Validation of Immunomonitoring Methods for Application in Clinical Studies: The HLA‐Peptide Multimer Staining Assay

Background Validated assays are essential to generate data with defined specificity, consistency, and reliability. Although the process of validation is required for applying immunoassays in the context of clinical studies, reports on systematic validation of in vitro T cell assays are scarce so far...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry Clinical cytometry, 2018-03, Vol.94 (2), p.342-353
Hauptverfasser: Chandran, P. Anoop, Laske, Karoline, Cazaly, Angelica, Rusch, Elisa, Schmid‐Horch, Barbara, Rammensee, Hans‐Georg, Ottensmeier, Christian H., Gouttefangeas, Cécile
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Validated assays are essential to generate data with defined specificity, consistency, and reliability. Although the process of validation is required for applying immunoassays in the context of clinical studies, reports on systematic validation of in vitro T cell assays are scarce so far. We recently validated our HLA‐peptide multimer staining assay in a systematic manner so as to qualify the method for monitoring antigen‐specific T cell responses after immunotherapy. Methods Parameters of the assay, specificity, precision, linearity, sensitivity, and robustness were assessed systematically. Experiments were designed to address specifically each parameter and are detailed. Results Nonspecific multimer staining was below the acceptance limit of 0.02% multimer(+) CD8(+) cells. The assay showed acceptable precision in all dimensions it was repeated (CV  0.99) of antigen specific cells. Conclusions We succeeded in validating the HLA‐multimer staining assay in a systematic manner. Additionally, we propose a technical framework and recommendations that can be applied for validating other T cell assessment methods. © 2016 International Clinical Cytometry Society
ISSN:1552-4949
1552-4957
DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.21397