P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment
Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted infections 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | A37 |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A37 |
container_title | Sexually transmitted infections |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Harding-Esch, Emma Sherrard-Smith, Ellie Fuller, Sebastian Suarez Harb, Ana Furegato, Martina Mercer, Catherine Sadiq, S Tariq Howell-Jones, Rebecca Nardone, Anthony Gates, Pam Pearce, Amy Keane, Frances Colver, Helen Nori, Achyuta Dewsnap, Claire Schatzberger, Rebecca Estcourt, Claudia Dakshina, Suba Dakshina, Catherine Lowndes, Catherine |
description | Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827891224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827891224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18278912243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8tOwzAURC0EEuXxD3fJxsWPxEnWCMQSie4rk9wSI8du7etS_h4LwQewmhmdM4yBFGsptbnPeKJkQ-ZKyJaLVkll1lL0Z2wlm05xrYw-r12bnjdDpy_ZVc4fQgjTtcOKHV5M-4qnYj284WyPLpYELgDNCOQWhD0mF6cK6RMx1HThHQgz4QS7mGCcvV2-JmfBhgkSjuiOf0qduXj6IZTQ0oKBbtjFzvqMt795ze6eHjcPz3yf4qHU13ZxeUTvbcBY8lb2qusHqVSj_6F-A0-fWOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827891224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Chlamydia</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harb, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furegato, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, S Tariq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colver, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Achyuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewsnap, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estcourt, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Suba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><description>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</description><subject>Chlamydia</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVi8tOwzAURC0EEuXxD3fJxsWPxEnWCMQSie4rk9wSI8du7etS_h4LwQewmhmdM4yBFGsptbnPeKJkQ-ZKyJaLVkll1lL0Z2wlm05xrYw-r12bnjdDpy_ZVc4fQgjTtcOKHV5M-4qnYj284WyPLpYELgDNCOQWhD0mF6cK6RMx1HThHQgz4QS7mGCcvV2-JmfBhgkSjuiOf0qduXj6IZTQ0oKBbtjFzvqMt795ze6eHjcPz3yf4qHU13ZxeUTvbcBY8lb2qusHqVSj_6F-A0-fWOo</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Harding-Esch, Emma</creator><creator>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creator><creator>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creator><creator>Harb, Ana</creator><creator>Furegato, Martina</creator><creator>Mercer, Catherine</creator><creator>Sadiq, S Tariq</creator><creator>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creator><creator>Nardone, Anthony</creator><creator>Gates, Pam</creator><creator>Pearce, Amy</creator><creator>Keane, Frances</creator><creator>Colver, Helen</creator><creator>Nori, Achyuta</creator><creator>Dewsnap, Claire</creator><creator>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creator><creator>Estcourt, Claudia</creator><creator>Dakshina, Suba</creator><creator>Dakshina, Catherine</creator><creator>Lowndes, Catherine</creator><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><author>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18278912243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chlamydia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harb, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furegato, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, S Tariq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colver, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Achyuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewsnap, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estcourt, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Suba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harding-Esch, Emma</au><au>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</au><au>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</au><au>Harb, Ana</au><au>Furegato, Martina</au><au>Mercer, Catherine</au><au>Sadiq, S Tariq</au><au>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</au><au>Nardone, Anthony</au><au>Gates, Pam</au><au>Pearce, Amy</au><au>Keane, Frances</au><au>Colver, Helen</au><au>Nori, Achyuta</au><au>Dewsnap, Claire</au><au>Schatzberger, Rebecca</au><au>Estcourt, Claudia</au><au>Dakshina, Suba</au><au>Dakshina, Catherine</au><au>Lowndes, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A37</spage><epage>A37</epage><pages>A37-A37</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</abstract><doi>10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-4973 |
ispartof | Sexually transmitted infections, 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37 |
issn | 1368-4973 1472-3263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827891224 |
source | BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Chlamydia |
title | P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P65Sexual%20behaviour%20in%20the%20time%20period%20between%20being%20tested%20for%20chlamydia%20and%20receiving%20test%20result%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Harding-Esch,%20Emma&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A37&rft.epage=A37&rft.pages=A37-A37&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1827891224%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827891224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |