Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose
Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical microbiology and infection 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 890.e7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 890.e1 |
container_title | Clinical microbiology and infection |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Chuang, Y.-C. Lin, H.-Y. Chen, P.-Y. Lin, C.-Y. Wang, J.-T. Chang, S.-C. |
description | Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826737842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1198743X16302427</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826737842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhidGY2v1B7gxLN3MyNflMLoybf1ImnSjiTvCwCFyMzNcgXuTdtO_Lje36s4VB3ifl_B03WtGB0aZercd3BIH3saBwkCZftKdM6nGnqqRPW0zG3UPUvw4616UsqWUciHk8-6Mg4QNCH3ePVzZXU3LnYsrOWAu-0LmuOJ9mqMnIWVSfyKpGW1dcK0kBXKwqzsBfcYSS7XtvN1hTi45Z2cyWdd2Fpdo35O47ObobI1pLUfc_3vPp4Ivu2fBzgVfPa4X3fdP198uv_Q3t5-_Xn686Z0YVe21UgDcgaYAYJ0WMG6YkuhD8BYZTsqD1H4KGwGKTXycAh0lciVDQziIi-7tqXeX0689lmqWWBzOs10x7YthmisQoCVvUXaKupxKyRjMLsfF5jvDqDl6N1vTvJujd0PBNO-NefNYv58W9H-JP6Jb4MMpgO2Th4jZFBdxdehjRleNT_E_9b8B_m6WeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826737842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1198-743X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27475738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Bacteraemia ; Bacteremia - drug therapy ; Cohort Studies ; Daptomycin ; Daptomycin - administration & dosage ; Daptomycin - therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification ; Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification ; Female ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Humans ; Linezolid ; Linezolid - administration & dosage ; Linezolid - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci ; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification]]></subject><ispartof>Clinical microbiology and infection, 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, C.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><title>Clinical microbiology and infection</title><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><description>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteraemia</subject><subject>Bacteremia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Daptomycin</subject><subject>Daptomycin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Daptomycin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linezolid</subject><subject>Linezolid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Linezolid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vancomycin-resistant enterococci</subject><subject>Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification</subject><issn>1198-743X</issn><issn>1469-0691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhidGY2v1B7gxLN3MyNflMLoybf1ImnSjiTvCwCFyMzNcgXuTdtO_Lje36s4VB3ifl_B03WtGB0aZercd3BIH3saBwkCZftKdM6nGnqqRPW0zG3UPUvw4616UsqWUciHk8-6Mg4QNCH3ePVzZXU3LnYsrOWAu-0LmuOJ9mqMnIWVSfyKpGW1dcK0kBXKwqzsBfcYSS7XtvN1hTi45Z2cyWdd2Fpdo35O47ObobI1pLUfc_3vPp4Ivu2fBzgVfPa4X3fdP198uv_Q3t5-_Xn686Z0YVe21UgDcgaYAYJ0WMG6YkuhD8BYZTsqD1H4KGwGKTXycAh0lciVDQziIi-7tqXeX0689lmqWWBzOs10x7YthmisQoCVvUXaKupxKyRjMLsfF5jvDqDl6N1vTvJujd0PBNO-NefNYv58W9H-JP6Jb4MMpgO2Th4jZFBdxdehjRleNT_E_9b8B_m6WeA</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Chuang, Y.-C.</creator><creator>Lin, H.-Y.</creator><creator>Chen, P.-Y.</creator><creator>Lin, C.-Y.</creator><creator>Wang, J.-T.</creator><creator>Chang, S.-C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><author>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteraemia</topic><topic>Bacteremia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Daptomycin</topic><topic>Daptomycin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Daptomycin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linezolid</topic><topic>Linezolid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Linezolid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vancomycin-resistant enterococci</topic><topic>Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, C.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuang, Y.-C.</au><au>Lin, H.-Y.</au><au>Chen, P.-Y.</au><au>Lin, C.-Y.</au><au>Wang, J.-T.</au><au>Chang, S.-C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</atitle><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>890.e1</spage><epage>890.e7</epage><pages>890.e1-890.e7</pages><issn>1198-743X</issn><eissn>1469-0691</eissn><abstract>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27475738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1198-743X |
ispartof | Clinical microbiology and infection, 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7 |
issn | 1198-743X 1469-0691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826737842 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Bacteraemia Bacteremia - drug therapy Cohort Studies Daptomycin Daptomycin - administration & dosage Daptomycin - therapeutic use Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification Female Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy Humans Linezolid Linezolid - administration & dosage Linezolid - therapeutic use Male Middle Aged Outcome Prospective Studies Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Vancomycin-resistant enterococci Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification |
title | Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Daptomycin%20versus%20linezolid%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20vancomycin-resistant%20enterococcal%20bacteraemia:%20implications%20of%20daptomycin%20dose&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20microbiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Chuang,%20Y.-C.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=890.e1&rft.epage=890.e7&rft.pages=890.e1-890.e7&rft.issn=1198-743X&rft.eissn=1469-0691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826737842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826737842&rft_id=info:pmid/27475738&rft_els_id=S1198743X16302427&rfr_iscdi=true |