Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone

Objectives The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio‐Oss®, Geistlich, Switzerland) in post‐extraction alveolar bone augmentation. Patients and Metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2017-07, Vol.28 (7), p.809-815
Hauptverfasser: Pang, Kang‐Mi, Um, In‐Woong, Kim, Young‐Kyun, Woo, Jae‐Man, Kim, Soung‐Min, Lee, Jong‐Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 815
container_issue 7
container_start_page 809
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 28
creator Pang, Kang‐Mi
Um, In‐Woong
Kim, Young‐Kyun
Woo, Jae‐Man
Kim, Soung‐Min
Lee, Jong‐Ho
description Objectives The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio‐Oss®, Geistlich, Switzerland) in post‐extraction alveolar bone augmentation. Patients and Methods A total of 33 graft sites in 24 patients were included in this study. AutoBT was used in 21 sites of 15 patients and Bio‐Oss® was used in 12 sites of 9 patients for alveolar bone augmentation 2–4 weeks after dental extraction. Vertical dimension of grafted bone was measured both at the time of graft placement and at implant fixture placement after 6 months. Trephine cores were harvested for the histomorphometric evaluations during implant placement when feasible. The primary stability of implant fixture was also measured. Results Infection of graft material or graft bed was not observed and graft sites healed without any notable complications in both groups. The vertical dimensions of alveolar bone increased by 5.38 ± 2.65 mm in AutoBT group and 6.56 ± 3.54 mm in Bio‐Oss® group at 6 months post‐extraction. Histomorphometrically, new bone formation of AutoBT‐grafted site was 31.24 ± 13.87% while that of Bio‐Oss® was 35.00 ± 19.33%. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants placed in AutoBT‐grafted sites measured 72.80 ± 10.81 while those placed in Bio‐Oss®‐grafted sites measured 70.0 ± 12.86. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements of the two groups. Conclusion Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth grafted to extraction sockets for the augmentation of vertical dimension was as effective as augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Both groups showed favorable wound healing, similar amount of implant stability, and histologically confirmed new bone formation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that autogenous tooth graft material is a viable option for alveolar bone augmentation following dental extraction.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.12885
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826695554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826695554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-6cec803dee38be69b27703998d902e65575e8705528c212406a8f93f30aa2e5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyMEokvhwAsgS1zKIe3YWTs2t2oFLdJKSAjOkdeZbF059uI425ZH4-kYdgsHJHzwH_nTN6P5VdVrDuec1oUL-ZwLreWTasEVQA0S-NNqAQZk3XLFT6oX03QLAMpo87w6Ea1ojVy2i-rn5VzSFmOaJ9bj6CNmG_wP7OkVi49stCX7ezbkNDK8L9m6Qp8lpXLDhpRZuUFm5-1ItC0-RZYGZsMeU7CZbVJEEg3oyntm2S6naUd3v0eWbezTeKjkgo_e2cCoEu1U1KVxZ7OfSHfnqZCNKW8tQWTcU48H8cvq2WDDhK8ez9Pq28cPX1fX9frz1afV5bp2jWxkrRw6DU2P2OgNKrMRbQuNMbo3IFBJ2UrULUgptBNcLEFZPZhmaMBagXJoTquzo5fa_z7jVLrRTw5DsBFpbB3XQikjpVwS-vYf9DbNOVJ3HTcClkoAaKLeHSlH85gyDt0u-9Hmh45D9zvQjgLtDoES--bROG9G7P-SfxIk4OII3PmAD_83dav1l6PyF5uvrgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1920462008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pang, Kang‐Mi ; Um, In‐Woong ; Kim, Young‐Kyun ; Woo, Jae‐Man ; Kim, Soung‐Min ; Lee, Jong‐Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Pang, Kang‐Mi ; Um, In‐Woong ; Kim, Young‐Kyun ; Woo, Jae‐Man ; Kim, Soung‐Min ; Lee, Jong‐Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio‐Oss®, Geistlich, Switzerland) in post‐extraction alveolar bone augmentation. Patients and Methods A total of 33 graft sites in 24 patients were included in this study. AutoBT was used in 21 sites of 15 patients and Bio‐Oss® was used in 12 sites of 9 patients for alveolar bone augmentation 2–4 weeks after dental extraction. Vertical dimension of grafted bone was measured both at the time of graft placement and at implant fixture placement after 6 months. Trephine cores were harvested for the histomorphometric evaluations during implant placement when feasible. The primary stability of implant fixture was also measured. Results Infection of graft material or graft bed was not observed and graft sites healed without any notable complications in both groups. The vertical dimensions of alveolar bone increased by 5.38 ± 2.65 mm in AutoBT group and 6.56 ± 3.54 mm in Bio‐Oss® group at 6 months post‐extraction. Histomorphometrically, new bone formation of AutoBT‐grafted site was 31.24 ± 13.87% while that of Bio‐Oss® was 35.00 ± 19.33%. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants placed in AutoBT‐grafted sites measured 72.80 ± 10.81 while those placed in Bio‐Oss®‐grafted sites measured 70.0 ± 12.86. