Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly

Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 yea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychogeriatrics 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297
Hauptverfasser: Thodberg, Karen, Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov, Christensen, Janne Winther, Poulsen, Pia Haun, Houbak, Birthe, Damgaard, Vibeke, Keseler, Ingrid, Edwards, David, Videbech, Poul B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 5
container_start_page 289
container_title Psychogeriatrics
container_volume 16
creator Thodberg, Karen
Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov
Christensen, Janne Winther
Poulsen, Pia Haun
Houbak, Birthe
Damgaard, Vibeke
Keseler, Ingrid
Edwards, David
Videbech, Poul B.
description Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period. Results We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P > 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P > 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P > 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P > 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P > 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P < 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P < 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P < 0.05). Conclusion Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/psyg.12159
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827900551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827900551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0Eom1gwwMgS2wQ0rTXvzNeQgUpUihIFAEry_VcJy6TmWDPFPL2dUjbBQuEN7al7xzdew4hzxgcs3JONnm7PGacKfOAHDJZm6oRwB6Wt5C6EgrggBzlfAXApRLiMTngWjHQgh-SNxcrTG6D0xg9xRDQj5kOgbbDkl7HHMsv9rSfUo79kq6GNWYahkTHFVLsWkzd9gl5FFyX8entPSNf3r29OD2rFh_n709fLyqvuTSVbDQYcKBAtUoZx3SZEowJdTA1aqUuXWil59o1PmjtWfCiBeeY95xJw8WMvNz7btLwc8I82nXMHrvO9ThM2bKG1wZAKfYfKGuEhKYxBX3xF3o1TKkvi-youpamKZnNyKs95dOQc8JgNymuXdpaBnZXgt2VYP-UUODnt5bT5Rrbe_Qu9QKwPfArdrj9h5X99Pn7_M602mtiHvH3vcalH1bXolb26_ncfisJL2C-sB_EDZlInno</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817749853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period. Results We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P &gt; 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P &gt; 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P &gt; 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P &gt; 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P &lt; 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P &lt; 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1346-3500</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-8301</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12159</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26510632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Actigraphy ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; animal-assisted activities ; Animals ; cognitive impairment ; Dementia - complications ; Dementia - psychology ; Dementia - therapy ; Denmark ; depression ; Depression - complications ; Depression - therapy ; Dogs ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; nursing home ; Nursing Homes ; Pets - psychology ; Psychomotor Agitation - complications ; Psychomotor Agitation - therapy ; Robotics ; sleep ; Treatment Outcome ; visiting dog</subject><ispartof>Psychogeriatrics, 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Psychogeriatrics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of © 2015 Japanese Psychogeriatric Society.</rights><rights>2016 Japanese Psychogeriatric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpsyg.12159$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpsyg.12159$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26510632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Janne Winther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houbak, Birthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keseler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><title>Psychogeriatrics</title><addtitle>Psychogeriatrics</addtitle><description>Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period. Results We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P &gt; 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P &gt; 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P &gt; 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P &gt; 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P &lt; 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P &lt; 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</description><subject>Actigraphy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>animal-assisted activities</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Dementia - complications</subject><subject>Dementia - psychology</subject><subject>Dementia - therapy</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>depression</subject><subject>Depression - complications</subject><subject>Depression - therapy</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>nursing home</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Pets - psychology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - therapy</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>sleep</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>visiting dog</subject><issn>1346-3500</issn><issn>1479-8301</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0Eom1gwwMgS2wQ0rTXvzNeQgUpUihIFAEry_VcJy6TmWDPFPL2dUjbBQuEN7al7xzdew4hzxgcs3JONnm7PGacKfOAHDJZm6oRwB6Wt5C6EgrggBzlfAXApRLiMTngWjHQgh-SNxcrTG6D0xg9xRDQj5kOgbbDkl7HHMsv9rSfUo79kq6GNWYahkTHFVLsWkzd9gl5FFyX8entPSNf3r29OD2rFh_n709fLyqvuTSVbDQYcKBAtUoZx3SZEowJdTA1aqUuXWil59o1PmjtWfCiBeeY95xJw8WMvNz7btLwc8I82nXMHrvO9ThM2bKG1wZAKfYfKGuEhKYxBX3xF3o1TKkvi-youpamKZnNyKs95dOQc8JgNymuXdpaBnZXgt2VYP-UUODnt5bT5Rrbe_Qu9QKwPfArdrj9h5X99Pn7_M602mtiHvH3vcalH1bXolb26_ncfisJL2C-sB_EDZlInno</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Thodberg, Karen</creator><creator>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creator><creator>Christensen, Janne