Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis

ABSTRACTCognitive remediation (CR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for impaired cognition in psychosis. However, little is known about adherence rates and factors predicting adherence to CR, particularly in clinical settings where high-level therapist support is unavailable. This study aimed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of nervous and mental disease 2016-10, Vol.204 (10), p.741-745
Hauptverfasser: Dillon, Rachael, Hargreaves, April, Anderson-Schmidt, Heike, Castorina, Marco, Corvin, Aiden, Fitzmaurice, Brian, Robertson, Ian, Donohoe, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 745
container_issue 10
container_start_page 741
container_title The journal of nervous and mental disease
container_volume 204
creator Dillon, Rachael
Hargreaves, April
Anderson-Schmidt, Heike
Castorina, Marco
Corvin, Aiden
Fitzmaurice, Brian
Robertson, Ian
Donohoe, Gary
description ABSTRACTCognitive remediation (CR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for impaired cognition in psychosis. However, little is known about adherence rates and factors predicting adherence to CR, particularly in clinical settings where high-level therapist support is unavailable. This study aimed to establish adherence rates and examine variables predicting adherence to a computerized CR program for psychosis (with minimal support). Patients with psychosis (n = 61) participated in an 8-week CR program. Results showed 46% completed a meaningful amount of CR training. The fully adherent (>80% of the prescribed amount) and nonadherent groups differed where adherent participants had poorer working-memory and higher negative symptom scores. These findings suggest that approximately half of the sample were adherent to treatment despite minimal therapist support. Furthermore, higher cognitive deficits and negative symptoms did not impede adherence, and may have contributed to patients’ motivation to complete the program.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000557
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826717139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826717139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-4b883da7b8adbe3b9fe7f0332a13bade49de3a1086ae89af440024d39ef16b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EglL4BwhZYmEJ2Dk3dkZUPqVCK-jAFjnJpTUkcbATqv57ggoIMXDLLc_76u4h5IizM85ief5wf3nGfs9oJLfIgI8gDiREz9tkwFgYBsC42iP73r8wxiUItkv2QglqJCQMyPQiX6LDOkPaWqrpxK6Cp65prGvp2C5q05p3pI9YYW50a2xN506b2tQLOnN24XRFC-vozK-zpfXGH5CdQpceD7_2kDxdX83Ht8FkenM3vpgEGSghA5EqBbmWqdJ5ipDGBcqCAYSaQ6pzFHGOoDlTkUYV60KI_heRQ4wFj1IYktNNa-PsW4e-TSrjMyxLXaPtfMJVGEkuOcQ9evIHfbGdq_vbPikZ8ViE0FNiQ2XOeu-wSBpnKu3WCWfJp-6k15381d3Hjr_Ku7Q39BP69tsDagOsbNmi869lt0KXLFGX7fL_7g9Cw4uE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827619423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dillon, Rachael ; Hargreaves, April ; Anderson-Schmidt, Heike ; Castorina, Marco ; Corvin, Aiden ; Fitzmaurice, Brian ; Robertson, Ian ; Donohoe, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Dillon, Rachael ; Hargreaves, April ; Anderson-Schmidt, Heike ; Castorina, Marco ; Corvin, Aiden ; Fitzmaurice, Brian ; Robertson, Ian ; Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTCognitive remediation (CR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for impaired cognition in psychosis. However, little is known about adherence rates and factors predicting adherence to CR, particularly in clinical settings where high-level therapist support is unavailable. This study aimed to establish adherence rates and examine variables predicting adherence to a computerized CR program for psychosis (with minimal support). Patients with psychosis (n = 61) participated in an 8-week CR program. Results showed 46% completed a meaningful amount of CR training. The fully adherent (&gt;80% of the prescribed amount) and nonadherent groups differed where adherent participants had poorer working-memory and higher negative symptom scores. These findings suggest that approximately half of the sample were adherent to treatment despite minimal therapist support. Furthermore, higher cognitive deficits and negative symptoms did not impede adherence, and may have contributed to patients’ motivation to complete the program.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000557</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27385473</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology ; Cognitive Dysfunction - therapy ; Cognitive Remediation - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Memory ; Mental health care ; Middle Aged ; Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - complications ; Psychotic Disorders - therapy ; Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Training ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The journal of nervous and mental disease, 2016-10, Vol.204 (10), p.741-745</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-4b883da7b8adbe3b9fe7f0332a13bade49de3a1086ae89af440024d39ef16b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-4b883da7b8adbe3b9fe7f0332a13bade49de3a1086ae89af440024d39ef16b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27385473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dillon, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-Schmidt, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castorina, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corvin, Aiden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzmaurice, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis</title><title>The journal of nervous and mental disease</title><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTCognitive remediation (CR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for impaired cognition