Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study
Objectives/Hypothesis To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers. Study Design Retrospective review and prospective data collection. Methods Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent co...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2017-01, Vol.127 (1), p.223-228 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 228 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 223 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 127 |
| creator | Sladen, Douglas P. Frisch, Christopher D. Carlson, Matthew L. Driscoll, Colin L.W. Torres, Jennifer H. Zeitler, Daniel M. |
| description | Objectives/Hypothesis
To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers.
Study Design
Retrospective review and prospective data collection.
Methods
Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at two centers were included. Pre‐ and postoperative measures included monosyllabic word and sentence recognition in quiet for the ear implanted, and sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition.
Results
Average monosyllabic word recognition scores in quiet improved significantly from 11.3% (standard deviation [SD] 15.6%) preoperatively to 48.7% (SD 24.2%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, although they did not increase significantly between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition scores in quiet increased significantly from 18.4% (SD 28.5%) preoperatively to 65.9% (SD 17.9%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, but not between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition increased from 59% (SD 16.3%) preoperatively to 72% (SD 16.0%) at 6‐months postactivation, though the difference was not statistically significant. Thirteen of the participants reported tinnitus prior to surgery. Of those, 12 reported that tinnitus was improved after implantation, and one reported that tinnitus was unchanged.
Conclusion
Preliminary results suggest that speech recognition in a singly deafened ear is significantly improved after cochlear implantation, although speech recognition in noise measured in the bilateral condition remains the same at 6‐months postactivation.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 127:223–228, 2017 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.26102 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826707883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2759246685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-b2d88ccf0d30d20035facb42d8f1de751296064419766570ab0d7bb48bee3f6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctq3DAUBmBRUprJtJs-QDFkEwJOj-5yd8OQSQIDhdBCuxK2dNQ6-DK1bMLs-gh5xjxJlDjNoousBEcfP4fzE_KRwhkFYJ-bctifMUWBvSELKjnNRVHIA7JInzw3kv04JEcx3gBQzSW8I4dMc6GMFguyWffud4PlkNXtrim7sRzrvstCP2Sx7n41eP_3LtYefeaxDB3G-CVbZe3UjLXDbsTExsnv35O3oWwifnh-l-T75vzb-jLffr24Wq-2uROSsrxi3hjnAngOngFwGUpXiTQN1KNOpFCghKCFVkpqKCvwuqqEqRB5UIEvycmcuxv6PxPG0bZ1dNikzbGfoqWGKQ3aGJ7o8X_0pp-GLm1nmZYFE0oZ-ZqiRoIqpGAqqdNZuaGPccBgd0PdprNbCvaxA_vYgX3qIOFPz5FT1aJ_of-OngCdwW3d4P6VKLtdXf-cQx8Aiw6Qxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1850695426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Sladen, Douglas P. ; Frisch, Christopher D. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Driscoll, Colin L.W. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Zeitler, Daniel M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sladen, Douglas P. ; Frisch, Christopher D. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Driscoll, Colin L.W. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Zeitler, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives/Hypothesis
To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers.
Study Design
Retrospective review and prospective data collection.
Methods
Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at two centers were included. Pre‐ and postoperative measures included monosyllabic word and sentence recognition in quiet for the ear implanted, and sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition.
Results
Average monosyllabic word recognition scores in quiet improved significantly from 11.3% (standard deviation [SD] 15.6%) preoperatively to 48.7% (SD 24.2%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, although they did not increase significantly between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition scores in quiet increased significantly from 18.4% (SD 28.5%) preoperatively to 65.9% (SD 17.9%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, but not between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition increased from 59% (SD 16.3%) preoperatively to 72% (SD 16.0%) at 6‐months postactivation, though the difference was not statistically significant. Thirteen of the participants reported tinnitus prior to surgery. Of those, 12 reported that tinnitus was improved after implantation, and one reported that tinnitus was unchanged.
Conclusion
Preliminary results suggest that speech recognition in a singly deafened ear is significantly improved after cochlear implantation, although speech recognition in noise measured in the bilateral condition remains the same at 6‐months postactivation.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 127:223–228, 2017</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.26102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27346874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear implants ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery ; Hearing Loss, Unilateral - surgery ; Humans ; Laryngoscopy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; signal‐to‐noise ratio ; single‐sided deafness ; Speech Perception ; speech understanding in noise ; sudden sensorineural hearing loss ; Tinnitus ; Tinnitus - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Voice recognition</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2017-01, Vol.127 (1), p.223-228</ispartof><rights>2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-b2d88ccf0d30d20035facb42d8f1de751296064419766570ab0d7bb48bee3f6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-b2d88ccf0d30d20035facb42d8f1de751296064419766570ab0d7bb48bee3f6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.26102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.26102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27346874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sladen, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisch, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Colin L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jennifer H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><title>Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives/Hypothesis
To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers.
Study Design
Retrospective review and prospective data collection.
Methods
Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at two centers were included. Pre‐ and postoperative measures included monosyllabic word and sentence recognition in quiet for the ear implanted, and sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition.