Winther</creator><creator>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creator><creator>Houbak, Birthe</creator><creator>Damgaard, Vibeke</creator><creator>Keseler, Ingrid</creator><creator>Edwards, David</creator><creator>Videbech, Poul B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</title><author>Thodberg, Karen ; Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov ; Christensen, Janne Winther ; Poulsen, Pia Haun ; Houbak, Birthe ; Damgaard, Vibeke ; Keseler, Ingrid ; Edwards, David ; Videbech, Poul B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6249-486090a0505d559a16830099f7f97e655bafd4c26a8cf66c1fc3d0aa1cc214923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actigraphy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>animal-assisted activities</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Dementia - complications</topic><topic>Dementia - psychology</topic><topic>Dementia - therapy</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>depression</topic><topic>Depression - complications</topic><topic>Depression - therapy</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>nursing home</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Pets - psychology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - therapy</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>sleep</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>visiting dog</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thodberg, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Janne Winther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, Pia Haun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houbak, Birthe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Vibeke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keseler, Ingrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videbech, Poul B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychogeriatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thodberg, Karen</au><au>Sørensen, Lisbeth Uhrskov</au><au>Christensen, Janne Winther</au><au>Poulsen, Pia Haun</au><au>Houbak, Birthe</au><au>Damgaard, Vibeke</au><au>Keseler, Ingrid</au><au>Edwards, David</au><au>Videbech, Poul B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Psychogeriatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Psychogeriatrics</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>289-297</pages><issn>1346-3500</issn><eissn>1479-8301</eissn><abstract>Background Previous studies have suggested that visiting dogs can have positive effects on elderly people in nursing homes. We wanted to study the effects of biweekly dog visits on sleep patterns and the psychiatric well‐being of elderly people. Methods A total of 100 residents (median age: 85.5 years; [79; 90]) from four nursing homes were randomly assigned to receive biweekly visits for 6 weeks from a person accompanied by either a dog, a robot seal (PARO), or a soft toy cat. Sleep patterns were measured using actigraphy technology before, during (the third and sixth week), and after the series of visits. The participants were weighed and scored on the Geriatric Depression Scale, the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale, and the Mini‐Mental State Examination before and after the visit period. Results We found that sleep duration (min) increased in the third week when visitors were accompanied by a dog rather than the robot seal or soft toy cat (dog: 610 ± 127 min; seal: 498 ± 146 min; cat: 540 ± 163 min; F2,37 = 4.99; P = 0.01). No effects were found in the sixth week or after the visit period had ended. We found that visit type had no effect on weight (F2,88 = 0.13; P &gt; 0.05), body mass index (F2,86 = 0.33; P &gt; 0.05), Geriatric Depression Scale (F2,82 = 0.85; P &gt; 0.05), Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (F2,90 = 0.41; P &gt; 0.05), or Mini‐Mental State Examination (F2,91 = 0.35; P &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, we found a decrease in the Geriatric Depression Scale during the experimental period (S = −420; P &lt; 0.05), whereas cognitive impairment worsened as shown by a decrease in Mini‐Mental State Examination score (S = −483; P &lt; 0.05) and an increase in the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen Scale (t = 2.06; P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion Visit type did not affect the long‐term mental state of the participants. The causal relationship between sleep duration and dog‐accompanied visits remains to be explored.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26510632</pmid><doi>10.1111/psyg.12159</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1346-3500
ispartof Psychogeriatrics, 2016-09, Vol.16 (5), p.289-297
issn 1346-3500
1479-8301
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827900551
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Actigraphy
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
animal-assisted activities
Animals
cognitive impairment
Dementia - complications
Dementia - psychology
Dementia - therapy
Denmark
depression
Depression - complications
Depression - therapy
Dogs
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
nursing home
Nursing Homes
Pets - psychology
Psychomotor Agitation - complications
Psychomotor Agitation - therapy
Robotics
sleep
Treatment Outcome
visiting dog
title Therapeutic effects of dog visits in nursing homes for the elderly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Therapeutic%20effects%20of%20dog%20visits%20in%20nursing%20homes%20for%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Psychogeriatrics&rft.au=Thodberg,%20Karen&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=289-297&rft.issn=1346-3500&rft.eissn=1479-8301&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/psyg.12159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827900551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817749853&rft_id=info:pmid/26510632&rfr_iscdi=true