Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly
Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 yea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychogeriatrics 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 297 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Psychogeriatrics |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Thodberg, Karen Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov Christensen, Janne Winther Poulsen, Pia Haun Houbak, Birthe Damgaard, Vibeke Keseler, Ingrid Edwards, David Videbech, Poul B. |
description | Background
Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people.
Methods
A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period.
Results
We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P > 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P > 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P > 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P > 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P > 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P < 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P < 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/psyg.12159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827900551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827900551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0Eom1gwwMgS2wQ0rTXvzNeQgUpUihIFAEry_VcJy6TmWDPFPL2dUjbBQuEN7al7xzdew4hzxgcs3JONnm7PGacKfOAHDJZm6oRwB6Wt5C6EgrggBzlfAXApRLiMTngWjHQgh-SNxcrTG6D0xg9xRDQj5kOgbbDkl7HHMsv9rSfUo79kq6GNWYahkTHFVLsWkzd9gl5FFyX8entPSNf3r29OD2rFh_n709fLyqvuTSVbDQYcKBAtUoZx3SZEowJdTA1aqUuXWil59o1PmjtWfCiBeeY95xJw8WMvNz7btLwc8I82nXMHrvO9ThM2bKG1wZAKfYfKGuEhKYxBX3xF3o1TKkvi-youpamKZnNyKs95dOQc8JgNymuXdpaBnZXgt2VYP-UUODnt5bT5Rrbe_Qu9QKwPfArdrj9h5X99Pn7_M602mtiHvH3vcalH1bXolb26_ncfisJL2C-sB_EDZlInno</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817749853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people.
Methods
A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period.
Results
We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P > 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P > 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P > 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P > 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P > 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P < 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P < 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1346-3500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-8301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26510632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Actigraphy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; animal-assisted activities ; Animals ; cognitive impairment ; Dementia - complications ; Dementia - psychology ; Dementia - therapy ; Denmark ; depression ; Depression - complications ; Depression - therapy ; Dogs ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; nursing home ; Nursing Homes ; Pets - psychology ; Psychomotor Agitation - complications ; Psychomotor Agitation - therapy ; Robotics ; sleep ; Treatment Outcome ; visiting dog</subject><ispartof>Psychogeriatrics, 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Psychogeriatrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of © 2015 Japanese Psychogeriatric Society.</rights><rights>2016 Japanese Psychogeriatric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpsyg.12159$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpsyg.12159$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Janne Winther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houbak, Birthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keseler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><title>Psychogeriatrics</title><addtitle>Psychogeriatrics</addtitle><description>Background
Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people.
Methods
A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period.
Results
We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P > 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P > 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P > 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P > 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P > 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P < 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P < 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</description><subject>Actigraphy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>animal-assisted activities</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Dementia - complications</subject><subject>Dementia - psychology</subject><subject>Dementia - therapy</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>Depression - complications</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>nursing home</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Pets - psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - therapy</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>sleep</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>visiting dog</subject><issn>1346-3500</issn><issn>1479-8301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0Eom1gwwMgS2wQ0rTXvzNeQgUpUihIFAEry_VcJy6TmWDPFPL2dUjbBQuEN7al7xzdew4hzxgcs3JONnm7PGacKfOAHDJZm6oRwB6Wt5C6EgrggBzlfAXApRLiMTngWjHQgh-SNxcrTG6D0xg9xRDQj5kOgbbDkl7HHMsv9rSfUo79kq6GNWYahkTHFVLsWkzd9gl5FFyX8entPSNf3r29OD2rFh_n709fLyqvuTSVbDQYcKBAtUoZx3SZEowJdTA1aqUuXWil59o1PmjtWfCiBeeY95xJw8WMvNz7btLwc8I82nXMHrvO9ThM2bKG1wZAKfYfKGuEhKYxBX3xF3o1TKkvi-youpamKZnNyKs95dOQc8JgNymuXdpaBnZXgt2VYP-UUODnt5bT5Rrbe_Qu9QKwPfArdrj9h5X99Pn7_M602mtiHvH3vcalH1bXolb26_ncfisJL2C-sB_EDZlInno</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Thodberg, Karen</creator><creator>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creator><creator>Christensen, Janne Winther</creator><creator>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creator><creator>Houbak, Birthe</creator><creator>Damgaard, Vibeke</creator><creator>Keseler, Ingrid</creator><creator>Edwards, David</creator><creator>Videbech, Poul B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><author>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actigraphy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>animal-assisted activities</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Dementia - complications</topic><topic>Dementia - psychology</topic><topic>Dementia - therapy</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>Depression - complications</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>nursing home</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Pets - psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - therapy</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>sleep</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>visiting dog</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Janne Winther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houbak, Birthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keseler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychogeriatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thodberg, Karen</au><au>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</au><au>Christensen, Janne Winther</au><au>Poulsen, Pia Haun</au><au>Houbak, Birthe</au><au>Damgaard, Vibeke</au><au>Keseler, Ingrid</au><au>Edwards, David</au><au>Videbech, Poul B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Psychogeriatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Psychogeriatrics</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>289-297</pages><issn>1346-3500</issn><eissn>1479-8301</eissn><abstract>Background
Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people.
Methods
A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period.
Results
We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P > 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P > 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P > 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P > 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P > 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P < 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P < 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P < 0.05).
Conclusion
Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26510632</pmid><doi>10.1111/psyg.12159</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1346-3500 |
ispartof | Psychogeriatrics, 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297 |
issn | 1346-3500 1479-8301 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827900551 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Actigraphy Aged Aged, 80 and over animal-assisted activities Animals cognitive impairment Dementia - complications Dementia - psychology Dementia - therapy Denmark depression Depression - complications Depression - therapy Dogs Female Geriatric Assessment Humans Male Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests nursing home Nursing Homes Pets - psychology Psychomotor Agitation - complications Psychomotor Agitation - therapy Robotics sleep Treatment Outcome visiting dog |
title | Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapeutic%20effects%20of%20dog%20visits%20in%20nursing%20homes%20for%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Psychogeriatrics&rft.au=Thodberg,%20Karen&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=289-297&rft.issn=1346-3500&rft.eissn=1479-8301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/psyg.12159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827900551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817749853&rft_id=info:pmid/26510632&rfr_iscdi=true |