Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention
Background/Objectives: Dietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recomm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical nutrition 2016-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1062-1067 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1067 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1062 |
container_title | European journal of clinical nutrition |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Penniston, K L Wertheim, M L Nakada, S Y Jhagroo, R A |
description | Background/Objectives:
Dietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recommendations. We examined patients’ recall and compliance with dietary recommendations provided during clinical evaluation.
Subjects/Methods:
Of 275 patients who received dietary recommendations from a dietitian, 112 completed an investigator-designed survey querying their recollection of dietary recommendations. Patients’ responses were compared with the recommendations actually provided as entered in patients’ medical records.
Results:
Patients (62% male, 56±13 years; 38% female, 52±14 years) were provided 3.4±1.1 recommendations (min–max, 1–6) and recalled 67% of recommendations. Highest recalls were for (i) lower meat/fish/poultry intake, (ii) higher fluid intake and (iii) lower sodium (⩾68% for all). Lowest recalls were for weight loss, using citrus juices and increasing fruits/vegetables (⩽61% for all). Forty-seven percent of patients given 1–3 recommendations recalled 100%, whereas only 23% of patients provided >3 recommendations did so (
P
=0.011). Even though 38% of patients reported some difficulty following dietary recommendations, nearly all (91%) said that they were willing to continue following them.
Conclusions:
Higher patient recall is associated with ⩽3 dietary recommendations. Patient recall of recommendations that were not actually provided (‘false recall’) may contribute to reduced recall and confusion about the most important dietary strategies to reduce their stone risk. Accordingly, providers should prioritize the most important dietary recommendations, reserving those less important for follow-up, and address any confusion patients have from information received prior to evaluation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/ejcn.2016.79 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827897948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A462667079</galeid><sourcerecordid>A462667079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-2f95f5cbf4fbe5e0e4cdb15e0b4d5d1ed9e90afa5cdf56f3c6fd56c61f4439da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhxhmthIR6YIPt9Uf2WFUtIFXiAmfLsceJw64dbG9R-fV4m0JTFEXIB1ueZ16PZ96qeo3RHKN28QE22s8JwnwuuifVDFPBG8YpelrNUMdo0yIkTqoXKW0QKkFBnlcnRBBCMGOzqr9SOoeYapVS0E5lMPVPl9f1VmUHPtcRtOr7OtjaeeNunBlV734VyjjIKt5OQBgG8KYkBJ9qG2L93RkPt3XKwUO9jXBTlErwZfXMqj7Bq_v9tPp2dfn14lNz_eXj54vz60ZzhnNDbMcs00tL7RIYIKDaLHE5LKlhBoPpoEPKKqaNZdy2mlvDuObYUtp2RrWn1dlOdxvDjxFSloNLGvpeeQhjknhBxKITHV38B4rFgrZIdAV9-w-6CWP05SOScEo4Q6QVx6hJCyPWdfiBWqkepPM25Kj09LQ8L0KIt4y0RynKCediV1dzgFqBh6j6MgDryvUjfn6AL8vA4PTBhHd7CWtQfV6n0I93835c71FwX_H9DtQxpBTBym10Q3GTxEhOrpaTq-XkanmHv7nv6bgcwPyF_9j4oQWphPwK4l7TDwn-Bkw1_xI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817105991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Penniston, K L ; Wertheim, M L ; Nakada, S Y ; Jhagroo, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Penniston, K L ; Wertheim, M L ; Nakada, S Y ; Jhagroo, R A</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Objectives:
Dietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recommendations. We examined patients’ recall and compliance with dietary recommendations provided during clinical evaluation.
Subjects/Methods:
Of 275 patients who received dietary recommendations from a dietitian, 112 completed an investigator-designed survey querying their recollection of dietary recommendations. Patients’ responses were compared with the recommendations actually provided as entered in patients’ medical records.
Results:
Patients (62% male, 56±13 years; 38% female, 52±14 years) were provided 3.4±1.1 recommendations (min–max, 1–6) and recalled 67% of recommendations. Highest recalls were for (i) lower meat/fish/poultry intake, (ii) higher fluid intake and (iii) lower sodium (⩾68% for all). Lowest recalls were for weight loss, using citrus juices and increasing fruits/vegetables (⩽61% for all). Forty-seven percent of patients given 1–3 recommendations recalled 100%, whereas only 23% of patients provided >3 recommendations did so (
P
=0.011). Even though 38% of patients reported some difficulty following dietary recommendations, nearly all (91%) said that they were willing to continue following them.
