Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project

BACKGROUND As clinical demands increase, understanding the features that allow academic hospital medicine programs (AHPs) to thrive has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a quantifiable definition of academic success for AHPs. METHODS A working group of academic hospita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hospital medicine 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.708-713
Hauptverfasser: Seymann, Gregory B., Southern, William, Burger, Alfred, Brotman, Daniel J., Chakraborti, Chayan, Harrison, Rebecca, Parekh, Vikas, Sharpe, Bradley A., Pile, James, Hunt, Daniel, Leykum, Luci K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 10
container_start_page 708
container_title Journal of hospital medicine
container_volume 11
creator Seymann, Gregory B.
Southern, William
Burger, Alfred
Brotman, Daniel J.
Chakraborti, Chayan
Harrison, Rebecca
Parekh, Vikas
Sharpe, Bradley A.
Pile, James
Hunt, Daniel
Leykum, Luci K.
description BACKGROUND As clinical demands increase, understanding the features that allow academic hospital medicine programs (AHPs) to thrive has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a quantifiable definition of academic success for AHPs. METHODS A working group of academic hospitalists was formed. The group identified grant funding, academic promotion, and scholarship as key domains reflective of success, and specific metrics and approaches to assess these domains were developed. Self‐reported data on funding and promotion were available from a preexisting survey of AHP leaders, including total funding/group, funding/full‐time equivalent (FTE), and number of faculty at each academic rank. Scholarship was defined in terms of research s presented over a 2‐year period. Lists of top performers in each of the 3 domains were constructed. Programs appearing on at least 1 list (the SCHOLAR cohort [SuCcessful HOspitaLists in Academics and Research]) were examined. We compared grant funding and proportion of promoted faculty within the SCHOLAR cohort to a sample of other AHPs identified in the preexisting survey. RESULTS Seventeen SCHOLAR programs were identified, with a mean age of 13.2 years (range, 6–18 years) and mean size of 36 faculty (range, 18–95). The mean total grant funding/program was $4 million (range, $0–$15 million), with mean funding/FTE of $364,000 (range, $0–$1.4 million); both were significantly higher than the comparison sample. The majority of SCHOLAR faculty (82%) were junior, a lower percentage than the comparison sample. The mean number of research s presented over 2 years was 10.8 (range, 9–23). DISCUSSION Our approach effectively identified a subset of successful AHPs. Despite the relative maturity and large size of the programs in the SCHOLAR cohort, they were comprised of relatively few senior faculty members and varied widely in the quantity of funded research and scholarship. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:708–713. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jhm.2603
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826686411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826686411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-1e66c6729c8814bdac835c05033471d185296ef1e953b5bdf1ef88329b6e1c6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdtq20AQhpfQ0BxayBOUhd4kF0r2oF2tehdMHKc4GOrkWqxWo0hGB3dHIvgZ8tJZJ7ELhVzNXHz_NwM_IWecXXLGxNWqai-FZvKAHHOlZKQ00192u0rFETlBXDEWS6Pir-RIJNykJomPycsU7DB6QNqXFEfnALEcG2qdLaCtHa16XNeDbWoc6Nr3T962-IvedVg_VQPS0vctHSqgy8lsMb_-Q8-X42QnmS3esvOQRVp3eylS2xU0HAXrXXWx9a7ADd_IYWkbhO8f85Q8Tm8eJrNovri9m1zPIyeNlBEHrZ1OROqM4XFeWGekckwxKeOEF9wokWooOaRK5iovwlYaI0Waa-BO5_KUnL97w92_I-CQtTU6aBrbQT9ixo3Q2uiY84D-_A9d9aPvwndbSvFEm1T8EzrfI3oos7WvW-s3GWfZtqAsFJRtCwrojw_hmLdQ7MFdIwGI3oHnuoHNp6Ls9-z-TfgKffKZ3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825176892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Seymann, Gregory B. ; Southern, William ; Burger, Alfred ; Brotman, Daniel J. ; Chakraborti, Chayan ; Harrison, Rebecca ; Parekh, Vikas ; Sharpe, Bradley A. ; Pile, James ; Hunt, Daniel ; Leykum, Luci K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seymann, Gregory B. ; Southern, William ; Burger, Alfred ; Brotman, Daniel J. ; Chakraborti, Chayan ; Harrison, Rebecca ; Parekh, Vikas ; Sharpe, Bradley A. ; Pile, James ; Hunt, Daniel ; Leykum, Luci K.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND As clinical demands increase, understanding the features that allow academic hospital medicine programs (AHPs) to thrive has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a quantifiable definition of academic success for AHPs. METHODS A working group of academic hospitalists was formed. The group identified grant funding, academic promotion, and scholarship as key domains reflective of success, and specific metrics and approaches to assess these domains were developed. Self‐reported data on funding and promotion were available from a preexisting survey of AHP leaders, including total funding/group, funding/full‐time equivalent (FTE), and number of faculty at each academic rank. Scholarship was defined in terms of research s presented over a 2‐year period. Lists of top performers in each of the 3 domains were constructed. Programs appearing on at least 1 list (the SCHOLAR cohort [SuCcessful HOspitaLists in Academics and Research]) were examined. We compared grant funding and proportion of promoted faculty within the SCHOLAR cohort to a sample of other AHPs identified in the preexisting survey. RESULTS Seventeen SCHOLAR programs were identified, with a mean age of 13.2 years (range, 6–18 years) and mean size of 36 faculty (range, 18–95). The mean total grant funding/program was $4 million (range, $0–$15 million), with mean funding/FTE of $364,000 (range, $0–$1.4 million); both were significantly higher than the comparison sample. The majority of SCHOLAR faculty (82%) were junior, a lower percentage than the comparison sample. The mean number of research s presented over 2 years was 10.8 (range, 9–23). DISCUSSION Our approach effectively identified a subset of successful AHPs. Despite the relative maturity and large size of the programs in the SCHOLAR cohort, they were comprised of relatively few senior faculty members and varied widely in the quantity of funded research and scholarship. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:708–713. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-5592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27189874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Frontline Medical Communications</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers - methods ; Academic Medical Centers - trends ; Biomedical Research ; Faculty, Medical - standards ; Financing, Organized - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitalists - standards ; Hospitalists - trends ; Humans ; Medicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of hospital medicine, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.708-713</ispartof><rights>2016 Society of Hospital Medicine</rights><rights>2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-1e66c6729c8814bdac835c05033471d185296ef1e953b5bdf1ef88329b6e1c6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-1e66c6729c8814bdac835c05033471d185296ef1e953b5bdf1ef88329b6e1c6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjhm.2603$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjhm.2603$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seymann, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southern, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brotman, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Chayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Bradley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pile, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leykum, Luci K.</creatorcontrib><title>Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project</title><title>Journal of hospital medicine</title><addtitle>J Hosp Med</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND As clinical demands increase, understanding the features that allow academic hospital medicine programs (AHPs) to thrive has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a quantifiable definition of academic success for AHPs. METHODS A working group of academic hospitalists was formed. The group identified grant funding, academic promotion, and scholarship as key domains reflective of success, and specific metrics and approaches to assess these domains were developed. Self‐reported data on funding and promotion were available from a preexisting survey of AHP leaders, including total funding/group, funding/full‐time equivalent (FTE), and number of faculty at each academic rank. Scholarship was defined in terms of research s presented over a 2‐year period. Lists of top performers in each of the 3 domains were constructed. Programs appearing on at least 1 list (the SCHOLAR cohort [SuCcessful HOspitaLists in Academics and Research]) were examined. We compared grant funding and proportion of promoted faculty within the SCHOLAR cohort to a sample of other AHPs identified in the preexisting survey. RESULTS Seventeen SCHOLAR programs were identified, with a mean age of 13.2 years (range, 6–18 years) and mean size of 36 faculty (range, 18–95). The mean total grant funding/program was $4 million (range, $0–$15 million), with mean funding/FTE of $364,000 (range, $0–$1.4 million); both were significantly higher than the comparison sample. The majority of SCHOLAR faculty (82%) were junior, a lower percentage than the comparison sample. The mean number of research s presented over 2 years was 10.8 (range, 9–23). DISCUSSION Our approach effectively identified a subset of successful AHPs. Despite the relative maturity and large size of the programs in the SCHOLAR cohort, they were comprised of relatively few senior faculty members and varied widely in the quantity of funded research and scholarship. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:708–713. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine</description><subject>Academic Medical Centers - methods</subject><subject>Academic Medical Centers - trends</subject><subject>Biomedical Research</subject><subject>Faculty, Medical - standards</subject><subject>Financing, Organized - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitalists - standards</subject><subject>Hospitalists - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><issn>1553-5592</issn><issn>1553-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdtq20AQhpfQ0BxayBOUhd4kF0r2oF2tehdMHKc4GOrkWqxWo0hGB3dHIvgZ8tJZJ7ELhVzNXHz_NwM_IWecXXLGxNWqai-FZvKAHHOlZKQ00192u0rFETlBXDEWS6Pir-RIJNykJomPycsU7DB6QNqXFEfnALEcG2qdLaCtHa16XNeDbWoc6Nr3T962-IvedVg_VQPS0vctHSqgy8lsMb_-Q8-X42QnmS3esvOQRVp3eylS2xU0HAXrXXWx9a7ADd_IYWkbhO8f85Q8Tm8eJrNovri9m1zPIyeNlBEHrZ1OROqM4XFeWGekckwxKeOEF9wokWooOaRK5iovwlYaI0Waa-BO5_KUnL97w92_I-CQtTU6aBrbQT9ixo3Q2uiY84D-_A9d9aPvwndbSvFEm1T8EzrfI3oos7WvW-s3GWfZtqAsFJRtCwrojw_hmLdQ7MFdIwGI3oHnuoHNp6Ls9-z-TfgKffKZ3w</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Seymann, Gregory B.</creator><creator>Southern, William</creator><creator>Burger, Alfred</creator><creator>Brotman, Daniel J.