Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose

Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical microbiology and infection 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7
Hauptverfasser: Chuang, Y.-C., Lin, H.-Y., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, C.-Y., Wang, J.-T., Chang, S.-C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 890.e7
container_issue 10
container_start_page 890.e1
container_title Clinical microbiology and infection
container_volume 22
creator Chuang, Y.-C.
Lin, H.-Y.
Chen, P.-Y.
Lin, C.-Y.
Wang, J.-T.
Chang, S.-C.
description Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826737842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1198743X16302427</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826737842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhidGY2v1B7gxLN3MyNflMLoybf1ImnSjiTvCwCFyMzNcgXuTdtO_Lje36s4VB3ifl_B03WtGB0aZercd3BIH3saBwkCZftKdM6nGnqqRPW0zG3UPUvw4616UsqWUciHk8-6Mg4QNCH3ePVzZXU3LnYsrOWAu-0LmuOJ9mqMnIWVSfyKpGW1dcK0kBXKwqzsBfcYSS7XtvN1hTi45Z2cyWdd2Fpdo35O47ObobI1pLUfc_3vPp4Ivu2fBzgVfPa4X3fdP198uv_Q3t5-_Xn686Z0YVe21UgDcgaYAYJ0WMG6YkuhD8BYZTsqD1H4KGwGKTXycAh0lciVDQziIi-7tqXeX0689lmqWWBzOs10x7YthmisQoCVvUXaKupxKyRjMLsfF5jvDqDl6N1vTvJujd0PBNO-NefNYv58W9H-JP6Jb4MMpgO2Th4jZFBdxdehjRleNT_E_9b8B_m6WeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826737842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1198-743X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27475738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Bacteraemia ; Bacteremia - drug therapy ; Cohort Studies ; Daptomycin ; Daptomycin - administration & dosage ; Daptomycin - therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification ; Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification ; Female ; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Humans ; Linezolid ; Linezolid - administration & dosage ; Linezolid - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci ; Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification]]></subject><ispartof>Clinical microbiology and infection, 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27475738$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, C.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><title>Clinical microbiology and infection</title><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><description>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bacteraemia</subject><subject>Bacteremia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Daptomycin</subject><subject>Daptomycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Daptomycin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Enterococcus faecium - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linezolid</subject><subject>Linezolid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Linezolid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vancomycin-resistant enterococci</subject><subject>Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation &amp; purification</subject><issn>1198-743X</issn><issn>1469-0691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vFSEUhidGY2v1B7gxLN3MyNflMLoybf1ImnSjiTvCwCFyMzNcgXuTdtO_Lje36s4VB3ifl_B03WtGB0aZercd3BIH3saBwkCZftKdM6nGnqqRPW0zG3UPUvw4616UsqWUciHk8-6Mg4QNCH3ePVzZXU3LnYsrOWAu-0LmuOJ9mqMnIWVSfyKpGW1dcK0kBXKwqzsBfcYSS7XtvN1hTi45Z2cyWdd2Fpdo35O47ObobI1pLUfc_3vPp4Ivu2fBzgVfPa4X3fdP198uv_Q3t5-_Xn686Z0YVe21UgDcgaYAYJ0WMG6YkuhD8BYZTsqD1H4KGwGKTXycAh0lciVDQziIi-7tqXeX0689lmqWWBzOs10x7YthmisQoCVvUXaKupxKyRjMLsfF5jvDqDl6N1vTvJujd0PBNO-NefNYv58W9H-JP6Jb4MMpgO2Th4jZFBdxdehjRleNT_E_9b8B_m6WeA</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Chuang, Y.-C.</creator><creator>Lin, H.-Y.</creator><creator>Chen, P.-Y.</creator><creator>Lin, C.-Y.</creator><creator>Wang, J.-T.</creator><creator>Chang, S.-C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</title><author>Chuang, Y.-C. ; Lin, H.-Y. ; Chen, P.-Y. ; Lin, C.-Y. ; Wang, J.-T. ; Chang, S.-C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-866772c780777ac83795164edffdae1eb6d748dbf53761b29bf094e264f807273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bacteraemia</topic><topic>Bacteremia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Daptomycin</topic><topic>Daptomycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Daptomycin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecalis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Enterococcus faecium - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linezolid</topic><topic>Linezolid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Linezolid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vancomycin-resistant enterococci</topic><topic>Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation &amp; purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chuang, Y.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, H.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, P.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, C.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, J.-T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, S.-C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chuang, Y.-C.</au><au>Lin, H.-Y.</au><au>Chen, P.-Y.</au><au>Lin, C.-Y.</au><au>Wang, J.-T.</au><au>Chang, S.-C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose</atitle><jtitle>Clinical microbiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Microbiol Infect</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>890.e1</spage><epage>890.e7</epage><pages>890.e1-890.e7</pages><issn>1198-743X</issn><eissn>1469-0691</eissn><abstract>Treatment options for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) bloodstream infection are limited. Studies comparing daptomycin or linezolid in treating VRE bloodstream infection have conflicting results and suggest daptomycin underdosing. The responses to different daptomycin doses have not been studied. We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study to compare linezolid and daptomycin (≥6 mg/kg) for the treatment of VRE bloodstream infection. The primary outcome was 14-day mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis for outcome analysis and a generalized additive model for dose-dependent response estimation. Two hundred twelve patients were included (daptomycin, n = 141; linezolid, n = 71). All-cause 14-day mortality was higher in the daptomycin group (36.9% vs. 21.1%; p 0.03). After adjusting for confounders in logistic regression, mortality was lower in the linezolid group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–0.96; p 0.04). The generalized additive model showed that higher-dose daptomycin (≥9 mg/kg) was associated with better survival than lower-dose daptomycin (6–9 mg/kg). Logistic regression showed that linezolid (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17–0.79; p 0.01) and higher-dose daptomycin (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.09–0.74; p 0.01) independently predicted lower mortality compared to lower-dose daptomycin. Linezolid was not superior to higher-dose daptomycin in terms of mortality (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.45–4.37; p 0.57). Higher-dose daptomycin had lower mortality than lower-dose daptomycin. Despite higher mortality for lower-dose daptomycin than linezolid, linezolid conferred no survival benefit compared to higher-dose daptomycin. Our findings suggest that the recommended daptomycin dose is suboptimal for treating VRE bacteraemia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27475738</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1198-743X
ispartof Clinical microbiology and infection, 2016-10, Vol.22 (10), p.890.e1-890.e7
issn 1198-743X
1469-0691
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826737842
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Bacteraemia
Bacteremia - drug therapy
Cohort Studies
Daptomycin
Daptomycin - administration & dosage
Daptomycin - therapeutic use
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Enterococcus faecalis - isolation & purification
Enterococcus faecium - isolation & purification
Female
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Humans
Linezolid
Linezolid - administration & dosage
Linezolid - therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome
Prospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci
Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci - isolation & purification
title Daptomycin versus linezolid for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteraemia: implications of daptomycin dose
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Daptomycin%20versus%20linezolid%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20vancomycin-resistant%20enterococcal%20bacteraemia:%20implications%20of%20daptomycin%20dose&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20microbiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=Chuang,%20Y.-C.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=890.e1&rft.epage=890.e7&rft.pages=890.e1-890.e7&rft.issn=1198-743X&rft.eissn=1469-0691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.07.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826737842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826737842&rft_id=info:pmid/27475738&rft_els_id=S1198743X16302427&rfr_iscdi=true