A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors

BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140
Hauptverfasser: Petersen, Christian Leth, Görges, Matthias, Massey, Roslyn, Dumont, Guy Albert, Ansermino, J Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1140
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1136
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 123
creator Petersen, Christian Leth
Görges, Matthias
Massey, Roslyn
Dumont, Guy Albert
Ansermino, J Mark
description BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients. METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components. RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826734690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826734690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr6D0T66EvXJk1zeVykXmC9oT6HbJrYatqsSevivzfLriI-ODAMDN85MxwAjmE2hQjmZ7Pbcpr9KlhkZAeMYYFISgvOdsE4bvMUcc5H4CCE1zWUMbIPRohigjnlY_AwS-69U7oavLRJabXqvdOd0staWvfiZZs8Nu1gZe98YmKXH9IOsm9clziTzDod-lqHRiY3rmsiFA7BnpE26KPtnIDni_Lp_Cqd311en8_mqcoLQlJZGCThAhLJWQ6xoZQsCsRyWhWMKqokVbhijFYcKYiZNooxVOUm4xIyg1U-Aacb36V370N8Q7RNUNpa2Wk3BAEZIjTHhGcRxRtUeReC10YsfdNK_ylgJtZhihim-BtmlJ1sLwyLVlc_ou_0IsA2wMrZXvvwZoeV9qLW0vb1_95fyu6AfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826734690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><source>Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients. METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components. RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27464979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Anesthesia - methods ; Anesthesia - standards ; Consciousness Monitors - standards ; Electroencephalography - instrumentation ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Electroencephalography - standards ; Humans ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140</ispartof><rights>2016 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27464979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görges, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Roslyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Guy Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients. METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components. RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</description><subject>Anesthesia - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia - standards</subject><subject>Consciousness Monitors - standards</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr6D0T66EvXJk1zeVykXmC9oT6HbJrYatqsSevivzfLriI-ODAMDN85MxwAjmE2hQjmZ7Pbcpr9KlhkZAeMYYFISgvOdsE4bvMUcc5H4CCE1zWUMbIPRohigjnlY_AwS-69U7oavLRJabXqvdOd0staWvfiZZs8Nu1gZe98YmKXH9IOsm9clziTzDod-lqHRiY3rmsiFA7BnpE26KPtnIDni_Lp_Cqd311en8_mqcoLQlJZGCThAhLJWQ6xoZQsCsRyWhWMKqokVbhijFYcKYiZNooxVOUm4xIyg1U-Aacb36V370N8Q7RNUNpa2Wk3BAEZIjTHhGcRxRtUeReC10YsfdNK_ylgJtZhihim-BtmlJ1sLwyLVlc_ou_0IsA2wMrZXvvwZoeV9qLW0vb1_95fyu6AfA</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Petersen, Christian Leth</creator><creator>Görges, Matthias</creator><creator>Massey, Roslyn</creator><creator>Dumont, Guy Albert</creator><creator>Ansermino, J Mark</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><author>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia - standards</topic><topic>Consciousness Monitors - standards</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görges, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Roslyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Guy Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Christian Leth</au><au>Görges, Matthias</au><au>Massey, Roslyn</au><au>Dumont, Guy Albert</au><au>Ansermino, J Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1136</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1136-1140</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients. METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components. RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>27464979</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826734690
source Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive; MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Anesthesia - methods
Anesthesia - standards
Consciousness Monitors - standards
Electroencephalography - instrumentation
Electroencephalography - methods
Electroencephalography - standards
Humans
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards
title A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Procedural%20Electroencephalogram%20Simulator%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Anesthesia%20Monitors&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Petersen,%20Christian%20Leth&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1136&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1136-1140&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826734690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826734690&rft_id=info:pmid/27464979&rfr_iscdi=true