Results
Average monosyllabic word recognition scores in quiet improved significantly from 11.3% (standard deviation [SD] 15.6%) preoperatively to 48.7% (SD 24.2%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, although they did not increase significantly between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition scores in quiet increased significantly from 18.4% (SD 28.5%) preoperatively to 65.9% (SD 17.9%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, but not between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition increased from 59% (SD 16.3%) preoperatively to 72% (SD 16.0%) at 6‐months postactivation, though the difference was not statistically significant. Thirteen of the participants reported tinnitus prior to surgery. Of those, 12 reported that tinnitus was improved after implantation, and one reported that tinnitus was unchanged.
Conclusion
Preliminary results suggest that speech recognition in a singly deafened ear is significantly improved after cochlear implantation, although speech recognition in noise measured in the bilateral condition remains the same at 6‐months postactivation.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 127:223–228, 2017</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>signal‐to‐noise ratio</subject><subject>single‐sided deafness</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>speech understanding in noise</subject><subject>sudden sensorineural hearing loss</subject><subject>Tinnitus</subject><subject>Tinnitus - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Voice recognition</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctq3DAUBmBRUprJtJs-QDFkEwJOj-5yd8OQSQIDhdBCuxK2dNQ6-DK1bMLs-gh5xjxJlDjNoousBEcfP4fzE_KRwhkFYJ-bctifMUWBvSELKjnNRVHIA7JInzw3kv04JEcx3gBQzSW8I4dMc6GMFguyWffud4PlkNXtrim7sRzrvstCP2Sx7n41eP_3LtYefeaxDB3G-CVbZe3UjLXDbsTExsnv35O3oWwifnh-l-T75vzb-jLffr24Wq-2uROSsrxi3hjnAngOngFwGUpXiTQN1KNOpFCghKCFVkpqKCvwuqqEqRB5UIEvycmcuxv6PxPG0bZ1dNikzbGfoqWGKQ3aGJ7o8X_0pp-GLm1nmZYFE0oZ-ZqiRoIqpGAqqdNZuaGPccBgd0PdprNbCvaxA_vYgX3qIOFPz5FT1aJ_of-OngCdwW3d4P6VKLtdXf-cQx8Aiw6Qxg</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Sladen, Douglas P.</creator><creator>Frisch, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Carlson, Matthew L.</creator><creator>Driscoll, Colin L.W.</creator><creator>Torres, Jennifer H.</creator><creator>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study</title><author>Sladen, Douglas P. ; Frisch, Christopher D. ; Carlson, Matthew L. ; Driscoll, Colin L.W. ; Torres, Jennifer H. ; Zeitler, Daniel M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-b2d88ccf0d30d20035facb42d8f1de751296064419766570ab0d7bb48bee3f6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Unilateral - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>signal‐to‐noise ratio</topic><topic>single‐sided deafness</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>speech understanding in noise</topic><topic>sudden sensorineural hearing loss</topic><topic>Tinnitus</topic><topic>Tinnitus - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Voice recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sladen, Douglas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisch, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, Colin L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jennifer H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sladen, Douglas P.</au><au>Frisch, Christopher D.</au><au>Carlson, Matthew L.</au><au>Driscoll, Colin L.W.</au><au>Torres, Jennifer H.</au><au>Zeitler, Daniel M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>223-228</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives/Hypothesis
To report the preliminary outcomes of patients with single‐sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss undergoing cochlear implantation at two centers.
Study Design
Retrospective review and prospective data collection.
Methods
Patients with single‐sided deafness who underwent cochlear implantation at two centers were included. Pre‐ and postoperative measures included monosyllabic word and sentence recognition in quiet for the ear implanted, and sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition.
Results
Average monosyllabic word recognition scores in quiet improved significantly from 11.3% (standard deviation [SD] 15.6%) preoperatively to 48.7% (SD 24.2%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, although they did not increase significantly between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition scores in quiet increased significantly from 18.4% (SD 28.5%) preoperatively to 65.9% (SD 17.9%) at the 3‐month postactivation interval, but not between the 3‐month and 6‐month intervals. Sentence recognition in noise in the best‐aided bilateral condition increased from 59% (SD 16.3%) preoperatively to 72% (SD 16.0%) at 6‐months postactivation, though the difference was not statistically significant. Thirteen of the participants reported tinnitus prior to surgery. Of those, 12 reported that tinnitus was improved after implantation, and one reported that tinnitus was unchanged.
Conclusion
Preliminary results suggest that speech recognition in a singly deafened ear is significantly improved after cochlear implantation, although speech recognition in noise measured in the bilateral condition remains the same at 6‐months postactivation.
Level of Evidence
4. Laryngoscope, 127:223–228, 2017</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27346874</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.26102</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2017-01, Vol.127 (1), p.223-228 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826707883 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Audiometry, Pure-Tone Child Child, Preschool Cochlear implant Cochlear Implantation - methods Cochlear implants Female Hearing Loss, Sensorineural - surgery Hearing Loss, Unilateral - surgery Humans Laryngoscopy Male Middle Aged Noise Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies signal‐to‐noise ratio single‐sided deafness Speech Perception speech understanding in noise sudden sensorineural hearing loss Tinnitus Tinnitus - surgery Treatment Outcome Voice recognition |
| title | Cochlear implantation for single‐sided deafness: A multicenter study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cochlear%20implantation%20for%20single%E2%80%90sided%20deafness:%20A%20multicenter%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Sladen,%20Douglas%20P.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=223-228&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.26102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2759246685%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1850695426&rft_id=info:pmid/27346874&rfr_iscdi=true |