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements of the two groups. Conclusion Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth grafted to extraction sockets for the augmentation of vertical dimension was as effective as augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Both groups showed favorable wound healing, similar amount of implant stability, and histologically confirmed new bone formation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that autogenous tooth graft material is a viable option for alveolar bone augmentation following dental extraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12885</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27279547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone ; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods ; Animals ; Augmentation ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; Bone healing ; bone regeneration ; bone substitutes ; Cattle ; clinical research ; Clinical trials ; Complications ; Cores ; Demineralizing ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental materials ; Dental prosthetics ; Dentin ; Dentin - transplantation ; Dentistry ; Extraction ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Grafting ; guided tissue regeneration ; histo‐pathology ; host mechanisms ; Humans ; Implants ; Infections ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minerals ; Osteogenesis ; Patients ; Placement ; Prospective Studies ; Republic of Korea ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Sockets ; Stability analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Teeth ; Tooth Extraction ; Tooth Socket - surgery ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Vertical Dimension ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2017-07, Vol.28 (7), p.809-815</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-6cec803dee38be69b27703998d902e65575e8705528c212406a8f93f30aa2e5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-6cec803dee38be69b27703998d902e65575e8705528c212406a8f93f30aa2e5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12885$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12885$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27279547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pang, Kang‐Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, In‐Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young‐Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Jae‐Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soung‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong‐Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio‐Oss®, Geistlich, Switzerland) in post‐extraction alveolar bone augmentation. Patients and Methods A total of 33 graft sites in 24 patients were included in this study. AutoBT was used in 21 sites of 15 patients and Bio‐Oss® was used in 12 sites of 9 patients for alveolar bone augmentation 2–4 weeks after dental extraction. Vertical dimension of grafted bone was measured both at the time of graft placement and at implant fixture placement after 6 months. Trephine cores were harvested for the histomorphometric evaluations during implant placement when feasible. The primary stability of implant fixture was also measured. Results Infection of graft material or graft bed was not observed and graft sites healed without any notable complications in both groups. The vertical dimensions of alveolar bone increased by 5.38 ± 2.65 mm in AutoBT group and 6.56 ± 3.54 mm in Bio‐Oss® group at 6 months post‐extraction. Histomorphometrically, new bone formation of AutoBT‐grafted site was 31.24 ± 13.87% while that of Bio‐Oss® was 35.00 ± 19.33%. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants placed in AutoBT‐grafted sites measured 72.80 ± 10.81 while those placed in Bio‐Oss®‐grafted sites measured 70.0 ± 12.86. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements of the two groups. Conclusion Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth grafted to extraction sockets for the augmentation of vertical dimension was as effective as augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Both groups showed favorable wound healing, similar amount of implant stability, and histologically confirmed new bone formation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that autogenous tooth graft material is a viable option for alveolar bone augmentation following dental extraction.</description><subject>Alveolar bone</subject><subject>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>bone substitutes</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>clinical research</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Demineralizing</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentin - transplantation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>guided tissue regeneration</subject><subject>histo‐pathology</subject><subject>host mechanisms</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Placement</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Sockets</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tooth Extraction</subject><subject>Tooth Socket - surgery</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vertical Dimension</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQhyMEokvhwAsgS1zKIe3YWTs2t2oFLdJKSAjOkdeZbF059uI425ZH4-kYdgsHJHzwH_nTN6P5VdVrDuec1oUL-ZwLreWTasEVQA0S-NNqAQZk3XLFT6oX03QLAMpo87w6Ea1ojVy2i-rn5VzSFmOaJ9bj6CNmG_wP7OkVi49stCX7ezbkNDK8L9m6Qp8lpXLDhpRZuUFm5-1ItC0-RZYGZsMeU7CZbVJEEg3oyntm2S6naUd3v0eWbezTeKjkgo_e2cCoEu1U1KVxZ7OfSHfnqZCNKW8tQWTcU48H8cvq2WDDhK8ez9Pq28cPX1fX9frz1afV5bp2jWxkrRw6DU2P2OgNKrMRbQuNMbo3IFBJ2UrULUgptBNcLEFZPZhmaMBagXJoTquzo5fa_z7jVLrRTw5DsBFpbB3XQikjpVwS-vYf9DbNOVJ3HTcClkoAaKLeHSlH85gyDt0u-9Hmh45D9zvQjgLtDoES--bROG9G7P-SfxIk4OII3PmAD_83dav1l6PyF5uvrgs</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Pang, Kang‐Mi</creator><creator>Um, In‐Woong</creator><creator>Kim, Young‐Kyun</creator><creator>Woo, Jae‐Man</creator><creator>Kim, Soung‐Min</creator><creator>Lee, Jong‐Ho</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone</title><author>Pang, Kang‐Mi ; Um, In‐Woong ; Kim, Young‐Kyun ; Woo, Jae‐Man ; Kim, Soung‐Min ; Lee, Jong‐Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-6cec803dee38be69b27703998d902e65575e8705528c212406a8f93f30aa2e5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone</topic><topic>Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone substitutes</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>clinical research</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Demineralizing</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentin - transplantation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>guided tissue regeneration</topic><topic>histo‐pathology</topic><topic>host mechanisms</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Placement</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Sockets</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tooth Extraction</topic><topic>Tooth Socket - surgery</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vertical Dimension</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pang, Kang‐Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Um, In‐Woong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young‐Kyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Jae‐Man</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Soung‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong‐Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pang, Kang‐Mi</au><au>Um, In‐Woong</au><au>Kim, Young‐Kyun</au><au>Woo, Jae‐Man</au><au>Kim, Soung‐Min</au><au>Lee, Jong‐Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>809</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>809-815</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical efficacy and histological outcome of the autogenous tooth graft material (AutoBT) compared to that of anorganic bovine bone (Bio‐Oss®, Geistlich, Switzerland) in post‐extraction alveolar bone augmentation. Patients and Methods A total of 33 graft sites in 24 patients were included in this study. AutoBT was used in 21 sites of 15 patients and Bio‐Oss® was used in 12 sites of 9 patients for alveolar bone augmentation 2–4 weeks after dental extraction. Vertical dimension of grafted bone was measured both at the time of graft placement and at implant fixture placement after 6 months. Trephine cores were harvested for the histomorphometric evaluations during implant placement when feasible. The primary stability of implant fixture was also measured. Results Infection of graft material or graft bed was not observed and graft sites healed without any notable complications in both groups. The vertical dimensions of alveolar bone increased by 5.38 ± 2.65 mm in AutoBT group and 6.56 ± 3.54 mm in Bio‐Oss® group at 6 months post‐extraction. Histomorphometrically, new bone formation of AutoBT‐grafted site was 31.24 ± 13.87% while that of Bio‐Oss® was 35.00 ± 19.33%. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) of implants placed in AutoBT‐grafted sites measured 72.80 ± 10.81 while those placed in Bio‐Oss®‐grafted sites measured 70.0 ± 12.86. There were no statistically significant differences between measurements of the two groups. Conclusion Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth grafted to extraction sockets for the augmentation of vertical dimension was as effective as augmentation using anorganic bovine bone. Both groups showed favorable wound healing, similar amount of implant stability, and histologically confirmed new bone formation. Thus, the results of this study suggest that autogenous tooth graft material is a viable option for alveolar bone augmentation following dental extraction.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27279547</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12885</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2017-07, Vol.28 (7), p.809-815
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826695554
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alveolar bone
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation - methods
Animals
Augmentation
Bone grafts
Bone growth
Bone healing
bone regeneration
bone substitutes
Cattle
clinical research
Clinical trials
Complications
Cores
Demineralizing
Dental Implantation, Endosseous
Dental materials
Dental prosthetics
Dentin
Dentin - transplantation
Dentistry
Extraction
Feasibility studies
Female
Grafting
guided tissue regeneration
histo‐pathology
host mechanisms
Humans
Implants
Infections
Male
Middle Aged
Minerals
Osteogenesis
Patients
Placement
Prospective Studies
Republic of Korea
Skin & tissue grafts
Sockets
Stability analysis
Statistical analysis
Teeth
Tooth Extraction
Tooth Socket - surgery
Transplantation, Autologous
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
Vertical Dimension
Wound healing
title Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix from extracted tooth for the augmentation of alveolar bone defect: a prospective randomized clinical trial in comparison with anorganic bovine bone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A59%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autogenous%20demineralized%20dentin%20matrix%20from%20extracted%20tooth%20for%20the%20augmentation%20of%20alveolar%20bone%20defect:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20clinical%20trial%20in%20comparison%20with%20anorganic%20bovine%20bone&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Pang,%20Kang%E2%80%90Mi&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=809-815&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12885&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826695554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1920462008&rft_id=info:pmid/27279547&rfr_iscdi=true