Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study
Aim To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) on fracture resistance of roots treated with different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Methodology One hundred and twenty intact single‐rooted premolar teeth were sectioned below the cementum–enamel junction to standardize t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International endodontic journal 2017-08, Vol.50 (8), p.799-804 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 804 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 799 |
container_title | International endodontic journal |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Turk, T. Kaval, M. E. Sarikanat, M. Hülsmann, M. |
description | Aim
To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) on fracture resistance of roots treated with different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
Methodology
One hundred and twenty intact single‐rooted premolar teeth were sectioned below the cementum–enamel junction to standardize the length of the teeth to 12 mm. The canals of one hundred specimens were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments up to size F4 and were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the final irrigating solutions: Group 1: distilled water (DW); Group 2: 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 3: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 4: 5% EDTA, 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX; Group 5: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX. Root canals were filled with gutta‐percha and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealer using a single‐cone technique. Twenty teeth served as negative controls and were not instrumented nor root filled (Group 6). All specimens were embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin and loaded vertically at 0.5 mm min−1 until fracture occurred. The data were evaluated statistically using one‐way anova test followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparison test (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iej.12680 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826735690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826735690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-32764097407916db71dfcbbabab9dbfd25f2141fab2da91b2311016cdc648de13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4ALIS1ikeJzESdghVP5UiQ2sI8ceg1GaFNsBehvOwslwKbBjZjF60veeRo-QQ2BTiHNq8XkKXJRsi4whFXnC8wq2yZhBlia8LPMR2fP-mTGWsxR2yYgXmcgKSMdEz4xBFWhvqLGdbKl1zj7KYPuOLl2vUA8OPY3KOKlCFDRq64PsFK5dru9DtLYtahoQw9MZlR3F98-PV_vaUx8GvdonO0a2Hg9-7oQ8XM7uL66T-d3VzcX5PFE8YyxJeSEyVhUZKyoQuilAG9U0Mm6lG6N5bjhkYGTDtayg4SkAA6G0ElmpEdIJOd7kxs9fBvShXlivsG1lh_3gayi5KNJcVCyiJxtUud57h6ZeOruQblUDq9el1rHU-rvUyB79xA7NAvUf-dtiBE43wJttcfV_Un0zu91EfgERwoJm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826735690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Turk, T. ; Kaval, M. E. ; Sarikanat, M. ; Hülsmann, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turk, T. ; Kaval, M. E. ; Sarikanat, M. ; Hülsmann, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) on fracture resistance of roots treated with different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
Methodology
One hundred and twenty intact single‐rooted premolar teeth were sectioned below the cementum–enamel junction to standardize the length of the teeth to 12 mm. The canals of one hundred specimens were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments up to size F4 and were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the final irrigating solutions: Group 1: distilled water (DW); Group 2: 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 3: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 4: 5% EDTA, 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX; Group 5: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX. Root canals were filled with gutta‐percha and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealer using a single‐cone technique. Twenty teeth served as negative controls and were not instrumented nor root filled (Group 6). All specimens were embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin and loaded vertically at 0.5 mm min−1 until fracture occurred. The data were evaluated statistically using one‐way anova test followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparison test (P < 0.05).
Results
Group 1 (only DW) had the lowest vertical fracture strength, followed by Group 3 (17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; P < 0.05). Group 6 (negative control group) had the highest fracture resistance. Final irrigation with CHX following irrigation with 17% EDTA or 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl (groups 4 and 5) significantly increased the fracture resistance of roots (P < 0.05). However, the difference between Group 4 and Group 5 was not significant (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Intracanal CHX rinse of EDTA/NaOCl‐treated root dentine enhanced the fracture resistance of roots filled with AH Plus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iej.12680</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27464713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; chlorhexidine ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Edetic Acid - administration & dosage ; Edetic Acid - pharmacology ; EDTA ; fracture resistance ; Humans ; irrigation ; resin sealer ; Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage ; Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology ; Tooth Fractures - physiopathology ; Tooth Root - drug effects ; Tooth Root - injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2017-08, Vol.50 (8), p.799-804</ispartof><rights>2016 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-32764097407916db71dfcbbabab9dbfd25f2141fab2da91b2311016cdc648de13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-32764097407916db71dfcbbabab9dbfd25f2141fab2da91b2311016cdc648de13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiej.12680$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiej.12680$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27464713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaval, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarikanat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsmann, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim
To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) on fracture resistance of roots treated with different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
Methodology
One hundred and twenty intact single‐rooted premolar teeth were sectioned below the cementum–enamel junction to standardize the length of the teeth to 12 mm. The canals of one hundred specimens were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments up to size F4 and were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the final irrigating solutions: Group 1: distilled water (DW); Group 2: 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 3: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 4: 5% EDTA, 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX; Group 5: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX. Root canals were filled with gutta‐percha and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealer using a single‐cone technique. Twenty teeth served as negative controls and were not instrumented nor root filled (Group 6). All specimens were embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin and loaded vertically at 0.5 mm min−1 until fracture occurred. The data were evaluated statistically using one‐way anova test followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparison test (P < 0.05).
