P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment

Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted infections 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37
Hauptverfasser: Harding-Esch, Emma, Sherrard-Smith, Ellie, Fuller, Sebastian Suarez, Harb, Ana, Furegato, Martina, Mercer, Catherine, Sadiq, S Tariq, Howell-Jones, Rebecca, Nardone, Anthony, Gates, Pam, Pearce, Amy, Keane, Frances, Colver, Helen, Nori, Achyuta, Dewsnap, Claire, Schatzberger, Rebecca, Estcourt, Claudia, Dakshina, Suba, Dakshina, Catherine, Lowndes, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A37
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A37
container_title Sexually transmitted infections
container_volume 91
creator Harding-Esch, Emma
Sherrard-Smith, Ellie
Fuller, Sebastian Suarez
Harb, Ana
Furegato, Martina
Mercer, Catherine
Sadiq, S Tariq
Howell-Jones, Rebecca
Nardone, Anthony
Gates, Pam
Pearce, Amy
Keane, Frances
Colver, Helen
Nori, Achyuta
Dewsnap, Claire
Schatzberger, Rebecca
Estcourt, Claudia
Dakshina, Suba
Dakshina, Catherine
Lowndes, Catherine
description Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827891224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827891224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18278912243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8tOwzAURC0EEuXxD3fJxsWPxEnWCMQSie4rk9wSI8du7etS_h4LwQewmhmdM4yBFGsptbnPeKJkQ-ZKyJaLVkll1lL0Z2wlm05xrYw-r12bnjdDpy_ZVc4fQgjTtcOKHV5M-4qnYj284WyPLpYELgDNCOQWhD0mF6cK6RMx1HThHQgz4QS7mGCcvV2-JmfBhgkSjuiOf0qduXj6IZTQ0oKBbtjFzvqMt795ze6eHjcPz3yf4qHU13ZxeUTvbcBY8lb2qusHqVSj_6F-A0-fWOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827891224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Chlamydia</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted infections, 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harb, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furegato, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, S Tariq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colver, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Achyuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewsnap, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estcourt, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Suba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><title>Sexually transmitted infections</title><description>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</description><subject>Chlamydia</subject><issn>1368-4973</issn><issn>1472-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVi8tOwzAURC0EEuXxD3fJxsWPxEnWCMQSie4rk9wSI8du7etS_h4LwQewmhmdM4yBFGsptbnPeKJkQ-ZKyJaLVkll1lL0Z2wlm05xrYw-r12bnjdDpy_ZVc4fQgjTtcOKHV5M-4qnYj284WyPLpYELgDNCOQWhD0mF6cK6RMx1HThHQgz4QS7mGCcvV2-JmfBhgkSjuiOf0qduXj6IZTQ0oKBbtjFzvqMt795ze6eHjcPz3yf4qHU13ZxeUTvbcBY8lb2qusHqVSj_6F-A0-fWOo</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Harding-Esch, Emma</creator><creator>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creator><creator>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creator><creator>Harb, Ana</creator><creator>Furegato, Martina</creator><creator>Mercer, Catherine</creator><creator>Sadiq, S Tariq</creator><creator>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creator><creator>Nardone, Anthony</creator><creator>Gates, Pam</creator><creator>Pearce, Amy</creator><creator>Keane, Frances</creator><creator>Colver, Helen</creator><creator>Nori, Achyuta</creator><creator>Dewsnap, Claire</creator><creator>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creator><creator>Estcourt, Claudia</creator><creator>Dakshina, Suba</creator><creator>Dakshina, Catherine</creator><creator>Lowndes, Catherine</creator><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</title><author>Harding-Esch, Emma ; Sherrard-Smith, Ellie ; Fuller, Sebastian Suarez ; Harb, Ana ; Furegato, Martina ; Mercer, Catherine ; Sadiq, S Tariq ; Howell-Jones, Rebecca ; Nardone, Anthony ; Gates, Pam ; Pearce, Amy ; Keane, Frances ; Colver, Helen ; Nori, Achyuta ; Dewsnap, Claire ; Schatzberger, Rebecca ; Estcourt, Claudia ; Dakshina, Suba ; Dakshina, Catherine ; Lowndes, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18278912243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chlamydia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harding-Esch, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harb, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furegato, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadiq, S Tariq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardone, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gates, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearce, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colver, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, Achyuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewsnap, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzberger, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estcourt, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Suba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dakshina, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowndes, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harding-Esch, Emma</au><au>Sherrard-Smith, Ellie</au><au>Fuller, Sebastian Suarez</au><au>Harb, Ana</au><au>Furegato, Martina</au><au>Mercer, Catherine</au><au>Sadiq, S Tariq</au><au>Howell-Jones, Rebecca</au><au>Nardone, Anthony</au><au>Gates, Pam</au><au>Pearce, Amy</au><au>Keane, Frances</au><au>Colver, Helen</au><au>Nori, Achyuta</au><au>Dewsnap, Claire</au><au>Schatzberger, Rebecca</au><au>Estcourt, Claudia</au><au>Dakshina, Suba</au><au>Dakshina, Catherine</au><au>Lowndes, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted infections</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A37</spage><epage>A37</epage><pages>A37-A37</pages><issn>1368-4973</issn><eissn>1472-3263</eissn><abstract>Background/introductionThere is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.Aim(s)/objectivesTo investigate the sexual behaviours of patients between the time of being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment in order to investigate the benefits that a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional clinical audit of GUM clinic attendees. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives. The data also served as an audit for the GUM clinics, following BASHH guidelines.ResultsFive of nine GUM clinics approached participated, in July-December 2014. Data from 775 patients were included in analyses, 365 of whom were chlamydia-positive. Males with 2-4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment. Data were missing on condom use (22%) and recent new partners (81%).Discussion/conclusionPatients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.</abstract><doi>10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-4973
ispartof Sexually transmitted infections, 2015-06, Vol.91 (Suppl 1), p.A37-A37
issn 1368-4973
1472-3263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827891224
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Chlamydia
title P65Sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P65Sexual%20behaviour%20in%20the%20time%20period%20between%20being%20tested%20for%20chlamydia%20and%20receiving%20test%20result%20and%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20infections&rft.au=Harding-Esch,%20Emma&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A37&rft.epage=A37&rft.pages=A37-A37&rft.issn=1368-4973&rft.eissn=1472-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052126.108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1827891224%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827891224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true