Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study
Abstract Study objective Bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) is one of the most frequently performed pediatric outpatient procedures with 667,000 children receiving tympanostomy tubes annually. Because of this high volume, discovering the ideal analgesic regimen may lead to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-08, Vol.32, p.162-168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 168 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Journal of clinical anesthesia |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Phillips, Maxie L., BS Willis, Bryan C., BS Broman, Aaron J., MD Lam, Humphrey V., MD Nguyen, Thanh T., MD Austin, Thomas M., MD |
description | Abstract Study objective Bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) is one of the most frequently performed pediatric outpatient procedures with 667,000 children receiving tympanostomy tubes annually. Because of this high volume, discovering the ideal analgesic regimen may lead to decreased overall postanesthesia care unit (PACU) costs while increasing patient and parent satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any benefit in supplementing intranasal (IN) fentanyl with intramuscular (IM) ketorolac with regard to immediate recovery characteristics. Design Retrospective, cohort study. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients One thousand one hundred forty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 pediatric patients scheduled for BMT. Interventions No interventions were performed. Measurements A propensity matched cohort of pediatric patients who underwent BMT at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2014 was analyzed. The authors compared PACU recovery time, rescue analgesic administration, maximal PACU pain scores, and maximal PACU agitation scores between subgroups of patients given either IN fentanyl and IM ketorolac or IN fentanyl alone intraoperatively. Main results After adjusting for patient demographics and fentanyl dose, the fentanyl/ketorolac group received rescue analgesics 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-7.5%) less often, displayed moderate to severe pain 4.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-8.0%) less often, and experienced emergence agitation 3.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-5.8%) less often than patients in the fentanyl-only group. This corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 127%, 76%, and 200%, respectively. Conclusions Based on our retrospective analysis, adding IM ketorolac to IN fentanyl may be beneficial to pediatric patients undergoing BMT. However, these results should be confirmed with a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818016300083</els_id><sourcerecordid>1796687218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2c25fac67fab51e332d2e2d9d52133ffcde4718a976e16a1d4e71d4482e621e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotvCX6gsceGS4I9s7HBAQFU-pEocgLPltSdbL0kcbKdSfgl_l0m3BamXXmx55vFrz7xTFOeMVoyy5s2hOtjej2aEiuO5oqKiVDwpNkxJUdZb3j4tNrTd8lIxRU-K05QOlFJMsOfFCZe8pW2jNsWfj34IzvTEjKbfQ_KG3CTSwZjNuPTEj2QC502O3pLJZI-JRObRQdwHP-7JzvcmQ0SBYYkYCDkMC4o5kpdhMmNIt4E874BMvbEwoMJbYsgUwwRj8nkhg8n2Ghyx4TrETFKe3fKieNaZPsHLu_2s-Pnp8sfFl_Lq2-evFx-uSlurOpfc8m1nbCM7s9syEII7Dty1DusUouusg1oyZVrZAGsMczVIXGrFoeEMpDgrXh918T-_Z0hZDz5Z6HvsbJiTZopLpXhd88dR2TaNkpwpRF89QA9hjtjhW0rWvOa0Rao5UjaGlCJ0eop-MHHRjOrVZX3Q9y7r1WVNhUaX8eL5nfy8G8D9u3ZvKwLvjwBg6248RJ0sWmfRygg2axf842-8eyCxUt6a_hcskP7XoxPXVH9fZ20dNdYInDMlxF_eM9Q3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797424209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Phillips, Maxie L., BS ; Willis, Bryan C., BS ; Broman, Aaron J., MD ; Lam, Humphrey V., MD ; Nguyen, Thanh T., MD ; Austin, Thomas M., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Maxie L., BS ; Willis, Bryan C., BS ; Broman, Aaron J., MD ; Lam, Humphrey V., MD ; Nguyen, Thanh T., MD ; Austin, Thomas M., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study objective Bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) is one of the most frequently performed pediatric outpatient procedures with 667,000 children receiving tympanostomy tubes annually. Because of this high volume, discovering the ideal analgesic regimen may lead to decreased overall postanesthesia care unit (PACU) costs while increasing patient and parent satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any benefit in supplementing intranasal (IN) fentanyl with intramuscular (IM) ketorolac with regard to immediate recovery characteristics. Design Retrospective, cohort study. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients One thousand one hundred forty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 pediatric patients scheduled for BMT. Interventions No interventions were performed. Measurements A propensity matched cohort of pediatric patients who underwent BMT at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2014 was analyzed. The authors compared PACU recovery time, rescue analgesic administration, maximal PACU pain scores, and maximal PACU agitation scores between subgroups of patients given either IN fentanyl and IM ketorolac or IN fentanyl alone intraoperatively. Main results After adjusting for patient demographics and fentanyl dose, the fentanyl/ketorolac group received rescue analgesics 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-7.5%) less often, displayed moderate to severe pain 4.