RJ3FLRcRD5zIf8_34GPiC4JTDJQcIr0Lg8SQFECFEB0Ev5DIZ6kTyw18di-NgQDQHP9qfOO8F5qYkaqsV5qx1L6YpLbPGzdqGdYuleUNWNoyWDk1N12zEHK5KXDPT5MwQIVGNzZK1hTeMff36-CRrKmQ1Guocbk06CY4KUxEOfnY_mN7dTsf3w8en9GE8ehzaSERyqIpCWYBZPFORzoGLCDSIGJS2AoTgyGcqsVqAKRC9srn_v9BJHhbcSCv6wfkuduHa9w5pmdUlWawq02DbUcZ1qBKQcRh59OwfOm871_jnMu5DeQRKqb2U5lrJWMaJpy52lHUtkcMiW7iyNm6Tcci2vWR_e_G42OHrssLNXjabpM9pCFJI8Q1owY1u</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creator><creator>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creator><creator>Buffam, Ishi</creator><creator>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creator><creator>Hall, Robert O.</creator><creator>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creator><creator>Koenig, Lauren E.</creator><creator>McDowell, William H.</creator><creator>Parr, Thomas B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><author>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Creeks & streams</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scale (ratio)</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>stream</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>uptake velocity</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mineau, Madeleine M.</au><au>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</au><au>Buffam, Ishi</au><au>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</au><au>Hall, Robert O.</au><au>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</au><au>Koenig, Lauren E.</au><au>McDowell, William H.</au><au>Parr, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2029</epage><pages>2019-2029</pages><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling.
Key Points
Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates
Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JG003204</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-8953 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029 |
issn | 2169-8953 2169-8961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906524 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Assaying Bioavailability Biogeochemistry Carbon Carbon cycle Coupling Creeks & streams Dissolved organic carbon Ecosystems Freshwater Freshwater ecosystems Inland water environment Laboratories Leachates Leaves Measurement Modelling Networks Organic compounds Removal Reviews river River networks Rivers Scale (ratio) Scaling stream Streams Uptake uptake velocity Velocity Watersheds |
title | Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A22%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dissolved%20organic%20carbon%20uptake%20in%20streams:%20A%20review%20and%20assessment%20of%20reach%E2%80%90scale%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Mineau,%20Madeleine%20M.&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2029&rft.pages=2019-2029&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JG003204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4180011901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1818765659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |