Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 841 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 837 |
container_title | The knee |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Lanzetti, R.M Monaco, E De Carli, A Grasso, A Ciompi, A Sigillo, R Argento, G Ferretti, A |
description | Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016016000168</els_id><sourcerecordid>4193073431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQDaK44-gP-CABX3zpsZK-gyjL4A0WfHDfQyZdPZvZdNLmMjh_5SeadlaFfRChSCWpUyepOkXIcwYbBqx5fdjcWsQNz_sNsGz1A7JiXVsWdQfwkKygb7oiR-GCPAnhAABNX9WPyQVvy7KrGazIj620dLHhkEKUO4OFcW6mBu0-3tCQwow2OH-io_4uo3aWDnjUCqnHIWU34uS8NDQma9FQtEb6PU5oI9ULc0SvnafKJ6VlRGr0Xv6KelTOhpjvF9Z39JLO3uXX8vGIVLlpTjmXRje5vZfzzYmGmIbTU_JolCbgszu_Jtcf3l9vPxVXXz5-3l5eFapqeSzGut3VUjWqqsaybtigqhJGhtCousexgo73rOcV402tRtmPSpWc9x2rUbIByzV5dabNn_qWMEQx6aDQGGnRpSBYx9uu41XT_A-0hJJDCxn68h704JK3uY4FlRlhAa8JP6NUbkjwOIrZ60n6k2AgFuXFQSzKi0V5ASxbnZNe3FGn3YTDn5TfUmfAmzMAc9eOGr0ISqNVOOgsRRSD0__mf3svXRlttZLmFk8Y_tYhAhcgvi6zt4xeNshLV_4EfdTYRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1822780182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27338510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ACL ; Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Clinical outcomes ; Conflicts of interest ; Female ; Femoral tunnel ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Ligaments ; Male ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Standard deviation ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Suspensory fixation device ; Tendons - transplantation ; Tibia - surgery ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tunnel widening ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016016000168$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciompi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigillo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argento, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</description><subject>ACL</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral tunnel</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Suspensory fixation device</subject><subject>Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tunnel widening</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQDaK44-gP-CABX3zpsZK-gyjL4A0WfHDfQyZdPZvZdNLmMjh_5SeadlaFfRChSCWpUyepOkXIcwYbBqx5fdjcWsQNz_sNsGz1A7JiXVsWdQfwkKygb7oiR-GCPAnhAABNX9WPyQVvy7KrGazIj620dLHhkEKUO4OFcW6mBu0-3tCQwow2OH-io_4uo3aWDnjUCqnHIWU34uS8NDQma9FQtEb6PU5oI9ULc0SvnafKJ6VlRGr0Xv6KelTOhpjvF9Z39JLO3uXX8vGIVLlpTjmXRje5vZfzzYmGmIbTU_JolCbgszu_Jtcf3l9vPxVXXz5-3l5eFapqeSzGut3VUjWqqsaybtigqhJGhtCousexgo73rOcV402tRtmPSpWc9x2rUbIByzV5dabNn_qWMEQx6aDQGGnRpSBYx9uu41XT_A-0hJJDCxn68h704JK3uY4FlRlhAa8JP6NUbkjwOIrZ60n6k2AgFuXFQSzKi0V5ASxbnZNe3FGn3YTDn5TfUmfAmzMAc9eOGr0ISqNVOOgsRRSD0__mf3svXRlttZLmFk8Y_tYhAhcgvi6zt4xeNshLV_4EfdTYRg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Lanzetti, R.M</creator><creator>Monaco, E</creator><creator>De Carli, A</creator><creator>Grasso, A</creator><creator>Ciompi, A</creator><creator>Sigillo, R</creator><creator>Argento, G</creator><creator>Ferretti, A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><author>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ACL</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral tunnel</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Suspensory fixation device</topic><topic>Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tunnel widening</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciompi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigillo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argento, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanzetti, R.M</au><au>Monaco, E</au><au>De Carli, A</au><au>Grasso, A</au><au>Ciompi, A</au><au>Sigillo, R</au><au>Argento, G</au><au>Ferretti, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>841</epage><pages>837-841</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27338510</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0160 |
ispartof | The knee, 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841 |
issn | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882466 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | ACL Adult Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods Clinical outcomes Conflicts of interest Female Femoral tunnel Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - surgery Humans Knee Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging Knee Joint - surgery Ligaments Male Orthopedic Fixation Devices Orthopedics Patients Prospective Studies Skin & tissue grafts Standard deviation Surgery Surgical techniques Suspensory fixation device Tendons - transplantation Tibia - surgery Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tunnel widening Young Adult |
title | Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20an%20adjustable-loop%20length%20suspensory%20fixation%20device%20reduce%20femoral%20tunnel%20enlargement%20in%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20reconstruction?%20A%20prospective%20computer%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Lanzetti,%20R.M&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=841&rft.pages=837-841&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4193073431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1822780182&rft_id=info:pmid/27338510&rft_els_id=S0968016016000168&rfr_iscdi=true |