Conclusions:
Higher patient recall is associated with ⩽3 dietary recommendations. Patient recall of recommendations that were not actually provided (‘false recall’) may contribute to reduced recall and confusion about the most important dietary strategies to reduce their stone risk. Accordingly, providers should prioritize the most important dietary recommendations, reserving those less important for follow-up, and address any confusion patients have from information received prior to evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.79</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27222155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699 ; 692/700 ; Adult ; Aged ; Calcium ; Calculi ; Citrus ; Clinical Nutrition ; Confusion ; Diet ; Diet therapy ; Dietary fiber ; Dietary supplements ; Disease prevention ; Epidemiology ; Evaluation ; Female ; Fluid intake ; Fruits ; Humans ; Influence ; Internal Medicine ; Kidney Calculi - prevention & control ; Kidney stones ; Kidneys ; Male ; Meat ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental Recall ; Metabolic Diseases ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Nephrolithiasis ; Nutritionists ; original-article ; Patient Compliance ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Poultry ; Prevention ; Public Health ; Recall ; Sodium ; Vegetables ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1062-1067</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Sep 2016</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-2f95f5cbf4fbe5e0e4cdb15e0b4d5d1ed9e90afa5cdf56f3c6fd56c61f4439da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-2f95f5cbf4fbe5e0e4cdb15e0b4d5d1ed9e90afa5cdf56f3c6fd56c61f4439da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/ejcn.2016.79$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/ejcn.2016.79$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27222155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penniston, K L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wertheim, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakada, S Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhagroo, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention</title><title>European journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Background/Objectives:
Dietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recommendations. We examined patients’ recall and compliance with dietary recommendations provided during clinical evaluation.
Subjects/Methods:
Of 275 patients who received dietary recommendations from a dietitian, 112 completed an investigator-designed survey querying their recollection of dietary recommendations. Patients’ responses were compared with the recommendations actually provided as entered in patients’ medical records.
Results:
Patients (62% male, 56±13 years; 38% female, 52±14 years) were provided 3.4±1.1 recommendations (min–max, 1–6) and recalled 67% of recommendations. Highest recalls were for (i) lower meat/fish/poultry intake, (ii) higher fluid intake and (iii) lower sodium (⩾68% for all). Lowest recalls were for weight loss, using citrus juices and increasing fruits/vegetables (⩽61% for all). Forty-seven percent of patients given 1–3 recommendations recalled 100%, whereas only 23% of patients provided >3 recommendations did so (
P
=0.011). Even though 38% of patients reported some difficulty following dietary recommendations, nearly all (91%) said that they were willing to continue following them.
Conclusions:
Higher patient recall is associated with ⩽3 dietary recommendations. Patient recall of recommendations that were not actually provided (‘false recall’) may contribute to reduced recall and confusion about the most important dietary strategies to reduce their stone risk. Accordingly, providers should prioritize the most important dietary recommendations, reserving those less important for follow-up, and address any confusion patients have from information received prior to evaluation.</description><subject>692/699</subject><subject>692/700</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calculi</subject><subject>Citrus</subject><subject>Clinical Nutrition</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet therapy</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid intake</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - prevention & control</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrolithiasis</subject><subject>Nutritionists</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0954-3007</issn><issn>1476-5640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vEzEQhlcIREPhxhmthIR6YIPt9Uf2WFUtIFXiAmfLsceJw64dbG9R-fV4m0JTFEXIB1ueZ16PZ96qeo3RHKN28QE22s8JwnwuuifVDFPBG8YpelrNUMdo0yIkTqoXKW0QKkFBnlcnRBBCMGOzqr9SOoeYapVS0E5lMPVPl9f1VmUHPtcRtOr7OtjaeeNunBlV734VyjjIKt5OQBgG8KYkBJ9qG2L93RkPt3XKwUO9jXBTlErwZfXMqj7Bq_v9tPp2dfn14lNz_eXj54vz60ZzhnNDbMcs00tL7RIYIKDaLHE5LKlhBoPpoEPKKqaNZdy2mlvDuObYUtp2RrWn1dlOdxvDjxFSloNLGvpeeQhjknhBxKITHV38B4rFgrZIdAV9-w-6CWP05SOScEo4Q6QVx6hJCyPWdfiBWqkepPM25Kj09LQ8L0KIt4y0RynKCediV1dzgFqBh6j6MgDryvUjfn6AL8vA4PTBhHd7CWtQfV6n0I93835c71FwX_H9DtQxpBTBym10Q3GTxEhOrpaTq-XkanmHv7nv6bgcwPyF_9j4oQWphPwK4l7TDwn-Bkw1_xI</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Penniston, K