</creator><creator>Chakraborti, Chayan</creator><creator>Harrison, Rebecca</creator><creator>Parekh, Vikas</creator><creator>Sharpe, Bradley A.</creator><creator>Pile, James</creator><creator>Hunt, Daniel</creator><creator>Leykum, Luci K.</creator><general>Frontline Medical Communications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project</title><author>Seymann, Gregory B. ; Southern, William ; Burger, Alfred ; Brotman, Daniel J. ; Chakraborti, Chayan ; Harrison, Rebecca ; Parekh, Vikas ; Sharpe, Bradley A. ; Pile, James ; Hunt, Daniel ; Leykum, Luci K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-1e66c6729c8814bdac835c05033471d185296ef1e953b5bdf1ef88329b6e1c6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers - methods</topic><topic>Academic Medical Centers - trends</topic><topic>Biomedical Research</topic><topic>Faculty, Medical - standards</topic><topic>Financing, Organized - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitalists - standards</topic><topic>Hospitalists - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seymann, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southern, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Alfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brotman, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Chayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parekh, Vikas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, Bradley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pile, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leykum, Luci K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hospital medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seymann, Gregory B.</au><au>Southern, William</au><au>Burger, Alfred</au><au>Brotman, Daniel J.</au><au>Chakraborti, Chayan</au><au>Harrison, Rebecca</au><au>Parekh, Vikas</au><au>Sharpe, Bradley A.</au><au>Pile, James</au><au>Hunt, Daniel</au><au>Leykum, Luci K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hospital medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Med</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>708-713</pages><issn>1553-5592</issn><eissn>1553-5606</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND As clinical demands increase, understanding the features that allow academic hospital medicine programs (AHPs) to thrive has become increasingly important. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a quantifiable definition of academic success for AHPs. METHODS A working group of academic hospitalists was formed. The group identified grant funding, academic promotion, and scholarship as key domains reflective of success, and specific metrics and approaches to assess these domains were developed. Self‐reported data on funding and promotion were available from a preexisting survey of AHP leaders, including total funding/group, funding/full‐time equivalent (FTE), and number of faculty at each academic rank. Scholarship was defined in terms of research s presented over a 2‐year period. Lists of top performers in each of the 3 domains were constructed. Programs appearing on at least 1 list (the SCHOLAR cohort [SuCcessful HOspitaLists in Academics and Research]) were examined. We compared grant funding and proportion of promoted faculty within the SCHOLAR cohort to a sample of other AHPs identified in the preexisting survey. RESULTS Seventeen SCHOLAR programs were identified, with a mean age of 13.2 years (range, 6–18 years) and mean size of 36 faculty (range, 18–95). The mean total grant funding/program was $4 million (range, $0–$15 million), with mean funding/FTE of $364,000 (range, $0–$1.4 million); both were significantly higher than the comparison sample. The majority of SCHOLAR faculty (82%) were junior, a lower percentage than the comparison sample. The mean number of research s presented over 2 years was 10.8 (range, 9–23). DISCUSSION Our approach effectively identified a subset of successful AHPs. Despite the relative maturity and large size of the programs in the SCHOLAR cohort, they were comprised of relatively few senior faculty members and varied widely in the quantity of funded research and scholarship. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:708–713. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Frontline Medical Communications</pub><pmid>27189874</pmid><doi>10.1002/jhm.2603</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-5592
ispartof Journal of hospital medicine, 2016-10, Vol.11 (10), p.708-713
issn 1553-5592
1553-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826686411
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Academic Medical Centers - methods
Academic Medical Centers - trends
Biomedical Research
Faculty, Medical - standards
Financing, Organized - statistics & numerical data
Hospitalists - standards
Hospitalists - trends
Humans
Medicine
title Features of successful academic hospitalist programs: Insights from the SCHOLAR (SuCcessful HOspitaLists in academics and research) project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A14%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Features%20of%20successful%20academic%20hospitalist%20programs:%20Insights%20from%20the%20SCHOLAR%20(SuCcessful%20HOspitaLists%20in%20academics%20and%20research)%20project&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hospital%20medicine&rft.au=Seymann,%20Gregory%20B.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=708-713&rft.issn=1553-5592&rft.eissn=1553-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jhm.2603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826686411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825176892&rft_id=info:pmid/27189874&rfr_iscdi=true