Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry

We assessed the clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) as an adjunct to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone for the management of stage IV pressure ulcers (PU) in the hospital outpatient department setting. Outcome data were derived from retrospe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wound repair and regeneration 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.904-912
Hauptverfasser: Carter, Marissa J., Gilligan, Adrienne M., Waycaster, Curtis R., Fife, Caroline E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 912
container_issue 5
container_start_page 904
container_title Wound repair and regeneration
container_volume 24
creator Carter, Marissa J.
Gilligan, Adrienne M.
Waycaster, Curtis R.
Fife, Caroline E.
description We assessed the clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) as an adjunct to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone for the management of stage IV pressure ulcers (PU) in the hospital outpatient department setting. Outcome data were derived from retrospective de‐identified electronic medical records from 2007 to 2013 using the US Wound Registry. A propensity score method was used to adjust for selection bias and to test for treatment effect between PU treated with CCO plus selective debridement vs. selective debridement alone. A total of 337 CCO and 336 non‐CCO stage IV PU were identified. The proportion of wounds closed at any time (e.g., at 1 or 2 years) was two times greater for stage IV PU treated with CCO compared with those not treated with CCO. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that time to wound closure at 1 year was significantly faster for PU treated with CCO vs. PU not treated with CCO. Among those with five or more CCO applications or selective debridement treatments, significantly more CCO‐treated PU were closed at 1 or 2 years than non–CCO‐treated PU. CCO as an adjunct to selective debridement improved clinical outcomes and provided faster rates of closure of stage IV PU relative to selective debridement alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/wrr.12458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826713518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826713518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3638-dabba1e7caccbf08dfb42028db0e6d91d6b9fa7484a1900bd1844be94d9939103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPGzEURq0KVGhg0T9QeUkXA_aMZ2x3h6DloYhK4ZGqG8uPO8FlHqk9ozT_voZAdnhzLd3zfbIPQp8pOabpnKxCOKY5K8UHtE_LnGWMl7920p1UPKMy53voU4x_CCFlKcVHtJfzgnHB2D4ydwH04LsFXgaIcQyAx8ZCiHjlh0dsmz4OwTuvG2z7ptEL6HQE3PtuaKEbvuEZxLEZIq5D3-LhEfD9LZ73Y-fSZuFTeH2AdmvdRDh8nRN0_-P73dllNv15cXV2Os1sURUic9oYTYFbba2piXC1YTnJhTMEKiepq4ysNWeCaSoJMY6mDxiQzElZSEqKCTra9C5D_3eEOKjWRwvp0R30Y1RU5BWnRUlFQr9uUBv6GAPUahl8q8NaUaKelaqkVL0oTeyX19rRtOC25JvDBJxsgJVvYP1-k5rPZm-V2SaR_MC_bUKHJ1XxgpdqfnOhOLs-zx_K32pa_AcNapG-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826713518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Carter, Marissa J. ; Gilligan, Adrienne M. ; Waycaster, Curtis R. ; Fife, Caroline E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Marissa J. ; Gilligan, Adrienne M. ; Waycaster, Curtis R. ; Fife, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><description>We assessed the clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) as an adjunct to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone for the management of stage IV pressure ulcers (PU) in the hospital outpatient department setting. Outcome data were derived from retrospective de‐identified electronic medical records from 2007 to 2013 using the US Wound Registry. A propensity score method was used to adjust for selection bias and to test for treatment effect between PU treated with CCO plus selective debridement vs. selective debridement alone. A total of 337 CCO and 336 non‐CCO stage IV PU were identified. The proportion of wounds closed at any time (e.g., at 1 or 2 years) was two times greater for stage IV PU treated with CCO compared with those not treated with CCO. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that time to wound closure at 1 year was significantly faster for PU treated with CCO vs. PU not treated with CCO. Among those with five or more CCO applications or selective debridement treatments, significantly more CCO‐treated PU were closed at 1 or 2 years than non–CCO‐treated PU. CCO as an adjunct to selective debridement improved clinical outcomes and provided faster rates of closure of stage IV PU relative to selective debridement alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12458</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27347844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.904-912</ispartof><rights>2016 by the Wound Healing Society</rights><rights>2016 by the Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3638-dabba1e7caccbf08dfb42028db0e6d91d6b9fa7484a1900bd1844be94d9939103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3638-dabba1e7caccbf08dfb42028db0e6d91d6b9fa7484a1900bd1844be94d9939103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwrr.12458$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwrr.12458$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27347844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Marissa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Adrienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waycaster, Curtis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fife, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><title>Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Rep