Risk factors for back pain among male farmers: Analysis of Iowa Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Study

Background Back pain causes considerable morbidity, disability, and economic loss among workers. Farmers handle heavy objects, often in awkward postures. However, the prevalence of back pain among farmers and the risk factors associated with back pain are not well known. Methods In this study, we as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of industrial medicine 2001-12, Vol.40 (6), p.646-654
Hauptverfasser: Park, Hyesook, Sprince, Nancy L., Whitten, Paul S., Burmeister, Leon F., Zwerling, Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Back pain causes considerable morbidity, disability, and economic loss among workers. Farmers handle heavy objects, often in awkward postures. However, the prevalence of back pain among farmers and the risk factors associated with back pain are not well known. Methods In this study, we assess the frequency of risk factors for back pain among 287 Iowa male farmers. From 1992 to 1994, using a mail questionnaire, we collected data on potential risk factors for back pain. Eighteen months later, we surveyed occurrence of back pain as the outcome measure. Results Thirty‐one percent of farmers reported having daily back pain for a week or more during the past 12 months compared to 18.5% in the general working population. Using a multiple logistic regression model, we found two factors associated with back pain: 45–59 years of age (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.02–4.43) and having a non‐agricultural job as the major occupation (OR = 2.02, 95% CI 0.98–4.17, P = 0.055). Conclusions Farmers had a significantly higher prevalence of back pain than the general working population. Middle‐aged farmers and those with additional non‐agricultural jobs had the highest risk for back pain. Am. J. Ind. Med. 40:646–654, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc
ISSN:0271-3586
1097-0274
DOI:10.1002/ajim.10025