Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding?
Background Screening for colorectal cancers outside the recommended guidelines presents a considerable burden to resource management in many public hospitals. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency, indications and outcomes for repeat colonoscopy performed within 5 years of a negative co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.E1-E5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E5 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | E1 |
container_title | ANZ journal of surgery |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Tee, Chin Li Stephensen, Bree Sloss, Andrew Grieve, David A. |
description | Background
Screening for colorectal cancers outside the recommended guidelines presents a considerable burden to resource management in many public hospitals. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency, indications and outcomes for repeat colonoscopy performed within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy.
Methods
A retrospective review of all colonoscopies at Nambour Hospital in 2008 was performed to identify those with a negative colonoscopy. The charts of patients undergoing repeat colonoscopy at the same institution within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy were examined further, and data obtained regarding indications and outcomes of subsequent colonoscopies.
Results
A total of 616 colonoscopies were identified, 427 (69.3%) were negative for adenoma and carcinoma. Of these patients, 74 (17.3%) underwent a repeat colonoscopy at Nambour Hospital within 5 years. Eighteen out of 74 (24.3%) were outside guideline recommendation. Overall, one patient (1.4%) had cancer and 11 patients (14.9%) had polyps detected at repeat colonoscopy. Most of the polyps detected had low‐risk features and were detected in the fourth and fifth years of the study period.
Conclusion
The yield of a second colonoscopy within 5 years of a good‐quality negative colonoscopy is low but not zero. In the absence of new concerning symptoms or other risk factors, patients can be reassured and guidelines adhered to. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ans.13631 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826700174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826700174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-c8354da6e29bb6947a7c208402ea774ddc89d4005ab03cd71350f9ea31726d0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtrWzEQhUVpycPJIn8gCLppFk70vLK6KSH0BaFZJF10JcbS2FG4llzp3gb_-yq220Whs5kZ-OYwnEPIGWeXvNUVpHrJZSf5K3LEldJTwa15vZ-5kvKQHNf6xBjvOqsPyKEwknGr1RFJPyL2geYFhYApr6BSSIH63OeCfoCeekgeS6XPcXiMiWq6QWjrywVNuIQh_sItn3L1eb15T6EgHR6RLscYsI8J63aMafnhhLxZQF_xdN8n5Punjw83X6a3d5-_3lzfTr3Ukk_9TGoVoENh5_POKgPGCzZTTCAYo0LwMxsUYxrmTPpguNRsYREkN6ILDOWEvNvprkv-OWId3CpWj30PCfNYHZ-JzjQ_jGro23_QpzyW1L5z3FopNBPNrgm52FG-5FoLLty6xBWUjePMvYTgWghuG0Jjz_eK43yF4S_5x_UGXO2A59jj5v9K7vrb_U7yN64Ej94</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993250227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tee, Chin Li ; Stephensen, Bree ; Sloss, Andrew ; Grieve, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tee, Chin Li ; Stephensen, Bree ; Sloss, Andrew ; Grieve, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Screening for colorectal cancers outside the recommended guidelines presents a considerable burden to resource management in many public hospitals. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency, indications and outcomes for repeat colonoscopy performed within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy.
Methods
A retrospective review of all colonoscopies at Nambour Hospital in 2008 was performed to identify those with a negative colonoscopy. The charts of patients undergoing repeat colonoscopy at the same institution within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy were examined further, and data obtained regarding indications and outcomes of subsequent colonoscopies.
Results
A total of 616 colonoscopies were identified, 427 (69.3%) were negative for adenoma and carcinoma. Of these patients, 74 (17.3%) underwent a repeat colonoscopy at Nambour Hospital within 5 years. Eighteen out of 74 (24.3%) were outside guideline recommendation. Overall, one patient (1.4%) had cancer and 11 patients (14.9%) had polyps detected at repeat colonoscopy. Most of the polyps detected had low‐risk features and were detected in the fourth and fifth years of the study period.
Conclusion
The yield of a second colonoscopy within 5 years of a good‐quality negative colonoscopy is low but not zero. In the absence of new concerning symptoms or other risk factors, patients can be reassured and guidelines adhered to.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.13631</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27301954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenoma ; adenomas ; Charts ; Colon ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; colorectal cancers ; Guidelines ; negative colonoscopy ; Patients ; Polyps ; Resource management ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.E1-E5</ispartof><rights>2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2018 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-c8354da6e29bb6947a7c208402ea774ddc89d4005ab03cd71350f9ea31726d0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-c8354da6e29bb6947a7c208402ea774ddc89d4005ab03cd71350f9ea31726d0e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fans.13631$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fans.13631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27301954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tee, Chin Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephensen, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloss, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieve, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding?</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Screening for colorectal cancers outside the recommended guidelines presents a considerable burden to resource management in many public hospitals. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency, indications and outcomes for repeat colonoscopy performed within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy.
