Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist
“Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” (Paine 1966) is the most-cited empirical article published in the American Naturalist. In short, Paine removed predatory sea stars (Pisaster ochraceus) from the rocky intertidal and watched the key prey species, mussels (Mytilus californianus), crowd out s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2016-10, Vol.188 (4), p.365-378 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 378 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Lafferty, Kevin D. Suchanek, Thomas H. |
description | “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” (Paine 1966) is the most-cited empirical article published in the American Naturalist. In short, Paine removed predatory sea stars (Pisaster ochraceus) from the rocky intertidal and watched the key prey species, mussels (Mytilus californianus), crowd out seven subordinate primary space-holding species. However, because these mussels are a foundational species, they provide three-dimensional habitat for over 300 associated species inhabiting the mussel beds; thus, removing sea stars significantly increases community-wide diversity. In any case, most ecologists cite Paine (1966) to support a statement that predators increase diversity by interfering with competition. Although detractors remained skeptical of top-down effects and keystone concepts, the paradigm that predation increases diversity spread. By 1991, “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” was considered a classic ecological paper, and after 50 years it continues to influence ecological theory and conservation biology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/688045 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827888470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26519181</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26519181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-95536347042ce65ec80b41730f58dc4b609ca3f788a574e944acc804e00fd3b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctOGzEUBmALFUEK9A1aWaqEumDA97GXUZQWJG7ish45zpnW0VxS24Ngx2vwejwJDqFU6qory_bn_9g-CH2i5JASrY6U1kTIDTSikpeF5Ix_QCNCCC8IFeU2-hjjIk-NMHILbbNSMaZLNkLhCu589Ml3P_Gl9R08Pz5FTI1S-Bosvk424Cto-zvb4On9EoJvoUsHOP0CfNbHVEx8gjmetksfvMtoHJJ3DWDfvZpxC6v1Dp_bNATb-Jh20WZtmwh7b-MOuv0-vZkcF6cXP04m49PCccVSYaTkiouSCOZASXCazAQtOamlnjsxU8Q4y-tSaytLAUYI67IRQEg95zPBd9C3de4y9L8HiKlqfXTQNLaDfogV1Swf1rnCf1BqDGHEyEy__kMX_RC6_JBVINda6le1v1Yu9DEGqKtl_jkbHipKqlXDqnXDMvzyFjfMWpi_sz8dyuDzGixi6sPffSWpydfiL5b_lyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1823885895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lafferty, Kevin D. ; Suchanek, Thomas H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lafferty, Kevin D. ; Suchanek, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><description>“Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” (Paine 1966) is the most-cited empirical article published in the American Naturalist. In short, Paine removed predatory sea stars (Pisaster ochraceus) from the rocky intertidal and watched the key prey species, mussels (Mytilus californianus), crowd out seven subordinate primary space-holding species. However, because these mussels are a foundational species, they provide three-dimensional habitat for over 300 associated species inhabiting the mussel beds; thus, removing sea stars significantly increases community-wide diversity. In any case, most ecologists cite Paine (1966) to support a statement that predators increase diversity by interfering with competition. Although detractors remained skeptical of top-down effects and keystone concepts, the paradigm that predation increases diversity spread. By 1991, “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” was considered a classic ecological paper, and after 50 years it continues to influence ecological theory and conservation biology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/688045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27622872</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Experiments ; Food Chain ; Historical Comment ; Marine ecology ; Mollusks ; Mytilus californianus ; Pisaster ochraceus ; Population Dynamics ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Starfish</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2016-10, Vol.188 (4), p.365-378</ispartof><rights>2016 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-95536347042ce65ec80b41730f58dc4b609ca3f788a574e944acc804e00fd3b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-95536347042ce65ec80b41730f58dc4b609ca3f788a574e944acc804e00fd3b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26519181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26519181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27622872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lafferty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchanek, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>“Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” (Paine 