L</creator><creator>Wertheim, M L</creator><creator>Nakada, S Y</creator><creator>Jhagroo, R A</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention</title><author>Penniston, K L ; Wertheim, M L ; Nakada, S Y ; Jhagroo, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c651t-2f95f5cbf4fbe5e0e4cdb15e0b4d5d1ed9e90afa5cdf56f3c6fd56c61f4439da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>692/699</topic><topic>692/700</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calculi</topic><topic>Citrus</topic><topic>Clinical Nutrition</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet therapy</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid intake</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - prevention & control</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrolithiasis</topic><topic>Nutritionists</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penniston, K L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wertheim, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakada, S Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhagroo, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penniston, K L</au><au>Wertheim, M L</au><au>Nakada, S Y</au><au>Jhagroo, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention</atitle><jtitle>European journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1062</spage><epage>1067</epage><pages>1062-1067</pages><issn>0954-3007</issn><eissn>1476-5640</eissn><abstract>Background/Objectives:
Dietary approaches to preventing the recurrence of idiopathic calcium-containing kidney stones are effective. However, a lifelong commitment to prevention is challenging for many patients. Multiple patient factors likely account for compliance and adherence with dietary recommendations. We examined patients’ recall and compliance with dietary recommendations provided during clinical evaluation.
Subjects/Methods:
Of 275 patients who received dietary recommendations from a dietitian, 112 completed an investigator-designed survey querying their recollection of dietary recommendations. Patients’ responses were compared with the recommendations actually provided as entered in patients’ medical records.
Results:
Patients (62% male, 56±13 years; 38% female, 52±14 years) were provided 3.4±1.1 recommendations (min–max, 1–6) and recalled 67% of recommendations. Highest recalls were for (i) lower meat/fish/poultry intake, (ii) higher fluid intake and (iii) lower sodium (⩾68% for all). Lowest recalls were for weight loss, using citrus juices and increasing fruits/vegetables (⩽61% for all). Forty-seven percent of patients given 1–3 recommendations recalled 100%, whereas only 23% of patients provided >3 recommendations did so (
P
=0.011). Even though 38% of patients reported some difficulty following dietary recommendations, nearly all (91%) said that they were willing to continue following them.
Conclusions:
Higher patient recall is associated with ⩽3 dietary recommendations. Patient recall of recommendations that were not actually provided (‘false recall’) may contribute to reduced recall and confusion about the most important dietary strategies to reduce their stone risk. Accordingly, providers should prioritize the most important dietary recommendations, reserving those less important for follow-up, and address any confusion patients have from information received prior to evaluation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27222155</pmid><doi>10.1038/ejcn.2016.79</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-3007 |
ispartof | European journal of clinical nutrition, 2016-09, Vol.70 (9), p.1062-1067 |
issn | 0954-3007 1476-5640 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827897948 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | 692/699 692/700 Adult Aged Calcium Calculi Citrus Clinical Nutrition Confusion Diet Diet therapy Dietary fiber Dietary supplements Disease prevention Epidemiology Evaluation Female Fluid intake Fruits Humans Influence Internal Medicine Kidney Calculi - prevention & control Kidney stones Kidneys Male Meat Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental Recall Metabolic Diseases Methods Middle Aged Nephrolithiasis Nutritionists original-article Patient Compliance Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Patients Poultry Prevention Public Health Recall Sodium Vegetables Weight loss |
title | Factors associated with patient recall of individualized dietary recommendations for kidney stone prevention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T10%3A02%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20patient%20recall%20of%20individualized%20dietary%20recommendations%20for%20kidney%20stone%20prevention&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=Penniston,%20K%20L&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1062&rft.epage=1067&rft.pages=1062-1067&rft.issn=0954-3007&rft.eissn=1476-5640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/ejcn.2016.79&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA462667079%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817105991&rft_id=info:pmid/27222155&rft_galeid=A462667079&rfr_iscdi=true |