GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services

We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of health economics 2016-09, Vol.49, p.169-183
Hauptverfasser: Riise, Julie, Hole, Arne Risa, Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, Skåtun, Diane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 183
container_issue
container_start_page 169
container_title Journal of health economics
container_volume 49
creator Riise, Julie
Hole, Arne Risa
Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte
Skåtun, Diane
description We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in all countries respond to information about societal costs, benefits and effectiveness, and that they make trade-offs between them. The UK GPs have higher willingness to accept costs when they can prescribe medicines that are cheaper or more preferred by the patient, while Norwegian GPs tend to have higher willingness to accept costs for attributes regarding effectiveness or the doctors' experience. In general, there is a substantial amount of heterogeneity also within each country. We discuss the results from the DCE in the light of the GPs' two conflicting agency roles and what we know about the incentive structures and cultures in the different countries.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827889412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167629616300534</els_id><sourcerecordid>1827889412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3eceac47db4eb11a79eac69efb8960566574418b94cb68e1bb241c5c85e452f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EokPhFypLLGCT4Jdx7GQHqqAgVYIFrK345YU4SuLBTkYqK_6BP-RLcDotCzbgjfXkc6_texm7AJGDAPVqyIeempHQ50Wac6FzIeAB20Gl6wyUVA_ZLh3oTBW1OmNPYhxEWuW-fszOCi21EkLvWHf1Kb7gbjqMDt3CD8H54Bb3vVmcn_nSB79-7TmObnbYjBx775Ai__XjJ6eja2lG4l3w04YS8flWl8DtcUvPI4XjJnjKHnXNGOnZ3X7Ovrx7-_nyfXb98erD5ZvrDEsJS2b3hNSg1K2VZAEaXadR1dTZqlaiVKrUUkJla4lWVQTWFhKwxKokWRbd_py9PPkegv-2UlzM5CLSODYz-TUaqApdVbWE4n_QAkBLpRL6_C908GtI37ylymQotEyUOlEYfIyBOpPSnJpwY0CYrTQzmPvSzFaaEdqk0pLw4s5-tRO1f2T3LSXg9QmgFN3RUTAR3RZ96wLhYlrv_nXHbw26rQY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825889074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Riise, Julie ; Hole, Arne Risa ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Skåtun, Diane</creator><creatorcontrib>Riise, Julie ; Hole, Arne Risa ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Skåtun, Diane</creatorcontrib><description>We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in all countries respond to information about societal costs, benefits and effectiveness, and that they make trade-offs between them. The UK GPs have higher willingness to accept costs when they can prescribe medicines that are cheaper or more preferred by the patient, while Norwegian GPs tend to have higher willingness to accept costs for attributes regarding effectiveness or the doctors' experience. In general, there is a substantial amount of heterogeneity also within each country. We discuss the results from the DCE in the light of the GPs' two conflicting agency roles and what we know about the incentive structures and cultures in the different countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27476007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Benefit cost analysis ; Choice Behavior ; Containment ; Cost containment ; Cost control ; Costs ; Cultural differences ; Culture ; Decision making ; Discrete choice ; Discrete choice experiments ; Drugs ; England ; Family physicians ; GPs ; Health administration ; Health care expenditures ; Health services ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Medical personnel ; National Health Programs ; Norway ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prescription behaviour ; Prescription Drugs ; Prioritization ; Scotland ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of health economics, 2016-09, Vol.49, p.169-183</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3eceac47db4eb11a79eac69efb8960566574418b94cb68e1bb241c5c85e452f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3eceac47db4eb11a79eac69efb8960566574418b94cb68e1bb241c5c85e452f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27476007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riise, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, Arne Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skåtun, Diane</creatorcontrib><title>GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services</title><title>Journal of health economics</title><addtitle>J Health Econ</addtitle><description>We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in all countries respond to information about societal costs, benefits and effectiveness, and that they make trade-offs between them. The UK GPs have higher willingness to accept costs when they can prescribe medicines that are cheaper or more preferred by the patient, while Norwegian GPs tend to have higher willingness to accept costs for attributes regarding effectiveness or the doctors' experience. In general, there is a substantial amount of heterogeneity also within each country. We discuss the results from the DCE in the light of the GPs' two conflicting agency roles and what we know about the incentive structures and cultures in the different countries.