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-8.0%) less often, and experienced emergence agitation 3.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-5.8%) less often than patients in the fentanyl-only group. This corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 127%, 76%, and 200%, respectively. Conclusions Based on our retrospective analysis, adding IM ketorolac to IN fentanyl may be beneficial to pediatric patients undergoing BMT. However, these results should be confirmed with a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27290968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Agitation ; Analgesia ; Analgesia - methods ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia & Perioperative Care ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Delirium ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Fentanyl - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Infant ; Ketorolac - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Ear Ventilation ; Myringotomy ; Pain ; Pain Medicine ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Propensity Score ; Recovery ; Recovery (Medical) ; Rescue ; Response rates ; Retrospective Studies ; Software ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables ; Vomiting</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-08, Vol.32, p.162-168</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2c25fac67fab51e332d2e2d9d52133ffcde4718a976e16a1d4e71d4482e621e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2c25fac67fab51e332d2e2d9d52133ffcde4718a976e16a1d4e71d4482e621e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1797424209?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72341</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27290968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Maxie L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Bryan C., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broman, Aaron J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Humphrey V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Thomas M., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>Abstract Study objective Bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) is one of the most frequently performed pediatric outpatient procedures with 667,000 children receiving tympanostomy tubes annually. Because of this high volume, discovering the ideal analgesic regimen may lead to decreased overall postanesthesia care unit (PACU) costs while increasing patient and parent satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any benefit in supplementing intranasal (IN) fentanyl with intramuscular (IM) ketorolac with regard to immediate recovery characteristics. Design Retrospective, cohort study. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients One thousand one hundred forty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 pediatric patients scheduled for BMT. Interventions No interventions were performed. Measurements A propensity matched cohort of pediatric patients who underwent BMT at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2014 was analyzed. The authors compared PACU recovery time, rescue analgesic administration, maximal PACU pain scores, and maximal PACU agitation scores between subgroups of patients given either IN fentanyl and IM ketorolac or IN fentanyl alone intraoperatively. Main results After adjusting for patient demographics and fentanyl dose, the fentanyl/ketorolac group received rescue analgesics 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-7.5%) less often, displayed moderate to severe pain 4.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-8.0%) less often, and experienced emergence agitation 3.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-5.8%) less often than patients in the fentanyl-only group. This corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 127%, 76%, and 200%, respectively. Conclusions Based on our retrospective analysis, adding IM ketorolac to IN fentanyl may be beneficial to pediatric patients undergoing BMT. However, these results should be confirmed with a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Ketorolac - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Ear Ventilation</subject><subject>Myringotomy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Rescue</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Vomiting</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQhiMEotvCX6gsceGS4I9s7HBAQFU-pEocgLPltSdbL0kcbKdSfgl_l0m3BamXXmx55vFrz7xTFOeMVoyy5s2hOtjej2aEiuO5oqKiVDwpNkxJUdZb3j4tNrTd8lIxRU-K05QOlFJMsOfFCZe8pW2jNsWfj34IzvTEjKbfQ_KG3CTSwZjNuPTEj2QC502O3pLJZI-JRObRQdwHP-7JzvcmQ0SBYYkYCDkMC4o5kpdhMmNIt4E874BMvbEwoMJbYsgUwwRj8nkhg8n2Ghyx4TrETFKe3fKieNaZPsHLu_2s-Pnp8sfFl_Lq2-evFx-uSlurOpfc8m1nbCM7s9syEII7Dty1DusUouusg1oyZVrZAGsMczVIXGrFoeEMpDgrXh918T-_Z0hZDz5Z6HvsbJiTZopLpXhd88dR2TaNkpwpRF89QA9hjtjhW0rWvOa0Rao5UjaGlCJ0eop-MHHRjOrVZX3Q9y7r1WVNhUaX8eL5nfy8G8D9u3ZvKwLvjwBg6248RJ0sWmfRygg2axf842-8eyCxUt6a_hcskP7XoxPXVH9fZ20dNdYInDMlxF_eM9Q3</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Phillips, Maxie