A comparison of the prevalence and clustering of major cardiovascular risk factors in the Netherlands and China

Background Cardiovascular risk factors tend to be clustered. Variations in clusters across populations have not been widely investigated. This study aims to compare the prevalence and clustering of major cardiovascular risk factors between adults in the Netherlands and China. Methods A total of 6542...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2016-11, Vol.23 (16), p.1766-1773
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xin, Bots, Michiel L, Yang, Fang, Sun, Jie, He, Shumei, Hoes, Arno W, Niu, Junqi, Vaartjes, Ilonca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Cardiovascular risk factors tend to be clustered. Variations in clusters across populations have not been widely investigated. This study aims to compare the prevalence and clustering of major cardiovascular risk factors between adults in the Netherlands and China. Methods A total of 6542 Dutch adults was recruited from 2001 to 2006 for the Utrecht Health Project, an ongoing cohort study among inhabitants of a newly developing area near Utrecht, the Netherlands. A total of 37,141 Chinese employees who received health screening in Changchun City, China was enrolled from 2003 to 2010, and 3850 residents from Dehui, another city from northeast China, were enrolled in 2007. Results The Dutch and Chinese populations shared similar patterns with increasing prevalence with age for most cardiovascular risk factors. Age-specific levels of body mass index, blood pressure and total cholesterol were higher in the Dutch than in the Chinese population. An exception to this was young men (18–44 years old): Chinese young men had similar body mass index levels compared to their Dutch counterparts. The age-standardised prevalence of current smoking was much higher in Chinese men compared to Dutch men (P 
ISSN:2047-4873
2047-4881
DOI:10.1177/2047487316648474