Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements

Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029
Hauptverfasser: Mineau, Madeleine M., Wollheim, Wilfred M., Buffam, Ishi, Findlay, Stuart E. G., Hall, Robert O., Hotchkiss, Erin R., Koenig, Lauren E., McDowell, William H., Parr, Thomas B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2029
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2019
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 121
creator Mineau, Madeleine M.
Wollheim, Wilfred M.
Buffam, Ishi
Findlay, Stuart E. G.
Hall, Robert O.
Hotchkiss, Erin R.
Koenig, Lauren E.
McDowell, William H.
Parr, Thomas B.
description Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling. Key Points Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015JG003204
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4180011901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFw9WZ7PJ7sZbqRotgiC9h-1moqn5U3ealt58BJ_RJ3FLRcRD5zIf8_34GPiC4JTDJQcIr0Lg8SQFECFEB0Ev5DIZ6kTyw18di-NgQDQHP9qfOO8F5qYkaqsV5qx1L6YpLbPGzdqGdYuleUNWNoyWDk1N12zEHK5KXDPT5MwQIVGNzZK1hTeMff36-CRrKmQ1Guocbk06CY4KUxEOfnY_mN7dTsf3w8en9GE8ehzaSERyqIpCWYBZPFORzoGLCDSIGJS2AoTgyGcqsVqAKRC9srn_v9BJHhbcSCv6wfkuduHa9w5pmdUlWawq02DbUcZ1qBKQcRh59OwfOm871_jnMu5DeQRKqb2U5lrJWMaJpy52lHUtkcMiW7iyNm6Tcci2vWR_e_G42OHrssLNXjabpM9pCFJI8Q1owY1u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1818765659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling. Key Points Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003204</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Assaying ; Bioavailability ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Coupling ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Dissolved organic carbon ; Ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Freshwater ecosystems ; Inland water environment ; Laboratories ; Leachates ; Leaves ; Measurement ; Modelling ; Networks ; Organic compounds ; Removal ; Reviews ; river ; River networks ; Rivers ; Scale (ratio) ; Scaling ; stream ; Streams ; Uptake ; uptake velocity ; Velocity ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JG003204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JG003204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling. Key Points Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Coupling</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Dissolved organic carbon</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecosystems</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>river</subject><subject>River networks</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Scale (ratio)</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>stream</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>uptake velocity</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFw9WZ7PJ7sZbqRotgiC9h-1moqn5U3ealt58BJ_RJ3FLRcRD5zIf8_34GPiC4JTDJQcIr0Lg8SQFECFEB0Ev5DIZ6kTyw18di-NgQDQHP9qfOO8F5qYkaqsV5qx1L6YpLbPGzdqGdYuleUNWNoyWDk1N12zEHK5KXDPT5MwQIVGNzZK1hTeMff36-CRrKmQ1Guocbk06CY4KUxEOfnY_mN7dTsf3w8en9GE8ehzaSERyqIpCWYBZPFORzoGLCDSIGJS2AoTgyGcqsVqAKRC9srn_v9BJHhbcSCv6wfkuduHa9w5pmdUlWawq02DbUcZ1qBKQcRh59OwfOm871_jnMu5DeQRKqb2U5lrJWMaJpy52lHUtkcMiW7iyNm6Tcci2vWR_e_G42OHrssLNXjabpM9pCFJI8Q1owY1u</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creator><creator>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creator><creator>Buffam, Ishi</creator><creator>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creator><creator>Hall, Robert O.</creator><creator>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creator><creator>Koenig, Lauren E.</creator><creator>McDowell, William H.</creator><creator>Parr, Thomas B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</title><author>Mineau, Madeleine M. ; Wollheim, Wilfred M. ; Buffam, Ishi ; Findlay, Stuart E. G. ; Hall, Robert O. ; Hotchkiss, Erin R. ; Koenig, Lauren E. ; McDowell, William H. ; Parr, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4346-7ff7c00b5b748d013408035078c30331e1b79c830afee79ccd911f89d2f1a6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Coupling</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Dissolved organic carbon</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecosystems</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>river</topic><topic>River networks</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Scale (ratio)</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>stream</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>uptake velocity</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mineau, Madeleine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffam, Ishi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parr, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mineau, Madeleine M.</au><au>Wollheim, Wilfred M.</au><au>Buffam, Ishi</au><au>Findlay, Stuart E. G.</au><au>Hall, Robert O.</au><au>Hotchkiss, Erin R.</au><au>Koenig, Lauren E.</au><au>McDowell, William H.</au><au>Parr, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2019</spage><epage>2029</epage><pages>2019-2029</pages><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Quantifying the role that freshwater ecosystems play in the global carbon cycle requires accurate measurement and scaling of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal in river networks. We reviewed reach‐scale measurements of DOC uptake from experimental additions of simple organic compounds or leachates to inform development of aquatic DOC models that operate at the river network, regional, or continental scale. Median DOC uptake velocity (vf) across all measurements was 2.28 mm min−1. Measurements using simple compound additions resulted in faster vf (2.94 mm min−1) than additions of leachates (1.11 mm min−1). We also reviewed published data of DOC bioavailability for ambient stream water and leaf leachate DOC from laboratory experiments. We used these data to calculate and apply a correction factor to leaf leachate uptake velocity to estimate ambient stream water DOC uptake rates at the reach scale. Using this approach, we estimated a median ambient stream DOC vf of 0.26 mm min−1. Applying these DOC vf values (0.26, 1.11, 2.28, and 2.94 mm min−1) in a river network inverse model in seven watersheds revealed that our estimated ambient DOC vf value is plausible at the network scale and 27 to 45% of DOC input was removed. Applying the median measured simple compound or leachate vf in whole river networks would require unjustifiably high terrestrial DOC inputs to match observed DOC concentrations at the basin mouth. To improve the understanding and importance of DOC uptake in fluvial systems, we recommend using a multiscale approach coupling laboratory assays, with reach‐scale measurements, and modeling. Key Points Better understanding of DOC processing in river networks is needed Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocity is faster for simple compounds than leachates Reach‐scale DOC uptake velocities are implausibly fast at the network scale</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JG003204</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2016-08, Vol.121 (8), p.2019-2029
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827906524
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Assaying
Bioavailability
Biogeochemistry
Carbon
Carbon cycle
Coupling
Creeks & streams
Dissolved organic carbon
Ecosystems
Freshwater
Freshwater ecosystems
Inland water environment
Laboratories
Leachates
Leaves
Measurement
Modelling
Networks
Organic compounds
Removal
Reviews
river
River networks
Rivers
Scale (ratio)
Scaling
stream
Streams
Uptake
uptake velocity
Velocity
Watersheds
title Dissolved organic carbon uptake in streams: A review and assessment of reach‐scale measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A22%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dissolved%20organic%20carbon%20uptake%20in%20streams:%20A%20review%20and%20assessment%20of%20reach%E2%80%90scale%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Mineau,%20Madeleine%20M.&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2019&rft.epage=2029&rft.pages=2019-2029&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JG003204&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4180011901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1818765659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true