and Reg</addtitle><description>We assessed the clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) as an adjunct to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone for the management of stage IV pressure ulcers (PU) in the hospital outpatient department setting. Outcome data were derived from retrospective de‐identified electronic medical records from 2007 to 2013 using the US Wound Registry. A propensity score method was used to adjust for selection bias and to test for treatment effect between PU treated with CCO plus selective debridement vs. selective debridement alone. A total of 337 CCO and 336 non‐CCO stage IV PU were identified. The proportion of wounds closed at any time (e.g., at 1 or 2 years) was two times greater for stage IV PU treated with CCO compared with those not treated with CCO. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that time to wound closure at 1 year was significantly faster for PU treated with CCO vs. PU not treated with CCO. Among those with five or more CCO applications or selective debridement treatments, significantly more CCO‐treated PU were closed at 1 or 2 years than non–CCO‐treated PU. CCO as an adjunct to selective debridement improved clinical outcomes and provided faster rates of closure of stage IV PU relative to selective debridement alone.</description><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPGzEURq0KVGhg0T9QeUkXA_aMZ2x3h6DloYhK4ZGqG8uPO8FlHqk9ozT_voZAdnhzLd3zfbIPQp8pOabpnKxCOKY5K8UHtE_LnGWMl7920p1UPKMy53voU4x_CCFlKcVHtJfzgnHB2D4ydwH04LsFXgaIcQyAx8ZCiHjlh0dsmz4OwTuvG2z7ptEL6HQE3PtuaKEbvuEZxLEZIq5D3-LhEfD9LZ73Y-fSZuFTeH2AdmvdRDh8nRN0_-P73dllNv15cXV2Os1sURUic9oYTYFbba2piXC1YTnJhTMEKiepq4ysNWeCaSoJMY6mDxiQzElZSEqKCTra9C5D_3eEOKjWRwvp0R30Y1RU5BWnRUlFQr9uUBv6GAPUahl8q8NaUaKelaqkVL0oTeyX19rRtOC25JvDBJxsgJVvYP1-k5rPZm-V2SaR_MC_bUKHJ1XxgpdqfnOhOLs-zx_K32pa_AcNapG-</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Carter, Marissa J.</creator><creator>Gilligan, Adrienne M.</creator><creator>Waycaster, Curtis R.</creator><creator>Fife, Caroline E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry</title><author>Carter, Marissa J. ; Gilligan, Adrienne M. ; Waycaster, Curtis R. ; Fife, Caroline E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3638-dabba1e7caccbf08dfb42028db0e6d91d6b9fa7484a1900bd1844be94d9939103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Marissa J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilligan, Adrienne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waycaster, Curtis R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fife, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Marissa J.</au><au>Gilligan, Adrienne M.</au><au>Waycaster, Curtis R.</au><au>Fife, Caroline E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Rep and Reg</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>912</epage><pages>904-912</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>We assessed the clinical effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment (CCO) as an adjunct to selective debridement compared with selective debridement alone for the management of stage IV pressure ulcers (PU) in the hospital outpatient department setting. Outcome data were derived from retrospective de‐identified electronic medical records from 2007 to 2013 using the US Wound Registry. A propensity score method was used to adjust for selection bias and to test for treatment effect between PU treated with CCO plus selective debridement vs. selective debridement alone. A total of 337 CCO and 336 non‐CCO stage IV PU were identified. The proportion of wounds closed at any time (e.g., at 1 or 2 years) was two times greater for stage IV PU treated with CCO compared with those not treated with CCO. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that time to wound closure at 1 year was significantly faster for PU treated with CCO vs. PU not treated with CCO. Among those with five or more CCO applications or selective debridement treatments, significantly more CCO‐treated PU were closed at 1 or 2 years than non–CCO‐treated PU. CCO as an adjunct to selective debridement improved clinical outcomes and provided faster rates of closure of stage IV PU relative to selective debridement alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27347844</pmid><doi>10.1111/wrr.12458</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-1927
ispartof Wound repair and regeneration, 2016-09, Vol.24 (5), p.904-912
issn 1067-1927
1524-475X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826713518
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Treating pressure ulcers with clostridial collagenase ointment: Results from the US Wound Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A46%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treating%20pressure%20ulcers%20with%20clostridial%20collagenase%20ointment:%20Results%20from%20the%20US%20Wound%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Carter,%20Marissa%20J.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=912&rft.pages=904-912&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wrr.12458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826713518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826713518&rft_id=info:pmid/27347844&rfr_iscdi=true