Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841
Hauptverfasser: Lanzetti, R.M, Monaco, E, De Carli, A, Grasso, A, Ciompi, A, Sigillo, R, Argento, G, Ferretti, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 841
container_issue 5
container_start_page 837
container_title The knee
container_volume 23
creator Lanzetti, R.M
Monaco, E
De Carli, A
Grasso, A
Ciompi, A
Sigillo, R
Argento, G
Ferretti, A
description Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P > 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016016000168</els_id><sourcerecordid>4193073431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQDaK44-gP-CABX3zpsZK-gyjL4A0WfHDfQyZdPZvZdNLmMjh_5SeadlaFfRChSCWpUyepOkXIcwYbBqx5fdjcWsQNz_sNsGz1A7JiXVsWdQfwkKygb7oiR-GCPAnhAABNX9WPyQVvy7KrGazIj620dLHhkEKUO4OFcW6mBu0-3tCQwow2OH-io_4uo3aWDnjUCqnHIWU34uS8NDQma9FQtEb6PU5oI9ULc0SvnafKJ6VlRGr0Xv6KelTOhpjvF9Z39JLO3uXX8vGIVLlpTjmXRje5vZfzzYmGmIbTU_JolCbgszu_Jtcf3l9vPxVXXz5-3l5eFapqeSzGut3VUjWqqsaybtigqhJGhtCousexgo73rOcV402tRtmPSpWc9x2rUbIByzV5dabNn_qWMEQx6aDQGGnRpSBYx9uu41XT_A-0hJJDCxn68h704JK3uY4FlRlhAa8JP6NUbkjwOIrZ60n6k2AgFuXFQSzKi0V5ASxbnZNe3FGn3YTDn5TfUmfAmzMAc9eOGr0ISqNVOOgsRRSD0__mf3svXRlttZLmFk8Y_tYhAhcgvi6zt4xeNshLV_4EfdTYRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1822780182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27338510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ACL ; Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods ; Clinical outcomes ; Conflicts of interest ; Female ; Femoral tunnel ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Ligaments ; Male ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Standard deviation ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Suspensory fixation device ; Tendons - transplantation ; Tibia - surgery ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tunnel widening ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016016000168$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27338510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciompi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigillo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argento, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</description><subject>ACL</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral tunnel</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Suspensory fixation device</subject><subject>Tendons - transplantation</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tunnel widening</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUtuKFDEQDaK44-gP-CABX3zpsZK-gyjL4A0WfHDfQyZdPZvZdNLmMjh_5SeadlaFfRChSCWpUyepOkXIcwYbBqx5fdjcWsQNz_sNsGz1A7JiXVsWdQfwkKygb7oiR-GCPAnhAABNX9WPyQVvy7KrGazIj620dLHhkEKUO4OFcW6mBu0-3tCQwow2OH-io_4uo3aWDnjUCqnHIWU34uS8NDQma9FQtEb6PU5oI9ULc0SvnafKJ6VlRGr0Xv6KelTOhpjvF9Z39JLO3uXX8vGIVLlpTjmXRje5vZfzzYmGmIbTU_JolCbgszu_Jtcf3l9vPxVXXz5-3l5eFapqeSzGut3VUjWqqsaybtigqhJGhtCousexgo73rOcV402tRtmPSpWc9x2rUbIByzV5dabNn_qWMEQx6aDQGGnRpSBYx9uu41XT_A-0hJJDCxn68h704JK3uY4FlRlhAa8JP6NUbkjwOIrZ60n6k2AgFuXFQSzKi0V5ASxbnZNe3FGn3YTDn5TfUmfAmzMAc9eOGr0ISqNVOOgsRRSD0__mf3svXRlttZLmFk8Y_tYhAhcgvi6zt4xeNshLV_4EfdTYRg</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Lanzetti, R.M</creator><creator>Monaco, E</creator><creator>De Carli, A</creator><creator>Grasso, A</creator><creator>Ciompi, A</creator><creator>Sigillo, R</creator><creator>Argento, G</creator><creator>Ferretti, A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</title><author>Lanzetti, R.M ; Monaco, E ; De Carli, A ; Grasso, A ; Ciompi, A ; Sigillo, R ; Argento, G ; Ferretti, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-f57b5ac6c44f3561dc430f1e06c59ef4082919241265cfa9fcc3229815ea1de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ACL</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral tunnel</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Suspensory fixation device</topic><topic>Tendons - transplantation</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tunnel widening</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanzetti, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaco, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carli, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grasso, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciompi, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigillo, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argento, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferretti, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanzetti, R.M</au><au>Monaco, E</au><au>De Carli, A</au><au>Grasso, A</au><au>Ciompi, A</au><au>Sigillo, R</au><au>Argento, G</au><au>Ferretti, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>841</epage><pages>837-841</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare bone femoral tunnel enlargement in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) transtibial reconstruction using an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device and a fixed-loop length suspensory fixation device. Methods All patients treated for ACL reconstruction with an ipsilateral hamstring between March 2013 and March 2014 were evaluated. Subjects were assigned to Group A (TightRope™ (TR) femoral fixation) or Group B (EndoButton® (EB) femoral fixation). All patients were evaluated with the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee examination and KT1000 arthrometer. The subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee score, the Lysholm knee score, and the Tegner activity scale. CT examination was performed to evaluate femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. All patients were assessed at a 12 month follow-up visit. Power analysis was performed a priori in accordance with the femoral tunnel enlargement values from the CT scans. Differences with P -values of ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results The groups were homogenous at baseline with regard to age, gender, BMI, dominance and disease duration. At the final follow-up, no statistically significant differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found according to subjective and objective clinical outcome measures. According to the femoral tunnel enlargement, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups ( P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion In transtibial ACL reconstruction, the use of a fixed or adjustable-loop length device products, on the femoral side, led to similar clinical and radiological results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27338510</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2016-10, Vol.23 (5), p.837-841
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882466
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ACL
Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - instrumentation
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - methods
Clinical outcomes
Conflicts of interest
Female
Femoral tunnel
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Humans
Knee
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - surgery
Ligaments
Male
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
Orthopedics
Patients
Prospective Studies
Skin & tissue grafts
Standard deviation
Surgery
Surgical techniques
Suspensory fixation device
Tendons - transplantation
Tibia - surgery
Tomography
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tunnel widening
Young Adult
title Can an adjustable-loop length suspensory fixation device reduce femoral tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective computer tomography study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20an%20adjustable-loop%20length%20suspensory%20fixation%20device%20reduce%20femoral%20tunnel%20enlargement%20in%20anterior%20cruciate%20ligament%20reconstruction?%20A%20prospective%20computer%20tomography%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Lanzetti,%20R.M&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=841&rft.pages=837-841&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4193073431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1822780182&rft_id=info:pmid/27338510&rft_els_id=S0968016016000168&rfr_iscdi=true