Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up

Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512
Hauptverfasser: Tunali, O., Saglam, Y., Balci, H. I., Kochai, A., Sahbaz, N. A., Sayin, O. A., Yazicioglu, O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)
container_volume 43
creator Tunali, O.
Saglam, Y.
Balci, H. I.
Kochai, A.
Sahbaz, N. A.
Sayin, O. A.
Yazicioglu, O.
description Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults. Methods Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status. Results Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient. Conclusions Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826697845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826697845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LBSEUhiWKvn9AmxDatLGOOndmbBeXPi4EbWot6mgZ85WOxfz7jFsRQatzOD7nPfIgdEThjAJU5xEAypoALUmugswbaJfWJSdCFHTzp-d8B-3F-JJhKBdsG-2wilUcKN1FjzcpTr4d8DSPFq9WqyUeRtvjyWuvsAvKTCnYiN_99IzfVDSpVQEHOyofLnDne9-lDjMy2zx2Q9sO7ySNB2jLqTbaw6-6jx6vrx6Wt-Tu_ma1vLwjhldsIsUCHLcGGqepM7p2JTdgtAbFXMOqwoFjoJ1zQtcN1LpgtFFgFkJVtlG24fvodJ07huE12TjJzkdj21b1dkhR0pqVpajqYpHRkz_oy5BCn38nqWClqLmoaKbomjJhiDFYJ8fgOxVmSUF-Opdr5zI7l5_O5Zx3jr-Sk-5s87PxLTkDbA3E_NQ_2fDr9L-pH5dMjcE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926983971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults. Methods Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status. Results Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient. Conclusions Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27273011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amputation ; Child ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fractures ; Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Open - surgery ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Intensive ; Ischemia ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Turkey ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods ; Wound Healing ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27273011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglam, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, H. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahbaz, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayin, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><title>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</title><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults. Methods Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status. Results Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient. Conclusions Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amputation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures, Open - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injury Severity Score</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1863-9933</issn><issn>1863-9941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LBSEUhiWKvn9AmxDatLGOOndmbBeXPi4EbWot6mgZ85WOxfz7jFsRQatzOD7nPfIgdEThjAJU5xEAypoALUmugswbaJfWJSdCFHTzp-d8B-3F-JJhKBdsG-2wilUcKN1FjzcpTr4d8DSPFq9WqyUeRtvjyWuvsAvKTCnYiN_99IzfVDSpVQEHOyofLnDne9-lDjMy2zx2Q9sO7ySNB2jLqTbaw6-6jx6vrx6Wt-Tu_ma1vLwjhldsIsUCHLcGGqepM7p2JTdgtAbFXMOqwoFjoJ1zQtcN1LpgtFFgFkJVtlG24fvodJ07huE12TjJzkdj21b1dkhR0pqVpajqYpHRkz_oy5BCn38nqWClqLmoaKbomjJhiDFYJ8fgOxVmSUF-Opdr5zI7l5_O5Zx3jr-Sk-5s87PxLTkDbA3E_NQ_2fDr9L-pH5dMjcE</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Tunali, O.</creator><creator>Saglam, Y.</creator><creator>Balci, H. I.</creator><creator>Kochai, A.</creator><creator>Sahbaz, N. A.</creator><creator>Sayin, O. A.</creator><creator>Yazicioglu, O.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><author>Tunali, O. ; Saglam, Y. ; Balci, H. I. ; Kochai, A. ; Sahbaz, N. A. ; Sayin, O. A. ; Yazicioglu, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-450f3ec0dfb1fcb8f63c0cbb0a2fd274f0f20bfff9b8d08b421da0c59a7edaed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amputation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures, Open - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injury Severity Score</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tunali, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglam, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balci, H. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochai, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahbaz, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayin, O. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazicioglu, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tunali, O.</au><au>Saglam, Y.</au><au>Balci, H. I.</au><au>Kochai, A.</au><au>Sahbaz, N. A.</au><au>Sayin, O. A.</au><au>Yazicioglu, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>505-512</pages><issn>1863-9933</issn><eissn>1863-9941</eissn><abstract>Purpose Salvage or amputation for grade 3C open fracture of tibia is not well responded question universally because of surgical innovations, cultural believes, difficulties in estimate the outcome, coasts, and different results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of Gustilo grade 3C open tibia fractures with at least two years follow-up in non-military adults. Methods Twenty-two non-military patients with a mean age of 31.1 were operated with grade 3c open fractures at tibia level in last 10 years in our clinic. We evaluated them retrospectively and asked about their daily life, pain, and if present, about the wish for secondary amputation. We also asked if they would prefer a first day amputation rather than their present status. Results Mean operation time after the injury was 13 h. Seven patients had nerve injury. Mean operation number was 3.5. Eight patients (%36) (all due to circulatory problem) had to have amputation. All patients treated with temporary unilateral external fixation than converted to circular external fixators when soft tissue healing was completed. Two patients were reoperated because of deformity. Four patients needed revision surgery because of non-union. At long term follow, we had osteomyelitis in one patient. Conclusions Scoring systems and the ischemic time are not the only predictors of amputation. The decision of the treatment mode should be made by the patient and the care team after discussing the options and outcomes rather than relying on a scoring system.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27273011</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-9933
ispartof European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2017-08, Vol.43 (4), p.505-512
issn 1863-9933
1863-9941
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826697845
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Amputation
Child
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Fractures
Fractures, Open - diagnostic imaging
Fractures, Open - surgery
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Intensive
Ischemia
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Article
Patients
Retrospective Studies
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Surgical Wound Infection
Tibial Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Tibial Fractures - surgery
Traumatic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Turkey
Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods
Wound Healing
Young Adult
title Gustilo type IIIC open tibia fractures with vascular repair: minimum 2-year follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gustilo%20type%20IIIC%20open%20tibia%20fractures%20with%20vascular%20repair:%20minimum%202-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20emergency%20surgery%20(Munich%20:%202007)&rft.au=Tunali,%20O.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=505-512&rft.issn=1863-9933&rft.eissn=1863-9941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00068-016-0689-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826697845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926983971&rft_id=info:pmid/27273011&rfr_iscdi=true