Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search

Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546
Hauptverfasser: Barrett, Doug J. K, Shimozaki, Steven S, Jensen, Silke, Zobay, Oliver
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1546
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1533
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 42
creator Barrett, Doug J. K
Shimozaki, Steven S
Jensen, Silke
Zobay, Oliver
description Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xhp0000239
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827896889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4204007101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c9L3UAQB_BFWvTVevEPKIFepJC6P7K_jkXUCkoLtvXgIUx2J32reUncTbTvvzfx2Qo9lO5lYPjwnR2GkH1GPzIq9OGvZU-nx4XdIgtmhc0Z1_oVWVBqVc4kFzvkTUo3M2JGbpMdrpmVWpkFuf4R0tilHoYATXbVxdvQ_swucNXF9VR8gAFTdtYuQxWGuQetz07AhSYM8NQ4HYOH1mEW2uxrxPuAD9klQnTLt-R1DU3Cvee6S76fHH87-pyffzk9O_p0noNkasgl99w5pQSlvp7XqFVdM6kBBOdCoJAVeOmMrS2C1AZN5cB7W1mhubdS7JKDTW4fu7sR01CuQnLYNNBiN6aSGa6NVcbY_6EF54XidKLv_6I33RjbaZFZSWN0Ycw_1TRUK17I-YcfNsrFLqWIddnHsIK4Lhkt5xuWLzec8LvnyLFaof9Dfx9tAvkGQA9ln9YO4hBcg8mNMWI7zGFlwZ-ypRDiERYIpdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789762455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver</creator><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver ; Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><description>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27195768</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Bayesian analysis ; Bias ; Conditions ; Cues ; Distraction ; Experimental psychology ; Facilitation ; Female ; Guidance ; Human ; Humans ; Information processing ; Information sources ; Inhibition ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Male ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Sensory evaluation ; Short Term Memory ; Space Perception - physiology ; Spatial discrimination ; Spatial memory ; Stimulus ; Suppression ; Temporal cues ; Uncertainty ; Visual memory ; Visual perception ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual Search ; Visual searching ; Visuospatial Ability ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195768$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobay, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Conditions</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Facilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guidance</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial discrimination</subject><subject>Spatial memory</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Suppression</subject><subject>Temporal cues</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual memory</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Search</subject><subject>Visual searching</subject><subject>Visuospatial Ability</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c9L3UAQB_BFWvTVevEPKIFepJC6P7K_jkXUCkoLtvXgIUx2J32reUncTbTvvzfx2Qo9lO5lYPjwnR2GkH1GPzIq9OGvZU-nx4XdIgtmhc0Z1_oVWVBqVc4kFzvkTUo3M2JGbpMdrpmVWpkFuf4R0tilHoYATXbVxdvQ_swucNXF9VR8gAFTdtYuQxWGuQetz07AhSYM8NQ4HYOH1mEW2uxrxPuAD9klQnTLt-R1DU3Cvee6S76fHH87-pyffzk9O_p0noNkasgl99w5pQSlvp7XqFVdM6kBBOdCoJAVeOmMrS2C1AZN5cB7W1mhubdS7JKDTW4fu7sR01CuQnLYNNBiN6aSGa6NVcbY_6EF54XidKLv_6I33RjbaZFZSWN0Ycw_1TRUK17I-YcfNsrFLqWIddnHsIK4Lhkt5xuWLzec8LvnyLFaof9Dfx9tAvkGQA9ln9YO4hBcg8mNMWI7zGFlwZ-ypRDiERYIpdQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Barrett, Doug J. K</creator><creator>Shimozaki, Steven S</creator><creator>Jensen, Silke</creator><creator>Zobay, Oliver</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</title><author>Barrett, Doug J. K ; Shimozaki, Steven S ; Jensen, Silke ; Zobay, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a516t-52d2cc66300df0023f6ff157aa32233e35bad5c89f9ea578e8bcadd9b9372d953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Conditions</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Facilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guidance</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial discrimination</topic><topic>Spatial memory</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Suppression</topic><topic>Temporal cues</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual memory</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Search</topic><topic>Visual searching</topic><topic>Visuospatial Ability</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Doug J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimozaki, Steven S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zobay, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrett, Doug J. K</au><au>Shimozaki, Steven S</au><au>Jensen, Silke</au><au>Zobay, Oliver</au><au>Enns, James T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1533</spage><epage>1546</epage><pages>1533-1546</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>Visual search is faster and more accurate when a subset of distractors is presented before the display containing the target. This "preview benefit" has been attributed to separate inhibitory and facilitatory guidance mechanisms during search. In the preview task the temporal cues thought to elicit inhibition and facilitation provide complementary sources of information about the likely location of the target. In this study, we use a Bayesian observer model to compare sensitivity when the temporal cues eliciting inhibition and facilitation produce complementary, and competing, sources of information. Observers searched for T-shaped targets among L-shaped distractors in 2 standard and 2 preview conditions. In the standard conditions, all the objects in the display appeared at the same time. In the preview conditions, the initial subset of distractors either stayed on the screen or disappeared before the onset of the search display, which contained the target when present. In the latter, the synchronous onset of old and new objects negates the predictive utility of stimulus-driven capture during search. The results indicate observers combine memory-driven inhibition and sensory-driven capture to reduce spatial uncertainty about the target's likely location during search. In the absence of spatially predictive onsets, memory-driven inhibition at old locations persists despite irrelevant sensory change at previewed locations. This result is consistent with a bias toward unattended objects during search via the active suppression of irrelevant capture at previously attended locations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>27195768</pmid><doi>10.1037/xhp0000239</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-0668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016-10, Vol.42 (10), p.1533-1546
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827896889
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Attention - physiology
Bayesian analysis
Bias
Conditions
Cues
Distraction
Experimental psychology
Facilitation
Female
Guidance
Human
Humans
Information processing
Information sources
Inhibition
Inhibition (Psychology)
Male
Memory
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Middle Aged
Sensory evaluation
Short Term Memory
Space Perception - physiology
Spatial discrimination
Spatial memory
Stimulus
Suppression
Temporal cues
Uncertainty
Visual memory
Visual perception
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual Search
Visual searching
Visuospatial Ability
Young Adult
title Visuospatial Working Memory Mediates Inhibitory and Facilitatory Guidance in Preview Search
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A30%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visuospatial%20Working%20Memory%20Mediates%20Inhibitory%20and%20Facilitatory%20Guidance%20in%20Preview%20Search&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Barrett,%20Doug%20J.%20K&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1533&rft.epage=1546&rft.pages=1533-1546&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xhp0000239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4204007101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789762455&rft_id=info:pmid/27195768&rfr_iscdi=true