1966) is the most-cited empirical article published in the American Naturalist. In short, Paine removed predatory sea stars (Pisaster ochraceus) from the rocky intertidal and watched the key prey species, mussels (Mytilus californianus), crowd out seven subordinate primary space-holding species. However, because these mussels are a foundational species, they provide three-dimensional habitat for over 300 associated species inhabiting the mussel beds; thus, removing sea stars significantly increases community-wide diversity. In any case, most ecologists cite Paine (1966) to support a statement that predators increase diversity by interfering with competition. Although detractors remained skeptical of top-down effects and keystone concepts, the paradigm that predation increases diversity spread. By 1991, “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” was considered a classic ecological paper, and after 50 years it continues to influence ecological theory and conservation biology.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Historical Comment</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>Mytilus californianus</subject><subject>Pisaster ochraceus</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Starfish</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctOGzEUBmALFUEK9A1aWaqEumDA97GXUZQWJG7ish45zpnW0VxS24Ngx2vwejwJDqFU6qory_bn_9g-CH2i5JASrY6U1kTIDTSikpeF5Ix_QCNCCC8IFeU2-hjjIk-NMHILbbNSMaZLNkLhCu589Ml3P_Gl9R08Pz5FTI1S-Bosvk424Cto-zvb4On9EoJvoUsHOP0CfNbHVEx8gjmetksfvMtoHJJ3DWDfvZpxC6v1Dp_bNATb-Jh20WZtmwh7b-MOuv0-vZkcF6cXP04m49PCccVSYaTkiouSCOZASXCazAQtOamlnjsxU8Q4y-tSaytLAUYI67IRQEg95zPBd9C3de4y9L8HiKlqfXTQNLaDfogV1Swf1rnCf1BqDGHEyEy__kMX_RC6_JBVINda6le1v1Yu9DEGqKtl_jkbHipKqlXDqnXDMvzyFjfMWpi_sz8dyuDzGixi6sPffSWpydfiL5b_lyg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Lafferty, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Suchanek, Thomas H.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist</title><author>Lafferty, Kevin D. ; Suchanek, Thomas H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-95536347042ce65ec80b41730f58dc4b609ca3f788a574e944acc804e00fd3b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Historical Comment</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>Mytilus californianus</topic><topic>Pisaster ochraceus</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Starfish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lafferty, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suchanek, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lafferty, Kevin D.</au><au>Suchanek, Thomas H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>365-378</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>“Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” (Paine 1966) is the most-cited empirical article published in the American Naturalist. In short, Paine removed predatory sea stars (Pisaster ochraceus) from the rocky intertidal and watched the key prey species, mussels (Mytilus californianus), crowd out seven subordinate primary space-holding species. However, because these mussels are a foundational species, they provide three-dimensional habitat for over 300 associated species inhabiting the mussel beds; thus, removing sea stars significantly increases community-wide diversity. In any case, most ecologists cite Paine (1966) to support a statement that predators increase diversity by interfering with competition. Although detractors remained skeptical of top-down effects and keystone concepts, the paradigm that predation increases diversity spread. By 1991, “Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity” was considered a classic ecological paper, and after 50 years it continues to influence ecological theory and conservation biology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>27622872</pmid><doi>10.1086/688045</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2016-10, Vol.188 (4), p.365-378 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827888470 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Conservation of Natural Resources Ecology Ecosystem Experiments Food Chain Historical Comment Marine ecology Mollusks Mytilus californianus Pisaster ochraceus Population Dynamics Predation Predatory Behavior Starfish |
title | Revisiting Paine’s 1966 Sea Star Removal Experiment, the Most-Cited Empirical Article in the American Naturalist |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T19%3A37%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20Paine%E2%80%99s%201966%20Sea%20Star%20Removal%20Experiment,%20the%20Most-Cited%20Empirical%20Article%20in%20the%20American%20Naturalist&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Lafferty,%20Kevin%20D.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=365-378&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/688045&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26519181%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1823885895&rft_id=info:pmid/27622872&rft_jstor_id=26519181&rfr_iscdi=true |