in psychosis. However, little is known about adherence rates and factors predicting adherence to CR, particularly in clinical settings where high-level therapist support is unavailable. This study aimed to establish adherence rates and examine variables predicting adherence to a computerized CR program for psychosis (with minimal support). Patients with psychosis (n = 61) participated in an 8-week CR program. Results showed 46% completed a meaningful amount of CR training. The fully adherent (&gt;80% of the prescribed amount) and nonadherent groups differed where adherent participants had poorer working-memory and higher negative symptom scores. These findings suggest that approximately half of the sample were adherent to treatment despite minimal therapist support. Furthermore, higher cognitive deficits and negative symptoms did not impede adherence, and may have contributed to patients’ motivation to complete the program.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - therapy</subject><subject>Cognitive Remediation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0022-3018</issn><issn>1539-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EglL4BwhZYmEJ2Dk3dkZUPqVCK-jAFjnJpTUkcbATqv57ggoIMXDLLc_76u4h5IizM85ief5wf3nGfs9oJLfIgI8gDiREz9tkwFgYBsC42iP73r8wxiUItkv2QglqJCQMyPQiX6LDOkPaWqrpxK6Cp65prGvp2C5q05p3pI9YYW50a2xN506b2tQLOnN24XRFC-vozK-zpfXGH5CdQpceD7_2kDxdX83Ht8FkenM3vpgEGSghA5EqBbmWqdJ5ipDGBcqCAYSaQ6pzFHGOoDlTkUYV60KI_heRQ4wFj1IYktNNa-PsW4e-TSrjMyxLXaPtfMJVGEkuOcQ9evIHfbGdq_vbPikZ8ViE0FNiQ2XOeu-wSBpnKu3WCWfJp-6k15381d3Hjr_Ku7Q39BP69tsDagOsbNmi869lt0KXLFGX7fL_7g9Cw4uE</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Dillon, Rachael</creator><creator>Hargreaves, April</creator><creator>Anderson-Schmidt, Heike</creator><creator>Castorina, Marco</creator><creator>Corvin, Aiden</creator><creator>Fitzmaurice, Brian</creator><creator>Robertson, Ian</creator><creator>Donohoe, Gary</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis</title><author>Dillon, Rachael ; Hargreaves, April ; Anderson-Schmidt, Heike ; Castorina, Marco ; Corvin, Aiden ; Fitzmaurice, Brian ; Robertson, Ian ; Donohoe, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-4b883da7b8adbe3b9fe7f0332a13bade49de3a1086ae89af440024d39ef16b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - therapy</topic><topic>Cognitive Remediation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Compliance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dillon, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-Schmidt, Heike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castorina, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corvin, Aiden</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzmaurice, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dillon, Rachael</au><au>Hargreaves, April</au><au>Anderson-Schmidt, Heike</au><au>Castorina, Marco</au><au>Corvin, Aiden</au><au>Fitzmaurice, Brian</au><au>Robertson, Ian</au><au>Donohoe, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis</atitle><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>204</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>741-745</pages><issn>0022-3018</issn><eissn>1539-736X</eissn><coden>JNMDAN</coden><abstract>ABSTRACTCognitive remediation (CR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for impaired cognition in psychosis. However, little is known about adherence rates and factors predicting adherence to CR, particularly in clinical settings where high-level therapist support is unavailable. This study aimed to establish adherence rates and examine variables predicting adherence to a computerized CR program for psychosis (with minimal support). Patients with psychosis (n = 61) participated in an 8-week CR program. Results showed 46% completed a meaningful amount of CR training. The fully adherent (&gt;80% of the prescribed amount) and nonadherent groups differed where adherent participants had poorer working-memory and higher negative symptom scores. These findings suggest that approximately half of the sample were adherent to treatment despite minimal therapist support. Furthermore, higher cognitive deficits and negative symptoms did not impede adherence, and may have contributed to patients’ motivation to complete the program.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>27385473</pmid><doi>10.1097/NMD.0000000000000557</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3018
ispartof The journal of nervous and mental disease, 2016-10, Vol.204 (10), p.741-745
issn 0022-3018
1539-736X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826717139
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology
Cognitive Dysfunction - therapy
Cognitive Remediation - methods
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
Mental health care
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance - statistics & numerical data
Psychosis
Psychotic Disorders - complications
Psychotic Disorders - therapy
Therapy, Computer-Assisted - methods
Training
Treatment Outcome
title Adherence to a Low-Support Cognitive Remediation Training Program for Psychosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A29%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adherence%20to%20a%20Low-Support%20Cognitive%20Remediation%20Training%20Program%20for%20Psychosis&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20nervous%20and%20mental%20disease&rft.au=Dillon,%20Rachael&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=204&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=741-745&rft.issn=0022-3018&rft.eissn=1539-736X&rft.coden=JNMDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000557&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826717139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827619423&rft_id=info:pmid/27385473&rfr_iscdi=true