Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer education 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.67-73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 73 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Journal of cancer education |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Wigfall, Lisa T. Tanner, Andrea H. |
description | The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits in the previous year. SDM was more than two times higher among adults who “always” versus “usually/sometimes/never” take health information to doctor visits (OR = 2.54; 95 % CI 1.19–5.43). There was a twofold increase in SDM among adults who were “completely/very confident” versus “somewhat/a little/not confident” about finding health information (OR = 2.03; 95 % CI 1.37–3.02). Differences in SDM between adults who understood health information and those who had difficulty understanding health information were not statistically significant (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI 0.93–2.07). A Healthy People 2020 goal is to increase SDM. Previous research has suggested that SDM may improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. Only about half of adults report always being involved in health-care decisions. Even more alarming is the fact that SDM has not increased from 2003 to 2013. Our findings suggest that increasing health literacy has the potential to increase health-care engagement and subsequently increase SDM. Effective intervention strategies are needed to improve health literacy and promote health-care engagement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826692516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826692516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7788240d1b6afd7142dbe86415790124faae150ee00091c2f9d2565af21811e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1uEzEQhS0EoiHwANwgS9xws8XjrPeHuyhtaaXwI6W9Xk3Ws8m2u3axvZXSN-StcLIpqpC48UhnvjkezWHsPYhTECL_7GEGRZ4IyBIQSiaPL9gEVDqLikpfsokoCpUUUKoT9sb7WxFlKdRrdiJzqSCbpRP2-5KwC1u-bAM5rHccjeajlizQET83G9xQTyZw9PynI93WwTrPbcNX20hofkZ161trkm9415oNn_d2_-qhC_zKNNb1GGKbr4juKE62hoct8ZvV_AvHqNbWaHQ7foYB-dxgt_PtwX9PHfd77vP9ULDj146M9nw1uAfavWWvGuw8vTvWKbu5OL9eXCbLH1-vFvNlUqegQpLnRSFToWGdYaNzSKVeU5HFXl4KkGmDSKAEkRCihFo2pZYqU9hIKABIzabs0-h77-yvgXyo-tbX1HVoyA6-gkJmWXm475R9_Ae9tYOLm0eqLGXcBCCPFIxU7az3jprq3rV9PEgFotrnXI05VzHnap9z9RhnPhydh3VP-u_EU7ARkCPgY8tsyD37-r-ufwABQ7Ri</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992788117</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wigfall, Lisa T. ; Tanner, Andrea H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wigfall, Lisa T. ; Tanner, Andrea H.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits in the previous year. SDM was more than two times higher among adults who “always” versus “usually/sometimes/never” take health information to doctor visits (OR = 2.54; 95 % CI 1.19–5.43). There was a twofold increase in SDM among adults who were “completely/very confident” versus “somewhat/a little/not confident” about finding health information (OR = 2.03; 95 % CI 1.37–3.02). Differences in SDM between adults who understood health information and those who had difficulty understanding health information were not statistically significant (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI 0.93–2.07). A Healthy People 2020 goal is to increase SDM. Previous research has suggested that SDM may improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. Only about half of adults report always being involved in health-care decisions. Even more alarming is the fact that SDM has not increased from 2003 to 2013. Our findings suggest that increasing health literacy has the potential to increase health-care engagement and subsequently increase SDM. Effective intervention strategies are needed to improve health literacy and promote health-care engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0154</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27251634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Clinical decision making ; Data Analysis ; Decision making ; Health education ; Health literacy ; Literacy ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer education, 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.67-73</ispartof><rights>American Association for Cancer Education 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Cancer Education is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7788240d1b6afd7142dbe86415790124faae150ee00091c2f9d2565af21811e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7788240d1b6afd7142dbe86415790124faae150ee00091c2f9d2565af21811e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27251634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wigfall, Lisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Andrea H.