Results
Group 1 (only DW) had the lowest vertical fracture strength, followed by Group 3 (17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; P < 0.05). Group 6 (negative control group) had the highest fracture resistance. Final irrigation with CHX following irrigation with 17% EDTA or 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl (groups 4 and 5) significantly increased the fracture resistance of roots (P < 0.05). However, the difference between Group 4 and Group 5 was not significant (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Intracanal CHX rinse of EDTA/NaOCl‐treated root dentine enhanced the fracture resistance of roots filled with AH Plus.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>chlorhexidine</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>EDTA</subject><subject>fracture resistance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>irrigation</subject><subject>resin sealer</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tooth Root - drug effects</subject><subject>Tooth Root - injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EoqWw4ALIS1ikeJzESdghVP5UiQ2sI8ceg1GaFNsBehvOwslwKbBjZjF60veeRo-QQ2BTiHNq8XkKXJRsi4whFXnC8wq2yZhBlia8LPMR2fP-mTGWsxR2yYgXmcgKSMdEz4xBFWhvqLGdbKl1zj7KYPuOLl2vUA8OPY3KOKlCFDRq64PsFK5dru9DtLYtahoQw9MZlR3F98-PV_vaUx8GvdonO0a2Hg9-7oQ8XM7uL66T-d3VzcX5PFE8YyxJeSEyVhUZKyoQuilAG9U0Mm6lG6N5bjhkYGTDtayg4SkAA6G0ElmpEdIJOd7kxs9fBvShXlivsG1lh_3gayi5KNJcVCyiJxtUud57h6ZeOruQblUDq9el1rHU-rvUyB79xA7NAvUf-dtiBE43wJttcfV_Un0zu91EfgERwoJm</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Turk, T.</creator><creator>Kaval, M. E.</creator><creator>Sarikanat, M.</creator><creator>Hülsmann, M.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study</title><author>Turk, T. ; Kaval, M. E. ; Sarikanat, M. ; Hülsmann, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2400-32764097407916db71dfcbbabab9dbfd25f2141fab2da91b2311016cdc648de13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>chlorhexidine</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>EDTA</topic><topic>fracture resistance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>irrigation</topic><topic>resin sealer</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tooth Root - drug effects</topic><topic>Tooth Root - injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turk, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaval, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarikanat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hülsmann, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turk, T.</au><au>Kaval, M. E.</au><au>Sarikanat, M.</au><au>Hülsmann, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>799</spage><epage>804</epage><pages>799-804</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim
To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) on fracture resistance of roots treated with different concentrations of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).
Methodology
One hundred and twenty intact single‐rooted premolar teeth were sectioned below the cementum–enamel junction to standardize the length of the teeth to 12 mm. The canals of one hundred specimens were instrumented with ProTaper Universal rotary instruments up to size F4 and were randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the final irrigating solutions: Group 1: distilled water (DW); Group 2: 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 3: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; Group 4: 5% EDTA, 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX; Group 5: 17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl, DW and 2% CHX. Root canals were filled with gutta‐percha and epoxy resin‐based root canal sealer using a single‐cone technique. Twenty teeth served as negative controls and were not instrumented nor root filled (Group 6). All specimens were embedded in self‐curing acrylic resin and loaded vertically at 0.5 mm min−1 until fracture occurred. The data were evaluated statistically using one‐way anova test followed by Holm–Sidak's multiple comparison test (P < 0.05).
Results
Group 1 (only DW) had the lowest vertical fracture strength, followed by Group 3 (17% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl; P < 0.05). Group 6 (negative control group) had the highest fracture resistance. Final irrigation with CHX following irrigation with 17% EDTA or 5% EDTA and 2.5% NaOCl (groups 4 and 5) significantly increased the fracture resistance of roots (P < 0.05). However, the difference between Group 4 and Group 5 was not significant (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Intracanal CHX rinse of EDTA/NaOCl‐treated root dentine enhanced the fracture resistance of roots filled with AH Plus.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>27464713</pmid><doi>10.1111/iej.12680</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2017-08, Vol.50 (8), p.799-804 |
issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826735690 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent chlorhexidine Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Edetic Acid - administration & dosage Edetic Acid - pharmacology EDTA fracture resistance Humans irrigation resin sealer Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology Tooth Fractures - physiopathology Tooth Root - drug effects Tooth Root - injuries Young Adult |
title | Effect of final irrigation procedures on fracture resistance of root filled teeth: an ex vivo study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A33%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20final%20irrigation%20procedures%20on%20fracture%20resistance%20of%20root%20filled%20teeth:%20an%20ex%C2%A0vivo%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Turk,%20T.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=799&rft.epage=804&rft.pages=799-804&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iej.12680&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826735690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826735690&rft_id=info:pmid/27464713&rfr_iscdi=true |