Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search
Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1546 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1533 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Barrett, Doug J. K Shimozaki, Steven S Jensen, Silke Zobay, Oliver |
description | Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xhp0000239 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827896889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4204007101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9L3UAQB_BFWvTVevEPKIFepJC6P7K_jkXUCkoLtvXgIUx2J32reUncTbTvvzfx2Qo9lO5lYPjwnR2GkH1GPzIq9OGvZU-nx4XdIgtmhc0Z1_oVWVBqVc4kFzvkTUo3M2JGbpMdrpmVWpkFuf4R0tilHoYATXbVxdvQ_swucNXF9VR8gAFTdtYuQxWGuQetz07AhSYM8NQ4HYOH1mEW2uxrxPuAD9klQnTLt-R1DU3Cvee6S76fHH87-pyffzk9O_p0noNkasgl99w5pQSlvp7XqFVdM6kBBOdCoJAVeOmMrS2C1AZN5cB7W1mhubdS7JKDTW4fu7sR01CuQnLYNNBiN6aSGa6NVcbY_6EF54XidKLv_6I33RjbaZFZSWN0Ycw_1TRUK17I-YcfNsrFLqWIddnHsIK4Lhkt5xuWLzec8LvnyLFaof9Dfx9tAvkGQA9ln9YO4hBcg8mNMWI7zGFlwZ-ypRDiERYIpdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789762455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver</creator><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver ; Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><description>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27195768</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; Conditions ; Cues ; Distraction ; Experimental psychology ; Facilitation ; Female ; Guidance ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Information sources ; Inhibition ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Sensory evaluation ; Short Term Memory ; Space Perception - physiology ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial memory ; Stimulus ; Suppression ; Temporal cues ; Uncertainty ; Visual memory ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Search ; Visual searching ; Visuospatial Ability ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobay, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Conditions</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial memory</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Suppression</subject><subject>Temporal cues</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual memory</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Search</subject><subject>Visual searching</subject><subject>Visuospatial Ability</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c9L3UAQB_BFWvTVevEPKIFepJC6P7K_jkXUCkoLtvXgIUx2J32reUncTbTvvzfx2Qo9lO5lYPjwnR2GkH1GPzIq9OGvZU-nx4XdIgtmhc0Z1_oVWVBqVc4kFzvkTUo3M2JGbpMdrpmVWpkFuf4R0tilHoYATXbVxdvQ_swucNXF9VR8gAFTdtYuQxWGuQetz07AhSYM8NQ4HYOH1mEW2uxrxPuAD9klQnTLt-R1DU3Cvee6S76fHH87-pyffzk9O_p0noNkasgl99w5pQSlvp7XqFVdM6kBBOdCoJAVeOmMrS2C1AZN5cB7W1mhubdS7JKDTW4fu7sR01CuQnLYNNBiN6aSGa6NVcbY_6EF54XidKLv_6I33RjbaZFZSWN0Ycw_1TRUK17I-YcfNsrFLqWIddnHsIK4Lhkt5xuWLzec8LvnyLFaof9Dfx9tAvkGQA9ln9YO4hBcg8mNMWI7zGFlwZ-ypRDiERYIpdQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Barrett, Doug J. K</creator><creator>Shimozaki, Steven S</creator><creator>Jensen, Silke</creator><creator>Zobay, Oliver</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><author>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Conditions</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial memory</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Suppression</topic><topic>Temporal cues</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual memory</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Search</topic><topic>Visual searching</topic><topic>Visuospatial Ability</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobay, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrett, Doug J. K</au><au>Shimozaki, Steven S</au><au>Jensen, Silke</au><au>Zobay, Oliver</au><au>Enns, James T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1533</spage><epage>1546</epage><pages>1533-1546</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>27195768</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0000239</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827896889 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention Attention - physiology Bayesian analysis Bias Conditions Cues Distraction Experimental psychology Facilitation Female Guidance Human Humans Information processing Information sources Inhibition Inhibition (Psychology) Male Memory Memory, Short-Term - physiology Middle Aged Sensory evaluation Short Term Memory Space Perception - physiology Spatial discrimination Spatial memory Stimulus Suppression Temporal cues Uncertainty Visual memory Visual perception Visual Perception - physiology Visual Search Visual searching Visuospatial Ability Young Adult |
title | Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A30%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visuospatial%20Working%20Memory%20Mediates%20Inhibitory%20and%20Facilitatory%20Guidance%20in%20Preview%20Search&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Barrett,%20Doug%20J.%20K&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1533&rft.epage=1546&rft.pages=1533-1546&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0000239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4204007101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789762455&rft_id=info:pmid/27195768&rfr_iscdi=true |