</creatorcontrib><title>Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey</title><title>Journal of cancer education</title><addtitle>J Canc Educ</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><description>The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits in the previous year. SDM was more than two times higher among adults who “always” versus “usually/sometimes/never” take health information to doctor visits (OR = 2.54; 95 % CI 1.19–5.43). There was a twofold increase in SDM among adults who were “completely/very confident” versus “somewhat/a little/not confident” about finding health information (OR = 2.03; 95 % CI 1.37–3.02). Differences in SDM between adults who understood health information and those who had difficulty understanding health information were not statistically significant (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI 0.93–2.07). A Healthy People 2020 goal is to increase SDM. Previous research has suggested that SDM may improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. Only about half of adults report always being involved in health-care decisions. Even more alarming is the fact that SDM has not increased from 2003 to 2013. Our findings suggest that increasing health literacy has the potential to increase health-care engagement and subsequently increase SDM. Effective intervention strategies are needed to improve health literacy and promote health-care engagement.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health literacy</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0885-8195</issn><issn>1543-0154</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd1uEzEQhS0EoiHwANwgS9xws8XjrPeHuyhtaaXwI6W9Xk3Ws8m2u3axvZXSN-StcLIpqpC48UhnvjkezWHsPYhTECL_7GEGRZ4IyBIQSiaPL9gEVDqLikpfsokoCpUUUKoT9sb7WxFlKdRrdiJzqSCbpRP2-5KwC1u-bAM5rHccjeajlizQET83G9xQTyZw9PynI93WwTrPbcNX20hofkZ161trkm9415oNn_d2_-qhC_zKNNb1GGKbr4juKE62hoct8ZvV_AvHqNbWaHQ7foYB-dxgt_PtwX9PHfd77vP9ULDj146M9nw1uAfavWWvGuw8vTvWKbu5OL9eXCbLH1-vFvNlUqegQpLnRSFToWGdYaNzSKVeU5HFXl4KkGmDSKAEkRCihFo2pZYqU9hIKABIzabs0-h77-yvgXyo-tbX1HVoyA6-gkJmWXm475R9_Ae9tYOLm0eqLGXcBCCPFIxU7az3jprq3rV9PEgFotrnXI05VzHnap9z9RhnPhydh3VP-u_EU7ARkCPgY8tsyD37-r-ufwABQ7Ri</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Wigfall, Lisa T.</creator><creator>Tanner, Andrea H.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey</title><author>Wigfall, Lisa T. ; Tanner, Andrea H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-7788240d1b6afd7142dbe86415790124faae150ee00091c2f9d2565af21811e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health literacy</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wigfall, Lisa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, Andrea H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wigfall, Lisa T.</au><au>Tanner, Andrea H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle><stitle>J Canc Educ</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>67-73</pages><issn>0885-8195</issn><eissn>1543-0154</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between health literacy, health-care engagement, and shared decision-making (SDM). We analyzed Health Information National Trends Survey 4 (cycle 3) data for 1604 information seekers who had one or more non-emergency room health-care visits in the previous year. SDM was more than two times higher among adults who “always” versus “usually/sometimes/never” take health information to doctor visits (OR = 2.54; 95 % CI 1.19–5.43). There was a twofold increase in SDM among adults who were “completely/very confident” versus “somewhat/a little/not confident” about finding health information (OR = 2.03; 95 % CI 1.37–3.02). Differences in SDM between adults who understood health information and those who had difficulty understanding health information were not statistically significant (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI 0.93–2.07). A Healthy People 2020 goal is to increase SDM. Previous research has suggested that SDM may improve health outcomes across the continuum of care. Only about half of adults report always being involved in health-care decisions. Even more alarming is the fact that SDM has not increased from 2003 to 2013. Our findings suggest that increasing health literacy has the potential to increase health-care engagement and subsequently increase SDM. Effective intervention strategies are needed to improve health literacy and promote health-care engagement.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27251634</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8195 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer education, 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.67-73 |
issn | 0885-8195 1543-0154 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826692516 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Clinical decision making Data Analysis Decision making Health education Health literacy Literacy Pharmacology/Toxicology Trends |
title | Health Literacy and Health-Care Engagement as Predictors of Shared Decision-Making Among Adult Information Seekers in the USA: a Secondary Data Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T08%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20Literacy%20and%20Health-Care%20Engagement%20as%20Predictors%20of%20Shared%20Decision-Making%20Among%20Adult%20Information%20Seekers%20in%20the%20USA:%20a%20Secondary%20Data%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Health%20Information%20National%20Trends%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20education&rft.au=Wigfall,%20Lisa%20T.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=67-73&rft.issn=0885-8195&rft.eissn=1543-0154&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13187-016-1052-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826692516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992788117&rft_id=info:pmid/27251634&rfr_iscdi=true |