A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors
BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia and analgesia 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1136 |
container_title | Anesthesia and analgesia |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Petersen, Christian Leth Görges, Matthias Massey, Roslyn Dumont, Guy Albert Ansermino, J Mark |
description | BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients.
METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components.
RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826734690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826734690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr6D0T66EvXJk1zeVykXmC9oT6HbJrYatqsSevivzfLriI-ODAMDN85MxwAjmE2hQjmZ7Pbcpr9KlhkZAeMYYFISgvOdsE4bvMUcc5H4CCE1zWUMbIPRohigjnlY_AwS-69U7oavLRJabXqvdOd0staWvfiZZs8Nu1gZe98YmKXH9IOsm9clziTzDod-lqHRiY3rmsiFA7BnpE26KPtnIDni_Lp_Cqd311en8_mqcoLQlJZGCThAhLJWQ6xoZQsCsRyWhWMKqokVbhijFYcKYiZNooxVOUm4xIyg1U-Aacb36V370N8Q7RNUNpa2Wk3BAEZIjTHhGcRxRtUeReC10YsfdNK_ylgJtZhihim-BtmlJ1sLwyLVlc_ou_0IsA2wMrZXvvwZoeV9qLW0vb1_95fyu6AfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826734690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><source>Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients.
METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components.
RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27464979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Anesthesia - methods ; Anesthesia - standards ; Consciousness Monitors - standards ; Electroencephalography - instrumentation ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Electroencephalography - standards ; Humans ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140</ispartof><rights>2016 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27464979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görges, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Roslyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Guy Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients.
METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components.
RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</description><subject>Anesthesia - methods</subject><subject>Anesthesia - standards</subject><subject>Consciousness Monitors - standards</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLxDAQhYMo7rr6D0T66EvXJk1zeVykXmC9oT6HbJrYatqsSevivzfLriI-ODAMDN85MxwAjmE2hQjmZ7Pbcpr9KlhkZAeMYYFISgvOdsE4bvMUcc5H4CCE1zWUMbIPRohigjnlY_AwS-69U7oavLRJabXqvdOd0staWvfiZZs8Nu1gZe98YmKXH9IOsm9clziTzDod-lqHRiY3rmsiFA7BnpE26KPtnIDni_Lp_Cqd311en8_mqcoLQlJZGCThAhLJWQ6xoZQsCsRyWhWMKqokVbhijFYcKYiZNooxVOUm4xIyg1U-Aacb36V370N8Q7RNUNpa2Wk3BAEZIjTHhGcRxRtUeReC10YsfdNK_ylgJtZhihim-BtmlJ1sLwyLVlc_ou_0IsA2wMrZXvvwZoeV9qLW0vb1_95fyu6AfA</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Petersen, Christian Leth</creator><creator>Görges, Matthias</creator><creator>Massey, Roslyn</creator><creator>Dumont, Guy Albert</creator><creator>Ansermino, J Mark</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</title><author>Petersen, Christian Leth ; Görges, Matthias ; Massey, Roslyn ; Dumont, Guy Albert ; Ansermino, J Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3566-a5f2a1b16a98314f776b52837d587c7ca7c4d887d92c148efc882d3f09a18f4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia - methods</topic><topic>Anesthesia - standards</topic><topic>Consciousness Monitors - standards</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petersen, Christian Leth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görges, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Roslyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Guy Albert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ansermino, J Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petersen, Christian Leth</au><au>Görges, Matthias</au><au>Massey, Roslyn</au><au>Dumont, Guy Albert</au><au>Ansermino, J Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1136</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1136-1140</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Recent research and advances in the automation of anesthesia are driving the need to better understand electroencephalogram (EEG)–based anesthesia end points and to test the performance of anesthesia monitors. This effort is currently limited by the need to collect raw EEG data directly from patients.
METHODS:A procedural method to synthesize EEG signals was implemented in a mobile software application. The application is capable of sending the simulated signal to an anesthesia depth of hypnosis monitor. Systematic sweeps of the simulator generate functional monitor response profiles reminiscent of how network analyzers are used to test electronic components.
RESULTS:Three commercial anesthesia monitors (Entropy, NeuroSENSE, and BIS) were compared with this new technology, and significant response and feature variations between the monitor models were observed; this includes reproducible, nonmonotonic apparent multistate behavior and significant hysteresis at light levels of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS:Anesthesia monitor response to a procedural simulator can reveal significant differences in internal signal processing algorithms. The ability to synthesize EEG signals at different anesthetic depths potentially provides a new method for systematically testing EEG-based monitors and automated anesthesia systems with all sensor hardware fully operational before human trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>27464979</pmid><doi>10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2999 |
ispartof | Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016-11, Vol.123 (5), p.1136-1140 |
issn | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826734690 |
source | Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive; MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Anesthesia - methods Anesthesia - standards Consciousness Monitors - standards Electroencephalography - instrumentation Electroencephalography - methods Electroencephalography - standards Humans Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods Monitoring, Intraoperative - standards |
title | A Procedural Electroencephalogram Simulator for Evaluation of Anesthesia Monitors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A19%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Procedural%20Electroencephalogram%20Simulator%20for%20Evaluation%20of%20Anesthesia%20Monitors&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Petersen,%20Christian%20Leth&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1136&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1136-1140&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001506&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826734690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826734690&rft_id=info:pmid/27464979&rfr_iscdi=true |