L., BS</creator><creator>Willis, Bryan C., BS</creator><creator>Broman, Aaron J., MD</creator><creator>Lam, Humphrey V., MD</creator><creator>Nguyen, Thanh T., MD</creator><creator>Austin, Thomas M., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study</title><author>Phillips, Maxie L., BS ; Willis, Bryan C., BS ; Broman, Aaron J., MD ; Lam, Humphrey V., MD ; Nguyen, Thanh T., MD ; Austin, Thomas M., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-2c25fac67fab51e332d2e2d9d52133ffcde4718a976e16a1d4e71d4482e621e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia & Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Ketorolac - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Ear Ventilation</topic><topic>Myringotomy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Rescue</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Vomiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Maxie L., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Bryan C., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broman, Aaron J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Humphrey V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Thomas M., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Maxie L., BS</au><au>Willis, Bryan C., BS</au><au>Broman, Aaron J., MD</au><au>Lam, Humphrey V., MD</au><au>Nguyen, Thanh T., MD</au><au>Austin, Thomas M., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><spage>162</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>162-168</pages><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study objective Bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) is one of the most frequently performed pediatric outpatient procedures with 667,000 children receiving tympanostomy tubes annually. Because of this high volume, discovering the ideal analgesic regimen may lead to decreased overall postanesthesia care unit (PACU) costs while increasing patient and parent satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is any benefit in supplementing intranasal (IN) fentanyl with intramuscular (IM) ketorolac with regard to immediate recovery characteristics. Design Retrospective, cohort study. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients One thousand one hundred forty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 pediatric patients scheduled for BMT. Interventions No interventions were performed. Measurements A propensity matched cohort of pediatric patients who underwent BMT at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2014 was analyzed. The authors compared PACU recovery time, rescue analgesic administration, maximal PACU pain scores, and maximal PACU agitation scores between subgroups of patients given either IN fentanyl and IM ketorolac or IN fentanyl alone intraoperatively. Main results After adjusting for patient demographics and fentanyl dose, the fentanyl/ketorolac group received rescue analgesics 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0%-7.5%) less often, displayed moderate to severe pain 4.7% (95% CI, 1.5%-8.0%) less often, and experienced emergence agitation 3.6% (95% CI, 1.5%-5.8%) less often than patients in the fentanyl-only group. This corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 127%, 76%, and 200%, respectively. Conclusions Based on our retrospective analysis, adding IM ketorolac to IN fentanyl may be beneficial to pediatric patients undergoing BMT. However, these results should be confirmed with a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27290968</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2016-08, Vol.32, p.162-168 |
issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1827882442 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Age Agitation Analgesia Analgesia - methods Analgesics Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Anesthesia Anesthesia & Perioperative Care Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use Child, Preschool Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Delirium Drug Therapy, Combination Female Fentanyl - therapeutic use Humans Infant Ketorolac - therapeutic use Male Middle Ear Ventilation Myringotomy Pain Pain Medicine Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Patients Pediatrics Propensity Score Recovery Recovery (Medical) Rescue Response rates Retrospective Studies Software Treatment Outcome Variables Vomiting |
title | Bimodal analgesia vs fentanyl in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube placement: a propensity matched cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bimodal%20analgesia%20vs%20fentanyl%20in%20pediatric%20patients%20undergoing%20bilateral%20myringotomy%20and%20tympanostomy%20tube%20placement:%20a%20propensity%20matched%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Phillips,%20Maxie%20L.,%20BS&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=162-168&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1796687218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797424209&rft_id=info:pmid/27290968&rft_els_id=S0952818016300083&rfr_iscdi=true |