Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up
Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 512 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Tunali, O. Saglam, Y. Balci, H. I. Kochai, A. Sahbaz, N. A. Sayin, O. A. Yazicioglu, O. |
description | Purpose
Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults.
Methods
Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status.
Results
Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient.
Conclusions
Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826697845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826697845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LBSEUhiWKvn9AmxDatLGOOndmbBeXPi4EbWot6mgZ85WOxfz7jFsRQatzOD7nPfIgdEThjAJU5xEAypoALUmugswbaJfWJSdCFHTzp-d8B-3F-JJhKBdsG-2wilUcKN1FjzcpTr4d8DSPFq9WqyUeRtvjyWuvsAvKTCnYiN_99IzfVDSpVQEHOyofLnDne9-lDjMy2zx2Q9sO7ySNB2jLqTbaw6-6jx6vrx6Wt-Tu_ma1vLwjhldsIsUCHLcGGqepM7p2JTdgtAbFXMOqwoFjoJ1zQtcN1LpgtFFgFkJVtlG24fvodJ07huE12TjJzkdj21b1dkhR0pqVpajqYpHRkz_oy5BCn38nqWClqLmoaKbomjJhiDFYJ8fgOxVmSUF-Opdr5zI7l5_O5Zx3jr-Sk-5s87PxLTkDbA3E_NQ_2fDr9L-pH5dMjcE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926983971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults.
Methods
Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status.
Results
Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient.
Conclusions
Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27273011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amputation ; Child ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures ; Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Open - surgery ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive ; Ischemia ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Turkey ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods ; Wound Healing ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglam, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, H. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahbaz, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayin, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><title>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</title><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose
Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults.
Methods
Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status.
Results
Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient.
Conclusions
Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1863-9933</issn><issn>1863-9941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LBSEUhiWKvn9AmxDatLGOOndmbBeXPi4EbWot6mgZ85WOxfz7jFsRQatzOD7nPfIgdEThjAJU5xEAypoALUmugswbaJfWJSdCFHTzp-d8B-3F-JJhKBdsG-2wilUcKN1FjzcpTr4d8DSPFq9WqyUeRtvjyWuvsAvKTCnYiN_99IzfVDSpVQEHOyofLnDne9-lDjMy2zx2Q9sO7ySNB2jLqTbaw6-6jx6vrx6Wt-Tu_ma1vLwjhldsIsUCHLcGGqepM7p2JTdgtAbFXMOqwoFjoJ1zQtcN1LpgtFFgFkJVtlG24fvodJ07huE12TjJzkdj21b1dkhR0pqVpajqYpHRkz_oy5BCn38nqWClqLmoaKbomjJhiDFYJ8fgOxVmSUF-Opdr5zI7l5_O5Zx3jr-Sk-5s87PxLTkDbA3E_NQ_2fDr9L-pH5dMjcE</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Tunali, O.</creator><creator>Saglam, Y.</creator><creator>Balci, H. I.</creator><creator>Kochai, A.</creator><creator>Sahbaz, N. A.</creator><creator>Sayin, O. A.</creator><creator>Yazicioglu, O.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><author>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglam, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, H. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahbaz, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayin, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tunali, O.</au><au>Saglam, Y.</au><au>Balci, H. I.</au><au>Kochai, A.</au><au>Sahbaz, N. A.</au><au>Sayin, O. A.</au><au>Yazicioglu, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>505-512</pages><issn>1863-9933</issn><eissn>1863-9941</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults.
Methods
Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status.
Results
Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient.
Conclusions
Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27273011</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-9933 |
ispartof | European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512 |
issn | 1863-9933 1863-9941 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826697845 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Amputation Child Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Female Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fractures Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging Fractures, Open - surgery Humans Injury Severity Score Intensive Ischemia Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Article Patients Retrospective Studies Sports Medicine Surgery Surgical Orthopedics Surgical Wound Infection Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging Tibial Fractures - surgery Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome Turkey Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods Wound Healing Young Adult |
title | Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gustilo%20type%20IIIC%20open%20tibia%20fractures%20with%20vascular%20repair:%20minimum%202-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20emergency%20surgery%20(Munich%20:%202007)&rft.au=Tunali,%20O.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=505-512&rft.issn=1863-9933&rft.eissn=1863-9941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826697845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926983971&rft_id=info:pmid/27273011&rfr_iscdi=true |