</description><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Containment</subject><subject>Cost containment</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discrete choice</subject><subject>Discrete choice experiments</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>GPs</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prescription behaviour</subject><subject>Prescription Drugs</subject><subject>Prioritization</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0167-6296</issn><issn>1879-1646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EokPhFypLLGCT4Jdx7GQHqqAgVYIFrK345YU4SuLBTkYqK_6BP-RLcDotCzbgjfXkc6_texm7AJGDAPVqyIeempHQ50Wac6FzIeAB20Gl6wyUVA_ZLh3oTBW1OmNPYhxEWuW-fszOCi21EkLvWHf1Kb7gbjqMDt3CD8H54Bb3vVmcn_nSB79-7TmObnbYjBx775Ai__XjJ6eja2lG4l3w04YS8flWl8DtcUvPI4XjJnjKHnXNGOnZ3X7Ovrx7-_nyfXb98erD5ZvrDEsJS2b3hNSg1K2VZAEaXadR1dTZqlaiVKrUUkJla4lWVQTWFhKwxKokWRbd_py9PPkegv-2UlzM5CLSODYz-TUaqApdVbWE4n_QAkBLpRL6_C908GtI37ylymQotEyUOlEYfIyBOpPSnJpwY0CYrTQzmPvSzFaaEdqk0pLw4s5-tRO1f2T3LSXg9QmgFN3RUTAR3RZ96wLhYlrv_nXHbw26rQY</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Riise, Julie</creator><creator>Hole, Arne Risa</creator><creator>Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte</creator><creator>Skåtun, Diane</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services</title><author>Riise, Julie ; Hole, Arne Risa ; Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte ; Skåtun, Diane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-b3eceac47db4eb11a79eac69efb8960566574418b94cb68e1bb241c5c85e452f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Containment</topic><topic>Cost containment</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discrete choice</topic><topic>Discrete choice experiments</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>GPs</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prescription behaviour</topic><topic>Prescription Drugs</topic><topic>Prioritization</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riise, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hole, Arne Risa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skåtun, Diane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riise, Julie</au><au>Hole, Arne Risa</au><au>Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte</au><au>Skåtun, Diane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services</atitle><jtitle>Journal of health economics</jtitle><addtitle>J Health Econ</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>49</volume><spage>169</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>169-183</pages><issn>0167-6296</issn><eissn>1879-1646</eissn><abstract>We present results from an extensive discrete choice experiment, which was conducted in three countries (Norway, Scotland, and England) with the aim of disclosing stated prescription behaviour in different decision making contexts and across different cost containment cultures. We show that GPs in all countries respond to information about societal costs, benefits and effectiveness, and that they make trade-offs between them. The UK GPs have higher willingness to accept costs when they can prescribe medicines that are cheaper or more preferred by the patient, while Norwegian GPs tend to have higher willingness to accept costs for attributes regarding effectiveness or the doctors' experience. In general, there is a substantial amount of heterogeneity also within each country. We discuss the results from the DCE in the light of the GPs' two conflicting agency roles and what we know about the incentive structures and cultures in the different countries.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27476007</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6296
ispartof Journal of health economics, 2016-09, Vol.49, p.169-183
issn 0167-6296
1879-1646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827889412
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Benefit cost analysis
Choice Behavior
Containment
Cost containment
Cost control
Costs
Cultural differences
Culture
Decision making
Discrete choice
Discrete choice experiments
Drugs
England
Family physicians
GPs
Health administration
Health care expenditures
Health services
Heterogeneity
Humans
Medical personnel
National Health Programs
Norway
Physicians
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prescription behaviour
Prescription Drugs
Prioritization
Scotland
Studies
title GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GPs'%20implicit%20prioritization%20through%20clinical%20choices%20%E2%80%93%20evidence%20from%20three%20national%20health%20services&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20health%20economics&rft.au=Riise,%20Julie&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=169-183&rft.issn=0167-6296&rft.eissn=1879-1646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1827889412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825889074&rft_id=info:pmid/27476007&rft_els_id=S0167629616300534&rfr_iscdi=true