Methods
A retrospective review of all colonoscopies at Nambour Hospital in 2008 was performed to identify those with a negative colonoscopy. The charts of patients undergoing repeat colonoscopy at the same institution within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy were examined further, and data obtained regarding indications and outcomes of subsequent colonoscopies.
Results
A total of 616 colonoscopies were identified, 427 (69.3%) were negative for adenoma and carcinoma. Of these patients, 74 (17.3%) underwent a repeat colonoscopy at Nambour Hospital within 5 years. Eighteen out of 74 (24.3%) were outside guideline recommendation. Overall, one patient (1.4%) had cancer and 11 patients (14.9%) had polyps detected at repeat colonoscopy. Most of the polyps detected had low‐risk features and were detected in the fourth and fifth years of the study period.
Conclusion
The yield of a second colonoscopy within 5 years of a good‐quality negative colonoscopy is low but not zero. In the absence of new concerning symptoms or other risk factors, patients can be reassured and guidelines adhered to.</description><subject>Adenoma</subject><subject>adenomas</subject><subject>Charts</subject><subject>Colon</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>colorectal cancers</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>negative colonoscopy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtrWzEQhUVpycPJIn8gCLppFk70vLK6KSH0BaFZJF10JcbS2FG4llzp3gb_-yq220Whs5kZ-OYwnEPIGWeXvNUVpHrJZSf5K3LEldJTwa15vZ-5kvKQHNf6xBjvOqsPyKEwknGr1RFJPyL2geYFhYApr6BSSIH63OeCfoCeekgeS6XPcXiMiWq6QWjrywVNuIQh_sItn3L1eb15T6EgHR6RLscYsI8J63aMafnhhLxZQF_xdN8n5Punjw83X6a3d5-_3lzfTr3Ukk_9TGoVoENh5_POKgPGCzZTTCAYo0LwMxsUYxrmTPpguNRsYREkN6ILDOWEvNvprkv-OWId3CpWj30PCfNYHZ-JzjQ_jGro23_QpzyW1L5z3FopNBPNrgm52FG-5FoLLty6xBWUjePMvYTgWghuG0Jjz_eK43yF4S_5x_UGXO2A59jj5v9K7vrb_U7yN64Ej94</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Tee, Chin Li</creator><creator>Stephensen, Bree</creator><creator>Sloss, Andrew</creator><creator>Grieve, David A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding?</title><author>Tee, Chin Li ; Stephensen, Bree ; Sloss, Andrew ; Grieve, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-c8354da6e29bb6947a7c208402ea774ddc89d4005ab03cd71350f9ea31726d0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adenoma</topic><topic>adenomas</topic><topic>Charts</topic><topic>Colon</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>colorectal cancers</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>negative colonoscopy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tee, Chin Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephensen, Bree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sloss, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieve, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tee, Chin Li</au><au>Stephensen, Bree</au><au>Sloss, Andrew</au><au>Grieve, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding?</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>E1</spage><epage>E5</epage><pages>E1-E5</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background
Screening for colorectal cancers outside the recommended guidelines presents a considerable burden to resource management in many public hospitals. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency, indications and outcomes for repeat colonoscopy performed within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy.
Methods
A retrospective review of all colonoscopies at Nambour Hospital in 2008 was performed to identify those with a negative colonoscopy. The charts of patients undergoing repeat colonoscopy at the same institution within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy were examined further, and data obtained regarding indications and outcomes of subsequent colonoscopies.
Results
A total of 616 colonoscopies were identified, 427 (69.3%) were negative for adenoma and carcinoma. Of these patients, 74 (17.3%) underwent a repeat colonoscopy at Nambour Hospital within 5 years. Eighteen out of 74 (24.3%) were outside guideline recommendation. Overall, one patient (1.4%) had cancer and 11 patients (14.9%) had polyps detected at repeat colonoscopy. Most of the polyps detected had low‐risk features and were detected in the fourth and fifth years of the study period.
Conclusion
The yield of a second colonoscopy within 5 years of a good‐quality negative colonoscopy is low but not zero. In the absence of new concerning symptoms or other risk factors, patients can be reassured and guidelines adhered to.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>27301954</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.13631</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1445-1433 |
ispartof | ANZ journal of surgery, 2018-01, Vol.88 (1-2), p.E1-E5 |
issn | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826700174 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adenoma adenomas Charts Colon Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer colorectal cancers Guidelines negative colonoscopy Patients Polyps Resource management Risk analysis Risk factors |
title | Yield of adenomas and colorectal cancers within 5 years of a negative colonoscopy: are the guidelines guiding? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A35%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yield%20of%20adenomas%20and%20colorectal%20cancers%20within%205%20years%20of%20a%20negative%20colonoscopy:%20are%20the%20guidelines%20guiding?&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Tee,%20Chin%20Li&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=E1&rft.epage=E5&rft.pages=E1-E5&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.13631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826700174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993250227&rft_id=info:pmid/27301954&rfr_iscdi=true |